For multi language sites, what is best - two domains or one with both languages?
-
We are assisting a client in setting up English and Spanish sites in Texas. They want to be able to find customers who are Spanish speaking predominantly or totally along with the customers they now get who are English speakers.
We are building them a new site and I have researched to find answers all over the board or less than clear. Should the structure be such that we have one site with a set of English and Spanish pages all with Spanish links to Spanish pages and English links to English pages.
Should we instead just have an English site for those people who utilize English and a different site for those who utilize Spanish?
Thanks
-
Thanks for responding Jason (your pic looks like it was taken in a rain forest).
As to traffic in Spanish for our clients product/service there is enough to put up Spanish language. As I said in reply to Ryan, I am going to have one site for the main with both English and Spanish. I would ask this: you said if considerable Spanish searches you would do one English and one Spanish, why? (Just interested in the reasoning on any SEO) Frankly, I think you could be right as much as I think doing one with both languages could be right.
-
I think on the whole this is a good answer and is what I was about 90% prepared to do. On the dialects it is a bit less tricky than the Castilian versus Mexican or American Spanish. The population in San Diego, Texas, etc. is going to be predominantly South American and all use essentially the same dialect. But, your advice is good advice for anyone not familiar with the language differences.
Thanks for the help, as always,
-
Thanks for the clarification Robert.
I live in California and I believe the San Diego area is similar to your client's area in that it is close to the Mexican border and is home to a large Spanish population.
Translated content is considered unique. If you have an English and Spanish version of the same article, it is not duplicate content. Therefore I would recommend keeping all your content on one site.
Use the proper meta language tag on each page. There are many dialects of Spanish, and I know for certain a Mexican Spanish speaker can have a lot of difficulty understanding someone from Spain. If you use a translator, don't simply locate someone who speaks Spanish. I would suggest finding someone from Mexico who understands English very well to write the Spanish pages.
-
Thanks Ryan, I think I was less than clear. The sites target the South Texas region of Texas. If unfamiliar with it, there is a large population of non English speaking immigrants and their offspring. Our client wants to specifically target that area and then, potentially, follow later and target other areas with larger Spanish speaking populations within the US. Since my Spanish is "mas o menos" and I came to Texas as a kid, I am familiar with the cultural differences and the linguistic differences (depending on country of origin for Spanish speakers) and that is a very good observation on your part.
There is enough of a Spanish only population in Texas that many companies advertise in both languages so the client is wanting to insure they are penetrating that market. Hope the additional info helps.
-
Is the spanish search traffic in Texas enough to make another site worth it? Or are most hispanics using english search terms anyway?
I'd say if the spanish search traffic isn't that much I would make one site that is spanish and english. But if there are considerable spanish searches in your area I would do a separate site in spanish.
Since this is probably a local business, you might confuse the local listings if you try to have two sites for one company. So having two sites could require setting up two companies.
If this was for two different countries, I would definitely make two sites. Since it's in the same geographical area I would lean towards one site instead of two.
-
There are supporters of both methods.
The first suggestion I will make is to keep in mind your segments should be country-based, not language based. Your "Spanish" site will be "US-Spanish", "Mexican-Spanish", "Spain-Spanish", etc. There are not only linguistic differences but cultural differences along with monetary systems and units of measurements.
Prior to offering a recommendation I need to ask, are both the English and Spanish sites targeting a specific country such as the US?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Validated pages on GSC displays 5x more pages than when performing site:domain.com?
