Rankings Last, google says no flags
-
I have a site thatsit.net.au I have never really promoted, but it used to
rank ok, the other day I decided I should spend some time on it as its my own
site and potential customers expect to see my own site rank well. I did a bit
of checking and in Bing I come up in first 4 for Web Development Perth, that is in
the .au TLD for Australia,
but in Google I am like 700+.If I take this line out of my home page and put it in quotes “a local Perth web development company” I see I am the only person in the world to have
this long tail query in both Bing and Google. If I search for the same without
quotes in Bing I come up first. If I do so in Google, I come up absolutely last.
I thought I must be flagged, but Google have replied that there is no manual
action taken on my site.I have no answer for this, It is hard to believe if I am the only person in
the world to have a long tail term that I would come last for it.Any ideas? I hope Matt Cutts reads this, and can come up with an explanation
besides write good and useful content. -
I agree link count is not the end all, but when Gianluca said I had only a few links
the focus was on that, where I don’t think that is the case and wanted the
focus back off that. To say that he had a point would also go against the statement
the number of links not being important rather the quality. OSE explorer I
found never has many links for new campaigns, and only having 5 campaign slots,
I did not have it loaded until a few days ago. I believe it finds the pages
relevant to the campaigns, that my understanding based of observation only, I expect
to see more next crawl . But I don’t think links is the problem. As I stated I was
number one for my company name, now I came no where, with the same or less
links.As for
Bing and Google not having a correlation I disagree, they do correlate very
well, it’s not a rule, but if you rank well in one you will rank well in the
other. I have always seemed to rank better with sites in Bing than Google, but generally
if I make progress in one I make progress in the other. To say the comparison
is completely worthless does not hold waterLook at
all the factors I have mentioned and I think, there is something wrong, take my
point about my company name, I Used to rank number one, now I don’t rank at all.
I made a site thatsitsolutions.net.au, with no links only a few days old, ranks
number 4.Imagine you search for a query, how to make pumpkin pie, you would expect some page with that exact phrase to be more important than a page that just happens to have those words in the content. This is what how search engines work, they work on meaning and relevance, not just matching words. If I was looking for a local Perth web developer I would expect the exact phrase to rank higher then a page with the words spread throughout the page.
As for the being my site, I have many sites and built and promoted many more, I am not sentimental
about my site, I am concerned that it has dropped out of the rankings to last
place.I have mentioned
that I don’t even rank for my company name where I had been number one for
years, that is not normal. That and all the other points I think I have a very
good case for being concerned.I hope
that it’s just a temp problem, that’s all I can say. As for actions I can take,
I think the best action I can take is try to work out why my rankings have dropped,
I really don’t think that doing a bit of link building is the answer. If you
have any specific action items that can explain the drop then I’m all ears, but
I am not asking for SEO help, I have done very well in SEO besides this
problem. -
In my experience link counts are a meaningless metric. You have twice mentioned having 500+ links. Many individuals can change a single forum signature and gain literally thousands of links overnight. One of those links has some value and all the rest combined have almost no value.
The important consideration is number of unique linking root domains, and the statistics of the pages which link to you. Based on OSE, your site lacks any real off-site support. In looking at your site, there is no social engagement either.
I can point out that OSE can be up to 60 days behind, but you also mentioned you have not done any recent SEO work for the site so I presume that means no recent link building.
I agree with you that your site deserves a better ranking, but you also need to acknowledge there are a LOT of sites out there with good enough content to earn rankings ahead of you, and many with more off-page support. Even this SEOmoz Q&A thread with an exact phrase match only ranks around 500 for the phrase search.
i should state once more i rank very very well in bing
I used to make that comparison but I learned some time ago it is completely worthless. I have repeatedly found instances where I ranked as #1 in Bing and not in the top 50 for Google, and vice-versa. Bing and Google are two separate companies which pull data independently and have completely different algorithms and standards. The results tend to line up only for the best sites.
Have look at page 50 or 60 you will see some that are hard to believe the should be above me
I did exactly as you asked, and I disagree. I already mentioned this Q&A which beats your page clearly on the offpage factors.
