"Near" perfect Keyword domain matches - Which would you choose?
-
Hi,
I was wondering on your thoughts, or if any tests had been done on the best format of "near" perfect keyword domain matches.
Suppose I am not really interested in branding, and I am principally after the bonus given to exact keyword matching, but all the exact match high level extensions have gone - whats the next best solution?
Suppose I am after the term "car hire", and on my website I want to target many different location keywords such as - "Car Hire London"
My main extensions are gone, but I have the options to go for::
Additional Word at the FRONT:
Number - eg 4:
4carhire.co.uk -> gives me -> 4carhire.co.uk/london/
Geo association - eg uk:
ukcarhire.co.uk -> gives me -> ukcarhire.co.uk/london/
Info term - eg compare:
comparecarhire.co.uk -> gives me -> comparecarhire.co.uk/london/Additional Word at the END: Number - eg 4:
carhire4.co.uk -> gives me -> carhire4.co.uk/london/
Geo association - eg uk:
carhireuk.co.uk -> gives me -> carhireuk.co.uk/london/
Info term - eg compare:
carhirecompare.co.uk -> gives me -> carhirecompare.co.uk/london/Which of the domains would be best to benifit when a term like "Car Hire London" is typed in ??
If you were to choose a domain which would you go for and why?
-
I don't have the answer. While I would be interested in hearing feedback from others, I highly doubt anyone has gone to this level of detail in any proper testing. URLs are a ranking factor, but a low one and this focus goes past the point of any realistic difference. I am willing to bet either way would never make any difference at all in a ranking determination. You are talking about 1 component of 1 low consideration factor. It's a 0.001% type of thing in my opinion.
Take a look at the Google.co.uk results for "care hire london". Notice you don't find the exact match URLs anywhere on the first page. If you go to the lengths to acquire an exact match domain, you have to receive exceptional rankings to make it pay off.
Notice you don't even see the "carhire.co.uk" nor the "carehirelondon-rentals.co.uk" until the second page of results. If you put this type of focus in ensuring you have the best quality site design along with world-class content, you will be on the first page of SERPs with or without the EMD.
EDIT: I'll go a bit further and add my private question from last month because I think it will help you as well. I carefully examined two results from a blog article Rand shared. Every single SEO indicator to which I have visibility tells me the #2 article should outrank the #1 article, including the URL.
When I look at both results without knowing the ranking outcome, I would have bet with confidence the #2 result would beat the #1 result, and I would have been wrong obviously. There are ranking factors to which we do not have visibility to or otherwise do not understand. Again, I agree you should have good domain names and URLs, but there are other more important factors which deserve our attention. http://www.seomoz.org/q/re-rand-s-blog-the-best-kept-secret-in-the-seomoz-toolset
-
Hi - thanks for your reply.
With regard to the question on the "additional" word Before/After the KW term in the domain, what I was looking for to how it would work for the sub pages.
EG - suppose my target terms is "Car Hire London"
I have options:
My question was really which of these 2 would be better (or make any difference at all) given the first domain www.TERMcarhire.co.uk/london has the exact KW string in the URL but www.carehireTERM.co.uk/london does not - IE it has the "TERM" seperating the KW string.
-
My experience is relying upon domain names in this manner is not a good approach. I'll set those feelings aside and answer your query as best I can. A few options you may wish to consider:
-
Since your primary goal is to improve search rankings and not brand your site, you can try alternative TLDs such as .info. Be sure to properly set up the site for the UK both on page and in WMT.
-
You could also consider hyphenated domains. I normally advise to avoid them but if your specific purpose is to gain the exact match benefit, they can help.
-
In my experience an exact match is a significant boost over a partial match. You can use the adwords keyword tool to locate the best keyword variations. Ideas like "hirecar" or "car for hire" come to mind.
-
I would not recommend adding a 3rd term to your URL unless either you were trying to brand the site such as "mycarhire" or you were matching a keyword phrase with a tremendous amount of search volume.
Based on the above, the only option you presented which is acceptable to me are the "compare" additions. I would only choose that option if "compare" is the best addition based on the keyword tool. With respect to adding on the beginning or end, I would choose the format which is most popular.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Target="_blank" and referral acquisition data
Hi, Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! I have been reading up on this topic but there is some contradictory articles out there and I was hoping someone could clarify the latest practise for me. Website A links out to four of its partner websites.
Search Behavior | | AMA-DataSet
These links are using a target="_blank". When i look at the acquisition data for any of the partner websites there is zero referral data from site A.
