Service Area Location Pages vs. User Experience
-
I'm familiar with the SAB best practices outlined here.
Here's my issue: Doing local landing pages as described here might not be ideal from a user experience point of view. Having a "Cities We Serve" or "Service Areas" link in the main navigation isn't necessarily valuable to the user when the city-specific landing pages are all places within a 15-mile radius of the SAB's headquarters.
It would just look like the company did it for SEO. It wouldn't look natural.
Seriously, it feels like best practices are totally at odds with user experience here. If I absolutely must create location pages for 10 or so municipalities within my client's service area, I'd rather NOT put the service areas as a primary navigation item. It is not useful to the user. Anyone who sees that the company provides services in the [name of city] metropolitan area will already understand that the company can service their town that is 5 miles away. It is self-evident. For example**, who would wonder whether a plumbing company with a Los Angeles address also services Beverly Hills?** It's just... silly.
But the Moz guide says I've got to do those location pages! And that I've got to put them high up in the navigation!
This is a problem because we've got to do local SEO, but we also have to provide an ideal experience.
Thoughts?
-
No worries at all. Where you put the pages in the menu should not impact organic traffic in terms of people coming directly from the SERPs to one of these landing pages, but it could impact the flow of traffic through the website (someone entering on the home page and then not seeing that you have these landing pages underneath and about tab or someplace else). So, ostensibly, this could impact the depth of the visits your website receives.
The main point of giving these pages their own navigation heading is to increase on-site awareness that the pages exist. From my work with SABs over the years, I've noticed that it has become an expected standard practice to give these pages their own main menu tab, to be sure they're being found by users for whom specialized content has been created. I don't have any recent studies to prove this out, but it's always been a rule of human usability to stick with formats users are already comfortable with. I, personally, wouldn't be inclined to look for my city's landing page under an 'About' tab, but for an authoritative answer on this for your specific brand, you'd need to conduct a usability test in which you see exactly how users are interacting with your website. Sometimes, the results of those studies are extremely surprising.
So, end of the day, it's always up to the owner to decide how he wants to structure his website. What I've tried to offer here would be standard best practice advice. But, the only way to know whether having a unique tab for service city content or putting these pages somewhere else helps/harms usability and conversions is to do a formal study. If you don't want to invest in that right now, you could at least ask a few friends who aren't at all familiar with your site to use it while you watch over their shoulders. You might ask them a question like, "What would you do if you were trying to find out if we serve X city?" and then see how they try to find the answer. Things like that might lend some data to your decision about site navigation.
-
Miriam,
Thanks again for the thoughtful response! I think we've just about talked this one to death (sorry!), but I do have one more question. Per your comment:
"Once you've got pages you're proud of, I don't think you'll have any qualms about giving them their own tab in the main menu. Putting them anyplace else (like in an unexpected place like the about tab) is going to risk that they're not being found, which would then negatively impact the conversions they might otherwise generate."
Are you suggesting that the only detrimental effect would be people not finding the local landing pages by browsing our site via the main navigation? The only reason we were planning to publish the local landing pages was for organic search traffic – not for people who arrived to the site via some other path (a blog? a service-specific landing page?) who happen to be noodling around in our menus. We have already designed an experience that we think best suits our users and feel that adding location pages to the main navigation would actually NOT serve them well, even if those pages are of an incredibly high quality. For our area, a single "Service Area" page with a brief outline of the area the company services is much simpler for the user, easier to understand, and cleaner.
I guess this is what I'm getting at: If adding local landing pages somewhere other than the main navigation is only detrimental in terms of people not finding the location pages in the menus, that's not a huge concern. HOWEVER, if putting them somewhere other than the main navigation is somehow detrimental for organic search traffic, that would be a concern.
I'm also not really seeing how something like "About > Service Areas > [name of city]" is unexpected or confusing to the user. I mean... I'm not hitting the streets doing user research or anything (the only way to really be sure what users want!), but this sort of content hierarchy actually seems super intuitive and natural to me. Is there any reason to think search engines would not like us if I organized local landing pages this way? Would they not want to display my local landing page to a searcher with a relevant query due to the overall organization/placement of the pages within the site architecture?