At the bottom of page 50 of Google.com SERPs for "a local Perth web development company" is the following result: http://www.exa.com.au/local-web-services.php
It is not a great result. I see link spam on the page along with other SEO issues, but that page also has a DA of 69, PA of 41 and should definitely outrank you (my opinion).
I know this is your site. I know you have put time and effort into the site. My best suggestion is to take a deep breath and a fresh analysis of your site. You have plenty of opportunities. If you wish shoot me an e-mail Ryan@Vitopian.com and I can share some specific action items I noticed. I assume you have noticed many of them as well.
-
See image, I have over 500 links. Many with keywords in link
textI understand the difference between broad and exact and phrase,
having the exact is usually best phrase second and broad last. Having the exact
match you would not expect to come last. You would expect to come first if you
were the only one to have it.I did test on this, and never did I get such a bad result
from any other site. Some times you may not be at the top, but if you have the exact
you can expect to be, well not last.Take the term Web Development Perth, I have it in my title, I
am well optimized for it. Yet I come 700+ out of 800+, and yesterday I was last
again.Let’s not forget, I ranked ok until recently. Somebody has
to come last for each term, but to come last so often, well what are the odds
of that.Even for my company name ThatsIT Solutions I used to come
first. I now come 900+ out of 1000, I made a site a few days ago with no links
that comes 4th for the term.Have a look at some of the sites that beat me, not at the top of cause they will be well optimized, have look at page 50 or 60 you will see some that are hard to believe the should be above me.
i should state once more i rank very very well in bing,
I only hope this is a temp problem
-
Hi Alan.
When you use quotation marks, that triggers Google to use a particular algorithm which only seeks exact matches. Web pages are scanned looking for the exact quote, and results are returned which match. It changes the search results completely in a similar manner to how local search uses a different algorithm then universal search.
When you remove the quotation marks, the entire body of a web page is considered. Google's algorithm then determines relevancy based on off-page factors and on-page factors. It is a completely different world of search. I believe you understand this aspect, but still are having difficulty believing the results, so I will add a bit more detail.
The attached image is from page 10 of Google.com results. You can see your search query at the top "a local Perth web development company". Take a look at the bold text in the search results. Notice that "companies" is a bold word meaning Google considers it a match for your query. Also notice that "design" is a bold word. Clearly Google feels "design" is a match for "development" in this circumstance.
I was trying to take a look at page 50 of the results and landed on page 48. I noticed your SEOmoz Q&A is at the top of page 48. See image #2. Your site is much better optimized for "Web Development Perth" but since the entire phrase is considered and offpage is 50%+ of SEO, you can clearly see how the DA of the SEOmoz site comes into play.
Your page is optimized for "Web Development Perth". At first glance it seems to me you should rank better then 700, but with so much competition, Gianluca's suggestion that not having enough quality offpage support seems valid.
-
I just checked Bing WMT and I have 500+ links from a variety
of domains including SEOMoz, many with my keyword in link text, but even if I had 2, I would not expect to come last in the world for a long tail term that only I have on my web site in the whole world.The fact that I come up first in Bing and the fact that I ranked
quite well not long ago, did you read my post?I also have another site that ranks relatively well for the same
term that has very few links and not optimised for the term.No it is not normal to come last under such circumstances.
-
Hi Alan...
did you think that maybe it is not the on page optimization failing, but the off site one?
The SEOmoz toolbar tells me that your site has 3 root linking domains linking to the home page for a total of 9 inbound links. Then, checking further with Oper Site Explorer, what I see is that really are just 2 the followed backlinks owned by your home paege from 2 root linking domains.... ah! the anchor text of the links is usually your domain name.
These numbers are surely not enough in order to compete with the sites that rank in the first page in Google.com.au for the "Web Development Perth" query:
- interweb.com.au > 646 root domains linking the hp
- cluedesign.com.au > 400
- sumo.com.au > 332
- perthweb.com.au > 348
- apiix.com > 51 (but high mozRank)
and so on.
Also the sites in second result page have at least 30 root domain name linking.
What do I want to tell with this? That before going directly to the conclusion that your site had been flagged, penalized, hacked or what so ever dramatic event an SEO can imagine, we must always consider if the problem is not simpler, as it seems to be in your case. From what I've seen, it is not Google flagging your site, but your site not being enough optimized on the web popularity side. Try to engage more and obtain more links from more root domain names and also more social signal, and you will see Google rewarding your job with better ranking.
