The Value of Backlinks - Blog posts
-
Alright,
So I'm trying to understand the value of a backlink from a blogger/site owner. Now, as I know, (let's use fashion industry), there are thousands of fashion bloggers with good metrics... Domain Authority 40+ Page Authority 40+ etc. etc. for their home page. And there are THOUSANDS of fashion bloggers that link back to ecommerce sites (backlinks).
My question is, is there really much of a value with these backlinks? Sure, the domain authority and page authority is high ( for the given example), BUT wouldn't the page authority automatically be a 1 for a "post" ?
Le'ts say one blogger writes a new blog for July 14th and dedicates that blog post about the awesome shoes they have and it links back to an ecommerce site; well, what impact does that make in regards to SEO? And if it does, how long would that take?
The biggest issue I see is the ROI. You link build, you get links - and then ....you wait. Or you hope that you'll move up in rankings, but yet they can take months for it to even move the needle. Especially the fact that if it's not a HOME PAGE link...there isn't that "much" of a boost compared to an internal page?
So then the NEXT question I have too, wouldn't influencer outreach be the same as far as getting a PBN link, creating web 2.0's, etc.? Let's think about it. You're outreaching to someone so you can benefit something back. It's all unnatural at the end of the day.
Would love to discuss.
So in summary
1 - Value of influencer outreach links - especially if the post is a brand new content piece.. (page authority being automatically 1)
2- - What exactly IS white hat when really any type of link building is mimicking?
-
Thanks Mike!
-
Paul, I hear you brother. Nobody enjoys link building. It takes what it takes. Evidently, in fashion it takes free stuff and gift cards. Yes, kind of hard to explain to others.
-
Right, and I'm sure you know that too, across other industries whatever it might be, that CEO's think the way every channel works is similar.
As we all know, SEO changes (although the core stays the same, title tags, h1, canonical tags, duplicate content, href lang tags, site architecture, etc.).
I just think that the link building portion has been evolving too. But I did wanted to bring up the conversation in regards to my initial question -
The issue is that those that are not well versed in SEO (whether it be the CMO, CEO, etc.), will scratch their heads when they see that having a new link from site x , or site y, didn't even move the needle yet they were provided with "metrics". For ex: We target sites with DA of minimum 20, with low outbound links etc. etc., but yet they're still going to ask "Well, why are we not moving?"
So - to your point, I do agree that we have to educate them and especially on how SEO worked and now works.
And yes, I'm sure you also know that ;).
But that's my thing, I just don't think linkbuilding is as effective as it once was. Going back to fashion industry though, dishing out "great" content isn't going to be the best approach. I know this, because I've been dealing with it for the past 4 years. Fashion bloggers know their value, they're not going to link to sites unless they get a product for free PLUS a gift card / $$. The only time they'll link to sites is if they just feel like it (natural links). But to outreach "grey hat" and to say "Hey look, we have some awesome content that we think you'd love to put on your site," just isn't cutting it. Especially if we're going for top tier bloggers.
-
Well, of course that linkbuilding is a blackbox. SEO is all about strategy and long term thinking. Sure you do know that.
The problem that rises here, as you pointerd about the ROIs and the CEO's asking about results, is that there is a common way of seeing SEO and strategies just as PPC. That is terrible wrong, sure you also know that.
My personal way of dealing with that is teaching them what SEO is about and talk some sense into them. I like to use the frase: "SEO is, in a great manner, making google to love our site and content"
-
Hey @Gaston,
First - thanks for the response. Second, I know linkbuilding is NOT the only reason why we get better SERPs.
- I know not getting ONE link will gain better positions .But that's the issue that I'm experiencing in the industry. SEO is such a blackbox, and doing link building is a blackbox within a blackbox. Let's think about it. With SEM - if I were to propose let's say, "increase bids to X dollars" we'd expect "X amount of clicks." It doesn't work that way with SEO. And I feel like this is a challenge for SEO.
Everyone keeps saying "create awesome content." There's going to be industries or even companies that will not allow "providing content" just the way of how things work. Which is another issue and I'm sure you see it where content team doesn't meet half way with the SEO team and that too is a roadblock.
Now let's say we do "content", CEO's / higher ups will ask "Okay what are the resources, and the time spent. With that time spent, what's our expectation?"
And what would be our response? Obviously they're not going to want to hear "Well, there's so many factors in SEO we can't just say providing content outreach for links will boost rankings".
-
Hi,
Not sure I fully understand the question as you intend it, but here goes...
Net/net, quality links from authoritative sites to your site will greatly help your site/pages rank.
On your automatic page authority of 1 point, that just means that Moz says it's indexed. It's not visibility into Google's love for your page.
On white hat link building as a philosophical issue, I agree with you AND it is beside the point. Backlinks are important to achieving search rank and will evidently continue to be. If Google, in all it's A/I wisdom, suddenly decided that sites with a purple color scheme would rank batter, you would quickly see a lot of purple sites. It's just the way it is. Whatever Google values, competitive site owners will find a way to deliver.
Best... Mike
-
Hi Paul,
-
the fact that a brand new piece of information gets PA1 doesnt mean that after some time it will get better metrics and get some linkjuice passed to your site. The answer is yes, they do affect SERPs.
You must take special care to those links. Just getting one link will not make you to gain instantly better positions. -
White hat in linkbuilding is getting links without paying for them or pushing to get that link. (its sort of a grey line here actually).
Your main focus should be in creating awesome content, so as those influences want to link you.
As shown in:
You also should inderstand that linkbuilding is not the only reason why we get better SERPs.
Hope it helps.
