Wordpress Blog, Schema and Authorship Settings
-
Hi Everyone,
What is the best practice for authorship in 2018 and going forward?
I am moving my entire blog over to a new wordpress theme so it's easier to read and navigate in an attempt to make it look better on the mobile and give better UX / CRO and implicit user feedback signals to google.
On the old blog I would say who the author is in the URL, H1 and in the content. This includes an image of the author with an image alt with their name, qualifications and blurb.
I've now set up each author as a 'user' for the new blog and their image and name comes up because I've marked those blogs as authored by that particular user in Wordpress.
What should I do as far as the SEO elements are concerned? I have read Eric Enge's blog about authorship being dead here and also that authorship should be marked up in schema correctly - which I've done. Also I've read around how it provides indirect signals even though it's no longer a direct ranking factor.
Should I tell wordpress to ignore the authorship SEO element by unticking the boxes relating to publishing authorship or let wordpress just do it's thing? Should I keep the images and alt tags and H1 in there or take them out and let the wordpress system take over the authorship SEO elements? It's going to look funny to have author (in wordpress theme) and then author details again just below?
So what is the best practice for authorship in 2018 and going forward?
Am I making too big a deal of it and can just let wordpress sort it out. Something it seems to do very well?
Thanks in advance,
Ed.
-
Thanks EGOL this is precisely what I need. We're all dentists so have all the things you're talking about. Apart from me - I'm a lawyer - and I figure it's like court. You can't just say you're something or someone - they want a certain standard of proof.
I'm busy getting all the professional bodies and associations pointing at the right people and pages and trying to get my people (who've all been to uni a few times) to write for their universities and members associations so we can get links from them too.
This is how they appear in the SERPS - but I'm working on making it like that for everyone.
Dr MJ Rowland-Warmann BSc BDS MSc Aes.Med. MJDF RCS (Eng)
<cite class="iUh30">https://www.smileworksliverpool.co.uk/team/mj-rowland-warmann/</cite> Rating: 4.9 - 230 reviewsDr MJ BSc BDS (Manc) MSc Aes.Med. (Lond) MJDF RCS (Eng) is our captain and co-founder She's loved by all and practices with formidable talent.
I will look into google scholar. I publish all their papers and studies in an 'academic resources' section too - I want to get google scholar to link to that or get them published. It's only university essays though and not peer reviewed stuff so might be a struggle.
I've noticed a bump in search when we use headlines like 'unbiased medical insights into x, y and z' or really play up the qualifications. 'Our orthodontists discuss the best braces treatments' is so much better than just 'buy this and that'
Thanks for your help with this. I'm on the right track but will now double down on your suggestions. Smart people will inherit the SERPS. Eventually...
-
I was excited when "Authorship" was announced and really disappointed when I heard that Google wasn't supporting it anymore.
However, an even better thing has surfaced..... E-A-T... Expertise, Authority and Trust. Google says a lot about it in their Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines.
I am working on this by adding credentials in an obvious location to anything important that I write, and linking my name to a profile page that explains my professional experience and credentials. If you have any type of degrees, certifications, registrations, diplomas, licenses, professional experience, etc. I think that it is important to present them and get your name associated with them. In the past couple of years I've gone back to school to add another one to my qualifications, and I keep my professional license up-to-date.
There are so many people out there writing fake content, writing uninformed content, stealing content, spinning content, etc.... I believe that Google is looking for ways to defend the integrity of their SERPs from all of the people who "know not that they know not". So, anyone who has formally-earned credentials and presents them might gain some advantage.
Beyond the credentials mentioned about,
-- if you can get a Google Scholar profile you should get it; it will help you bring offline authorship online,
-- if you offer a service or produce a product that can quality for a trademark, you should apply for one;
-- if you are active in a professional organization, you should make it visible;
-- if you have expertise that enables you to write about a high profile topic in the news, you should get writing;
... the above are just a few of the many things. Think about what you do that demonstrates your EAT and associate it with your name in a visible way, and link your by-lines to it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved Duplicate LocalBusiness Schema Markup
Hello! I've been having a hard time finding an answer to this specific question so I figured I'd drop it here. I always add custom LocalBusiness markup to clients' homepages, but sometimes the client's website provider will include their own automated LocalBusiness markup. The codes I create often include more information. Assuming the website provider is unwilling to remove their markup, is it a bad idea to include my code as well? It seems like it could potentially be read as spammy by Google. Do the pros of having more detailed markup outweigh that potential negative impact?
