Organic search traffic has dropped by 35% since 18 September, we don't know why.
-
Organic traffic to our website has dropped 35% since 18 September 2017 to date. From 1 January to 18 September 2017 organic traffic was up by just under 1% over all (Google up by 1.32%). Paid search traffic over the same time has remained steady. There is nothing we can think of that we've done that has caused the drop. We had an issue with Google page speed test failing when running a test but we resolved this issue on 20 November and in that time we've seen an even greater drop (44% in the last week).
The drop is seen across the 3 main search engines, not just Google, which points toward something we've done, but as mentioned, we can't think of any significant change we made in September that would have such negative effects. There is little difference across devices.
Is anyone aware of a significant event in September in the search engine world that may have influenced our organic traffic?
Any help gratefully received.
-
thanks Donna, much appreciated.
We're having a meeting about it on Wednesday with developers and marketing. We know the site is slow, we're working on a new back end to the site that will increase speed significantly, but it's still 6 months away. I think it will need to be brought up in the Wednesday meeting.
The one caveat is that the site as always been slow (even slower!). Maybe google have lost patience.
-
As far as I know, only comparing before and after page traffic using Google Analytics.
All those pages that are canonicalized to https://www.scottscastles.com/property/unavailable/ and https://www.scottscastles.com/property/enquire/ are eventually going to get noindexed. There are 335 of them.
Your site is slow. Google's bots might not be allocating enough time to index the entire site.
-
Thanks Donna
To your question about whether the dropped pages have healthy link profiles, do you know how to identify the pages that were indexed that are no longer indexed?
-
Were significant changes made to the site around that time? You seem to have a mix of non-html, html, http, https, 301 and 302 (temporary) redirects.
Do Google and Bing have your most up-to-date sitemap?
Have you orphaned any pages?
Have you checked messages in Google Search Console?
Do the dropped pages have healthy link profiles?
Do you have a large amount of duplicate content that has not been accounted for in canonicals?
Pages with 5xx and 4xx errors won't get indexed.
Hosting problems (inaccessible or slow responding host) can prevent pages from being indexed.
-
Thanks very much for your feedback Donna.
We've identified a strong correlation between a sharp drop in indexed pages around 18 September and our drop in organic search traffic. We're stumped as to why google sharply reduced the number of indexed pages. There was a similar drop around the end of April but this had little influence on our organic search traffic.
Does anyone know why this would occur for a reason other than removing the pages or no-indexing pages?
-
I've also seen a decent drop in our organic traffic the last two weeks, it started November 15th. Our longer tail keywords for our FAQs started to creep back up but our root high volume keywords show almost a 5% average position drop over the past 30 days. Our competitors did not experience this drop from my analysis and OSE tools. Nor am I able to find anything that we may have done to cause this. I'm assuming it's an algorithm update, just keeping my fingers crossed that our root high volume keywords start going back up sooner than later.
-
Look at your landing page report comparing the before and after time period for organic traffic. Is it specific landing pages that have lost traffic or is the 35% drop roughly consistent across the board?
You have a bunch of pages (787) ending in html that are timing out with a 504 Gateway error.
Here are a few examples.
https://www.scottscastles.com/book/enquire/baronial-castle-54.html
https://www.scottscastles.com/book/enquire/beautiful-historic-mansion-31.html
https://www.scottscastles.com/book/enquire/beautiful-holiday-house-23.htmlI sampled a few with a site: command. Many are still indexed so that could be the problem. A few are tagged as no-index, but they're the exception rather than the rule. Many are canonicalized to https://www.scottscastles.com/property/enquire/ or https://www.scottscastles.com/property/unavailable/ but none are redirected.
I'd start there.
-
The something that "happened" might have been a Google algo change. Or it could have been Google giving one of your competitors a promotion. If a website has made significant improvment, many pages on the site could be promoted at the same time.
If you want to know when "something happens" in Google check here.
