Whats the best practice for internal links?
-
Hi our site is set up typically for a key product (money page) with 6 to 12 cluster pages, with a few more associated blog pages.
If for example the key product was "funeral plans" what percentage of the internal anchor text links should be an exact match?
Will the prominence of those links eg higher up the page have an impact on the amount of juice flowing?
And do links in buttons count in the same way as on page anchor text eg "compare funeral plans"?
Many thanks
Ash -
@AshShep1 Exact Match Anchor Text: Use different types of words for links, not just the exact product name. It's better for search engines.
Where Links Are: Links at the top of the page might get noticed more, but it's more important that they make sense with the rest of the page.
Links in Buttons: Links in buttons work like regular links, so use words that make sense for the link and the button.
-
When you write, say, a long blog post, you might mention many different products that you sell, then you might want to add an internal link to the page, that sells that product.
It helps the customer find products that they might want to buy.
so we need to add internal links to all of these pages.
-
You are welcome
-
That's really helpful
Many thanks for taking the time
Ash
-
The rel=canonical element helps us determine which version of a URL is the original when multiple version of a URL returns the same content. This can happen when, for example, you append a tracking notation to a URL. Two discrete URLs then exist, yet both have identical content. By implementing a rel=canonical, you can tell us the original one, giving us a hint as to where we should place our trust. Do not use this element in place of a proper redirect when moving content.
Take for example the following URLs
- http://over50choices.co.uk/funeral-planning/wills-and-probate
- http://www.over50choices.co.uk/funeral-planning/wills-and-probate
- https://www.over50choices.co.uk/funeral-planning/wills-and-probate
- https://www.over50choices.co.uk/funeral-planning/wills-and-probate?ref=twitter
- https://www.over50choices.co.uk/funeral-planning/wills-and-probate/amp
Each URL is referring to the same page content for Legal Services, however, the URLs themselves are slightly different.
This can be an issue for search engines because the engine itself doesn’t necessarily know which page should be the source of truth, and it may just choose a canonical URL algorithmically for you.
In other words, if you have a web page accessible by multiple URLs, or different pages with similar content (ie. separate mobile and desktop versions), you should specify to a search engine which URL is authoritative (canonical) for that page.
In the Google Search Console, you can find the option to set URL parameters, once your website is verified. What this does is give you the ability to tell Google which parameters you would like to consider passive. What this means is that you can tell Google, “whenever you see this URL parameter, just treat it like it doesn’t exist”.
These are 2 good sources of what I'm talking about Google and Moz
-
Hi Roman
Thank you for your help.
Im looking at the speed issue as well.
None of our pages have the canonical tag on them - why is this so important?
Ash
-
Site: https://www.over50choices.co.uk/ “funeral plans”
Checking on Google there are 1,430 results for that keyword on your site
So that is starting point easy and fastInternal Links
- Input URL: https://www.over50choices.co.uk/funeral-planning/funeral-plans
- Total links: 124
- External links: 19 - (15%) of Total links
- Duplicate links: 45 - (36%) of Total links
- Empty anchor: 0
- No alt tag: 1
- Nofollow count (Line-through): 1
According to the On-Page Grader Tool
https://analytics.moz.com/pro/research/page-graderThese are some basic points to improve
- Avoid Keyword Stuffing
- Keyword Placement in Page Title
- Optimal Use of Keywords in Header Tags
- Includes a Rel Canonical Tag ----> This is very Important
-
I made a quick audit of your website and will make some assumptions
This is your flagship page
https://www.over50choices.co.uk/funeral-planning/funeral-plansAs I see you already have a good backlink profile but suddenly you have been losing ranks these are some advice to you
- check the spam score of all your backlinks (Here on Moz is called Spam Score on Semrush is Called Toxic Score)
- build internal links (I will assume that you are working on that right now)
- disavow all the useless links
- build new backlinks
Also, I notice a Drop on ranks on October (Ahref rank) keeping in mind that you are in a competitive niche all the details are important
- You need to figure out how to improve your user experience, making a quick test on PageSpeed there are several small tasks that you can perform to improve it (Enable the compression, Leverage, Browser Cache) By itself will not show a big impact but the summary of all of them can show a big impact. AMP can give you more visibility on mobile devices
-
Thank you for your detailed answer, its much appreciated.
