Less relevant/not optimized competitor sites ranking higher in SERPs?
-
Has anyone else noticed their rank positions falling to competitor sites that aren't optimized and are less relevant? I've noticed that we've lost some rankings or have dropped over the past few weeks and the competitor pages that have replaced us haven't been optimized, aren't as relevant, and it doesn't look like there has been any updates (looking through archived versions). For example, their main "shoes" gallery is ranking for more specific shoe types, like "sandals", and "sandals" isn't even mentioned in their metadata and they have no on-page copy. Their DA is slightly higher, but our sites have a denser link profile (although, yes, I do need to go through and see what kind of links, exactly, we've gained).
Has anyone else seen this happen recently, or have any ideas of why or what we could do to get our rank positions back? My main initiatives have been to create and implement fresh on-page copy, metadata, and manage 404s/301 redirects, but I'm thinking this issue is beyond a quick copywriting tweak.
-
Hey Matt! Hmm, I don't think I've used Keyword Explorer for that purpose, yet. I still need to go back and really dive into the tool. I'll check it out! Thanks!
-
Good point on the disavowed/backlinks! I think it's so easy to get sucked into the nitty gritty details and lose sight of those bigger picture initiatives that will have a bigger impact in the long run. At least, I know that's something I struggle with.
-
Hi WWWSEO! Have you done any competitive research in Keyword Explorer? The SERP analysis section might give you a sense of what's going on.
-
There are lots of misteries around the reasons for a specific SERP.
I'd advise you to work in a different way so as to get even better than them.
Also remember the data we have access is always a part of the data that actualy google crawls. You'd never tell if them have disavowed links of if there are a big backlinks recently created.Wish you best of luck!
GR. -
Right. Like I said, I'm sure it's not just a simple tweak to metadata or copy, and I've looked at their link profile compared to ours, authority, etc. I've noticed that their internal linking is kind of insane (10+ links within a short paragraph plus additional "popular links" at the bottom), but none of this is new for them, even of this year. It doesn't look like they have made any updates recently that would have boosted their performance all of a sudden, which is why I'm dumbfounded as to what happened.
-
Well, without specific information its imposible to determine why other pages outrank yours.
I suspect that you already know, instead I'll remind them, these are the ranking factors that moz have stated.There are many posibilities that those pages, instead of being badly optimized, have more "juice" in other ranking factor, such as some better backlinks, better internal linkbuinlding, better CTR, pagespeed or many others.
Don't cruch yourself only in on-page optimization, its a big reason to get better rankings, but not the only one.
-
Ah, my bad, I didn't specify that I'm actually referring to competitor landing pages rather than our own. It's strange because the landing pages we had ranking were optimized for specific terms, have on-page copy, etc., but over the last couple weeks, a few competitors overtook our sites and their pages aren't optimized at all and I've looked through archived versions and there haven't been any changes.
-
Hi there!
It'd be something that Rand Fishkin has already spoken in a Whiteboard friday:
What to Do When the Wrong Page Ranks for Your Keyword(s) - Whiteboard FridayHope it helps.
GR.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Relevant Link, but Low DA...good idea?
If a website has a low DA (not because of spam. Just because it's new or because there isn't a ton of content) but it is industry specific/relevant, then is that worth pursuing? I have read how relevancy is supposed to be a major portion determining a link's benefit, but I"m leery about about something with a low DA - like under 15 low. Thanks, Ruben
Algorithm Updates | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Mobile SERPs
Morning Mozzers, Please can someone tell me if Mobile SERPs are different to desktop? Do they have a separate algorithm? Mobile makes up 50% of my sites traffic and I want to make sure I am visible on all devices. Any articles welcomed. Kind regards Ben, London
Algorithm Updates | | Bendall0 -
How important is Social Media for building domain authority / Google rankings? Are there any cases?
I really would like to know if someone tested the importance of Social Media for Google rankings.
Algorithm Updates | | Seeders
Are there some sites who build authority only by doing good social media?
Ofcourse, I know it is all about the mix (content, linkbuilding, social media, etc.) but how important is it?
I know many sites who rank good without any form of social media, but I do not know any sites who do only social media and rank high. I hope there are some good cases which give good insight. ps. I know it becomes more and more important...0 -
Ranking gcctld?
I am working on a new site that uses a .io TLD. I have just started working to get the domain to rank for its own name. What are some others experience with ranking and SEO for gcctlds?
Algorithm Updates | | JoshAM0 -
How on earth is a site with ONE LINK ranking so well for a competitive keyword?
Ok, so I'm sure you get the gist of what I'm asking about in my question. The query is 'diy kitchens' in Google UK and the website is kitchens4diy[dot]com - which is ranking in third from my viewing. The thing is, the site has just ONE BACKLINK and has done for a good while. Yet, it's ranking really well. What gives?
Algorithm Updates | | Webrevolve0 -
SERP Rankings: Breadcrumb appears near URL
Hi mozzers, I was checking at the "carpet cleaning" kw national search and an usual result appeared(image attached): -Title Tag -Url + Breadcrumbs following The Breadcrumb showing up near the url is the first time I see that happening! Anyone has an idea why? Do you think it is a Google new trick or do you guys think it is the webmaster who added a hack to it? Thanks for letting me know Tf52L.png
Algorithm Updates | | Ideas-Money-Art0 -
Difference in which pages Google is ranking?
Over the past two weeks I've noticed that Google has decided to change which pages on our site rank for specific keywords. The thing is, this is for keywords that the homepage was already ranking for. Due to our workload, we've made no changes to the site, and I'm not tracking any additional backlinks. Certainly there are no new deep links to these pages. In SEOmoz dashboard (and via tools/manual checking with a proxy) of the 24 terms we have first page ranking for, 9 of them are marked "new to top 50". These are terms we were already ranking for. Google just appears to have switched out the homepage for other pages. I've noticed this across a couple of client sites, too, though none to the extent that I'm seeing on our own. Certainly this isn't a bad thing, as the deeper pages ranking means that they're landing on the content they want first, and I can work to up the conversion rates. It's just caught me by surprise. Anyone else noticing similar changes?
Algorithm Updates | | BedeFahey1 -
CTR for Google Rankings
I run a local business, and I'm working on ranking for keyword + city. I currently rank on the first page for just about every keyword I'm working on, but only the top 3 for a little less than half. Because the search volume is so low for each keyword (for most cities Google doesn't have an estimated monthly search volume) the grand total of a few searches a month for each keyword + city combination is where I get my traffic. Although I seem to be getting consistently higher in the rankings, I am curious as to how much more traffic I can expect. I read somewhere that sites that are ranked number one are clicked 50% of the time, number two 20% of the time, number three 15% and from there on it goes down fast. Rank 7 and on is below 1%. Probably around 30% of my keywords are ranked between 7-10 and probably about 20% are ranked 4-6. Are the CTR numbers fairly accurate? I understand that there are a lot of influences on CTR, such as title/description, but generally is that somewhat accurate? If it is, I am missing out on A LOT of traffic. I am pulling about 800 unique visitors a month from Google. If I get in the top 3 for most of my keywords, can I expect significantly more traffic? I ask the question because there are many other things I could be doing with my time to help the business aside from SEO. I don't want to be working constantly on SEO if traffic is only going to increase very little.
Algorithm Updates | | bjenkins240