Robots.txt gone wild
-
Hi guys, a site we manage, http://hhhhappy.com received an alert through web master tools yesterday that it can't be crawled. No changes were made to the site.
Don't know a huge amount about the robots.txt configuration expect that using Yoast by default it sets it not to crawl wp admin folder and nothing else. I checked this against all other sites and the settings are the same. And yet 12 hours later after the issue Happy is still not being crawled and meta data is not showing in search results. Any ideas what may have triggered this?
-
Hi Radi!
Have Matt and/or Martijn answered your question? If so, please mark one or both of their responses "Good Answer."
Otherwise, what's still tripping you up?
-
Have you checked the downtime of the site recently? Sometimes it could be that Google isn't able to reach your robots.txt file and because of that they'll stop crawling your site temporarily.
-
Are you getting the message in Search Console that there were errors crawling your page?
This typically means that your host was temporarily down when Google landed on your page. These types of things happen all the time and are no big deal.
Your homepage cache shows a crawl date of today so I'm assuming things are working properly ... if you really want to find out, try doing a "Fetch" of your site in Search Console.
Crawl > Fetch as Google > Fetch (big red button)
You should get a status of "Complete." If you get anything else there should be an error message with it. If so, paste that here.
I have checked the site headers, cache, crawlability with Screaming Frog, and everything is fine. This seems like one of those temporary messages but if the problem persists definitely let us know!
-
Our host has just offered this response which does not get me any closer:
Hi Radi,
It looks like your site has its own robots.txt file, which is not blocking any user agents. The only thing it's doing is blocking bots from indexing your admin area:
<code>User-agent: * Disallow: /wp-admin/</code>This is a standard robots.txt file, and you shouldn't be having any issues with Google indexing your site from a hosting standpoint. To test this, I curled the site as Googlebot and received a 200OK response:
<code>curl -A "Googlebot/2.1" -IL [hhhhappy.com](http://hhhhappy.com) HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 22:17:26 GMT Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Connection: keep-alive Set-Cookie: __cfduid=d3177a1baa04623fb2573870f1d4b4bac1457216246; expires=Sun, 05-Mar-17 22:17:26 GMT; path=/; domain=.[hhhhappy.com](http://hhhhappy.com); HttpOnly X-Cacheable: bot Cache-Control: max-age=10800, must-revalidate X-Cache: HIT: 17 X-Cache-Group: bot X-Pingback: [http://hhhhappy.com/xmlrpc.php](http://hhhhappy.com/xmlrpc.php) Link: <[http://hhhhappy.com/](http://hhhhappy.com/)>; rel=shortlink Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT X-Type: default X-Pass-Why: Set-Cookie: X-Mapping-fjhppofk=2C42B261F74DA203D392B5EC5BF07833; path=/ Server: cloudflare-nginx CF-RAY: 27f0f02445920f09-IAD</code>I didn't see any plugins on your site that looked like they would overwrite robots.txt, but I urge you to take another look at them, and then dive into your site's settings for the meta value that Googlebot would pick up. Everything on our end seems to be giving the green light.
Please let us know if you have any other questions or issues in the meantime.
Cheers,
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Robots.txt, Disallow & Indexed-Pages..
Hi guys, hope you're well. I have a problem with my new website. I have 3 pages with the same content: http://example.examples.com/brand/brand1 (good page) http://example.examples.com/brand/brand1?show=false http://example.examples.com/brand/brand1?show=true The good page has rel=canonical & it is the only page should be appear in Search results but Google has indexed 3 pages... I don't know how should do now, but, i am thinking 2 posibilites: Remove filters (true, false) and leave only the good page and show 404 page for others pages. Update robots.txt with disallow for these parameters & remove those URL's manually Thank you so much!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | thekiller990 -
Will disallowing URL's in the robots.txt file stop those URL's being indexed by Google
I found a lot of duplicate title tags showing in Google Webmaster Tools. When I visited the URL's that these duplicates belonged to, I found that they were just images from a gallery that we didn't particularly want Google to index. There is no benefit to the end user in these image pages being indexed in Google. Our developer has told us that these urls are created by a module and are not "real" pages in the CMS. They would like to add the following to our robots.txt file Disallow: /catalog/product/gallery/ QUESTION: If the these pages are already indexed by Google, will this adjustment to the robots.txt file help to remove the pages from the index? We don't want these pages to be found.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | andyheath0 -
Robots.txt - Googlebot - Allow... what's it for?
