Agonizing over Meta length or content seems to make no sense as Google seems to be ignoring them!
-
Real frustrating for me to see Google ignoring my 'Meta Descriptions' and 'mining' my site for any description it chooses. For years my meta has always been displayed and was set up with best practices according to MOZ. My site snopro.co.nz and snopro.co.nz/wanaka-ski-hire have plenty of competition in the market but we are the only ones with a huge point of difference, we are web based only, and deliver the ski rental gear. My quality meta was a way I could control the text and use for a good CTR due to offering something unique in the 'Meta' (Rental Delivery). Seems the only way I can 'control' any text is with 'Adwords' ...funny that! Any others out there finding the same? Justin.
BTW my meta is - 'Snopro Ski Rental Delivery Wanaka. We deliver & custom fit ski hire in the comfort of your accommodation. Hassle Free. Multi-day save 10%. Book here'
-
Hi Ed.
Well second time I have responded to this! MOZ had a little 'hiccup' and lost the entire response
Ill try remember! ahhh now it wont allow me to post a large response. so its in 3 parts...(1 of 3)Thanks for your insight I really appreciate it! Yes, as you said I do kill it for ski rental delivery queenstown/wanaka related searches but I am the only offering for this service and its not searched often. My most valuable keywords that I put most effort into are 'ski hire queenstown' and ski hire wanaka'. This puts me in the mix with my competition and I need to use the Meta and Title to 'sell' my point of difference (delivery and fitting) and generate a good CTR. Positions 1-3 for these searches on both google.co.nz and google.com.au would be ideal. I believe our site is far superior than our competitons and ranking it after 8 years in the game should not be too hard (BTW we are ranking pretty well esp. Local)In fact I have just spent a month updating our NAPs across the web to match and reflect our 2 physical trading locations in Wanaka and Queenstown. So the site is split in 2 locations already as you suggested. You will see this if you try to book or look at rates. ...contd -
contd...(2 of 3)
We started in 2011 as snopro.co.nz and just in Queenstown. All our efforts on and off page were to rank that site for ski hire queenstown related searches. 2014 we expanded to Wanaka. We needed to split the site. We then created snopro.co.nz/queenstown-ski-hire and snopro.co.nz/wanaka-ski-hire and focused the on page to reflect the individual locales. Snopro.co.nz became the 'homepage' and mentions our service is available in wanaka and queenstown (and everywhere in between). Thing is, Google never dropped snopro.co.nz for ranking to all queenstown related searches in favour of snopro.co.nz/queenstown-ski-hire. The sites history and backlinks made this the favourite in googles eyes. Issue is the snopro.co.nz as our homepage is optimized for wanaka and queenstown, (see the metas below) so it 'waters' down the impact of queenstown alone and prevents us killing it for 'ski hire queenstown' related searches (IMO).Anyways, none of this really explains why Google is not using my actual Metas.meta description for home page https://www.snopro.co.nz/ is the following:
-
cont'd... (3 of 3)
https://www.snopro.co.nz/wanaka-ski-hirehttps://www.snopro.co.nz/queenstown-ski-hiremeta name="description" content="Snopro Ski Rental Delivery Queenstown. We deliver & custom fit ski hire in the comfort of your accommodation. Hassle Free. Multi-day save 10%. Book here."Thanks for the advice Ed, really appreciated! Yep Queenstown is a pretty magical part of the planet!Cheers
-
Also you need one of these on your site if you don't already have it. People want information about the season and coming to NZ.
The sheer amount of people all over the world googling ski field opening dates is quite staggering. Put together a really great page (like this one) and you'll get a ton of traffic. Then use that page to do native advertising for your home boot, binding and board services.
You might even get the featured snippet if you use a nice table in wordpress or something that is really simple, fits on and looks good. Get some schema plugins failing that or just write out the code using a code generator (like this epic free one) You'll have to find out whether it's a service or an 'event' I haven't had much luck with events TBH but give it a go. Always be testing.
You're in a great position though because looking briefly at your numbers there's **nothing stopping you from overtaking all your competitors and becoming number one. **It's all about getting it right and there's no right answer, you just have to experiment.
Another thing is just because you do something a bit different (come to people's houses) doesn't mean you're not competing with those who don't do that or just have shops in town. I advertise for loads of things that we (as dentists) don't even offer. All types of old or obsolete braces and veneers and loads of stuff. We have pages associated with those products and tell the customer all about them, why we DON'T offer them (usually because they're rubbish or not made anymore) and then what the customer should be looking for. Like educating them.
