What would you pick? Species/Breed or Topic
-
If you'd like to take a look, the site under quesiton is http://ArkAnimals.Com. At the moment I am considering doing landing pages by topics and not by the type of animals. I will be blending both wild and domestic animals but how to best do this is confusing since so much has changed over the years.
My competitors are focusing on animal types mainly and competition is fierce. Also the site attracts by three main topics not specific animals--so I want to be a bit unique which is why I am considering a topic driven focus.
What would you recommend?
Background
This site has been online since 1994 and on its own domain for a long while. However, over time it has suffered from a lot of things--different designers, expansion, movement of content to niche sites and bad seo. LOL
Once everything was on one site with sub directories. Then, it expanded and my online advisors recommended moving topics off into their own niche sites. So, I did that. Ugh.
Now, much of that content is being integrated back as I am undergoing an intense revamp (the last one was a disaster).
There are a few presenting problems that I could use your perspective and expertise--since I am too close to it.
Problems for Needing Your Input
-
The site is over 2600 pages with many in html and others in php.What is the best practice? Moving the remaining html pages over into php? Some of the pages that were not active have a redirect to the blog. I plan on doing page to page 301 redirects once I dig in--unless you have a better idea. There are a lot of well established links to some of the pages.
-
How many topics are too many? I have a wide variety of content. First, the magazine format covered about six topics. Later, I began covering more pet related items and did a lot of different news summaries to keep it fresh. I want to dump the short outdated pages as many of them have obsolete links or are too short to add any value. Or should I update if they help with the seo rather than continue to let them dilute the site?
-
Landing page or blog? Which is better, an index landing page or blog? At the moment the blog appears on the main index for freshness and the site attracts traffic for specific topics not animal breeds or species.
I want to move the site from an educational site to serving as a main funnel for potential clients driving them to get on a list or to a niche site for sales related to the particular topic/training of interest.
What your take on this if you were to tackle it?
Any input would be greatly appreciated. My audience includes those who are pet owners, novice trainers, and animal lovers with no critter sense.
-
-
Thanks Ryan, I can play with the widget code for the Facebook.
Yes, I am doing an entire site redesign but I wanted to run a few things over here at SEOMoz as well.
It is pretty comprehensive based on all the topics and content and so it is taking a while. My designer so rocks--and has some great ideas.
-
A few thoughts I can share:
The attachment is an image of how your facebook widget appears to me. I checked two different pc's using two different versions of Firefox. There are numerous issues with it's appearance.
I am not a web designer. I have the highest respect for those gifted designers who have the ability to take web content and present in cleanly with a "wow" effect. I can share an award winning web design I have found which I enjoy very much. This design is for Joomla CMS, but can be modified for other sites: http://themeforest.net/item/futureprospects-stylish-corporate-joomla-template/full_screen_preview/400149#?tp=1
I specifically like the "HOW CAN WE HELP? What we offer" idea. Whatever services you provide and whichever items you sell need to be presented in some format on your home page. At the very least, a link needs to be offered which provides greater details.
It sounds like you are unhappy with your site. You would clearly benefit from an updated design. I realize it can be expensive but you may want to consider a site rebuild. Determine what you want from the site with respect to SEO, sales, presentation, etc. and work with a developer who is able to offer a high quality site.
If a site redesign is not workable for you, then possibly redesign the home page.
-
Thanks Ryan,
Appreciate your taking a look. We have already implemented a site wide htaccess change for the blog to remove date stamps but I wasn't aware we could change everything site wide. The last designer did a html template and that is a mess which is another reason I wanted to change the pages.
To answer your question, yes many of the pages I have not touched do have backlinks. Some have traffic and some of the links are 15 years old--which is why I have stayed hands off on messing with it.
Orginally the site was a magazine with six different categories. At the moment I am testing two keywords in the nav and one is out peforming the other. I have three business services which is why you see three keywords. So what would you suggest?
I switched to the Genesis theme last Nov and am not happy with it for a number of reasons. Not sure why the Facebook looks odd to you but will put that on the list. I am testing the response and it actually has grown my community offsite.
As far as sales, at the moment a call to action for sign ups for more information is one idea or a call to action leading to the specific sale of the service most relevant for the topic.
