Site stuck on 2nd page on Google - how can it improve?
-
Hi
I am working on a site http://www.harrisbassett.co.uk that for search terms such as 'Chartered Accountants Swansea' appears near the top of the 2nd page of Google.
When looking at what is listed on the 1st page for 'Chartered Accountants Swansea' I would appreciate any advice/guidance on what else could be done to give the site a final push to get on the 1st page of search results.
Over the past 2 weeks I have been building inbound links from local citation sites yelp, qype etc along with sites from competitor analysis via opensiteexplorer.
Looking at the sites that are on the 1st page I cant understand why many of them are ranking higher than me?
Any insight and plan of attack would be most appreciated from any search experts on the forum.
Many Thanks
-
Hi Dan
Ran the report and its as I thought
My site has better rankings across the board than 6 of the top 10 results?
- For example on page optimisation analysis is graded A and there is only one other A grade in the top 10
- FB shares - we have none but only 3 of the top 10 have 1 FB share each, while we are the only one with a Google Buzz share.
- We have the 4th best domain authority and mozrank, 3rd best moztrust
- Linking c and root domains we are 5th best and 4th best page authority
We have been building links the past 2 weeks but these dont seem to be showing in the report as on exact anchor text links we have 0 when we should have several. BTW out of the top 10 8 out of the 10 have 0 for this metric
Does it take time for the links we have built to show in this report?
-
Correct.
I hate to offer any "wait" type of answer, but that is the next step. The first opportunity for a change is when Google crawls your page again. Your Google page cache is from October 8th. Since this issue is from your home page which is crawled more frequently, I estimate it will be updated this week.
Please check your site and ensure there are no other similar issues on other pages with respect to black hat technique usage. If a site is penalized, it can be the entire site regardless or which page the issue is discovered upon. Sometimes it is only the page, depending on the issue.
The rankings could be resolved right away. Your site may have also been given a "time out" form of penalty where it can take 30 days for the rankings to improve. To be sure, I would wait 30 days after the cache has been updated. I suggest marking the date on your calendar as a reminder.
-
Thanks
Is it best to canonicalise the URL via webmaster tools to point to the www version of the site.
I have added some content on the site before they was very little - how much content is enough - looking at some of the top 10 sites in the SERPS their content leaves a lot to be desired.
I am using ALT tags on images on the homepage already for the target search phrase - have I missed any opportunities?
Good idea with google map and images I can see where you are coming from- thanks
-
Hi
I have removed the hidden h1 behind the graphic on the homepage and included the targetted search phrase on the body copy of the homepage which I have also made bold. So time will tell if it makes a difference to the ranking?
-
canonicalise your urls
more content on the homepage
Get rid of crappy stock photography, makes you look spammy. Have large, quality images
Id add an image with keyword relevant alt attribs
Add a google map with your location
-
Hi
Use the Keyword Difficulty and SERP Analysis tool - run a full report. It will give you all the ranking factor metrics of the top 10 results (plus an 11th site you can add). The major things I always check first are;
- Linking root domains
- Linking C Blocks (there should not be a giant difference between root domains and C blocks)
- Exact and Partial match anchor text
- Facebook Shares
- On Page Optimization Grade
Chances are you may need to beat some people in the top 10 in any of these metrics.
-Dan
-
The resources it takes to improve your site are relatively low. Your site is not an e-commerce site. You don't accept online payments. It is a relatively simple site. With the proper knowledge, you can build it yourself. Alternatively, you can hire someone else to build the site for you.
Many companies offer to create basic word press sites for $500+. Personally, I don't like the quality of those sites at all. For between $1000 -$2000 you can build a very high quality, professional WP site including any extensions you need, a graphics layout, and everything you need to succeed from a SEO perspective. There are major corporations who spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to build their website. A small business should be able to afford a simple site as described.
