Would other TLDs (Top Level Domains) be helpful?
-
Hi,
I have a website geared towards an international crowd. It is written in English on the .com TLD. We are currently having it translated to Japanese on the .jp TLD and to French on the .fr TLD. Is getting a TLD for each country/translation a good way to go? Not only in terms of SEO, but is this the best way to get found in these other countries?
Second questions: Would getting TLDs in other English speaking countries do any good? Like .com.au or .com.nz or .ca? Again, both in terms of SEO and reach for users in those countries.
Last question, since I'm not going to change the content much (or any...) for the other English TLDs, how should I go about them? 301 redirect to the .com website? Show same content without a redirect? Other idea?
Thank you in advance!
-Elad
-
Yes but still not as good as promoting the one site.
You seem to like the local idea, so go with that, if at some stage you think its the wrong stratigy, you can always stop promoting all, and concentrate on the .com only -
Oh... but the proverbial rabit hole goes even deeper
If I have local sites, with better local search results, I have more local linking opertunities. Since these landing pages will be linking to the main .com site, this will also be giving some link juice to the main site. So these links not only boost the local results, but also boost .com site, no?
-
Yes it will, but when you have so many sites, how to get the links.
Getting quality links is hard.What is best, getting 100 quality links each for 5 sites, or 500 qualitty links for 1 site, i think the latter.
so we have a trade off, more links, or the benifit of local?
Toss a coin
-
As with any landing pages, you should always be testing. So, test the localized pages. Create a landing page that is .com.au and test it against a .com (both identical in every other way) and see how each converts.
With your snippet showing .com.au versus .com, you could likely test the does the .au improve your chances with Google.com.auYou can PM me when you have results as I would be very interested in them.
-
Thank you for the detailed reply!
We are an Internet only business. We will not be taking advantage of Places and localized listings, etc.
I agree with your customer acquisition perspective, given a choice, I would opt to first visit a local site.
In terms of cost, it will be negligible. The cost of these domains is less than 10$/yr. and all our English content is done in-house, so it's bought and paid for anyway.
But still, would localized landing pages, with just several pages (or maybe even just one) of content and links to the main site hurt the main site in any way or render the localized domain useless?
I'm currently leaning towards giving it a try, I just don't want to end up shooting myself in the foot.
-
As to the English translation to French, Japanese, Spanish, etc. this does not count as duplicate content in the eyes of google. From Google webmaster blog:
What isn't duplicate content?
Though we do offer a handy translation utility, our algorithms won't view the same article written in English and Spanish as duplicate content. Similarly, you shouldn't worry about occasional snippets (quotes and otherwise) being flagged as duplicate content.So, in my opinion you are going the right direction. The question about having a different TLD for each English speaking country assuming the content is different, I would think that it would depend on the benefit you derive from localization beyond having Places locations should you include bricks and mortar sites in your business model. If the cost in time and money is such that it is very small, then it probably helps to localize the TLD. (If not from an SEO perspective, potentially from a customer acquisition perspective.) My opinion is that if I have a site that is .AU and another that is .com and appears to be U.S., I am more likely to buy from the one where I live. So, for me, the US site is preferable as a consumer.
Without weighing the costs involved, I do not think you can make a determination of value for the other country specific TLD's.
-
It's a moderately competitive industry, but most sites are global and don't make any local effort. On-Page SEO is very powerful even for the global site. I'm guessing the local site will have even more weight put in the on-page factors. The questions is, will having a .com.au site give me an advantage with searches on google.com.au, for example.
-
That will get you around the duplicate content problem, but how about seo for so many sites, are you in a commpeditive industry?
-
For languages other than English, I would opt for a local domain, and I agree that it should not be a problem. As for TLDs for English speaking countries, I would still like to have a local TLD. I was thinking of maybe making a local landing page for the TLD, which gives some country specific content, and links to the .com site for further information and registration. Any thoughts on that?
-
This is a hard one, going local is always better, global is hard, but haveing duplicate content is not going to help, if you use a 301 or canoical tags only one site is going to rank.
I would think that duplicate content in anther lingo is usefull and should not be a problem, but in english it would.
Maybe a site for each lingo, not country
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can I use rel="alternate" language tags on multiple domains?
On a page with the domain "www.example-1.com.br" (for pt-BR) I will include the following tags: That will work?