Hi mozzers, When checking the coverage report on GSC I am seeing over 649,000 valid pages https://cl.ly/ae46ec25f494 but when performing site:domain.com I am only seeing 130,000 pages. Which one is more the source of truth especially I have checked some of these "valid" pages and noticed they're not even indexed?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ty19860 -
Site migration/ CMS/domain site structure change-no access to search console
Hi everyone, We are migrating an old site under a bigger umbrella (our main domain). As mentioned in the title, We'll perform CMS migration, domain change, and site structure change. Now, the major problem is that we can't get into google search console for the old site. The site still has old GA code, so google search console verification using this method is not possible, also there is no way developers will be able to add GTM or edit DNS setting (not to bother you with the reason why). Now, my dilemma is : 1. Do we need access to old search console to notify Google about the domain name change or this could be done from our main site (old site will become a part of) search console 2. We are setting up 301 redirects from old to the new domain (not perfect 1:1 redirect ). Once migration is done does anything else needs to be done with the old domain (it will become obsolete)? 3.The main site, Site-map... Should I create a new sitemap with newly added pages or update the current one. 4. if you have anything else please add:) Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bgvsiteadmin0 -
Merging two sites to one Rel Can Question
Hi All, We have 2 brands (1 main 1 product as a satellite domain) that we're merging into our main brand. When doing a 301 redirect - should we redirect everypage of the product satellite to the new site or is 1 main redirect fine? I'm Confusing ....yep. Ill do an E.G www.nike.com & www.air-jordan.com we are now shutting down www.airjordan.com and will be migrating all the content to www.nike.com/air-jordan Just of course there will be other pages like air-jordan.com/order-now . Should i do a rel can from air-jordan.com/order-now to www.nike.com/air-jordan/order-now ? Or is simply a 301 from www.airjordan.com to www.nike.com/air-jordan sufficient? Cheers!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CFCU0 -
Domain Authority... http://www.domain.com/ vs. http://domain.com vs. http://domain.com/
Hey Guys, Looking at Page Authority for my Site and ranking them in Decending Order, I see these 3 http://www.domain.com/ | Authority 62 http://domain.com | Authority 52 http://domain.com/ | Authority 52 Since the first one listed has the highest Authority, should I be using a 301 redirects on the lower ranking variations (which I understand how works) or should I be using rel="canonical" (which I don't really understand how it works) Also, if this is a problem that I should address, should we see a significant boost if fixed? Thanks ahead of time for anyone who can help a lost sailor who doesn't know how to sail and probably shouldn't have left shore in the first place. Cheers ZP!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mr_Snack0 -
What happens if one remove the disavow file from a non penalised site
What happens if one remove the disavow file from a site that has not received a manual penalty from Google. Although the site did suffer from a drop in traffic and rankings.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Taiger0 -
Best practice for duplicate website content: same root domain name but different extension
Hi there I have a new client who has two websites: http://www.bayofislandsteambuilding.co.nz
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | turnbullholdingsltd
http://www.bayofislandsteambuilding.org.nz They are the same in every regard apart from the domain extension (.co.nz & .org.nz) which is likely to be causing them issues with Google ranking given the huge amount of duplicate content. What is the best practice approach to fixing this? Normally, if I was starting from scratch, I would set one of the extensions as an alias which redirects to the main domain. Thanks in advance. Laurie0 -
1 site on 2 domains (interesting situation, expert advice needed)
Dear all, i have read many posts about having one content on 2 different domains, how to combine those two to avoid duplicate content. However the story of my two domains makes this question really difficult. Domain 1: chillispot.org ( http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=chillispot.org ) The original site was on this domain, started 9 years ago. That time the owner of the domain was not me. The site was very popular with lots of links to it. Then after 5 years of operation, the site closed. I have managed to save the content to: Domain 2: chillispot.info ( http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=chillispot.info ) The content i put there was basically the same. Many links were changed to chillispot.info on external sites when they noticed the change. But lots of links are still unchanged and pointing to .ord domain. The .info is doing well in search engines (for example for keyword 'chillispot'). Now i managed to buy the original chillispot.org domain. As you can see the domain authority of the .org domain is still higher than the .info one and it has more valuable links. Question is: what would be the best approach to offer content on both domains without having penalized by google for duplicated content? Which domain should we keep the content on? The original .org one, which is still a better domain but not working for several years or the .info one who has the content for several years now and doing well on search engines? And then, after we decide this, what would be the best approach to send users to the real content? Thanks for the answers!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Fudge0 -
How To Best Close An eCommerce Site?
We're closing down one of our eCommerce sites. What is the best approach to do this? The site has a modest link profile (a young site). It does have a run of site link to the parent site. It also has a couple hundred email subscribers and established accounts. Is there a gradual way to do this? How do I treat the subscribers and account holders? The impact won't be great, but I want to minimize collateral damage as much as possible. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AWCthreads0