-
Hi Green Web!
So glad if my answer was helpful. You've asked some good follow-up questions here. I'll number my responses to match your queries.
-
Yes, a searcher in LA looking for "plumbers" will be shown plumbers in LA, but if he looks up "plumbers Beverly Hills", then Google will show him businesses in that city, instead.
-
Your business is at an important point-of-decision here. Your options are to:
a) Skip building landing pages and just put up a map, knowing that doing so means you are foregoing any rankings, traffic or conversions you might have achieved for your service cities
b) Put up weak landing pages - which is something too many SABs do, downgrading the overall quality of their website and appearing somewhat lazy to consumers and competitors
c) Put in the time to create strong landing pages and feature them proudly in your menu. This would be a standard Local SEO best practice (not silly) and a way for you to increase conversions and improve your analytical tracking of different customer bases. But, yes, this serious approach will require a dedication of resources on the part of your brand. It is easier to create really good landing pages in some industries than in others. For example, a house painter can showcase his different projects in different cities quite easily because of the appealing visual content of before-and-afters. For a plumber it requires more creativity, but he can still strive for unique, compelling pages via user-based content (reviews/testimonials/videos/stories hinging on customers served in the different cities). He can also showcase his expertise relative to the various cities. For example, city X might have lead pipes that need to be replaced, while city B may have high iron content in the water requiring filtering. The point is, any brand in your scenario needs to put in the creative time brainstorming what these landing pages could contain that will persuade the user of the trustworthiness of the company as a service provider in his city.
Once you've got pages you're proud of, I don't think you'll have any qualms about giving them their own tab in the main menu. Putting them anyplace else (like in an unexpected place like the about tab) is going to risk that they're not being found, which would then negatively impact the conversions they might otherwise generate.
Of course, at the end of the day, the decision of how to market your brand is going to be totally up to you. If you don't feel you can create good landing pages, then you may decide to skip creating them altogether, with the understanding that you'll be foregoing the revenue they could generate for your business. But, best practice advice you're going to hear from pretty much any Local Search marketer is going to hinge on putting in the effort to find a compelling strategy for these pages, so that they are sending you good leads.
Hope these thoughts are helpful!
-
-
Miriam,
Thank you for the thorough and thoughtful response! It is gratifying to receive guidance from the person who actually wrote the closest thing I can find to a definitive guide on local landing pages.
For what it's worth, I used Beverly Hills/Los Angeles as a stand-in for my client's actual metropolitan area because I figured the example would be something more participants/respondents/lurkers would be familiar with. The point still stands, though. The client has a 15 to 20-mile service area, and pretty much anybody in a nearby municipality – and yes, they're actual cities distinct from the primary one in which my client is based (so the West Hollywood vs. Los Angeles analogy is comparable) – will know that the company serves their area without landing pages, paid ads, city-specific blogging, or city-specific social media outreach.
Even so, I totally get that it's the "right" thing to do from an SEO standpoint to include these local landing pages. With that in mind, let me narrow down this discussion to two questions:
1. Your response states that...
Google sees these as totally distinct user bases, and if a searcher located in Beverly Hills or Los Angeles just searches for "plumber", they are going to see these totally different results, localized to their location at the time they search.
The real-world effect of this, therefore, is that someone in Beverly Hills will first see plumbers with: a). Beverly Hills addresses and b). Beverly Hills-specific content (like a landing page) before they see the LA plumber _if they don't happen to be searching for "los angeles plumbers" themselves. _If they search for "los angeles plumbers," they'll be more likely to see the L.A. results even though they are physically located in Beverly Hills, right?