Local Website Optimization | | GoogleAlgoServant0 -
Has Anyone Successfully implemented SpecialAnnouncement Schema?
Hello, I'm in the process of updating my clients' websites with the SpecialAnnouncement Schema type, and I'm wondering if anyone has successfully done so yet, and whether or not they're seeing any kind of results /richsnippets directly in SERPs from it? Also, has anyone else run into issues checking their schema with Google's Structured Data Testing Tool? Sometimes I get an error saying "specialAnnouncement is not a type known to Google," and sometimes I get one saying that "the property datePosted is not recognized by Google for an object of type SpecialAnnouncement." I assume these errors are because the schema type is so new, but you know what happens when you assume... Thank you for any insights!
Local Website Optimization | | LocalSEOLady0 -
Duplicate Schema Syntax
Is having both JSON and Microdata markup on one site detrimental to SEO? I'm unsure if Google would read it as spammy to have both.
Local Website Optimization | | GoogleAlgoServant2 -
Blog name convention
Hiya, We are about to launch a new blog called 'Leading Minds Network' and we are wondering what would it the best SEO friendly name convention across the website. Wether if we call it 'blog' across the website and then drive people to our blog page called 'Leading Minds Network' or whther if we call it 'leading minds Network' on the website and drive people to the 'leading minds network' page. Any suggestion would be appreciated Regards Olatz
Local Website Optimization | | OlatzB0 -
Schema Markup adds whitespace
We have this white space below our logo when our local schema markup is added: http://d.pr/i/73EmV0 Can the markup be hidden to remove the space and still be indexed by google? Kevin
Local Website Optimization | | KevnJr1 -
How do I set up 2 businesses that work together but are ran seperately with two separate websites but similar content?
How do I set up these sites so that they will not be negatively affecting their SEO efforts? I have 2 businesses with the same owner. Business A manufactures nurse call systems and Business B installs them. They are run separately with two websites. The content is very similar because the business that installs them describes the different products on their website. These are the two sites: intercallsystems.com and nursecallny.com , My thought was on nursecallny.com when you click on the nav link "Nurse Call Systems" you would be directed to the intercell website. Would this be the best method? Thank you for your help!
Local Website Optimization | | renalynd270 -
Canonical for blog tag or search site
Dear all, I have problem with duplicate content on my site and crawled by seomoz as "duplicate content", might be i am not clear enough about how to put "canoncial" but the problem is with my site mostly on blog or tags or categories, so some link that actually different tags ....come with same result..so like: http://www.livingwordfreelutheran.org/news-events/blog/tag/ Gymnastics and http://www.livingwordfreelutheran.org/news-events/blog/tag/ God's Power It will show same result..the problem is,all are dynamic... and what i should put the canonical for that page? Both of link use same page or controller? If i put the canonical itself on each result it will be fix it? Or how? …and also I confusing how I put it also on search result? Like ?query=keywords that show same result? How I put canonical on there? Sorry if this duplicate question... I very very appreciate for the help…thank you! Best regards,
Local Website Optimization | | lwflc
Harrison0 -
Ranking after switching to Wordpress
About 2 weeks ago we have switched our website and our blog to Wordpress (our website was about 400 pages) our blog was originally on Sgopify website (the blog was about 800 pages). One of the reasons we transferred all the blogs from our account on Shopify to our domain is because we were told that this will help our ranking. We switched everything in the last 2 weeks to Wordpress under the same domain name. The only thing that was changed are the URLs. We also did a 301 redirect however the dilemma we have now is not ranking at all although before the transfer we were ranking 1st or 2nd for certain keywords on organic search. Does anyone know why is this happening? Thank you
Local Website Optimization | | SinaKashani0