GR. -
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Blog on Custom Website - WordPress Alternatives
Howdy folks. I'm trying to find any good alternative for adding CMS blog to custom website. Most people, us included, are using WP, but, as we know, it's really painful to work with, easily hackable etc etc. So, I wonder if anyone knows of a blog platform, which can be installed on our own websites for blogging, but without drawbacks of WordPress. Any nudge in correct direction will be appreciated. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DmitriiK1 -
Implementing AMP pages on WordPress blog
Hey Moz Users, Has anyone tried using the WordPress plugin for AMP pages on their blog yet? Here's the link to it: https://wordpress.org/plugins/amp/. The implementation seems pretty straightforward but since there will be an AMP and a mobile friendly version of the posts on my blog I'm worried it will create a lot of duplicate content issues. I've seen a lot of articles pointing to a rel canonical tag that can be used to fix this situation. Not sure if I'm going to have an AMP version of all the posts on my blog, so this seems like it would be a pain to place the tag manually on specific pages with the AMP version only. Has anyone tried this plugin and what have you done to fix this duplicate content issue? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | znotes0 -
Should I delete 100s of weak posts from my website?
I run this website: http://knowledgeweighsnothing.com/ It was initially built to get traffic from Facebook. The vast majority of the 1300+ posts are shorter curation style posts. Basically I would find excellent sources of information and then do a short post highlighting the information and then link to the original source (and then post to FB and hey presto 1000s of visitors going through my website). Traffic was so amazing from FB at the time, that 'really stupidly' these posts were written with no regard for search engine rankings. When Facebook reach etc dropped right off, I started writing full original content posts to gain more traffic from search engines. I am starting to get more and more traffic now from Google etc, but there's still lots to improve. I am concerned that the shortest/weakest posts on the website are holding things back to some degree. I am considering going through the website and deleting the very weakest older posts based on their quality/backlinks and PA. This will probably run into 100s of posts. Is it detrimental to delete so weak many posts from a website? Any and all advice on how to proceed would be greatly recieved.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | xpers1 -
Removing A Blog From Site...
Hi Everyone, One of my clients I am doing marketing consulting for is a big law firm. For the past 3 years they have been paying someone to write blog posts everyday in hopes of improving search traffic to site. The blog did indeed increase traffic to the site, but analyzing the stats, the firm generates no leads (via form or phone) from any of the search traffic that lands in the blog. Furthermore, I'm seeing Google send many search queries that people use to get to the site to blog pages, when it would be much more beneficial to have that traffic go to the main part of the website. In short, the law firm's blog provides little to no value to end users and was written entirely for SEO purposes. Now the law firm's website has 6,000 unique pages, and only 400 pages of the site are NON-blog pages (the good stuff, essentially). About 35% of the site's total site traffic lands on the blog pages from search, but again... this traffic does not convert, has very high bounce rate and I doubt there is any branding benefit either. With all that said, I didn't know if it would be best to delete the blog, redirect blog pages to some other page on the site, etc? The law firm has ceased writing new blog posts upon my recommendation, as well. I am afraid of doing something ill-advised with the blog since it accounts now for 95% of the pages of the website. But again, it's useless drivel in my eyes that adds no value and was simply a misguided SEO effort from another marketer that heard blogs are good for SEO. I would certainly appreciate any guidance or advice on how best to handle this situation. Thank you for your kind help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | gbkevin0 -
Blogs and E-Commerce websites
I have recently launched an e-commerce website which has a whopping domain authority of 1! I was thinking about adding a blog to it (it's in open cart), but that would mean creating it in a wordpress but using the same domain name. Would this be beneficial from an SEO stand point (i.e sending traffic to w blog that isn't actually on the e-commerce website itself) , or am I better off creating content as blogs/articles on other people sites?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lindsayjhopkins0 -
EDU Backlinks wrapped in Wiki worthwhile?
I asked below question yesterday and got some answers, but am still looking for more justification whether such links are worthwhile getting or not. Here is the question: An SEO expert offers my site backlinks from .edu's wrapped in wiki. Structure as follows "wiki.xxx.UNINAME.edu/etc..etc" - the pages have authority of 1 (domain obviously high with the dot edu) but there is no relevant info on the pages and obviously wiki links are no follow. This does not sound right to me, but can anyone share some insight since it is wiki + edu combined it sounds on surface like credibility, but with page having no relevant content I feel it isn't right.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | knielsen0 -
Is my Company Blog Causing issues?
We have a company blog. IE companydomain.com/blog/. Much of the content is unrelated to what we do. So why do we do it? Cover local topics that our customers may be interested in and searching for. Get them in the back door so to speak. Link bait, social sharing etc Develop a marketing culture that's engaged always learning. Customers get to know the people behind the company. Here's my Pickle If i sub domain or separate the site entirely, i won't benefit from all the juice we're generating. If i keep the status quo, since much of the content isn't directly related to my "category", logic tells me that i could be diluting my website in Googles prying eyes. Feedback PLEASE.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | schmeetz0 -
Quantifying Linking Campaign Value
Is there any way to predict if and how Organic traffic would change if we sucesfully added some high-quality links to our website? Quantifying link value would help to plan how much time/efforts we should spend on quality link-building. I understand that the more good links we get - the better. But beyond that, I am looking for some methodology/data/formulas that would help to decide if links are worth pursing. Here is an example: Let's say we acquired 20 high-quality links from PR 0-5 pages of some trusted web sites of PR6-8. Let's say that on these pages would also link to 10-20 other web sites. Would such campaign be of some direct value to our ecommerce website of PR6? My question is limited to how high-quality links improve overall Google search traffic to the website only. I am not interested in calculating value of individual keywords - most of our search traffic comes from long tail. I am also not interested in how to estimate referral traffic - both seem much easier topics to tackle. But how would I be able to measure the value of lets say 1 link from PR 8 site with a PR3 page, when there are 10 other external links on that page?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Quidsi0