This matters to my situation because it's highly unlikely that all of the people in my client's service area will be using the name of their actual city when they search. Some will. Some won't. I suppose only keyword research can confirm this to be true for sure, but that's my feeling given my knowledge of this area. (bracing for commentary along the lines of, "do the research, don't assume")
2. How horrible would it be to make the "Cities we serve" or "Service area" section of the site not be a top-level navigation item? What if it was nested within, say... the "About Us" dropdown? I think this would be better from a UX perspective because it will help us avoid looking goofy for putting a list of city-level pages at the very top of the site. I'm just not confident we can make these city-level pages super duper compelling and interesting and valuable. The region I'm in has several different distinct cities, but they all bleed into one another and don't really have any identity.
Honestly, from a pure UX perspective, it seems much simpler and better to just throw a map up there with the service areas colored a different color from the rest of the map. Done. No noodling around on our website required.
-
Hey There, Green Web!
Thanks for reading my article. It's a bit of an old one, but in the main, is still pretty accurate advice. This one is 2 years fresher, in case it helps: https://moz.com/blog/overcoming-your-fear-of-local-landing-pages
All that being said, there are horses for courses, and a blog post like the one you've linked to is offering general best practices rather than one-on-one consulting about what you, personally, should do for your specific business model. You're totally right that that post (though long!) didn't cover every possible scenario.
From your description, it sounds like you have a service area business that serves within a tight radius (as opposed to having a restaurant chain with 30 locations across the state of California). Please, correct me on anything I'm not quite getting right about your model. If you have a single physical location, you are only able to create a single Google My Business listing and citation set for your business. This often frustrates SABs, because they may serve multiple cities from a single location, and can't rank in the local packs for them, because Google will only rank their physical location within a single town. So, a plumber in Oakland might be annoyed that he can't also rank for San Jose and San Francisco, because he lacks physical locations there.
It's from this dilemma, and from the desire to target content to specific user groups that the practice of creating local landing pages evolved. If you can't rank in the local packs for your service cities, you can go after organic rankings with landing pages. If you don't do anything, you have little or no chance of ever seeing rankings of any kind for these service cities.
Beverly Hills is considered a separate city from Los Angeles, as is another city like West Hollywood. These are not merely neighborhoods of Los Angeles, but actually considered separate cities. If you do a search for "plumber Los Angeles" you will get completely different local and organic results than for a search for "plumber Beverly Hills". So, clearly, Google sees these as totally distinct user bases, and if a searcher located in Beverly Hills or Los Angeles just searches for "plumber", they are going to see these totally different results, localized to their location at the time they search.
Because of this, it's not really safe to go with your assumption that people know a plumber in LA serves Beverly Hills, despite the short driving distance between them. Whether this is good common sense or not, it's not the way Google works, and relying on Google to show your LA-based plumbing company to Beverly Hills searchers will not work unless you give Google some additional reason to do so (that being content on your website showcasing your services in Beverly Hills, which may give you some hope of ranking organically for these searches).
Upshot: If you need customers from Beverly Hills to find you on the web, you must build something for them to find. Your options for this would include:
-
A Beverly Hills landing page
-
Ongoing blogging showcasing your work in Beverly Hills
-
Paid advertising targeted to Beverly Hills
-
Social media outreach targeting Beverly Hills
In a competitive market, you'll likely need to do all of this to build brand awareness in any city where you serve but aren't physically located.
