What are no followed links?
-
Hi there,
probably this is so self explaining that I didn't find it described in the tutorial about learning to use PRO or here in Q&Α. But remember, there is no dumb question What are the followed vs no followed links? I understand followed links as backlinks to my site, but what is a no followed link?
Thank you in advance!
-
SEOmoz linkscape presents both, that's why you can filter them to see just external nofollowed links or just internal ones.
-
thanks, but I am still confused about what the no followed links SEOMOZ talks about are. Are they external backlinks to my site that I submitted to no follow policy directories? Or internal links I put a no follow on? Or both?
-
Linkscape doesn't crawl and "index" all the links existing in the web. Just those that they consider having a real value.
If you want to see if you link building in directories is working, I suggest you to use Majestic SEO, that has a larger but less "selected" links' crawling.
-
Follow and NoFollow are commands you can give to bots about a link they find in a page:
- follow > follow the link and visit the page linked.
- nofollow > don't follow the link and don't visit the page linked.
Please note that I'm not talking about external site or the same sites, but both.
Then, followed links are likes opened pipes through which a % of link juice of the page where the link is pass to the linked pages. Nofollowed links have that "pipe" closed and do not pass link juice (that evaporates, as stated long time ago by Matt Cutts: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/
Related to the SEOmoz tools, for instance with Open Site Explorer you can filter followed links and nofollowed one, and also at the same time "internal links" and "external links".
When an internal link is nofollowed (being links by default followed), that is because of your own decision when creating the internal navigation of the site, and it does not depend by external factors
When an external link is nofollowed, is because the site that links to you maybe use a nofollow policy. That is a classic in blogs'comments.
-
Well, I actually searched on the Internet for directory catalogues and submitted my site on over 100 of them. Now if I type "www.freegamesonline.gr" on Google I find about half of them linking to my site, and Seomoz pro only shows 20 of them, which is rather confusing. Why does this happen?
Also I find my competitors got their links on sites like fcc.gov which seems to contain no links to external sites - i have no idea how on earth they did that - some king of hack? Even more unanswered questions!
Anyway, I will keep exploring seomoz for builgind linking strategies but still I have no clue how to interpret the metrics, I have attached a screenshot again. So what are the no followed links pro reports and how did I manage to do that while my competitors were more clever? It seems so self-explaining but it confuses me. None of the tutorials helped.
-
Great questions.
The response I offered pertained to outbound links from your site to other sites. If you are looking at your SEOmoz PRO tools, I need to ask which tool specifically to understand whether you are looking at outbound links from your site, or other sites linking to you.
For example, your crawl report covers all links that exist on your site. This report would cover your internal links and links you create to other site.
The Open Site Explorer tool shows only inbound links to your site from other sites. Your campaign tool works with both OSE and the crawler.
Many free directories will add your listing as a nofollow'd link, but if you pay them they will then change the link to a follow'd link. This practice is against Google's terms and I strongly recommend you avoid most directories. The overwhelming majority of directories provide no benefit to your site whatsoever. I recall a recent report where someone created 100 directory links and exactly one of them actually registered as having any value.
Many forums and blogs automatically nofollow any user generated content. If a user types a post and says "hey, visit xyz.com, it's a great site" then a nofollow link will be generated to that site.
A huge part of SEO is working to generate followed links. There are many people employed full-time as link builders. It is basically a form of marketing. The more authentic links you earn, the better. The problem is there are so many scams and worthless links it can be challenging to learn the process.
In short, ask yourself if a link looks legitimate. If a real gaming site such as IGN.com provides an honest link to your site saying "hey, we offer pay-to-play games but if you are only interested in free-to-play then visit xyz.com because it is a great site", then that is a good link. Likewise, if you get mentioned by cbs.com or other credible sites, that is great as well.
On the other hand, if a free directory will link to any site "just enter your URL and we will link to you", clearly that type of link farm has no value.
-
Thanks Ryan, I now understand what a no followed link is, but how does this apply to my site? I mean are the no followed links mentioned in PRO (followed vs no followed) external backlinks to my site not followed by search engines because, for example, I submitted them to directories that put a no follow on the links? All of my competition seems to have followed links and I have a lot no followed, so I am trying to understand which links are these and what I have done wrong.
-
As a site owner, when you offer a link to another site you are endorsing the site. If I recall, your site is focused on gaming. You may link to ncsoft.com since they create many online games. You also might link to the developer or distributor of many games as well such as lineage2.com. When you create those links, you are encouraging your site's readers to click on those links which can drive traffic to the site. If you leave those as follow links, you are basically saying "this is a good site, feel free to visit them".
Sometimes you are unsure about a site. For example, you may offer a forum on your site where you ask members to "post your favorite sites here". Since anyone can post a link, you don't know if the site they will link to can be trusted. Some people may post links to porn or other bad sites. If you allow those links to be followed, a search engine will believe you approve of the site. If you link to a "bad" site, then you can be penalized. For that reason, it is recommended site owners nofollow any links which they do not trust.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why are my month old links not showing in WMT or OSE?