So long as you're not misleading your customers and are remaining truly authentic you'll get lots of great success with this tactic. We even have people asking for the products that we've slammed in our unbiased reviews or said you literally can't get anymore because they haven't read the articles to the end and just see that we do x, y and z and then call up wanting it. These people always book in for something different.
-
I feel your pain! It's highly frustrating when you spend time crafting a great meta description and then Google decides to use its own! Especially now that you can play around with up to 320 characters in that space!
From my knowledge, there is very little you can do. As Ed pointed out, you may want to review those lines of content from the block of text Google is currently pulling.
Other than that the best advice I can give you is to try different descriptions.
Goodluck!
-
Hey Justin,
This is a very cool product and you're killing it for ski hire queenstown delivery but I'm sure the real money is in the broader ski hire queenstown. or ski here wanaka. You're constantly in the map pack which is great so there's nothing seemingly wrong with local (from a very short assessment and some googling) but for ski hire and snowboard hire your coming in at 3-5 position which is not great. you need to be 1-3.
Have you tested splitting things out? When I type ski hire queenstown in the meta comes:
"Looking forski hireor snowboard hire in Queenstown?"
This tells me that google considers ski and snowboard hire to be different things. So maybe a seperate page covering each and not trying to cram everything into your H1.
Ski Hire Queenstown & Wanaka | Rental Delivery | Snowboard Hire
Also have you tried splitting our QT and W as locations? You'll need a physical location or depot or address in each town but that might help with location specific signals and you can save space by using a headline with something more in it. Like:
Dependable, hassle free ski fitting and hire delivered to you in Wanaka (might just fit on) and then the same for Queenstown. This will make the H1 and SERP entry more attractive and get you to number one with the Click Through rate.
As for Meta descriptions, they take from the first paragraph usually. So get your terms into there in bold or google will just pick them naturally up from the first sentence (or most relevant sentence) you write. They will often be much longer so write a sort of 'featured snippet' as your first paragraph on each page.
But i'd say you need to get more granular with the pages. Without falling foul of maccabees update. So test it and see what happens. If you look above you NZSki and Snowrental are just Queenstown. That could be the key.
Also do some keyword density and top ten benchmarking with these pages and see if there are other problems that you can fix.
God I wish I was there now. Has the season started yet?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
A company claiming to have a proprietary software that replicates Google algorithm?
Hi all, Unfortunately, getting into a bit of a p*ssing match 😞 with a company trying to compete for the business of one of our clients and just wanted to some feedback from the community here. The company competing for the client's business claims to have spent $1 million to replicate Google's algorithm so they create a replica site (not sure I understand this) of the client site, then test and optimize on-page SEO changes in their software to determine whether the on-page changes are ideal. Sounds fishy to me. Thoughts?
Algorithm Updates | | RickyShockley0 -
Meta Descriptions - Google ignores what we have
Hi I still write meta descriptions to help with CTR. I am currently looking at a page where the CTR needs improving. I check the meta on Google SERPs & it isn't pulling through the meta description we have - but other info on the page. This isn't ideal - why does this happen? Will Google just make the decision and are descriptions not worth writing?
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Help for a webstore with Google Warnings for Watermark Images and Panda
I have not had too much experience with helping websites that have been hit by Panda - any tried and tested formulas I can pass to website owner would be great. He does not want to reveal domain name - its in the area of children/baby products 'Web site featured on page 1 of Google search results for many years (website 5 years old- Australian domain) . In April/May 2014, Google suspended our Google Shopping account because we used watermarks on all our images. We were advised that the suspension would remain in place indefinitely or until such time the watermarks were removed. We wrote back to Google to explain that these watermarks were put in place by our store back 2005 with the sole purpose of protecting our intellectual property. Needless to say, their attitude was unwavering. And as a result, revenue plummeted. However, the perfect storm was about to hit our store without warning. In the same month, Panda 4.0 was unleashed and our store was hit once again. This update alone reduced visitor numbers by around 50% overnight. The Panda 4.0 algorithm update was designed to target poor quality, duplicate content and unfortunately we had some of it. We have now begun creating original content with many of the new products we're uploading onto our web site. It's slow and tedious. We have modified our web site to now include a tag on a the home page (this was missing). We have removed many duplicate links from our footer (it was too big and contained hundreds of links that were also repeated from the header). We introduced a blog and we have engaged the services of a local seo company to disavow any bad backlinks and add missing or improve existing content to category and brand pages. No improvement in our situation is yet visible and with Christmas just 3 months away, poor sales during our 'bread and butter' period will mean even tougher times for our store in 2015. ANY PANDA EXPERTS who can help please email me felicity@gardenbeet.com - looking for independent freelancers rather than agencies
Algorithm Updates | | GardenBeet0 -
Is it possible that Google may have erroneous indexing dates?
