Can't figure out how my competitor has so many links
-
I suspect something possibly black-hat is going on with the amount of inbound links for www.pacificlifestylehomes.com ( http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=www.pacificlifestylehomes.com ) mainly because they have such a large volume of links (for my industry) with their exact targeted keyword.
Can anyone help clear this up for me?
-
Spend your time and money focused on generated incredible CONTENT not buying links.
You or someone who works for the site can be reaching out to become a solid member of the housing community. Newspapers, government agencies, builders and others all write about housing. Find out what the current hot topics are and write about them.
Don't write the standard "I need a 500 word SEO article" type of internet junk. Forget about your company. Write the best, most sincerely helpful article you can think of regarding a housing topic. "The Importance of Researching Local Schools Before Buying a Home", "Building a Truly Green Home", "Home Improvements that Add Value", etc.
Write an article that talks about something people will WANT to link to. Talk about something YOU would link to if you even found it on a competitor's site. The value of your competitors links were not that strong. I don't recall any links from DA 7x sites. You can earn those kind of links with a high quality article.
-
Ryan,
Thanks so much for this breakdown - those settings in OSE make sense and are very helpful. I wish I didn't have to buy links like they apparently did, but in the housing industry the bulk of organic links companies get are either branded to the company's name or they just say 'website'. Why can't everyone understand SEO??
-
Hi Christopher.
When using OSE, I always set the top filters as follows:
Show followed + 301 - I only wish to see followed links which help DA/PA
links from only external - internal links are not helpful for my backlink analysis
pages to pages on this root domain - usually I wish to see all links to the domain and not just links to the given page
and group by domain - usually I am trying to learn which domains are providing the link and do not need to see each individual link
Before applying the filter I notice the site has 4646 total links from 51 domains. That's an average of close to 100 links per domain. With a high link average it's common to find some site-wide links. Site-wide links muddy the waters a bit and make it difficult to see the links which offer value. You can work hard, obtain 50 links from 50 domains and then obtain one site-wide footer link from a 10k page forum site which has little value, but then your backlink profile will show 10,050 links from 51 domains.
With the above in mind I apply the filter and see this site only has links from 44 domains. That is not a large number. When I scanned the link I noticed a michigan.gov link which stood out, but when I tried to follow the link it is to a file. The Linkscape index upon which OSE is dependent had an issue with the last crawl of the web and some files showed links which are not actually there. This issue should be resolved during the next crawl.
Many of the remaining links appear to be from a network of classified ad sites. When I check the first OSE link www.vancouverclassifieds.com/ it shows the "Custom New Homes Portland" anchor text at the top of the page. As you can see from the backlink profile, this link appears on many of the other network classified sites. The site presents itself as a free classified ad site and I could not find anywhere which mentioned how to pay or otherwise receive an anchor link in that location. Either I missed something, or this site owner has a friend or otherwise paid someone to receive a link in that location.
As I look at other sites, the links seem to be paid links that are not otherwise obvious. They are links from sidebars such as found at http://oregoncatalyst.com/. There is no apparent reason for the link.
You could try contacting the sites and ask what you can do to earn a link like your competitor. The answer you receive may offer further clarity.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO Links in Footer?
Hi, One of my clients uses a pretty powerful SEO tool, won't mention the name. They now have a "link equity" tool, which they are using on a lot of their client's sites, which include tons of fortune 500 companies. It involves add footer links to your site that change based on the content of the page they are on. The machine learning tries to figure out the most related pages and links to them with the heading tag of that page as the anchor text. Initially this sounds very spammy to me. But then, it seems a lot like "related products" tools that many companies use. The goal for this tool is to build up internal linking, especially for deeper pages on their site. They have over 10,000 currently. What are everyone's thoughts on this strategy?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | vetofunk2 -
Is a Link Wheel Safe If I Control the Wheel?