-
Thanks for your response. It hasn't been a gradual drop off of organic search traffic. It can be pinpointed to 18 September. That's why I was wondering if anything happened around that time to cause the sudden drop.
-
Is anyone aware of a significant event in September in the search engine world that may have influenced our organic traffic?
Many things could cause a drop in traffic. Here are the things you should check where data is available or consider if you don't have the data.
- Google is showing more Adwords ads above the fold
- Google is showing more Shopping ads above the fold
- Google is showing more "people also ask" units
- Google is showing more features in the SERPs like news, images, video, etc.
- Google is showing more knowledge boxes and featured snippets
Lots of people have lost traffic to the above in the past year - even if their organic rankings are HIGHER
Maybe competitors are hammering away at your traffic.. Amazon and WalMart and Ebay are working really hard and spending billions to dominate the SERPs - and there are millions of third-party sellers listing items on all of these websites. Lots of dirtbag sites are stealing images, rewriting and spinning the content of other websites. Your competitors are working every day to take positions from you. If you are not working every single day they are doing that to take your positions. They are hungry and working hard.
A person or a small team or even a huge company can be working like mad and not be able to stand up to all of the above. For as long as there has been competition on the web, these things and more have been killing business almost as fast as they arrive. There are only ten organic positions (or less) on the first page of google and everybody wants them and Google is now using up to 50% or more of the real estate on the first page of the SERPs for their own stuff.
All of the above assumes that you have a great website with worthy content. If you website is anything less then Google's quality filters might hit you. If you are not compliant with Google's guidelines then other filters might hit you.
This is the way of the web and all of the above are accelerating and not slowing down.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
No related searches
Does anyone have any insight as to why a site wouldn't show any results when using this google search operator:
Technical SEO | | SoulSurfer8
related:site.com There are no results appearing. We recently moved from .com to .org with 301 redirects in place and change of address tool submitted. There are no penalties or warnings in search console but we have seen a significant decrease in search traffic. Thanks in advance.0 -
Where did the 'Contributor To' area go in Google+
I went into my Google+ profile this morning to try to add a new guest blog in the 'Contributor To' section but I can't find it. Did they move it somewhere?
Technical SEO | | JonathanGoodman0 -
Consistent top 10 in G image search - but a different 'stolen' version every time!
I have a photo that was uploaded back in 2005. It is an aerial shot and has received a fair bit of traffic over the years. I'm pretty sure it was ranked #1 in Google Images for the town name for a while. Now, however, it never ranks. Well actually it does. But every single time it is a version on a different website that is being used without permission.
Technical SEO | | Cornwall
And I'm not talking about one website. Every time I fill out a DMCA and have the image removed only to see a completely different website featuring in the top 10. This has happened 5 times so far and I'm just about to fill out another DMCA request. What is going on? Surely Google in its infinite wisdom is smart enough to check the timestamp or date cues on page to figure out which is the original. These other sites are often complete unknowns compared to my site which is a 12yr old authority site on the subject.
Don't get it!0 -
Can't for the life of me figure out how this is possible !! Any ideas ?
I would imagine it's not all that easy to rank on 1st page ( not going for 1st position here ) for https://www.google.com.au/search?q=credi+cards. I am looking at the AU market. For some reason which I can't figure out Everyday Money Credit Card ( https://www.woolworthsmoney.com.au/ ) ranks number 4. The home page redirect to https://www.woolworthsmoney.com.au/wowm/wps/wcm/connect/wowmoney/wowmoney/home/home/ Why have your homepage in this format ? I would love to hear any theories you guys might have. It does not look like they have a strong link profile , I could not figure out how old the domain was or what other possible reason there is for the site to rank .