Hey Everyone! I've been working hard on boosting my ranking after launching my new site 2 months ago. I realize that this process normally takes some time however I've come across a questions that I'm not sure I know that answer to... I had some really solid back links added about a month ago but nothing is showing up yet in WMT on them. When I run an OSE I don't see any links there (not even under newly discovered). Can someone please help with some insight on why they might now be showing. Is it just a time thing or should I be doing something different?Any insight will be very helpful. Thanks
Moz Pro | | MDesigns0 -
Is there an external tool to check for Link Balance profile (anchor text)?
Hi, Regarding the topic of Link Balance (anchor text from external sites). Is there an external tool you can point to your site or an individual URL that can give you the link balance (branded terms, exact match etc). This article is great:
Moz Pro | | STL
http://moz.com/blog/anchor-text-distribution-avoiding-over-optimization But it's a lot of work to do for individual pages (of which we have many). Just trying to see if there's a tool out there (Moz or otherwise), that can report on such balance on a page-by-page basis (paste in URL, hit 'Go'). Thanks.
Rich Talbot0 -
Open Site Explorer - Link Export Not Showing Same Number of Links
Noob question. I'm using Open Site Explorer to hunt down some external links for a website. In the attached image (post-pressing the filter button), it says I have 889 external links, but after I've downloaded the CSV, I only get 695 links. Why the difference in number? And if I'm doing something wrong, how do I make sure I'm getting the full amount of external links to my client's website? Thanks! GG6wURf.jpg
Moz Pro | | EEE31 -
Report not showing all links
I am trying to pull the back link report for the following URL www.hotscripts.com/category/scripts/php/scripts-programs/image-galleries/ OSE shows a total of 589 back links. When i download the report all I get in excel is 207. Why?
Moz Pro | | inetteam1 -
About how long does it take Google WMT to refresh stats on "Links to Your Site"?
About how long does it take Google WMT to refresh stats on "Links to Your Site"? We're dealing with an unnatural link/anchor phrase issue and I'm curious as to the "typical" time it takes for Google to recognize the links removal or Anchor Text change. Any refresh time ideas on OpenSiteExplorer or AHREFS as well would be a plus... Thanks! Dan Using this guide (very helpful thanks SEOmoz!) http://www.seomoz.org/blog/identifying-link-penalties-in-2012
Moz Pro | | MTteam0 -
OSE Backlink results - reported link not actually there?
Not a complaint, but a question to understand how the research tool operates: When I run backlink checks on websites, often the reported link is not only not on the page, but it's not found anywhere on the site. I use several tools to search for the link url as well as for the keyword. Why does the tool report a link is there, but I cannot find the links in some cases? Is there a lag in the information the tool is using, making it not quite up to date, or is it something else? Thanks much!
Moz Pro | | AdamThompson0 -
Is canonical link enough?
Hi SEOmozers! I have a question. SEOmoz analysis report me some duplicate that I thought I had fix. I can give a concrete example. This page: http://www.nuxeo.com/en/about/events/dec2011training-boston/moreinfo is reported as having 6 duplicated URL in the tool. When I click on 6, SEOMOZ tells me "Our crawl bots are getting their joints greased to fetch you even better data. Sorry for the delay!" And on the page itself, I placed a canonical link to follow recommandation. rel="canonical" href="http://www.nuxeo.com/en/about/events/apr2012training-boston" /> As a result I am curious why I would have this reported as duplicate by SEOmoz. Is this a bug? Thanks for feedback!
Moz Pro | | nuxeo0 -
Why are SEOmoz Pro Keyword Ranking reports different between two 301-linked URLs?
Hi, My main domain is www.dancenut.com. I have this 301 URL redirected to www.dancenut.com/boston/. I set up an SEOmoz Pro campaign for each of these URLs in order to see if they were being treated differently in any way. In most cases the report results are identical, or the small differences are understandable. However, there is one big difference between the two sets of campaign reports. In the Keyword Ranking reports, the data for the Bing and Yahoo! reports are identical, but the data for the Google reports are dramatically different. Out of 21 keywords, 9 are listed in the top 50 for www.dancenut.com, but only 2 are listed in the top 50 for www.dancenut.com/boston/ (the specific positions are the same for the 2 keywords that are listed for both). Does this make any sense? Could the SEOmoz Pro data be wrong? If not, then I'm suspicious that Google may not be interpreting the 301 redirect properly. I don't think this could be fully explained by a 1-10% reduction in link juice due to the 301 because I have one keyword for which my site ranks #1 in Google, Bing, and Yahoo! with www.dancenut.com, but it doesn't even rank in the top 50 in Google with www.dancenut.com/boston/. And why would these differences only exist for Google? Any insight would be much appreciated! Andrew
Moz Pro | | dancenut0