Hi, folks. Our company operates over 50 disease-specific, nice websites. Currently, we're building resource/landing pages for some therapies and other related topics. One experimental therapy is being investigated across four different disease types: cystic fibrosis, Muscular Dystrophy, Hemophilia, and cancers. We have sites for all of them, and have created original landing pages for each site. Question: is it safe / does it make sense to "link wheel" these pages, especially since the wheel is composed of all our own sites? The other option of course is to simply interlink all of them, but will I get more visibility with a cyclical linking scheme? I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Michael_Nace1 -
Disappearing Links Black Hat ?
I have seen reports of Black hat spamming with dodgy links but we have another issue with a clients site. The site had a small number of solid following links about 60 which had been in place for years and in the past few weeks all but those directly under their control have ceased to link. At the same time a very aggressive competitor has entered their market which is owned by the officers of an SEO company. Could it be that they have somehow disavowed the links to the site to damage it how do we find out? there are now just 10 following links?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Eff-Commerce0 -
Can I Use Meta NoIndex to Block Unwanted Links?
I have a forum thread on my site that is completely user generated, not spammy at all, but it is attracting about 45 backlinks from really spammy sites. Usually when this happens, the thread is created by a spammer and I just 404 it. But in this instance, the thread is completely legit, and I wouldn't want to 404 it because users could find it useful. If I add a meta noindex, nofollow tag to the header, will the spammy pagerank still be passed? How best can I protect myself from these low quality backlinks? I don't want to get slapped by Penguin! **Note: I cannot find contact information from the spam sites and it's in a foreign language.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | TMI.com0 -
Lot of new suspicious external links
I am running a small-language site and suddenly saw a lot of incoming English links in Moz Reports and Opensiteexplorer from various domains (the sites are in English, but anchor words are not). When I check the page sources of there is no link to the site (as there shouldn't). Any idea what is happening and what to do about it? Thanks for help in advance!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | tjr0 -
What to do if you've been hacked.....
Just logged into our CMS system and it appears we have been hacked. All page titles have been hijacked adding a secondary title tag linking out to website http://emapaydayloans.com with anchor text pay day loans. Our Web Dev team are working on fixing the hack now. My concern is the potential knock on effect to SEO. This looks like a bad neighbourhood site: 3 pages indexed PR 0 And for I don't know how long we've had almost every page on all our domains linking out with the following page title including the same link and anchor text: payday loans I assume its a wait and see at this stage.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RobertChapman0 -
Should I 301 Redirect a Site with an 'Unnatural Link' Warning?
Hey Fellow Mozzers, I have recently been approached by a new client that has been issued with an 'Unnatural Link' warning and lost almost all of their rankings. Open Site Explorer shows a ton of spammy links all using main keyword anchor text and there are way too many of them to even consider manually getting them removed. There are two glimmers of hope for the client; The first is that the spammy links are dropping off at a rate of about 25 per week; The second is that they own both the .com and the .co.uk domain for their business. I would really appreciate some advice on the best way to handle this, should I :- Wait it out for some of the spammy links to drop off whilst at the same time pushing social media and build some good clean links using the URL and brand as anchor text? Then submit a recosideration request? Switch the website over from the .com domain to the .co.uk domain and carry out a 301 redirect? Switch the website over from the .com to the .co.uk without doing a redirect and start again for the client with a clean slate? I would still register an address change via Webmaster Tools. Add a duplicate site on the .co.uk domain. Leave the .com site in place but rel="canonical" the entire domain over to the .co.uk Any advice would be very much apprecited. Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | AdeLewis
Ade.0 -
Too many links with the same Anchor-text?
My first question at SeoMoz: Recently my gambling site has been experimenting a subtle yo-yo effect for our most sought-after keyword. A month ago we legitimately added a PR-6 inbound link with that keyword (tragamonedas) from an institutional site of our own development. We are worried that google might have regarded that move as an illegitimate link acquisition, since those apparent troubles with our keyword appear to have started right after that link was processed. Is it too late to change the anchor text, in case that action might deliver positive results? Also, we might have focused too much on the very same keyword in our link building campaign. Can a constant repetition of the same anchor harm our indexing reputation? Thank you in advance and good SEO luck, Andi.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | castano0