I completely get your UX concerns. You are rightly perceiving that there's a real danger of putting up a bunch of weak, silly content for every city your company serves, and that this would downgrade user experience and the overall quality of your website. So, you can't take that route. Rather, you'd want to come up with a plan for making those landing pages incredibly useful and persuasive, so that they truly do serve users, while also signalling to search engines that you have relevance to this target community. Hopefully, that newer article I've linked to will provide some inspiration, but if you need further ideas, please feel free to ask here.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Business has multiple locations, but want to rank for commutable cities, geographies
Hello, The business I am working for has multiple locations, but the service they provide is one that you would commute for. At present, they have 20 or so pages with yucky geographical keyword stuffed content (think "New York computer services" and they are based out of a suburb (maybe 40 miles away). For some ridiculous reason, some of these pages are ranking for exact match search terms? We are in the process of revamping the whole site-taking approx five sites and integrating into one mega site. I want to first, figure out the best strategy for ranking for the region that each is in and serve, without being spammy like the previous SEO. I want to eliminate the spammy pages without losing the rank and link juice. What is the most appropriate and above-board strategy? These are my thoughts. Should I: 1. Keep the pages, but tweak them enough to make the content quality? If I do, should they be geo pages? Should they be "locations served", statistics of the area, etc? 2. Group the pages according to region (one page per region) that are location-oriented and tweaked to still include the terms they were ranking for (without the spammy look and stuffing), along with a map, etc? And then, I have to figure out how to redirect so not to lose the value we have now for some of them. The company deals with treatment for addiction, so in recommending and tips-remember that our audience will commute by car, and eventually (hopefully) by plane. 😉 Thank you so so much for any and all help you can provide! Sorry for such a long description!
Local Website Optimization | | lfrazer1231 -
Which URL and rel=canonical structure to use for location based product inventory pages?
I am working on an automotive retailer site that displays local car inventory in nearby dealerships based on location. Within the site, a zip code is required to search, and the car inventory is displayed in a typical product list that can be filtered and sorted by the searcher to fit the searchers needs. We would like to structure these product inventory list pages that are based on location to give the best chance at ranking, if not now, further down the road when we have built up more authority to compete with the big dogs in SERP like AutoTrader.com, TrueCar.com, etc. These higher authority sites are able to rank their location based car inventory pages on the first page consistently across all makes and models. For example, searching the term "new nissan rogue" in the Los Angeles, CA area returns a few location based inventory pages on page 1. The sites in the industry that are able to rank their inventory pages will display a relatively clean looking URL with no redirect that still displays the local inventory like this in the SERP:
Local Website Optimization | | tdastru
https://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/New+Cars/Nissan/Rogue
but almost always use a rel=canonical tag within the page to a page with a location parameter attached to the end of the URL like this one:
https://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/New+Cars/Nissan/Rogue/Los+Angeles+CA-90001"/>
I'm having a hard time figuring out why sites like this example have their URLs and pages structured this way. What would be the best practice for structuring the URL and rel=canonical tags to be able to rank for and display location based inventory pages for cars near the searcher?0 -
More pages on website better for SEO?
Hi all, Is creating more pages better for SEO? Of course the pages being valuable content. Is this because you want the user to spend as much time as possible on your site. A lot of my competitors websites seem to have more pages than mine and their domain authorities are higher, for example the services we provide are all on one page and for my competitors each services as its own page. Kind Regards, Aqib
Local Website Optimization | | SMCCoachHire0 -
SEO geolocation vs subdirectories vs local search vs traffic
My dear community and friends of MOZ, today I have a very interesting question to you all. Although I´ve got my opinion, and Im sure many of you will think the same way, I want to share the following dilemma with you. I have just joined a company as Online Marketing Manager and I have to quickly take a decision about site structure. The site of the company has just applied a big structure change. They used to have their information divided by country (each country one subdirectory) www.site.com/ar/news www.site.com/us/news . They have just changed this and erased the country subdirectory and started using geolocation. So if we go to www.site.com/news although the content is going to be the same for each country ( it’s a Latinamerican site, all the countries speak the same language except Brazil) the navigation links are going to drive you to different pages according to the country where you are located. They believe that having less subdirectories PA or PR is going to be higher for each page due to less linkjuice leaking. My guess is that if you want to have an important organic traffic presence you should A) get a TLD for the country you want to targe… if not B)have a subdirectory or subdomain for each country in your site. I don’t know what local sign could be a page giving to google if the URL and html doesn’t change between countries- We can not use schemas or rich formats neither…So, again, I would suggest to go back to the previous structure. On the other hand…I ve been taking a look to sensacine.com and although their site is pointing only to Spain | |
Local Website Optimization | | facupp1
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | They have very good rankings for big volume keywords in all latinamerica, so I just want to quantify this change, since I will be sending to the designers and developers a lot of work1 -
Disproportionate Links to Home Page
I'm a professional magician and mentalist who travels nationally for corporate events, social functions, and trade shows. Unfortunately, the landing pages are all for different venues and locations, but the product stays the same. How do you recommend optimizing for somebody whose product is essentially themselves? The pages have similar content, videos, etc., so I don't want to be dinged for duplicate content.
