Should I noindex user-created fundraising pages?
-
Hello Moz community!
I work for a nonprofit where users are able to create their own fundraising pages on the website for supporters to directly donate. Some of them are rarely used, others get updated frequently by the host. There are likely a ton of these on our site. Moz crawl says we have ~54K pages, and when I do a "site:[url]" search on Google, 90% of the first 100 results are fundraising pages.
These are not controlled by our staff members, but I'm wondering if meta noindexing these pages could have a big effect on our SEO rankings. Has anyone tried anything similar or know if this strategy could have legs for our site?
My only concern is whether users wouldn't be able to find their fundraising page in our Google CSE implemented on the website.
Any insight you fine folks could provide would be greatly appreciated!
-
I'd tread very carefully here as thing 1 and thing 2 seem to contradict each other at face value. You're right, Google can send traffic to a site in ways other than keywords, but it's not the norm. The next thing I'd look at is, hmm - how are we tracking keyword rankings? Is it an online, cloud based rank tracker that relies on you specifying all of (and all of the right) keywords to track? Most of those trackers track between 50 and 300 KWs (daily, weekly) but it's not uncommon for such sites to have 10,000+ keywords contributing. If they're not all in there, it's a bad sample you are looking at. Connect Google Search Console to Google Analytics. let it run for a few weeks, analyse the 'search query' data from within Google Analytics (which can be done once it's all hooked up). GSC only lets you export 1k keywords (usually, sometimes it can be more) but GA will take 5k and that's much better for your analysis. You might be surprised to find, those pages rank for more keywords than you thought. maybe hundreds of little ones, instead of a few big ones
-
Effectdigital is right in looking at your analytics and backlinks to help make this decision.
In the Moz case study we referenced earlier, they were getting rid of pages that didn't provide value at all to anyone. Those pages probably didn't have any links pointing to them at all. So it made sense to get rid of them.
Since your pages are providing value (it seems) and your getting 1/3 of your traffic coming into those pages, we would tread carefully on meta noindexing them.
You might only consider meta noindexing a group of them that haven't brought in any traffic this whole year and that don't have any links pointing to them. That way, you won't lose any existing traffic that your getting but you can see if the trimming helps your site's overall traffic and rankings.
-
Appreciate the word of caution, I'm relatively new and am looking for well-rounded opinions about the repercussions such a massive move could make for our site. As a response:
Thing #1: We don't have many fundraising pages that rank highly for keywords, as we're still working on juicing up our regular site pages as is to improve in the SERP results. I was mainly wondering whether the glut of fundraising pages could be harming our SERP results. Some certainly have duplicate content but that's beyond our control, and I'm not sure if that could significantly be harming our results. Any thoughts on that?
Thing #2: Great call on checking the data. YTD nearly 1/3 of our user sessions have landed on one of these fundraising pages. I'm guessing that's likely either the hosts using google to find their page and then subsequently log in, or friends searching for it on google and then navigating and donating. We do still have a Google Custom Search Engine on our site. Presumably people could find them that way?
If you have any additional opinions or feedback given what I detailed above, I'd very much appreciate it!
-
Be VERY careful
Thing #1) Just because you stop Google indexing and crawling some pages, that doesn't mean they will give that same traffic (keywords linking to those pages) to other URLs on your site. They may decide that your other URLs, do not satisfy the specific keywords connecting with the fundraiser URLs
Thing#2) CHECK. Go onto Google Analytics and actually check what percentage of your Google traffic (and overall traffic, I guess) comes specifically through these URLs. If it's like 2-3%, no big deal. If most of your traffic comes to and lands on these pages, no-indexing them all could be the single largest mistake you'll ever make
Blog posts and articles are fun but no substitute for checking your own, real, actual, factual data. Always always do that
-
Thanks! I've been wondering about it for awhile and actually stumbled upon this very article today - which prompted the question
-
Britney Muller, with Moz, did just that when she meta noindexed over 70,000 low quality profile pages created by users. As a result, Moz saw an increase in organic users, almost 9% the following month and then they saw a lift of 13.7% year-over-year for organic traffic the following month.