Technical SEO | | RuchirP0 -
Best way to handle indexed pages you don't want indexed
We've had a lot of pages indexed by google which we didn't want indexed. They relate to a ajax category filter module that works ok for front end customers but under the bonnet google has been following all of the links. I've put a rule in the robots.txt file to stop google from following any dynamic pages (with a ?) and also any ajax pages but the pages are still indexed on google. At the moment there is over 5000 pages which have been indexed which I don't want on there and I'm worried is causing issues with my rankings. Would a redirect rule work or could someone offer any advice? https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site:outdoormegastore.co.uk+inurl:default&num=100&hl=en&safe=off&prmd=imvnsl&filter=0&biw=1600&bih=809#hl=en&safe=off&sclient=psy-ab&q=site:outdoormegastore.co.uk+inurl%3Aajax&oq=site:outdoormegastore.co.uk+inurl%3Aajax&gs_l=serp.3...194108.194626.0.194891.4.4.0.0.0.0.100.305.3j1.4.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.SDhuslImrLY&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=ff301ef4d48490c5&biw=1920&bih=860
Technical SEO | | gavinhoman0 -
Error msg 'Duplicate Page Content', how to fix?
Hey guys, I'm new to SEO and have the following error msg 'Duplicate Page Content'. Of course I know what it means, but my question is how do you delete the old pages that has duplicate content? I use to run my website through Joomla! but have since moved to Shopify. I see that the duplicated site content is still from the old Joomla! site and I would like to learn how to delete this content (or best practice in this situation). Any advice would be very helpful! Cheers, Peter
Technical SEO | | pjuszczynski0 -
I just found something weird I can't explain, so maybe you guys can help me out.
I just found something weird I can't explain, so maybe you guys can help me out. In Google http://www.google.nl/#hl=nl&q=internet. The number 3 result is a big telecom provider in the Netherland called Ziggo. The ranking URL is https://www.ziggo.nl/producten/internet/. However if you click on it you'll be directed to https://www.ziggo.nl/#producten/internet/ HttpFox in FF however is not showing any redirects. Just a 200 status code. The URL https://www.ziggo.nl/#producten/internet/ contains a hash, so the canonical URL should be https://www.ziggo.nl/. I can understand that. But why is Google showing the title and description of https://www.ziggo.nl/producten/internet/, when the canonical URL clearly is https://www.ziggo.nl/? Can anyone confirm my guess that Google is using the bulk SEO value (link juice/authority) of the homepage at https://www.ziggo.nl/ because of the hash, but it's using the relevant content of https://www.ziggo.nl/producten/internet/ resulting in a top position for the keyword "internet".
Technical SEO | | NEWCRAFT0 -
Does 'framing' a website create duplicate content?
Something I have not come across before, but hope others here are able offer advice based on experience: A client has independently created a series of mini-sites, aimed at targeting specific locations. The tactic has worked very well and they have achieved a large amount of well targeted traffic as a result. Each mini-site is different but then in the nav, if you want to view prices or go to the booking page, that then links to what at first appears to be their main site. However, you then notice that the URL is actually situated on the mini-site. What they have done is 'framed' the main site so that it appears exactly the same even when navigating through this exact replica site. Checking the code, there is almost nothing there - in fact there is actually no content at all. Below the head, there is a piece of code: <frameset rows="*" framespacing=0 frameborder=0> <frame src="[http://www.example.com](view-source:http://www.yellowskips.com/)" frameborder=0 marginwidth=0 marginheight=0> <noframes>Your browser does not support frames. Click [here](http://www.example.com) to view.noframes> frameset> Given that main site content does not appear to show in the source code, do we have an issue with duplicate content? This issue is that these 'referrals' are showing in Analytics, despite the fact that the code does not appear in the source, which is slightly confusing for me. They have done this without consultation and I'm very concerned that this could potentially be creating duplicate content of their ENTIRE main site on dozens of mini-sites. I should also add that there are no links to the mini-sites from the main site, so if you guys advise that this is creating duplicate content, I would not be worried about creating a link-wheel if I advise them to link directly to the main site rather than the framed pages. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | RiceMedia0