Local Listing only Showing out of the Local Market. Have you seen this? What are my options?
-
I have a client (law firm) who has been dominant locally for years. A few months ago he stopped showing locally when you search in his city, but when you search from other cities, he's still dominant. Here are a couple facts:
1. None of the competition is in his building.
2. He does rank dominant locally if you select "top rated" in Google maps.*
*Interestingly enough, his competitors on regular searches have great ratings too so its a bit weird that he shows up in front of them but only when you select top rated.
Have you seen this? Any suggestions?
-
Ah, good to know we've narrowed this down together! For another reporting method, I'd tweet GMB @__GoogleMyBiz__ and link to your GMB forum post. If you do succeed in getting Google to edit the spammed names, I would love to hear what you see happen in the local pack after that. It may/may not affect rankings, so your experience would be educational to our community if you can share it. It's been a pleasure chatting with you about this.
-
You nailed it! I actually know for sure what it is now.
All the SEO items you mentioned are completely on point with this client (thus why dominant everywhere else and why he has been top Google for a long time). Even organic. Dominant.
However, there are two competitive firms that are spamming. I've noticed a few times when the spammers show up even nationally, the client disappears. So I suspected they had something to do with this.
This makes total sense now that since they are keyword spamming, that triggers the filter on my client and is completely gone.
I'm not ok with spamming the name (even if there is currently no penalty) because long-term that will be resolved and when it is, we will be there.
I've always used the map edit listing before, but I've been reporting them for 3 months now with no resolution (it just says pending in my account).
Final Question- Besides map edits and reporting on Google forum is there any other way to effective report a spammer?
You've been a huge help!
-
So glad that helped. So, based on your anecdotal account, if the business is located near other law offices, it was previously ranking well locally but is now only showing up when you filter the results or zoom in, it does sound like Possum is a likely candidate.
Overcoming the Possum filter basically comes down to convincing Google that it is your listing that doesn't deserve to be filtered. How do you do this?
-
Familiarize yourself with the major Local Search Ranking Factors (likely, you're familiar with this annual survey, but if you've not looked at the 2017 version, here's the link: https://moz.com/local-search-ranking-factors). You've got to build both the organic and local strength of the law firm so that Google sees it as the one that deserves to be shown instead of filtered.
-
Do a competitive audit. Look at the businesses that aren't being filtered and analyze what they are getting right that your law firm is missing. The audit has to look at a wide variety of factors, including but not limited to:
-
Age of the listing (is the competitor more established?)
-
Age of the domain (same as above)
-
Domain authority (links, content, etc.)
-
Citation consistency and authority + lack or presence of duplicate GMB listings
-
Google-based reviews (mainly total review count, but with some increasing emphasis on rating/sentiment)
-
Page authority of the URL the listing points to
-
Spam (are any of your competitors violating guidelines to achieve rankings, like stuffing their business title, - if so, report them)
-
etc.
So, basically, what you need to do is evaluate your own marketing to identify weaknesses and improve in those areas, while also evaluating the non-filtered competitors' strengths and weaknesses to see what they're doing better than your client and where they might be vulnerable. This is a major undertaking, with no guarantees that you'll automatically get unfiltered right away if you take the right steps to become the dominant player, but I've covered here your basic options for getting it right. If the business is experiencing a serious loss of traffic due to being filtered, it might be worthwhile for them to invest in some professional consulting with a heavy-hitting Local SEO (think Mike Blumenthal, Phil Rozek, Joy Hawkins) for a complete audit and some strategy sessions that will create a plan for improving the business' chances of becoming dominant again.
The problem with Possum recovery is that it doesn't work like some of Google's previous updates have. It's not like you've done something wrong that resulted in you being filtered out. It's just that you're not authoritative enough for Google to choose you as a top result. Joy Hawkins wrote an interesting article on Streetfight about how one business recovered from Possum (http://streetfightmag.com/2017/04/24/when-breaking-googles-guidelines-is-almost-necessary-with-gmb/) but she is careful to state that she's not advocating violating Google's guidelines in order to achieve recovery, though, like many Local SEOs, she empathizes with the business owner's decision to do so. I'd recommend reading that and considering your next steps, which might need to include high-level consulting. Hope this helps!
-
-
Actually, yes he does show up when when he hits zoom once in the city and there are other firms on his street (not in the actual office).
That was a great article, but I'm still a little stuck on what to do next. Our NAP is perfect. The site isn't spammy (offsite or onsite). We have good quality video (and its marketed well). But what steps to we need to take to overcome this. Any articles you recommend?
Thanks!
-
Hey There!
Was his disappearance from the local packs coeval with the rollout of Possum? If there are other law firms on the same block (or even couple of blocks), he could simply be being filtered by Possum. When you zoom in on the map, does he appear? If so, Possum is a likely culprit, though I can't say for sure without seeing the actual listing.
Obviously, the other thing to check for would be guideline violations/penalties/malware.