Hello - I just came across this in robots.txt for the first time, and was wondering why it is used? Why would you have to proactively tell Googlebot to crawl JS/CSS and why would you want it to? Any help would be much appreciated - thanks, Luke User-Agent: Googlebot Allow: /.js Allow: /.css
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart0 -
Help with Robots.txt On a Shared Root
Hi, I posted a similar question last week asking about subdomains but a couple of complications have arisen. Two different websites I am looking after share the same root domain which means that they will have to share the same robots.txt. Does anybody have suggestions to separate the two on the same file without complications? It's a tricky one. Thank you in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Whittie0 -
Robots.txt: how to exclude sub-directories correctly?
Hello here, I am trying to figure out the correct way to tell SEs to crawls this: http://www.mysite.com/directory/ But not this: http://www.mysite.com/directory/sub-directory/ or this: http://www.mysite.com/directory/sub-directory2/sub-directory/... But with the fact I have thousands of sub-directories with almost infinite combinations, I can't put the following definitions in a manageable way: disallow: /directory/sub-directory/ disallow: /directory/sub-directory2/ disallow: /directory/sub-directory/sub-directory/ disallow: /directory/sub-directory2/subdirectory/ etc... I would end up having thousands of definitions to disallow all the possible sub-directory combinations. So, is the following way a correct, better and shorter way to define what I want above: allow: /directory/$ disallow: /directory/* Would the above work? Any thoughts are very welcome! Thank you in advance. Best, Fab.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau1 -
Files blocked in robot.txt and seo
I use joomla and I have blocked the following in my robots.txt is there anything that is bad for seo ? User-agent: * Disallow: /administrator/ Disallow: /cache/ Disallow: /components/ Disallow: /images/ Disallow: /includes/ Disallow: /installation/ Disallow: /language/ Disallow: /libraries/ Disallow: /media/ Disallow: /modules/ Disallow: /plugins/ Disallow: /templates/ Disallow: /tmp/ Disallow: /xmlrpc/ Disallow: /mailto:myemail@myemail.com/ Disallow: /javascript:void(0) Disallow: /.pdf
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Blocking Pages Via Robots, Can Images On Those Pages Be Included In Image Search
Hi! I have pages within my forum where visitors can upload photos. When they upload photos they provide a simple statement about the photo but no real information about the image,definitely not enough for the page to be deemed worthy of being indexed. The industry however is one that really leans on images and having the images in Google Image search is important to us. The url structure is like such: domain.com/community/photos/~username~/picture111111.aspx I wish to block the whole folder from Googlebot to prevent these low quality pages from being added to Google's main SERP results. This would be something like this: User-agent: googlebot Disallow: /community/photos/ Can I disallow Googlebot specifically rather than just using User-agent: * which would then allow googlebot-image to pick up the photos? I plan on configuring a way to add meaningful alt attributes and image names to assist in visibility, but the actual act of blocking the pages and getting the images picked up... Is this possible? Thanks! Leona
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HD_Leona0 -
Not using a robot command meta tag
Hi SEOmoz peeps. Was doing some research on robot commands and found a couple major sites that are not using them. If you check out the code for these: http://www.amazon.com http://www.zappos.com http://www.zappos.com/product/7787787/color/92100 http://www.altrec.com/ You fill not find a meta robot command line. Of course you need the line for any noindex, nofollow, noarchive pages. However for pages you want crawled and indexed, is there any benefit for not having the line at all? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | STPseo0
