High PR networks look like they are gaining traction - and working!
-
Let me put a disclaimer here that I do not use high PR networks in any of my seo endeavors. That being said, they have always looked attractive - especially post panda where in content links from high pr websites are valuable.
I run seo campaigns for a large lot of websites & have been noticing my competition creeping past me who are using links from these networks to increase their positions for hard to attain keywords.
Has anyone here had experience building links using these types of networks? It looks like they are under google's radar for now & are a great way to get some powerful links to your site. Any thoughts on if google will catch onto these types of links if they are properly protected (limited footprint, revolving links, unique content, etc.)?
It's tough not to be at least interested in networks like this b/c of the results they provide.
-
I want to say that I 100% agree with Ryan, but I will play devil's advocate.
There is a time and place for everything, including black hat SEO. If your goals are well-aligned with short term success, then black hat SEO is probably the cheapest and most effective option you have. To me, link building isn't an ethical consideration, but a business decision. If black hat tactics fit my goals, or my clients' goals, and everybody is aware of the risk involved and all of the options at play, then why not?
There's no doubt about it - these are paid links, and as Ryan said, they will eventually be addressed by Google's Webspam team, and when that happens, you're going to lose a large share of your link portfolio (at best) or receive a penalty (at worst). But there is no Matt Cutts fairy that haunts black hatters at night, preying on them as they dream of paid links and content farms. It's economics, plain and simple. I don't know what industry you are in or what your exact situation is, so it would be presumptuous of me to completely rule out black hat SEO strategies.
That said, I've yet to encounter a situation where I've needed to resort to black hat tactics, for personal projects or client work. Just sayin...
-
Do you feel something like this, if done right, will be "busted" by Google?
Of course it will. It's only a matter of time.
Many people refer to Google as a nameless, faceless group. People often refer to "the government" in a similar manner. The Google spam team, headed by Matt Cutts, is a highly educated, experienced and savvy group of people. They are also very patient. Time is on their side. When they find a violation, there is no rush for them to quickly take action. They could choose to study sites for months to gather further information.
So how does one person or group run these 35-55 sites in a cost effective manner? The only possibility is all these sites need to be offered by one host. Each host is assigned their own C block, but some companies offer "seo hosting". I don't know for sure how it works but I imagine they pay for rack space to have their servers hosted with dozens of ISPs, thereby acquiring numerous C blocks.
Google can easily open one account with any one of these companies, capture all the IPs, then effectively take down every site on the network. The entire idea of "seo hosting" is to manipulate search engine results, so it is definitely a black hat technique.
You are always welcome to report any paid links or other information to Google. They do listen. It's important your report is not a "this site is outranking me and I don't like it" type of report. I have read Google's forums and it seems MANY of the complaints take that exact tone. You need to offer very specific, verifiable reasons as to why you believe the links are a violation of Google's policies. Your suspicions and feelings are not of value and will be received with the standard "thank you for your report and we will investigate the matter" and that will probably be the end of it. But if you can offer a thorough, logical analysis, then you are making it easy for the Spam Team to investigate the issue.
-
Sorry, I should have been more specific with my initial question. A high PR network is a privately owned network of websites each hosted on different class c ip addresses, with unique or private whois information, no website footprint between the sites (the html structure / layout of each site is different), and all reflecting good PR ranging from 3-7 with no historical large fluctuations in PR.
Owners of these networks will sell in-content homepage text link advertisements for a monthly fee ranging from $80 per month to $150 per month. A network usually consists of 35-55 websites and the link to your site using your targeted keyword would be made available on each site, usually with a unique content "blurb" on each website of about 150 words. If you stop payment, your link is removed from the entire network.
This is a very "black hat" technique to attain rankings but it appears to be working well for huge serp gains. Do you feel something like this, if done right, will be "busted" by Google? It's not fair to engage in ethical SEO and be circumvented by the black hatters!
-
Can you be more specific about what you mean by "high PR networks"? Are you talking about Web 2.0 websites like Squidoo? Or microsites / linkwheels? I'm a bit confused.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I earned some high-quality backlinks, but the target page's ranking is not improving. Why?