I also recommend reading this thread over at the Local Search Forum, which is discussing the phenomenon of proximity to the point of search impacting local rank in a variety of ways: https://www.localsearchforum.com/local-seo-ranking/43925-page-hated-within-100-mile-radius-city-loved-outside.html
From your description, I suspect Possum, but this is a guess without reviewing your client's unique scenario. Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Star rating not showing up in local pack, and knowledge panel pulling in healthgrades
Hello, I have a client that when you Google just their business name a couple of odd things are happening. First off, they show up in the map pack, but it's now showing their review rating. They have 29 reviews, with an average star rating of 4.6, but at first glance, it doesn't look like they have any reviews:
Reviews and Ratings | | ElaineBushey0 -
Rich snippets not showing up in Google
Would anyone know why after adding schema.org markup to a websites products, reviews and ratings why it still isn't showing up in Google SERPs? Does Google pick and choose who's rich snippets get displayed on a random basis or some other criteria?
Reviews and Ratings | | znotes0 -
New building ownership and NAP - strategies for removing old listings with bad reviews
I have a question based on this scenario: An apartment building changes ownership. Previous owners were terrible and online listings have had terrible reviews. Since the apartment building now has a new brand name, new office address and phone number, the new owners want to create new online listings instead of claiming the old listings with the bad reviews. Also they want to report the old listings as "closed". They would like to remove the old listings with bad reviews from the old management and old brand name and start fresh, since they plan many improvements. Has anyone tried this strategy? How much luck has anyone had rebranding an apartment building and reporting old business listings as closed?
Reviews and Ratings | | DragonSearch0 -
Do ratings/reviews show up in Organic Search Results anymore?
I read about using schema or h1review to add markup that would get an individual person's review to show up in organic search, but it was from 2013. I did a few queries for keywords in my area, and none of the results had this. Then I did some queries for generic things like "best pizza in Tampa" and "coffee in tampa" and they didn't have it either. So, is this still something that can be done or not? I do see it when a review site like yelp comes up or in ads, but I'm specifically talking about organic search results from our website. Thanks, Ruben
Reviews and Ratings | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Started using a 3rd Party Review Company for our Website. Do we need to show the reviews or is a widget (badge) with a link back to review company sufficient enough from an SEO ranking point of view?
Hi All, We have started to use a 3rd party review company and now have the choice of either implementing their re-supplied widgets (Java ) on our site showing customer reviews or use their an API to get this information. The widgets (Java) , would be loaded once the page is actually loaded so I am not sure how and if google will read this information if at all? If we use a widget then we won't be able to implement it with Schema.org although we will be able to use rich snippets to it will appear on any PPC (once we have had 30 reviews). If we go down the API route, it's more expensive for us but we can use the review schema.org for this. Does anyone have any experience of what works best for them ?.. We have a choice of having a widget showing latest reviews or just a badge (which is actually a link to the review site showing our reviews). From an SEO point of view, is one better than the other ? Does google actually read the content of the review or is the link back to the 3rd party review company sufficient enough to help with rankings etc. Am I correct in assuming that by linking to a 3rd party review company and showing our reviews on our site , this will help with rankings as even though the content in the reviews doesn't really say much ,. I did see it was a ranking factor on the survey but not sure how google uses this. ? I've read up some information on reviews etc but wondered what the general consensus was with what others found works best for them Any help greatly appreciated Pete
Reviews and Ratings | | PeteC120 -
Schema Markup for email with review action for Google places listing - Auto segment.
Hi Guys I have been trying to integrate schema markup with review action into car purchase emails to drive additional reviews for dealership google places listings. I have used the below mark-up but im struggling to get the review action when defining itemtype as AutoDealer. When changing itemtype to FoodEstablishment the review action works perfectly. Has anyone got any suggestions why this may be or have any experience using the review action within emails for google places or itemtype other than FoodEstablishment. I have read the great Moz post on this here but im still struggling. Thanks in advance for any help! See mark-up below... http://schema.org/EmailMessage">http://schema.org/ReviewAction">http://schema.org/Review">https://schema.org/AutoDealer">https://schema.org/Rating">http://schema.org/HttpActionHandler">http://schema.org/Property">http://schema.org/Property"> http://schema.org/HttpRequestMethod/POST"/>
Reviews and Ratings | | MBASydney0 -
Duplicate Google Plus Business Listings
Hi everyone, We have a client with duplicate Google Plus pages for two of their locations. The ones that are showing in search results for the most part are the ones we control, but we'd still like to report or delete the duplicates (which we do not control from our existing accounts). I used to notice the option to report a page as duplicate but no longer see that...any advice? Thanks!
Reviews and Ratings | | SUCCESSagency0 -
Where Google+ Local Gets Listings?
I've seen a lot of business owners mention that their website is on Google+ Local but they say they never added it. Does anyone know which companies Google buys databases from and lists the businesses and unclaimed? And how often do they do this?
Reviews and Ratings | | CyberAlien0