International SEO | | Ewerton.RD0 -
Duplicate content on .co.uk and .com TLDs with different domain authority
What's the best approach to take for a site that has identical content on the .co.uk and .com versions of the root domain? The .co.uk version has a significantly higher domain authority (54 vs 32 according to Open Site Explorer - see attached screenshot). But it's an international company with its largest customer base in North America and customers in over 60 countries. The company does not intend to localize content. My initial thought before seeing the domain authority was to 301 redirect the .co.uk to the .com domain to consolidate all the link equity under one international TLD. However, I wondered if the higher domain authority for .co.uk would be passed on if we did this. I figured that a non-UK audience would be more likely to trust a .com site. I still think 301 redirecting .co.uk to .com might be the best strategy in the long term. But is there likely to be a dip in rankings and organic search volume in the short term until .co.uk is replaced in the index by .com? I'd really appreciate your thoughts on this. CbVnfSO.png
International SEO | | Torchbox0 -
Multilingual Site with 2 Separate domains and hand-translated
I have 2 separate domains: .com & .jp
International SEO | | khi5
I am having a professional translator translate the English written material from .com. However, the .jp will have same pictures and videos that I have on the .com which means alt tags are in English and video titles are in English. I have some dynamic pages where I use Google Translate and those pages I place as "no index follow" to avoid duplicate issues and they are not very important pages for me any way. Question: since I am doing a proper translating - no machines involved - can I leave pages as is or should I include any format of these: ISO language codes
2) www.example/com/” /> Even though hand translated, the translation will probably be 85% similar to that if I used Google Translate. Will that potentially be seen as duplicate content or not at all since I have not used the Google Translate tool? I wonder from which angle Google analyses this. Thank you,0 -
Are NON French companies allowed to own domains in France?
Hi, I was wondering if any one knows if the French government has changed it's stance in recent years to the ownership of domains in their country. My understanding is that it can be pretty difficult to own a domain there if you do not reside there. In the past I have had people register domains using their passport as identification to prove their domicile in that country. We like many others have sites with .com/fr etc. and we do have one domain that is a .fr and seriously out performs the .com version. Many thanks for any input on this question. David *** UPDATE - Sorry no need for a response, I've just been informed that businesses who are located in a Member State of the European Union (EU) are allowed to own .fr domains which the French government needs to comply with. Best, David
International SEO | | David-E-Carey1 -
Linking Between Domains
My company has a main xxx.com website and geo-specific subsites - xxx.co.uk, xxx.es, etc... We link to each of the subsites from the menu, however it also makes sense from a content perspective to link between the sites on internal pages. However, in this video Matt Cutts seems to discourage this - http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-linking-20-domains-together-likely-a-cross-linking-scheme-167089 Do you think its worthwhile to keep the inter-site linking to just the menu or okay (or even helpful) to link between the different sites.
International SEO | | theLotter0 -
Multi country targeting for listing site, ccTLD, sub domain or .com/folder?
Hi I know this has been covered in a few questions but seen nothing recent that may take into account changes google may have applied. We would like to target multiple english speaking counties with a new project and I'm a little unsure as to whether ccTLD, subdomain or subfolders are the best way to publish country specific information. Can anyone shed some light on this?
International SEO | | Mulith0 -
Is having duplicated content on different domains a problem when using alternate tag, but no canonical?
We will be launching a couple of new language versions. I understand that ccTLD is mostly considered as best option, however I thought that to start with it might be better to launch the new language version first on a subdirectory of our established domain with strong backlink profile as it may rank much better until I can attract some strong links to new ccTLD. I would wait for the pages of new language versions to be indexed on the main domain and then after a month launch the same content paralell on the ccTLD setting up an alternate tag in the main domain pointing to the ccTLD. I would not setup any canonical tag. As I understand google would rank whatever of the 2 versions ranks higher. Should not cause duplicated content issues right?
International SEO | | lcourse
Any thoughts? EDIT:
For clarification. The language we are launching are mostly spoken in several countries. E.g. for Portuguese I would add in main domain an altnernate tag for Brazilian visitors to Brazilian ccTLD, but no alternate tag for Portuguese visitors. For Corean I would add in main domain an alternate tag for visitors in south corea, but not one for visitors in north corea.0 -
Multilingual site - separate domain or all under the same umbrella
this has been asked before with not clear winner. I am trying to sum up pros and cons of doing a multilingual site and sharing the same domain for all languages or breaking it into dedicated subdomains e.g. as an example lets assume we are talking about a french property portal with an english version as well. Assume most of the current incoming links and traffic is from France. A) www.french-name.fr/fr/pageX for the french version www.english-name.com/en/pageX for the english version B) www.french-name.fr/fr/ for the french name (as is) www.french-name.fr/en for the english version the client currently follows approach A but is thinking to move towards B we see the following pros and cons for B take advantage of the french-name.fr domain strength and incoming links scalable: can add more languages without registering and building SE position for each one individually potential issues with duplicate content as we are not able to geotarget differenly on web master tools of google potential dilution of each page's strength as we will now have much more pages under the same domain (double the pages basically) - is this a valid concern? usability/marketing concerns as the name of the site is not in english (but then people looking for a house in France would be at least not completely alien to it) what are your thoughts on this? thanks in advance
International SEO | | seo-cat0