Within the last three months, I acquired five .EDU backlinks and two editorial links to a page ranking for a competitive keyword. After the first few links came through, the page jumped from #15 to #7. It stayed there with minor fluctuations for a couple weeks. I earned a couple more good links, and the page fell as far as #44. It has recovered a bit then, but has not returned to the first page. It is worth noting that the .EDU links were achieved by sponsoring university programs. Could Google possibly be recognizing this as a link scheme? Are the links being earned too quickly? I don't believe it could be either, as the links reside on high quality, trustworthy sites and there wasn't a sudden major influx of them. Thank you for your insight! Also, I think my username tricked Moz into thinking I'm a staffer. Not the case!
Link Building | | StevenLevine0 -
Need advice: How to replace a high-ranking pdf with a landing page -- without dropping much in rank?
Hi! We have a pdf of a white paper on our site that ranks #1 for a niche term. We are now exploring the idea of building a landing page for this paper with an overview (2-3 paragraphs) and a registration form for interested parties to fill out in order to access the paper. Do you think there'd be any hope of ensuring the new landing page would rank almost as well eventually (top 3)? I'm thinking a key consideration would be preserving the link juice from the existing links that are coming into the pdf, and that 301 redirecting the pdf URL to the new landing page URL could help with that. Am I right? Or would it be better to try to reach out to the linking sites and ask them to update their links (seems daunting). Any advice/opinions on this situation would be appreciated. (If folks think that there would be a significant risk of permanently dropping out of the top 5 by attempting this, we would likely choose to leave the pdf ungated as is.) Thanks!! -John
Link Building | | jomosi0 -
Subpage PR4, No PR increase on Homepage - what gives?
This subpage gained a PR4 (was PR5) from external links. http://tinyurl.com/a24ghh9 It only has 5 links, including 2 links to the site's homepage. The homepage was PR2 before this subpage was published, and still is even after 2 PR updates. I'm surprised the PageRank that should be flowing from this subpage to the homepage hasn't increased the homepage PR to at least 3. Assuming each level of toolbar PR is 10x the one before, a PR4 subpage with 5 links should pass more than enough PR to the homepage to bump it from PR2 to PR3, right? Any ideas? Does Google have a really strong decay on how much PR gets passed from subpages to homepages? This is somewhat troubling to me, as it poses a problem for the "attract links to your content pages and your homepage and money pages will rise with the tide" approach.
Link Building | | AdamThompson0 -
How to do SEO for a social networking site?
Howdy SEOmoz fans, We are about to launch an educational social networking site. We have planned a lot of good strategies for offline and online marketing. Coming to SEO, how we can do search engine optimization effectively for our social networking site. The home page will be sign up page and there wont be any content in it. It would be great if you can suggest us prefect SEO tactics for our site. Thank you.
Link Building | | jjv0 -
Why am is my PR # dropping after signing up for quality directories?
I have followed the suggestion regarding quality inbound linking from reputable sites....ie open directory, yahoo, and only directories recommended by other SEO groups and only with PR's of 4 or higher. After listing, my PR # went down. How do I find the culprit to start reversing this? My fear is I am on a downward slope..Thanks!
Link Building | | cschwartzel0 -
3-Way Link Exchange Method - Does it Work?
Hello People, I have been searching for a service to help us with our link building and have been talking to a company that uses the 3-Way link exchange method and my question is: Does it work well? Below I pasted an email from this company explaining their method. Thanks in advance to everyone! =============================== Our success rate is about 80%. For one way links, we use 3 way link exchange method for making links. Suppose your site is A. My website is B. My friends website is C and friend's client's site is D. I will add a link on B linking to D and my friend will add a link on C linking to A. This is the procedure we use for making links. We check the quality of the website before putting link on it. The site will be completely relevant, no spam links will present there and the page will be minimum of PR1. ================================
Link Building | | k9byron0 -
How do paid directories like thomasnet.com do so well in the serps? Aren't the Panda updates supposed to be moving us away from this?
With all of the updates/changes to Google's algo, I assumed that paid listings & links like those on thomasnet.com would have less merit. Is this an incorrect assumption?
Link Building | | PropelMike0 -
PR in deeper pages
Hi, I got a question, a main domain from one site that link to me is PR 6 and deeper pages has no PR, i know this occur because the deeper pages are new. I just want to know if this deeper pages give to me a good backlink quality even it has no PR like main domain?
Link Building | | Ex20