Ciao
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What I am Doing Wrong with My Rank
Hi, I am doing something wrong but I don't understand what is the issue. The rank of my website for a particular keyword is by far lower than one of my competitors (they are in top 20 while I am not even in top 50 in google). I did all fixes recommended by MOZ, I have higher number of backlinks (natural built), relatively similar social media activities, bigger content but still I'm far away. Do you have any idea what is wrong? Best, Tony
Technical SEO | | Threeding.com0 -
Local Google vs. default Google search
Hello Moz community, I have a question: what is the difference between a local version of Google vs. the default Google in regards to search results? I have a Mexican site that I'm trying to rank in www.google.com.mx, but my rankings are actually better if I check my keywords on www.google.com The domain is a .mx site, so wouldn't it make more sense that this page would rank higher on google.com.mx instead of the default Google site, which in theory would mean a "broader" scope? Also, what determines whether a user gets automatically directed to a local Google version vs. staying on the default one? Thanks for your valuable input!
Technical SEO | | EduardoRuiz0 -
Why do they rank the home page?
We are trying to rank for the key word Motorcycle Parts. We have moved up to page 2 over the past couple months; however, google is ranking our home page not our http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/s/49/61/Motorcycle-Parts page that is for motorcycle parts. We are working on internal linking to help point the right signals too. Any other thoughts? ( we have new content written to put in as well we just have to wait for an issue to be fixed before we can put it in)
Technical SEO | | DoRM0 -
Mysterious drop of website ranking in google
Usually, I don't want to bother anybody by posting silly questions on forums. But this time I really might need advice. My wife and I took over the website maintenance and e-marketing of a local air conditioning company end of March this year. Before that the applied SEO strategies were not very user friendly and a little too search engine focused (spammy keyword stuffed articles, confusing website structure, a lot of directory links). Yesterday night (May 15th) the website more or less stopped ranking. For search terms like "ac repair englewood fl" or "trane north port" and many more the website was on page 1. Here are some more details: I replaced the old website with a newer version end of April. Since some of old the url structure did not apply any longer, I did a setup of around 30 301-redirects in .htaccess. The new site seemed to rank more or less as expected. The homepage has a PakeRank of 1 (seomoz Page Authority is 31). I am working on that but good natural links just take some time. site:kobiecomplete.com still brings up all the pages Google Webmaster Tools notified me on May 12th that there was a possible outage: _"_While crawling your site, we have noticed an increase in the number of transient soft 404 errors around 2012-05-08 16:00 UTC (London, Dublin, Edinburgh). Your site may have experienced outages. These issues may have been resolved. Here are some sample pages that resulted in soft 404 errors:" The listed pages under "some sample pages" are only pages from the old website which do not exist any longer and the 301 redirect was not setup. But this should have been already any issue before, if at all.
Technical SEO | | grojoh
I added the missing 301 redirects and marked them as fixed in Google Webmaster Tools. I had a copy of the website on a testing webspace (root directory of brightsidewg.com). Even though I had robots.txt set to disallow everything and WordPress search engine privacy set to do not index / follow, the website appeared on the Google search results yesterday night instead of the original website (kobiecomplete.com). Even though brightsidewg was a few ranks worse than kobiecomplete.com was, it was still ranking.
To remove the duplicate content, I deleted everything on brightsidewg.com and requested the removal of the website in the Webmaster Tools. Now brightsidewg.com is not any longer indexed (good) but it didn't help the ranking of kobiecomplete.com. Especially the homepage and the service area pages were ranking pretty decent on Google before yesterday night. Now I can not find them at all. Only other less important pages rank on page 8+ No malware on website I did not do any big changes on the website yesterday (only really minor ones). I did not acquire any weird/paid links even though there is a new link from a PageRank 0 website which I did not setup: http://www.indo-karya.com/detail/news/2012/kombise But that alone I think would not be enough for a penalty. It almost looks like that Google applied a partial -950 filter!? I could submit the website for reconsideration to Google and tell them about the duplicate content issue with my testing webspace brightsidewg.com. What do you think about it and what shall I do? Thank you so much for any help!0 -
Page rank and ranking down
Hi I blog at Technostarry. Some 3 months back during page rank update, my page rank went down from 3 to 2. I don't know the reason behind this. And now, my traffic and ranking is also down. I am not involved in any bad SEO practices, I don't copy paste and I write original content. I am too confused as why and what has happened with my site. If someone could analyze my blog and look at my weak points then that would be great. I would like to get any suggestions to get back my ranking and also page rank back. Thanks.