We've discussed doing landing indexes per topic--so your idea about an animal page in a different manner.
Again, my topics overlap different services/topics about animals and each has a different audience (think domestic versus captive wildlife) so I didn't think the animal category would be the best based on the current competition and since many of the topics would overlap between the two species.
For instance, training principles for dogs are common for say, an elephant--so the training principle topic focus makes more sense to me--but then I am too close to this which is why I am in the forum.
I'd be interested in any additional thoughts about that as well.
-
I am wondering the best practice in moving the remaining html pages over into php.
From a technical perspective, any html page can be changed to a php page simply by renaming the file. If you have a page called animals.html and rename it to animals.php, the page will work just fine as long as users link to the proper url.
From a SEO perspective, it would be best to use "tech-free" URLs. Instead of linking to a /animals.html or /animals.php page, simply link to a /animals page. The extension is not necessary. You can ask your host or web developer about making this change. It is extremely easy but the exact method would vary depending on your site's software.
Once the change is made, you would simply 301 the old pages to the new pages. Ideally you can make the change with a single redirect for the whole site saying to simply remove the .php and .html extensions from all URLs. This method would save you from the headaches involved with redirecting 2600 pages individually. It also improves the look of your URL, and eliminates the need to make similar changes in the future.
Before dumping any pages, I would suggest performing some analysis. Do these pages have backlinks? Do these pages have traffic? If the answer to either question is yes, you want to carefully 301 these pages to the most relevant page on your site, or consider keeping / updating the page.
Your site has many SEO opportunities.
-
Your home page title targets 4 keywords and contains your phone number. This is not a good strategy for SEO.
-
You do not have any H1 tag on your home page
-
Your facebook widget is poorly integrated into your sidebar. I am using FF and the appearance is quite bad with me not being able to read any of the text of your comments.
There are numerous other opportunities. In general, if you wish to transition to a sales approach, you will need to directly engage your visitors and have some form of "Buy" call-to-action message prominently displayed.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
No designated 404 page, but any made-up URL path displays homepage Good / Bad?
I have a custom website where if you type in companyxyz.com/_any-made-up-url _it displays the homepage. So then you will see the homepage and in the URL bar the made up URL path remains visible "companyxyz.com/any-made-up-url" Is this good or bad or not an issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Rich_Coffman0 -
I've got duplicate pages. For example, blog/page/2 is the same as author/admin/page/2\. Is this something I should just ignore, or should I create the author/admin/page2 and then 301 redirect?
I'm going through the crawl report and it says I've got duplicate pages. For example, blog/page/2 is the same as author/admin/page/2/ Now, the author/admin/page/2 I can't even find in WordPress, but it is the same thing as blog/page/2 nonetheless. Is this something I should just ignore, or should I create the author/admin/page2 and then 301 redirect it to blog/page/2?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | shift-inc0 -
Duplicate Content / Canonical Conundrum on E-Commerce Website
Hi all, I’m looking for some expert advice on use of canonicals to resolve duplicate content for an e-Commerce site. I’ve used a generic example to explain the problem (I do not really run a candy shop). SCENARIO I run a candy shop website that sells candy dispensers and the candy that goes in them. I sell about 5,000 different models of candy dispensers and 10,000 different types of candy. Much of the candy fits in more than one candy dispenser, and some candy dispensers fit exactly the same types of candy as others. To make things easy for customers who need to fill up their candy dispensers, I provide a “candy finder” tool on my website which takes them through three steps: 1. Pick your candy dispenser brand (e.g. Haribo) 2. Pick your candy dispenser type (e.g. soft candy or hard candy) 3. Pick your candy dispenser model (e.g. S4000-A) RESULT: The customer is then presented with a list of candy products that they can buy. on a URL like this: Candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-A All of these steps are presented as HTML pages with followable/indexable links. PROBLEM: There is a duplicate content issue with the results pages. This is because a lot of the candy dispensers fit exactly the same candy (e.g. S4000-A, S4000-B and S4000-C). This means that the content on these pages are the basically same because the same candy products are listed. I’ll call these the “duplicate dispensers” E.g. Candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-A Candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-B Candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-C The page titles/headings change based on the dispenser model, but that’s not enough for the pages to be deemed unique by Moz. I want to drive organic traffic searches for the dispenser model candy keywords, but with duplicate content like this I’m guessing this is holding me back from any of these dispenser pages ranking. SOLUTIONS 1. Write unique content for each of the duplicate dispenser pages: Manufacturers add or discontinue about 500 dispenser models each quarter and I don’t have the resources to keep on top of this content. I would also question the real value of this content to a user when it’s pretty obvious what the products on the page are. 2. Pick one duplicate dispenser to act as a rel=canonical and point all its duplicates at it. This doesn’t work as dispensers get discontinued so I run the risk of randomly losing my canonicals or them changing as models become unavailable. 3. Create a single page with all of the duplicate dispensers on, and canonical all of the individual duplicate pages to that page. e.g. Canonical: candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-Series Duplicates (which all point to canonical): candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-Series?model=A candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-Series?model=B candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-Series?model=C PROPOSED SOLUTION Option 3. Anyone agree/disagree or have any other thoughts on how to solve this problem? Thanks for reading.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | webmethod0 -
Help with https// redirects
Hey there
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jay328
I have a client who just moved from a self hosted CMS to Adobe Catalyst (don't ask!)