Our site is www.over50choices.co.uk is well established with a national presence.
We have 5 or 6 "cornerstone" products and until recently have been successful with most of them through natural search, we do v little PPC.
We have seen "funeral plans" and "over 50 life insurance" rankings drop from top half of page 1 to bottom/page 2 positions which of course impacts our earnings.
Our site has always been set up in the way that you suggest, so the reason for my questions are because we have been looking at ways to squeeze every last bit of juice we can and more recently have read about the importance of internal links, so was keen to understand whether the sidebar site wide links was not the most effective way to structure the site going forwards?
They have always been there but if google has changed the rules recently i was wondering whether this is what could be hurting us.
We have started a review of internal links for these products as we have so many and the early findings are that we could do with some tidying up but nothing major.
All of our other long tail keywords are still performing well, so its just the big keywords that generate a lot of our income that have dropped.
Does this info help shed any more light on why they may have dropped?
Thanks
Ash
-
Just to clarify then, having to say 300 links all with the same anchor text and most with an exact match to the main keyword/product is ok?
I will assume that you want to rank your site for the keyword funeral plans
I'll explain exactly what I would doBut first, you need to be clear in some basic concepts
The structure of a website and your internal link is of great importance for its
chances to rank in search engines. For two main reasons:1 A decent structure and internal linking make sure Google ‘understands’ your site.
2 A decent structure makes sure you do not compete with your own content.Important terms and definitions that you have to keep in mind to understand what I'm doing
Keyword research (I will assume that you already did it and you know what is)
Long tail keywords in your case these are some examplesprepaid funeral plans - Volume 100 - Keyword Difficulty: 08
cost of prepaid funeral plans - Volume 50 - Keyword Difficulty: 07
low-cost funeral plans - Volume 40 - Keyword Difficulty: 04Landing pages are the main pages through which visitors enter your
website.In this case, I will assume you are a local business
so one of your landing pages will look like thisAll depends on your site structure and your content
Cornerstone contents are the most important articles or pages on your website.
This is the content that exactly reflects your business. These articles
should be relatively high in your site structure. In most cases, the
homepage directly links to these pages or articlesIn affiliate marketing, this content is called Money Pages
Definition: A piece of content that is monetized in some fashion, such as
promoting products as an affiliate, capturing leads to sell them to a
3rd party or heavy advertisement.Here on Moz is called 10X content
https://moz.com/blog/how-to-create-10x-content-whiteboard-fridayWhat is cornerstone content?
https://yoast.com/what-is-cornerstone-content/So instead on focus on anchor text or internal links or link counts
the first question and the most important that you need to answer is- What is your main content?
- What is your business about?
So if you provide funeral plans on a specific location
all your business needs to be focused on that ( SEO, PPC, Social Media) all your internal links will be focused on those pages. You don't just start to build internal link just because you read an article about it. **I need to have a goal in mind **Example
Title: Affordable Funeral Plans Miami - Title
URL: wwww.yourwebsite.com/funeral-plans/So this what I would do on your case
- **Define your cornerstone content (Your internal links will point to these) **
- **Make a keyword research looking for all closed related term of your main keyword **
- Building internal links to those pages using the keywords above (main+secondary)
- Make almost perfect On-page optimization
- Add Schemas to that page to add even more visibility
- **Add Amp version of that page **
- **Finally, build some back-links to those pages **
Hope this info helps you to answer your question
-
Yes its in the sidebar.
Just to clarify then, having say 300 links all with the same anchor text and most with an exact match to the main keyword/product is ok ?
Also if say i have an internal link in the main body of content for one of the pages linked that is also in the sidebar which will google take as the primary link eg sidebar link is "over 50 life insurance" and link in page content is "compare life insurance" both going to the same page?
Ash
-
I'm assuming that you are talking about a widget when you say "Quick Links Boxes" in the sidebar or in the footer or any other specific area. There's no need to remove them but you need to keep in mind that all those links will make those pages outstand over other pages.
So your main question is this. Do you want to make those pages your **10X content (Most relevant pages) **If the answer is positive keep the Link Box if not just remove it.
-
HI Roman
Thank you for your answer.
