Tons of Crappy links in new OSE (Open Site Explorer)
-
I am starting to miss the old OSE. I've found that for a lot of the pages on our site, the new OSE is showing WAY more links and most of them are garbage nonsense links from China, Russia, and the rest of the internet Wild West.
For instance, in the old OSE, this page used to show 9 linking domains:
http://www.uncommongoods.com/gifts/by-recipient/gifts-for-him
It now shows 454 links. Some of the new links (about 5 of them) are legitimate. The other 400+ are garbage. Some are porn sites, most of them don't even open a web page, they just initiate some shady download. I've seen this for other sites as well (like Urban Outfitters) This is making it much harder for me to do backlink analysis on bc I have no clue how many "Normal" links they have. Is anyone else having this problem ? Any way to filter all this crap out ? See attached screenshot of the list of links I'm getting from OSE.
-
Ok thank you. I will email directly.
-
Hey Zack,
Sorry to hear you're still having problems - we've seen an improvement on most sites at this point. Would you want to send me info on the site you're searching and any filters you are using?
If you don't feel comfortable posting that info on this thread, feel free to email me directly: carin@seomoz.org.
Thanks!
Carin
-
Hey Carin,
I just wanted to follow up on this...I'm still seeing these spammy binary files show up as links. Unfortunately it makes OSE quite useless for me in regards to exploring our own backlinks.
What is the status of this problem? Has there been any headway ? Why does our site have problems but most others don't?
Thanks!
-Zack
-
Hey Zack,
Thanks so much for understanding! We are doing everything we can to get the bug resolved. Binary files are the downloadable files you see as links - .pdf, .exe, .img, etc.
I'm really sorry, but we don't have a URL to the old OSE. I saw Steven's response as a workaround - is that possible or are there too many file types to filter out?
Our crawlers that provide the metrics to OSE are always crawling, but will take about a month for our fix to propagate through to all the pages we crawl. Once we have removed these links from our crawlers, then we'll have to process the metrics. This is why it's looking like late September for the fix to show up.
I really appreciate your patience and understanding, we're doing everything we can to fix it!!
Thanks,
Carin
-
Hey Carin-
Thank you so much for this in-depth response. Glad to hear that you guys are aware of it and trying to sort it out. Very interesting info...I'd never hear of "binary" links before but I hope you guys can figure out how to handle these. Seems like a tough task to tackle, just by looking at my CSV it looks like these come in several different forms and they could be hard to identify..I have a few questions:
1. Is there by chance a URL you could give me that points to the old OSE ?
2. How often does OSE crawl? Is it a constant process or are there scheduled crawls?
Thanks!!
-Zack
-
Hey Zack, I saw the ticket you filed was answered by Aaron, but I just wanted to follow up with you as well. We have made some really exciting changes to the crawler, but, unfortunately, there is a pretty obvious bug as well...
The reason for the “questionable” links coming from the Internet Wild West is due to the crawler reaching much deeper into sites where there are more download (i.e. binary) links. The first issue is the crawler is counting a binary file as a link, but the larger issue, is that the crawler doesn’t really know how to handle these types of files. This bug is causing some links to be improperly associated with certain domains. This is probably what you're seeing with all the crazy links from China and Russia which don't actually link to the site you're researching.
There are two steps to addressing this issue: changing how the crawler sees these file types and then fixing how the crawler handles these file types. We have made improvements to our algorithm so that we will be handle the majority of these files correctly, however, this update will need about a month to propagate. The fix for this issue probably won’t be seen for two more updates, meaning late September. Our improvements should catch most of the issues, but there still could be a few cases we haven't addressed. If this happens, don't hesitate to let us know; we love feedback since it helps us improve and make our index even better!
The next step is to fix how our crawlers handle binary file links and prevent them from being improperly associated with certain domains. We are in the process of working through that issue right now. We’re doing everything we can to resolve this bug as we know it is alarming to see these “questionable” links associated with your sites.I hope this helps and thanks so much for being patient :)Thanks,Carin
-
2 ways:
- Get as CSV and spend the time going through it
- Wait it out
-
OK cool good info, hope they fix it soon!! Any good ideas on how you can filter this crap[ out ?
-
Hello Zack,
That is an issue that they are working on, I know this because I already discussed this with one of their help desk people. Here is the page that describes the changes: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/brand-new-open-site-explorer-is-here
In addition to that, here is some additional information I can share with you:
you may see “questionable” links with weird file extensions. This is due to the crawler reaching much deeper into sites where there are more download links. We are looking into fixing this bug as soon as we can so these won’t be counted as links.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz can't see my link from an external site
Hi, I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this. I've had a followed link created from http://www.dubaisharks.com/ pointing to my website - http://www.yallarugby.com but in the reports it doesn't show that there is a link coming fro this website. The link has been active for a few months now, but still no record of it. Any ideas?
Moz Pro | | SeoSheikh0 -
New Subscriber - What am I looking at?
I just become a PRO subscriber and feel a little overwhelmed. Where do I start? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. What is sparking my interest are the items listed below on the image attached. Specific items are, Internal Equity-Passing Links Total Internal Links Total Links MOZ.png
Moz Pro | | TeamAguilar0 -
Why cant I open my Campaigns
When i go to the Campaigns URL , Its not allowing me to open in order to view my ranking. Why?
Moz Pro | | CBC10 -
What are Spammy Back Links
My site was hit by Penguin 2, where I lost 40% of traffic. People keep talking about spammy links but I've made none of those for my site. So how can I analyse my site and find out which links are hurting me. Can it be done with SEOMOZ software? What do I look for? I used Site Explorer and most of my links are to relevant websites. Is there a penalty for being in somebody else's blogroll even if I was added naturally and their site is a high ranking (PR4) and relevant site? All the links to my site coming from forums are no-follow. Could it be my own website? How do I check that? I have no clue what to look for. Thanks
Moz Pro | | uesat0 -
Canonical issue in open site explorer
When I look at my back links in OSE, I see two landing pages on my site that are really the same page. www.mysite.com/ and www.mysite.com/(affiliate code here) These show different inbound link characteristics and page authority. The page in question has a rel=canonical tag. Am I doing something wrong?
Moz Pro | | EugeneF0 -
Open Site explorer (last 1-3 updates) shows new and wierd results
Hi Moz'ers! I have a questions for you guys. Can you explain why the website "Netspiren" has a lower "domain Authority" than "Duft og Natur"? See screenshot. I know it's a tough question without a detailed analysis, but looking at OSE's data, does the mozrank,moztrust, C-block don't reflect the power of the Domain Authority. What's you take? BTW: "Netspiren" has always had more and better links, and also had a higher Domain Authority. Something about the Domain Authority changed since the past 1-3 OXE updates. Looking forward for your take on this! Have a good weekend! mnRPI.png
Moz Pro | | FrederikTrovatten220 -
Forum posting link building
Is answering questions on yahoo answers and forums genuine link building opportunity? I dont mean spamming much, but being a genuine member of the forums
Moz Pro | | CompleteOffice0