Local Website Optimization | | KevinViner0 -
How to approach SEO for a national umbrella site that has multiple chapters in different locations that are different URLS
We are currently working with a client who has one national site - let's call it CompanyName.net, and multiple, independent chapter sites listed under different URLs that are structured, for example, as CompanyNamechicago.org, and sometimes specific to neighborhoods, as in CompanyNamechicago.org/lakeview.org. The national site is .net, while all others are .orgs. These are not subdomains or subfolders, as far as we can tell. You can use a search function on the .net site to find a location near you and click to that specific local site. They are looking for help optimizing and increasing traffic to certain landing pages on the .net site...but similar landing pages also exist on a local level, which appear to be competing with the national site. (Example: there is a landing page on the national .net umbrella site for a "dog safety" campaign they are doing, but also that campaign has led to a landing page created independently on the local CompanyNameChicago.org website, which seems to get higher ranking due to a user looking for this info while located in Chicago. We are wondering if our hands are tied here since they appear to be competing for traffic with all their localized sites, or if there are best practices to handle a situation like this. Thanks!
Local Website Optimization | | timfrick0 -
SEO: .com vs .org vs .travel Domain
Hi there, I am new to MOZ Q&A and first of all I appreciate all the folks here that share their expertise and make everyone understand 'the WWW' a bit better. My question: I have been developing a 'travel guide' site for a city in the U.S. and now its time to choose the right domain name. I put a strong focus on SEO in terms of coding, site performance as well as content and to round things up I'd like to register the _best _domain name in terms of SEO. Let's suppose the city is Atlanta. I have found the following domain names that are available and I was wondering whether you guys could give me some inside on which domain name would perform best. discoveratlanta.org
Local Website Optimization | | kinimod
atlantaguide.org
atlanta.travel
atlantamag.com Looking at the Google Adwords Keyword tool the term that reaches the highest search queries is obviously "Atlanta" itself. Sites that are already ranking high are atlanta.com and atlanta.gov. So basically I am wondering whether I should aim for a new TLD like atlanta.travel or rather go with a .org domain. I had a look around and it seems that .org domains generally work well for city guides (at least a lot of such sites use .org domains). However, I have also seen a major US city that uses .travel and ranks first. On the other hand in New York, nycgo.com ranks well. Is it safe to assume that from the domain names I mentioned it really doesn't matter which one I use since it wouldn't significantly affect my ranking (good or bad)? Or would you still choose one above the other? What do you generally thing about .travel domain names (especially since they are far more expensive then the rest)? I really appreciate your response to my question! Best,
kinimod0 -
Local SEO + Best Practice for locations
Hi All, Based on a hypothetical scenario, lets say you are a plumber. You live and operate within Chelsea in London. You have established a Google places profile and incorporated schema data to tell Google your fixed place location. In addition you operate in several nearby towns with no fixed location presence. i.e Brentford, Bromley, Catford, Cheswick and Tottenham. I create a feature rich page on 'How to find a quality plumber'. Within the page I incorporate the following description: blah blah, as a quality plumber serving the community of Chelsea, we also offer our services to nearby towns of Brentford, Bromley, Catford, Cheswick and Tottenham. I create hyperlinks for the towns (Brentford, Bromley, Catford, Cheswick and Tottenham) that allow the user see in details a full list of services, operation hours, etc. Naturally all towns will have there own unique content (no duplication). Question
Local Website Optimization | | Mark_Ch
Is the above scenario the correct way to provide local seo or is this approach considered spammy to Google? Thanks Mark0