We also have site wide "Quick Links" boxes on most pages where we have a list of anchor text with links eg
- Equity Release Calculator
- Compare funeral plans
- Affordable Health Insurance
- Over 50 Life Insurance
These are in addition to on page text links.
So google will see hundreds of links coming in to these key pages all with the same anchor text - should we continue with this or remove them?
Regards
Ash
-
If for example, the key product was "funeral plans" what percentage of the internal anchor text links should be an exact match? there is no static rule about it, so your starting point will be your own Search Console Account and your GA Account
Unlike external links, where over-optimization of anchor text is manipulative and can lead to penalties, internal links should have optimized anchor text. Using keyword-rich anchor text is helpful to both search crawlers and users clicking the link.
My advice is to select all your target keyword and all the close variation and start to create internal links on this way
**Check your most relevant pages **
1. Pages that had high traffic and PA. You can find these in Google Analytics, Search Console and Ahrefs
2. Pages where the keyword already existed unlinked. You can use this query to find such pages: Site:[yoursite.com] “funeral plans”In your case, searching for “funeral plans” will show you a number of mentions
After making a list of these pages add internal links by hand. (This is my personal option other people use tools, plugins or whatever) These new links from established posts showed Google that you thought of this page as “important.”Will the prominence of those links eg higher up the page has an impact on the amount of juice flowing?
First and foremost, internal links are important because they help search engines better understand your site.
A large number of internal links pointing to a specific page signal that page is important and helps search engines determine which pages to return in their search results.
Sometimes a broader category page will rank above a specific product page for a query about that specific product — this is less than ideal.
For example, a company that sells different types of bats could see their general “Bats” category page ranking above their “Softball bats” page for the query [cheap softball bats]. Internally linking to the “Softball bats” page could help Google recognize it should be returning that page for the given query.
And do links in buttons count in the same way as on page anchor text eg "compare funeral plans"? It will help you to pass link juice to your page but it will not help Google to understand the content of that page (It will not help you to rank for your target keyword)
** I hope this info helps you to answer your question**
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to deal with parameter URLs as primary internal links and not canonicals? Weird situation inside...
So I have a weird situation, and I was hoping someone could help. This is for an ecommerce site. 1. Parameters are used to tie Product Detail Pages (PDP) to individual categories. This is represented in the breadcrumbs for the page and the use of a categoryid. One product can thus be included in multiple categories. 2. All of these PDPs have a canonical that does not include the parameter / categoryid. 3. With very few exceptions, the canonical URL for the PDPs are not linked to. Instead, the parameter URL is to tie it to a specific category. This is done primarily for the sake of breadcrumbs it seems. One of the big issues we've been having is the canonical URLs not being indexed for a lot of the products. In some instances, the canonicals _are _indexed alongside parameters, or just parameter URLs are indexed. It's all very...mixed up, I suppose. My theory is that the majority of canonical URLs not being linked to anywhere on the site is forcing Google to put preference on the internal link instead. My problem? **I have no idea what to recommend to the client (who will not change the parameter setup). ** One of our Technical SEOs recommended we "Use cookies instead of parameters to assign breadcrumbs based on how the PDP is accessed." I have no experience this. So....yeah. Any thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alces0 -
What Are Internal Linking Best Practices For Blogs?
We have a blog for our e-commerce site. We are posting about 4-5 blog posts a month, most of them 1500+ words. Within the content, we have around 10-20 links pointing out to other blog posts or products/categories on our site. Except for the products/categories, the links use non-optimized generic anchor text (i.e guide, sizing tips, planning resource). Are there any issues or problems as far as SEO with this practice? Thank You
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kekepeche0 -
How to best add affiliate links in a way that minimizes panda risk?
We have a site of about 100.000 pages that is getting several million of visitors per year via organic search. We plan to add about 50.000 new pages gradually in the next couple of months and would like to add affiliate links to the new pages. All these 50.000 new pages will have unique quality data that a team has been researching for a while. I would like to add in the area under the fold or towards the end of the pages in an unobstrusive way affiliate links to about 5 different affiliate programs with affiliate links customized to page content and of real value to visitors. Since affiliate links are one of the factors that may trigger panda I am a bit nervous whether we should add the affiliate links and if there is any way of implementing the affiliate links in a way that they may be less likely to trigger panda. E.g. would you consider hiding affiliate links from google by linking to intermediate URL (which I would mark as noindex nofolllow) on our domain which then redirects to the final affiliate landing page (but google may notice via chrome or android data) ? Any other idea?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lcourse0 -
First Link on Page Still Only Link on Page?