The problem: Their url indexed with google is https://domain.com, Adobe Catalyst does not support third party SSL certificates or https domains. Now when people google them https://domain.com shows up in search, HOWEVER it does not have a trusted certificate and a pop up window blocks the site. They are a mortgage company so SSL is really not needed. What can I do to get google to recognize the site at http: vs. https? Would this be something in GWMT? Thanks!0 -
Duplicate Title - Magento Products / Kunena Forum - Nofollow vs. Follow
Hello Mozzers! This is my first post so hopefully I can explain this in a way that is clear! I just signed up for my PRO membership and wanted to finally start hacking away at this companies site that I work for. I ran my report and noticed my Crawl Diagnostics: 715 Dupliate Page Titles I noticed that a lot those were coming from the customer login in magento. So I added the: User-agent: *Disallow:/customer/ as mentioned in this link: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10742052/duplicate-content-issues-for-login-page Any suggestions on that? Also, We have a Kunena forum on our site and have noticed all of the nofollow links. People say I should change them to follow links, but other people say leave them or I will get penalized. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NRMWEBWORKS0 -
302 Redirect of www. version of a site - Pros/Cons
Hi, I am considering making the 301 redirect from the domain to a 302 temporary redirect. Currently if a user lands on "www" version of the site, they are redirected to the non "www" version. But after the redirect, they will land on an external webpage (so if a user lands on the "www" version, they are redirected to a different website, not related to my domain). Reason I'm considering this is because I have received a large number of spammy backlinks on the "www" version of the site (negative seo). So I'm hoping that the temporary redirect will help me recover. Your thoughts on this: 1. Is this the best way to do a 302 redirect (redirecting the www version to an external domain)? 2. Will the redirect help the main domain recover, considering all spammy backlinks are pointing to the www version? 3. What are the pros/cons, if any? Thanks in advance for your thoughts! Howard
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | howardd0 -
Top 5 link building articles/videos
Hello, What are the top 5 resources for learning how to do a fantastic ecommerce link building campaign? I'm starting by adding 100-200 articles to our site. I'm wanting the 5 most up-to-date resources. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobGW0 -
URL Structure - Keywords vs. Information Architecture/Navigation
I'm creating the URL structure for an ecommerce site and was wondering if it's better to structure my URLs according to the most popular way people word their key phrases or by what makes most sense from a navigation perspective. Let's say I'm selling clothing (I'm not, just an example). I want the site to be open enough so a user can navigate by Person Type (Men's, Women's, Children's), Clothing Type (Shoes, Shirts, Hats), and Brands (Nike, Reebok, adidas). My gut and past experience say to structure the URLs from the least specific to the most specific: mysite.com/mens/shoes/nike But I know "men's Nike shoes" is searched for more than "men's shoes Nike", which would render this URL: mysite.com/mens/nike/shoes I know mysite.com/mens-nike-shoes would be best, but the folders setup is what I have to work with. So which is best for SEO? URLs that play to the structure of the most searched for key phrases? Or URLs that follow the information architecture/navigation of a site? Nate
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rball10