Technical SEO | | technotech0 -
Mobile site rank on Google S.E. instead of desktop site.
Hello, all SEOers~ Today, I would like to hear your opinion regarding on Mobile site and duplicate contents issue. I have a mobile version of our website that is hosted on a subdomain (m instead www). Site is targeting UK and Its essentially the same content, formatted differently. So every URL on www exists also at the "m" subdomain and is identical content. (there are some different contents, yet I could say about 90% or more contents are same) Recently I've noticed that search results are showing links to our mobile site instead of the desktop site. (Google UK) I have a sitemap.xml for both sites, the mobile sitemap defined as follows: I didn't block googlebot from mobile site and also didn't block googlebot-mobile from desktop site. I read and watched Google webmaster tool forum and related video from Matt Cutts. I found many opinion that there is possibility which cause duplicate contents issue and I should do one of followings. 1. Block googlebot from mobile site. 2. Use canonical Tag on mobile site which points to desktop site. 3. Create and develop different contents (needless to say...) Do you think duplicate contents issue caused my mobile site rank on S.E. instead of my desktop site? also Do you think those method will help to show my desktop site on S.E.? I was wondering that I have multi-country sites which is same site format as I mentioned above. However, my other country sites are totally doing fine on Google. Only difference that I found is my other country sites have different Title & Meta Tag comparing to desktop site, but my UK mobile site has same Title & Meta Tag comparing to desktop. Do you think this also has something to do with current problem? Please people~! Feel free to make some comments and share your opinion. Thanks for reading my long long explanation.
Technical SEO | | Artience0 -
Will rankings for my micro site rank better if I 301 redirect it to my main site?
This is my first time asking so I will try to be as clear as possible. Ok, I have a micro site that is an (exact match domain) and the domain is a couple 3-4 years old and ranks very well for several search terms. The main two terms it ranks for are like this. houses for rent in XXXXX XXXXX homes for rent (XXXXX equals a city name) The issue is this site has no backlinks, zero advanced SEO, I only did basic optimization to it when i set the site up. Even site structure, url structure all are not good.
Technical SEO | | Robbie8299
The only page I have ever even seen rank is the main root url. But with all that the site does really good in the top 1-2 results for key search terms. Now, I have a main site that is a very big site that has steadily been climbing in search terms every month with great backlinks, optimized for the city and all.
It currently ranks on second page for the listed search terms listed above. What I want to do is 301 redirect this microsite to my city page on my main site that is much better optimized for the key city terms.
The 301 redirect would point this "root domain" (mymicrosite.com) to my city page that looks like this. www.mymaindomain.com/city/XXXXXXX If I do this will Google rank my main URL city page as well as it ranks this microsite with zero links, seo, etc, etc. What happens if it does not? Will I be able to turn off the 301 redirect and keep the microsite rankings? My main reason for wanting this is I want this city page to rank well and I only want to optimize one site instead of both. Any help would be great!0 -
Why won't google rank my homepage
I have a site that ranks high on the first page for it's main keyword at both Bing and Yahoo but horribly at Google. It's a domain I recently acquired and am in the process of optimizing. My goal is to improve the relevancy for the site in Google so that the site shows up better for it's main keyword. With that said I've been working on building valuable links to the page and I would like some opinions on why the homepage is not ranking for the main keyword. Instead I have a junky content page that is ranking for the term. So in the event that you have a exact match domain showing up very high in Bing and Yahoo but not in Google for the homepage, what factors would you look at? Add in the complexity that a page other than the homepage is making grounds on the exact match keyword having moved up from "not in the top 100" to the 50's, what's my best solution to ranking the homepage? The site is optimized well and most inbound links predominantly point to the homepage.
Technical SEO | | DotCar0