With respect to the time, I noticed from your About page your company has at least 3 employees: Nick, David and Sharon. Is it possible each employee could write one helpful article each month? They could talk about a current situation they face, or a current hot topic in the industry. If one outstanding article can be written per month by each employee, your content will steadily grow over time. Additionally, you content may draw in new clients. The content will certainly offer new opportunities to rank for additional keywords.
Would the creation of a twitter account and feed on the homepage help with SEO to get us on the 1st page?
The creation of a twitter account in and of itself will not offer any tangible benefit. You need to actually use the account for it to have value. Tips, links to articles, helpful reminders, etc. can all make great tweets.
if you look at the other sites in the top 10 list they are very weak, I cant understand how my site has not overtaken them already.
As I shared, your site has at least two major problems with respect to ranking for the key term. You are using a black hat technique which alone can knock you off the first page. Additionally, you do not use the target phrase a single time in content. Both of these points are major SEO issues. At the very least, fix these two issues today.
-
With proper SEO I take it you mean build inbound links as there is not much more SEO or technical side SEO left to do?
What I was trying to achieve with the accountant-swansea page was to capture the traffic and ranking for this search phrase - which way would you recommend that I achieve this with supporting internal links?
I totally understand what you mean but the no1 site are a large firm and have the resources to do this - many small businesses do not have the time to run a blog or write financial articles - if you look at the other sites in the top 10 list they are very weak, I cant understand how my site has not overtaken them already.
Would the creation of a twitter account and feed on the homepage help with SEO to get us on the 1st page?
-
None of the results on the first page are particularly strong. With proper SEO, you should be able to not only reach the first page but climb to the top over time.
The next most important item is to clarify within your site which page should rank for each term. I have a concern because your site is so small and you are trying to rank your home page for "Chartered Accountants Swansea" yet you have another page which targets "Accountants Swansea": http://www.harrisbassett.co.uk/accountant-swansea.html
You can certainly provide two separate pages on your site which target similar phrases. It should be done in a very careful manner with supporting internal links.
Additionally, while your site appears professional, it is a very basic html site. Notice the #1 rank site has a "search" function which is generally part of a CMS. It also offers social engagement, blog, rss feed, etc. If this site belonged to my client, I would recommend moving to a WordPress or Joomla CMS and increasing their web presence.
-
Great thanks - will make those changes - anything else that I should be looking at?
-
First and foremost, ensure you are not using any blackhat techniques on your site's home page. I found a problem within 2 minutes on your site. It is highly likely Google noticed as well.
Your home page's header tag is not visible on the page. It is hidden behind the graphics at the top of your page.
<h1 class="HomeTitle">Chartered Accountants Swansea | Harris Bassett h1>
I would also suggest using your target phrase at least once on your page in content. You do use the words on the page, but not together as a single phrase.
Once making these changes, it may take a full month to see the changes in search results.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Building Page Rank
I have a situation where there is a product category page with multiple products listed linking to individual product pages. The pages been around some time with no change. The strange thing is although page rank is reasonable on the category page it doesn't seem to be passing any rank to the individual product pages. Any ideas to swing the roundabouts on this? Thanks
Link Building | | seoman100 -
Domain vs. page SEO
Hi I'm new to SEO and trying to optimize one of my pages. However this page that I'm trying to optimize is not the homepage. Does it mean that since I have collected links from other pages to my homepage that the specific page I'm trying to SEO doesn't get any "link juice"? And how could this situation be corrected? Is the only way to get direct links to the page I'm trying to optimize?