Bruce Clay and others did some research and found that the first link on the page is the most important and what is accredited as the link. Any other links on the page mean nothing. Is this still true? And in that case, on an ecommerce site with category links in the top navigation (which is high on the code), is it not useful to link to categories in the content of the page? Because the category is already linked to on that page. Thank you, Tyler
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tylerfraser0 -
Best way to link 150 websites together
Fellow mozzers, Today I got an interesting question from an entrepreneur who has plans to start about 100-200 webshops on a variety of subjects. His question was how he should like them together. He was scared that if he would just make a page on every website like: www.domain.com/our-webshops/ that would list all of the webshops he would get penalised because it is a link farm. I wasn't sure 100% sure which advise to give him so i told him i needed to do some research on the subject to make sure that i'm right. I had a couple of suggestions myself. 1. Split the amount of pages by 3 and divide them into three columns. Column A links to B, B links to C and C links to A. I realize this is far from ideal but it was one of the thoughts which came up. 2. Divide all the webshops into different categories. For example: Webshops aimed at different holidays, webshops aimed at mobile devices etcetera. This way you will link the relevant webshops together instead of all of them. Still not perfect. 3. Create a page on a separate website (such as a company website) where the /our-webshops/ page exists. This way you only have to place a link back from the webshops to this page. I've seen lots of webshops using this technique and i can see why they choose to do so. Still not ideal in my opinion. That's basicly my first thoughts on the subject. I would appreciate any feedback on the methods described above or even better, a completely different strategy in handling this. For some reason i keep thinking that i'm missing the most obvious and best method. 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WesleySmits0 -
Best way to find broken links on a large site?
I've tried using Xenu, but this is a bit time consuming because it only tells you if the link sin't found & doesn't tell you which pages link to the 404'd page. Webmaster tools seems a bit dated & unreliable. Several of the links it lists as broken aren't. Does anyone have any other suggestions for compiling a list of broken links on a large site>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline1 -
How Google treat internal links with rel="nofollow"?
Today, I was reading about NoFollow on Wikipedia. Following statement is over my head and not able to understand with proper manner. "Google states that their engine takes "nofollow" literally and does not "follow" the link at all. However, experiments conducted by SEOs show conflicting results. These studies reveal that Google does follow the link, but does not index the linked-to page, unless it was in Google's index already for other reasons (such as other, non-nofollow links that point to the page)." It's all about indexing and ranking for specific keywords for hyperlink text during external links. I aware about that section. It may not generate in relevant result during any keyword on Google web search. But, what about internal links? I have defined rel="nofollow" attribute on too many internal links. I have archive blog post of Randfish with same subject. I read following question over there. Q. Does Google recommend the use of nofollow internally as a positive method for controlling the flow of internal link love? [In 2007] A: Yes – webmasters can feel free to use nofollow internally to help tell Googlebot which pages they want to receive link juice from other pages
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CommercePundit
_
(Matt's precise words were: The nofollow attribute is just a mechanism that gives webmasters the ability to modify PageRank flow at link-level granularity. Plenty of other mechanisms would also work (e.g. a link through a page that is robot.txt'ed out), but nofollow on individual links is simpler for some folks to use. There's no stigma to using nofollow, even on your own internal links; for Google, nofollow'ed links are dropped out of our link graph; we don't even use such links for discovery. By the way, the nofollow meta tag does that same thing, but at a page level.) Matt has given excellent answer on following question. [In 2011] Q: Should internal links use rel="nofollow"? A:Matt said: "I don't know how to make it more concrete than that." I use nofollow for each internal link that points to an internal page that has the meta name="robots" content="noindex" tag. Why should I waste Googlebot's ressources and those of my server if in the end the target must not be indexed? As far as I can say and since years, this does not cause any problems at all. For internal page anchors (links with the hash mark in front like "#top", the answer is "no", of course. I am still using nofollow attributes on my website. So, what is current trend? Will it require to use nofollow attribute for internal pages?0