You can read all about it or watch the interview about it here: https://www.getcredo.com/britney-muller/
We think it's worth a try for sure.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Which is the better keyword strategy? Specifying page or seeing what ranks?
I recently began using another third-party tool that requires a list of keywords and the URLs I want those keywords to rank on (for example, "vegetarian recipes" on www.123.com/vegetarian-recipes). Is this a better strategy than using the Moz ranking tool to see which pages on my domain my target keywords are already ranking for? I can see how the former might mean we miss opportunities but the latter doesn't necessarily show how my priority pages are doing for specific keywords.
Moz Pro | | RikkiAyers1 -
Should I set blog category/tag pages as "noindex"? If so, how do I prevent "meta noindex" Moz crawl errors for those pages?
From what I can tell, SEO experts recommend setting blog category and tag pages (ie. "http://site.com/blog/tag/some-product") as "noindex, follow" in order to keep the page quality of indexable pages high. However, I just received a slew of critical crawl warnings from Moz for having these pages set to "noindex." Should the pages be indexed? If not, why am I receiving critical crawl warnings from Moz and how do I prevent this?
Moz Pro | | NichGunn0 -
Crawl diagnostics incorrectly reporting duplicate page titles
Hi guys, I have a question in regards to the duplicate page titles being reported in my crawl diagnostics. It appears that the URL parameter "?ctm" is causing the crawler to think that duplicate pages exist. In GWT, we've specified to use the representative URL when that parameter is used. It appears to be working, since when I search site:http://www.causes.com/about?ctm=home, I am served a single search result for www.causes.com/about. That begs the question, why is the SEOMoz crawler saying there is duplicate page titles when Google isn't (doesn't appear under the HTML improvements for duplicate page titles)? A canonical URL is not used for this page so I'm assuming that may be one reason why. The only other thing I can think of is that Google's crawler is simply "smarter" than the Moz crawler (no offense, you guys put out an awesome product!). Any help is greatly appreciated and I'm looking forward to being an active participant in the Q&A community! Cheers, Brad
Moz Pro | | brad_dubs0 -
Blog Page URLs Showing Duplicate Content
On the SEOMoz Crawl Diagnostics, we are receiving information that we have duplicate page content for the URL Blog pages. For Example: blog/page/33/ blog/page/34/ blog/page/35/ blog/page/36/ These are older post in our blog. Moz is saying that these are duplicate content. What is the best way to fix the URL structure of the pages?
Moz Pro | | _Thriveworks0 -
SEOmoz tools: Keyword Difficuty + On-page Analysis
To analyse the current KWD situation. I would want to see the top 10 results link metrics (as in Keyword Difficulty & SERP Analysis) and each page's On page score (as in On-page Analysis) for the keyword. Those two figures would give me a pretty good picture of the current situation. Kind regards,
Moz Pro | | OscarSE0 -
Reports for page titles
Is there a report I can run on SEOmoz that shows me the page titles for all pages on my website, along with the link to each page?
Moz Pro | | TalarMade0 -
I am looking to create keyword reports filtered by labels
We have roughly 800 keywords and I have created labels for the different groups of keywords. What I would like to do is have weekly or monthly reports sent to me based on the labels associated with the individual keywords. Any ideas on how I can do this? Thanks David
Moz Pro | | DavidRFrank0 -
Pass Page LinkJuice? Or Pass Keyword LinkJuice?
I have a popular page that is not one of the three pages that I am hoping to raise awareness of (want to focus on). The dilemma I am trying to understand is that I really don't want to encourage all the flow from the popular to ONE of my hopeful pages (focus pages). Rather, I want to focus the keyword portions of that page to help the three hopeful pages. So I consider the rel=canonical tag.... err no. rel=canonical would pass ALL my popular page link juice to ONE of my three hopeful pages. What's the best way to pass the keyword link juice relevant to each of my three hopeful pages their, um, portion, of the popular page link juice. I'm white hat by preference. All four pages are good legitimate landing pages, and of course I dread sabotaging the popularity of what is working. Suggestions? Advice?
Moz Pro | | iansears0