Link Building | | agentti0 -
Content of the Product Page
Hi Everybody : how can you tell if the content on the product pages are accessible by google ? please have a look at my product page : http://www.fireplaceproducts.co.uk/stoves/aarrow-stoves/aarrow-ecoburn-defra-wood-burning-stove/ i used classes in product page to set the key features, construction ,... i notices other companies done these as text and they get better ranks do you think that's the reason ? also to test that i added the text exact same as the key features , construction ,... as additional information at the end of the product page , would you thin that would be considered as duplication ? Kind Regards Arta
Link Building | | fireproductsuk0 -
Content Strategy - High Value on Lots of Sites vs. High Value on One Site
Good afternoon Mozzers. I have a discussion based question and I'd be interested to know your thoughts. I currently implement a content strategy where we create a series of high value How-to written articles, relevant to our audience and then work at getting them placed on multiple high value websites. I have just been offered an opportunity with a PR6 domain to create a similar series of content but place it all on their site with links back to ours through a dedicated section. So my question is would I gain more value from small amounts of great content in lots of places vs. a lot of great content in on place? Effectively 1 link from 20 sites vs. 20 links from 1 site.
Link Building | | RobertChapman0 -
5th failed Google reconsideration attempt, can you help? (are scraper/related news sites the issue?)
(sorry for the long question - I thought it would be useful to give the background!) I am really struggling a Google's reconsideration request for my site, and although we thought we had removed almost all the 'bad' backlinks I am still getting no-where... We are really wanting to focus on building our brand, and establishing our site as an authority but this penalty is really holding us back. The latest response from Google: There are still many inorganic links pointing to your site. At this point, we believe we’ve evaluated these links appropriately, and no further action from us is required. In order for your site to have a successful reconsideration request, we will need to see a substantial, good-faith effort to remove the links, and this effort should result in a significant decrease in the number of bad links that we see. We do not recommend that you submit another reconsideration request until you have been able to make a good amount of progress. Once you’ve been able to get the links removed, please reply to this email with the details of your clean-up effort. My Website: http://bit.ly/KXg8y1 History: This is a new domain - approx 6 months old Old domain received a Google links warning We decided to start a new website, launch a new brand and start from the beginning We 301 re-directed the old domain so we didnt lose customers We then got a Google links warning for the new site We assumed this was related to links from the old site and so removed the 301 redirect on the 20th August Our old sites links still show in Google webmaster tools Reconsideration History 1st re-consideration request: Explained the 301 redirect had been removed, assured we would now be focussing on high quality content/brand building and after 2 weeks received a standard message to say that still had inorganic links 2nd Request: Went through the new sites links (using open site explorer, AHREFs, SEO Majestic and GWM) and removed those we identified as low quality (mostly directories built by an SEO company we had started working with). We complied a spreadsheet with all the links in it (including 301 redirect links) and explained which had been removed, webmaster contact details etc. We also uploaded our template email and screenshots showing contact with webmasters. 3rd, 4th and 5th Request: We went through the new site links and were able to remove a few more links which were thin or could be seen as inorganic, and the end result is that apart from 6 links we have removed all those we have identified as inorganic. Links The old site had some pretty poor links We have done no paid linking, no blog networks, no spammy web 2.0 sites on this site. We've added good quality content to our blog, focussed on social media, published an infographic, and are committed to long-term brand building The links mostly come from guest blog posting. An SEO company (who told us they were 100% content based) built some directory links - but 99% of these have been removed There are some links from Scraper/related news sites (ones that have related blog posts or scrape images etc) Press releases which were picked up and re-published (some of these include anchor text) My Question/s: Do you think Google is still seeing the links from the previous 301 redirect in Google webmasters and including these still? Are these scraper/related post sites causing the issue? (organic links - but some dubious sites) Are sites re-publishing our press releases causing the issue? (organic links - but includes some anchor text I really appreciate your time on this one, I have tried really hard to identify and remove links, but am now struggling! Many Thanks
Link Building | | twhite0 -
Open Site Explorer
Typically when using Open Site Explorer to analyze links, how long does it take for them to show up? I have some links that are on high page ranking sites, yet they still do not show up with the Open Site Explorer. Thank you
Link Building | | TP_Marketing0 -
Unblock Shopping Cart Page
Is it weird to remove the View Cart page from being blocked in robots.txt if it has links pointing to it?
Link Building | | poolguy0