Should we change branded keywords based on audience knowledge?
-
Good Morning Moz,
Wanted to pose a question to the community that our company has been wrestling with internally for a while now. I think your insights would be tremendously valuable.
Our company effectively has two business units, one that is online and one that is offline. Each appeals to a different customer base as well. In one business unit, the larger, more offline and better established of the two, we refer to ourselves as a "manufacturer of high end automobiles" (not true, but using as an example). We've carried this through to the other business unit which is very small, web-based, and growing, but have quickly realized that the majority of would-be customers do not search for "automobiles", they search for "cars." And the keyword volume is night and day. On the order of 5000 searches/mo for automobiles, and 1,000,000 searches/mo for cars (again, not true for these example keywords but this is the actual ratio against our real keywords).
So, do we optimize heavily against a lesser known and used keyword, or do we try to target "cars" which sees higher search volume even though it's significantly more competitive?
We have this problem with a few different branded keywords, actually, and our search performance reflects as much. If someone were to search for these lesser known keywords they would find us, and we rank well. But the volume isn't there.
Thoughts? Thanks in advance.
-
Thanks, Chris. That's a great point. We'll certainly keep that in mind as we approach our messaging and targeting.
-
Thank you, Robert. It's a good suggestion and one that I think would actually help us considerably in the long run. The keyword we currently target is not really used by many others, so to build around it could position us well for long term growth (assuming we executed our awareness drivers well). Really appreciate your time and thoughts.
-
Thanks David. It's interesting because we target the lower volume keyword exclusively and are typically number 5 on a typical SERP. We don't even appear in results for the higher volume keyword (a synonym at that) that we have little invested against.
-
Thank you, Gaston. It sounds like a good approach and makes sense. Really appreciate your time.
-
Gaston has already answered your question well so I won't go into that any further. What I will say though is don't forget to consider the user intent here - depending on what your product actually is, people using that niche word may be looking for something different.
To use your cars vs automobiles example in a research context, you might find for example that people searching for "history of cars" are searching for recent history, whereas users searching for "history of automobiles" may be looking for info dating right back to the very first automobile.
Perhaps a poor example of my point but hopefully this illustrates what I'm getting at. While the two may technically be the same, sometimes we use variations of a word with a different intent. Your keyword focus should always be around this intent rather than just the words themselves.
I hope that makes sense!
-
Hi Jamie,
I would agree with Gaston with a slight addition. Depending on the resources, time and team you have to dedicate to this project, what you could do is begin an awareness campaign for the small volume traffic keywords you are ranking well for. I believe your SEO efforts should be focused on high-volume keywords, with small amounts of work dedicated to terms you are already ranking well for.
However, what I would be aiming for would be to introduce a social media campaign or general marketing campaign with the goal of generating knowledge and awareness of the existence of your less well-known terms to increase the amount of times people are searching for it. Social media also provides you with the option of creating content which bridges the gap between your "cars" audience and "automobiles" audience. Using this example, "Top 10 Cars & Automobiles" gives you the option of ranking your article for both terms and utilizing LSI keywords (keywords that are relevant to the main keyword you are targeting) will give you the option of creating relevancy for both terms simultaneously.
In this case, using keywords such as "vehicle", "vehicles", "motor vehicles", etc. as your LSI keywords along with content targeting both "cars" and "automobiles" would do the trick.
Hope this helps to get the creative juices flowing.
All the best,
-
Keep in mind google does recognize synonyms of words. If your real issue is a pure synonym it may not matter which you choose as google cares more about topic then keywords these days. learn more about it here https://moz.com/blog/can-seos-stop-worrying-keywords-focus-topics-whiteboard-friday
can-seos-stop-worrying-keywords-focus-topics-whiteboard-friday
-
Hi Jamie
I think that you've answered the question yourself:
- With the branded and with less traffic you rank well.
- With the other, there is a big chance to get much more traffic that with the other keyword.
My advice, focus on both keywords, but put mor effort on increasing the SERPs on the high traffic keyword. for example: 70-30.
Remember that for the "small" keyword you already rank well.Hope it helps.
GR
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keywords and funels6
Describe your question in detail. The more information you give, the better! It helps give Hello, I'm Raph by name. I need your help here. After getting Keywords across the different positions in your funnel, do you now rank each page or what exactly do you eventually do with these keywords to assist your sales? for a great answer.
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Mgbeme0 -
Viability of PPC for Competitive Keywords?