I am consulting someone for a problem related to copied content. Both sites in question are WordPress (self hosted) sites. The "good" site publishes a post. The "bad" site copies the post (without even removing all internal links to the "good" site) a few days after. On both websites it is obvious the publishing date of the posts, and it is clear that the "bad" site publishes the posts days later. The content thief doesn't even bother to fake the publishing date. The owner of the "good" site wants to have all the proofs needed before acting against the content thief. So I suggested him to also check in Google the dates the various pages were indexed using Search Tools -> Custom Range in order to have the indexing date displayed next to the search results. For all of the copied pages the indexing dates also prove the "bad" site published the content days after the "good" site, but there are 2 exceptions for the very 2 first posts copied. First post:
Algorithm Updates | | SorinaDascalu
On the "good" website it was published on 30 January 2013
On the "bad" website it was published on 26 February 2013
In Google search both show up indexed on 30 January 2013! Second post:
On the "good" website it was published on 20 March 2013
On the "bad" website it was published on 10 May 2013
In Google search both show up indexed on 20 March 2013! Is it possible to be an error in the date shown in Google search results? I also asked for help on Google Webmaster forums but there the discussion shifted to "who copied the content" and "file a DMCA complain". So I want to be sure my question is better understood here.
It is not about who published the content first or how to take down the copied content, I am just asking if anybody else noticed this strange thing with Google indexing dates. How is it possible for Google search results to display an indexing date previous to the date the article copy was published and exactly the same date that the original article was published and indexed?0 -
Will Google discount new gTLDs?
I have the opportunity now to acquire a very desirable generic domain name with either the .org or .pro TLD. Obviously, the .pro version I can get for a far better price. The .org will probably end up being about 10x the price of the .pro. I feel like the .org would give me instant clout while the .pro might raise eyebrows. Also, I'm concerned that Google might also discount these new gTLDs. What do you guys think? Is the perceived authority of the old-time TLDs something worth investing in? Or will this fizzle away over time as the new gTLDs flood the market? THanks! Ira
Algorithm Updates | | iraweissman0 -
Has there been a Google change in the last 24 hours?
We have come in this morning to find our site (paydayuk.co.uk) has suddenly disappeared from their SERPs, we have consistently been ranking in the top 5 for a wide range of search terms but now do not even appear for our brand name of Payday UK where we have been first for many months. Our site is still indexed and we have made no changes for a while as any SEO work is waiting on completion of a CMS system. Looking in https://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/forum/#!categories/webmasters/crawling-indexing--ranking and there seem to be a lot of people having the same issues but as of yet no answers. I'd also like to add we don’t use black hat techniques so we really don’t understand why we have been penalised. Can anyone help please?
Algorithm Updates | | Sarbs0 -
Will signing up for Google Places affect my national rankings
OK, Here is a question which I can't find but think people have thought about. I would like to know others opinion. I have had a site that ranks well under generic national keyword terms. (not geographically specific) Its a small website, only 10 pages. We get 85% of our business from online applications. These applications come from all over the united states.Our SERP rankings generate 70% of all our traffic. My question is this: we operate in a state where we don't do business. We are a virtual business. Should I sign up for google places? Will It hurt my national SERP rankings?
Algorithm Updates | | FidelityOne0 -
Can AJAX implementation affect the rankings in Google Panda?
Hi there, I have the following situation with one of our job sites. We migrate the site to a new application, which is better from design point of view and also usability. For this we use a lot AJAX especially in searches. So every time a user is filtering down their search new results will be shown on the page, at the same url and with no page load. But, having this implementation. affected Bounce rate - which increased from 38% to nearly 60%, PI/visits - which are now half, at 3 and also Avg Time on Site is half that is used to be coming to 2,5 min from nearly 6 min. From Rand post, it is clearly that the content is very important in Google Panda, and all of these parameters we should consider, as it is telling the quality of the content. So, my question will be, can this site be hit by Panda updates (maybe later on) because Bounce Rate, PI/Visits and Avg Time on site, decreased in such way? At the moment we don't measure the Ajax impresion, but as I understood that we can do that though virtual pages in GA, does anyone of you have the experience how to handle this? Won't be this an artificial increase? Thanks, Irina
Algorithm Updates | | InformMedia0