I tested this wasn't an analytics bug by using the real time feature while clicking the partner links to see what had happened, and to also find the source, but I found that they are all being returned as a source direct. Ideally id like it to show the referrals once more for reporting purposes. Do I need to add extra google analytics parameters/functions to track the outbound links? or should this referral data be appearing correctly and it is something unrelated to the links themselves? or should I throw in the towel and drop the target blanks? Thank you in advance for your time.
Best Regards.0 -
Vanish from google after choosing preferred domain and fixing 40 duplicate meta descriptions?
I recently followed 2 Google webmaster suggestions to clean up the on page SEO for our site. I chose a preferred domain 2 weeks ago(to www.website.com) and fixed the duplicate meta descriptions that our CMS was setting to unique and more natural descriptions for each page. I did that 3 days ago. Webmaster tools still says they are duplicates because it hasn't crawled the whole site yet. We have been fortunate enough to have some of our blog posts be covered by yahoo.com, cnet.com, huffingtonpost.com, gizmodo.com, etc. That is some major backlink juice and, as recently as 2 weeks ago, our website would be the #1 result when searching Google for "ourwebsite.com exact title of very popular blog post". Now it is on the 3rd page, and the top results are the websites that linked to our blog post. So....what gives? Is there a specific area I should look at? Our should I wait for Google to fully index our whole site now that changes have been made? It should be noted that our rankings have stayed the same in yahoo and bing. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
Search Behavior | | garyislearning0 -
Any Good Study on the Effects of CTR on Keyword Capitalization in SERP Description
Hey Guys I am wondering if any of you have done any study or testing on this ( or perhaps you might have come across one at some point in your career ) Personally I feel that while adding a description , it makes sense to Capitalize the Keywords and other words ( first letter only ) that I want to emphasise on ( perhaps stuff like Buy, High Quality, Best, etc ) . I want to pick your brains on this and see what you guys think about it. I have not tested the effects on CTR yet .. if someone else has then it will be a good resource for me to go through. ( and if no one else has done any relevant study I might do it at some stage ). Regards Saijo
Search Behavior | | Saijo.George0 -
How to Track Keywords Locally?
Does anyone know how to track keyword rankings locally? Like, if I want to track the ranking for "pizza" for people who search that in our local area? Thanks!
Search Behavior | | fiberglass0 -
How to approach SEO for a large site that doesn't have specific keyword goals?
So, I have a project that has 10,000+ page of unique editorial content in a specific industry. They currently get about 500,000 pageviews a month and average just under 2 pages per visit. It has a 66 domain authority and has been doing "the basics" for SEO for about 7 years (headline is an H1, URL is custom while the headline is more "reader friendly", description is a snippet of the body copy a little into the first paragraph, nofollow in the comments). The crux is that it's an editorial publication so they're not targeting specific keywords, but a wide swath of keywords. Would it be best to just dive in and figure out some of the less competitive keywords for some of the articles that they could tailor some content to rank better for, then just move onto more and more? What are some ways to approach this if they just want to raise their general traffic and relevancy to the next level?
Search Behavior | | jpea0 -
Would it be worthwhile to update URLs to include "for sale"
My team is new to the world of SEO. We were both in other departments when our last "expert" left and we became the entire department. Needless to say, we have many questions. I have a site for an existing customer - she wants to know if it is a good idea to change her URLs. She went to a webinar that suggested she include "for sale" in URL, since that is the site's primary purpose These are the current inventory URLs: http://www.dealerskinssite.com/used-inventory http://www.dealerskinssite.com/new-inventory The change would give something like: http://www.dealerskinssite.com/used-cars-for-sale
Search Behavior | | DealerskinsSearch
http://www.dealerskinssite.com/new-cars-for-sale I did some searching and could not find a solid recommendation one way or another. If it is true that people typically search for "used cars for sale" rather than a "used inventory", then there might be benefit to including that as part of the URL... but that is as far as my knowledge got me. Please let me know your thoughts Steve0 -
Google Rel="Next" & Rel="Prev"
Hello, I have a catalogue website and I am implementing the rel="next" and rel="prev" to the website. My question is that we do have a view all page also, which apparently Google likes over a 'page1'.. Should I add the canonical to this page? I already have it set to WEBSITEURL/sonos (which is going well) I don’t want to have to change this to [URL]sonos/view-all (which is my view all link) as the first page is getting ranked well I am then telling Google no, the view all page is the parent. Any advice would be very much appreciated. Thanks Rick
Search Behavior | | Lantec0 -
Can we rank as a related search query on a competitor's brand keyword?
One of my clients wanted to know whether it's possible for him to rank as one of the related pages on Google for a brand name of a competitor. I honestly don't know whether it's possible so any ideas whether it's possible and if so, ideas on what can be done is greatly welcome. Thank you in advance. 🙂
Search Behavior | | als0070