My company is a commercial real estate agency in New York City that helps businesses acquire office space. We are thinking of running a PPC campaign on Google Adwords. However our targeted keywords can cost up to $30 each. Perhaps we can spend $2,000 to $3,000 per month. Is there any way to predict if this campaign would be cost effective? If only 1 out of 15 site visitors generated by the PPC campaign contacts our firm, and one out of ten of those is a viable prospect, and we close with one out of five of those, it would mean that it would cost 750 clicks per transaction. If an average click is $20, that means that we would need to spend $15,000 per transaction. Our average commission is $20,000. So this is very marginal. Is my calculation overlooking something? A few keywords we would be competing on are the following: Manhattan office space rates
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Kingalan1
Manhattan office space for lease
Rental office Manhattan
Midtown office space for rent
Office space for lease nyc I might ad that we are competing against huge companies like Loopnet, Weworks, Regus, and several large real estate brokerages and landlords. Also, many of PPC visitors are running office space like searches when they are looking for shared executive office suites with very short term leases. This is not our market, we are seeking tenants that need their own demised space for a lease term of at least 3 years. Is there any way PPC can filter out clicks so we don't pay for visits from the executive office suite market? The site that we would be marketing is www.metro-manhattan.com Thanks,
Alan Rosinsky0 -
Browser-based redirect vs. dynamic content
Hey everyone, We have a free browser extension for Chrome and a paid web product for all other browsers. Given the differences in product and pricing (free vs. paid) I'd like visitors to see a different landing page based on their browser. Visitors using Chrome should see a landing page with content about the free browser extension, while visitors from every other browser should see a landing page with content about the paid, premium web product. I'm trying to decide between these two options: a) 302 redirect visitors from one static HTML landing page to another if their user agent suggests they're using Chrome b) Use javascript to make parts of the landing page dynamic and show a different CTA and different copy for visits from Chrome Does anyone have any experience with having to make this choice? What are some things I should take into consideration for optimal "crawlability" and page-load-speed? Thanks in advance!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | ipancake0 -
Track bounce rate per PPC keyword
Hi all Wondering if anyone could give me a nudge in the right direction with this please. When running an adwords campaign is there a way in which one can track the bounce rate on the landing page per keyword sending paid traffic? I've had a play about in adwords and GA and couldn't find the right option. The site I am sending traffic to is not a ecommerce site so cannot set up conversion tracking so we are going to monitor the bounce rates of different keywords and drop the ones which are bouncing much higher than others as it seems better to invest the budget in those words which are keeping people on the page for longer. Many thanks Carl
Conversion Rate Optimization | | carl_daedricdigital0 -
If your brand name is the same as your URL should you include it in your homepage title tag?
I have always felt that having your brand name in every title tag though-out your website when your URL is your brand name is a waste. The space your brand name takes up could be used for more valuable non-branded keywords. If your brand name is unique, the URL (and content optimized with your brand name) should be enough to have you rank #1 across the board in search results. Though I beleive this I still think it is valuable placing your brand name in the back of your homepage title tag. Example: Full Service Advertising Agency | Your Brand Name Any thoughts why you should or shouldn't do this? Isn't this useful for branded purposes? Doe this help click-though rate? Don't you want your visitors to know our brand at first glance of search results? Another argument I had for doing it was if it weren't important, than why does every search site do this? http://moz.com/ http://searchengineland.com/ http://searchenginewatch.com/ http://www.seroundtable.com/ Thanks for the help!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | EvanC.EGC0 -
Google Plus account - Should I use Brand or Product Type
Hi Let's assume that our company's name is "Smith Computers" and we specialize in Ultrabooks (for those who don't know - super light and slim computers - a niche within computers for the matter). Under which name would you open the Plus account - Smith Computers Ultrabooks Smith Ultrabooks Smith Ultrabooks Computers The example is not 100% but the question remains - No one knows Smith Computers and even if we turn up in search results for computers, the customers are not looking for our type products.
Conversion Rate Optimization | | BeytzNet
However, it is our brand name! Ultrabooks - I assume it will help us gain followers faster but will be hard to brand. The followers will be people who like the product and not the company but might be good people to sell to in the future. I'd say that option 3 is half branding and option 4 is 75% branding 🙂
Both will also have good chances to pop up in search results. The company at hand is a family owned business. We do not plan to rule the industry but rather taking it to the next level. We do not count on having thousands of people searching Google for "Smith Computers" like Best Buy etc. Please consider that at the end we want to use it both for promoting our brand (slowly) but also (and maybe mainly) SEO (by getting more people that click +1 onsite). We currently have lots of Facebook followers but naturally they only Like and not +1 Please help...0 -
Call extension only showing with some keywords/ads?
I've enabled Call Extensions with Call Forwarding on my Adwords Campaign (found out Location Extension must be enabled, so enabled that, but left out phone number in location settings). I thought these extensions should work on a campaign level. However, I can only see the google voice call forwarding extension on some of my keywords/ads. What's up?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Mozzin0 -
Non-branded search before branded search in Google Analytics
A lot of organic search phrases contain branded terms. Does Google Analytics provide a possibility to track wheteher the first interactor with the website is due to a non-branded search term? Example: On monday someone search for 'online shoes' and on thursday this visitor search for 'shoestore.com'. Ist it possible in the Thursday report in Google Analytics to see that this visitor has first arrived on the site with the search term 'online shoes'? The same question can be asked for direct/none traffic. is it possible to see whether these visits ca be attributed to an organic search term?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | xicero0