How to best correct cannibalization?
-
I apologize if this has already been answered, but after reading several posts on cannibalization, I can't seem to find what I am looking for.
The site in question is www.urbanitystudios.com and in particular the term "western wedding invitation". We rank in the top 30 for this term in Google, but Google has indexed a particular product, versus our western wedding invitation collection page.
The product that is indexed for this term:
http://www.urbanitystudios.com/Designs/western-wedding-invitations-p-1527.html
The page that we would rather be indexed:
http://www.urbanitystudios.com/Designs/western-wedding-invitations-c-95_179_181.html
After running an onpage report in SEOmoz tools for the collection page, we recieve an A grade, but get a warning on the cannibalization line item. As you can see, we name each product within that collection as "Western Wedding Invitation-x" (and have done this for other product categories...not good). After a good head slap, we realized that we are confusing Google as to what should be the main page.
If we rename our products, the product's URL will change-Do we do a 301 for those products?
If we rename our products, do we take out the words "Western Wedding Invitation" entirely or can we say "x-Western Wedding Invitation"?
Or. because cannibalization is deemed a "low priority" in the reports, do we let things be and work on getting links to the collections page vs the individual product?
Any insight would be most appreciated.
-
The idea behind cannibalization is you do not want multiple pages on your site discussing the exact same topic. If the same topic needs to be discussed, then some slant on the topic should be established so search engines and users can differentiate between the two pages. Instead of making a second "Wedding Invitations" page you could focus on "2012 Wedding Invitations" or "10 Best Wedding Invitations".
This is where I pause for a moment and confess my ignorance. I have no idea what a "cupcake invitation" is, and my mother and sister aren't available to help. I google'd it and still am not quite clear on the concept. What's missing is the wikipedia page, which is a GREAT opportunity for you! Go to wikipedia, create a quality "cupcake invitation page" and include 2 links to your site, but try to include links to other high quality sites which discuss the topic as well. If you don't already have such a page on your site, you may want to make a "Man's Guide to Invitations". It can be a simple, one page article to help those who are not familiar with the terms and etiquette get by. Alternatively a glossary page could be offered. Make sure the page you link to from wikipedia is a very high quality page, preferable without ads and a "buy now" focus.
For this reply please allow me to replace the "cupcake invitation" with "wedding invitation". Using that category, you have some products such as "pink-plaid".
For your first question, it is up to you how to combine the category and product. The normal URL presentation would be category first followed by product such as /wedding-invitations/pink-plaid. That type of setup is generally easy to implement and well understood by users. You can create alterations but they often don't scale so well to other categories.
For your second question, I would suggest including the category name in the H1 tag. A "pink plaid" page in and of itself does not hold a lot of meaning. I presume you could have wedding invitations, baby announcements and other categories with a "pink plaid" page. You need to differentiate them by adding the category name such as "Pink Plaid Wedding Invitations".
-
After reading your post and processing through the information we have started to change some of our keyword phrases within our category pages. However, we now have run up against a possible issue of more cannibalization items. I will try to explain what we think will happen if we do the following:
We created a category called Cupcake Invitations and have optimized the page for that keyword phrase. We have placed five products within this category and are very unclear as to how we should name each product. We would like to do one of two things (or whatever would work best). One idea would be to adjust their names so their URL contains “cupcake invitations”. The reason for this is because if we don’t add in “cupcake invitations” to our product name, our URL would look like this:
http://www.urbanitystudios.com/Designs/pink-plaid-p-####.html instead of
http://www.urbanitystudios.com/Designs/pink-plaid-cupcake-invitations-p-####.html
Question #1-Add the category name to the end of the product name?
Would we serve or hinder ourselves to name the product something like “pink plaid cupcake invitation” (which would be an H3 on the category page of “Cupcake Invitations”)i.e.. we think we would serve ourselves that if someone searches for “cupcake invitation” in say Googlebase, these products would show up. But would we hinder ourselves if we name all five products with some “product-name-cupcake-invitation” will we not run into keyword stuffing and cannibalization among the product pages? Especially when we grow that category with more cupcake themed products?
Question #2-If no, add the category name as an H1 on the individual product page? We have seen many top ranking competitors in our field use this strategy.
We would name the product just “pink plaid” so that on the “cupcake invitations” page, the link “pink plaid” isn’t confusing or cannibalizing. Then, on the actual product page pull in the category name of “cupcake invitations” (H1) next to the product name (H2).
Clear as mud? I am probably making this much harder than it actually is, but any clarification would help. Thank you!
-
Yes. It is enough to differentiate by adding a single work like "Wheat" or "Wanted Sign" to the phrase.
A word of caution. When using two phrases on your site where Phrase A is a subset of Phrase B, it is very important to ensure your Title, Header Tag, ALT tags, Content and Internal Linking all support this effort.
Phrase A "Country Wedding Invitation". Page Title "Country Wedding Invitation", H1 tag "Country Wedding Invitations", use the term at least twice in content with the first use in the first sentence, and then one time on this page offer an anchor text link to Page B such as "If you liked this page you may want to check out our Country Wedding Invitation - Wheat page" where the "Country Wedding Invitation - Wheat" is an anchor text link to that page.
The Phrase B page is treated exactly the same but replace "Country Wedding Invitation" with "Country Wedding Invitation - Wheat".
Don't forget to adjust ALT tags too. It would be helpful if at least some external links used this keyword as well. This is the hard part about your chosen phrase. It is likely people will link with "Western Wedding Invitation" to the "Wheat" page instead of "Western Wedding Invitation - Wheat". Ideally whatever you name your product needs to be something users will accept and use.
-
Thank you very much for the response. One reason we named our products "Western Wedding Invitations" and "Western Wedding Invitation-Wheat" is because of Google base---thought that would return good results (which for product 1527 it has). Could we not change the name so drastically to "Country Wedding Invitations" but instead to "Western Wedding Invitation-Wanted Sign" or something like that? Is that enough of a differentiation from Western Wedding Invitations? Thanks so much.
-
Hi Meghann.
Your two pages represent a classic case of keyphrase cannibalization.
The page title of each page is identical: Western Wedding Invitations by UrbanityStudios
The H1 tag of each page is almost identical: Western Wedding Invitations - 1527a
The URL of each page is almost identical: http://www.urbanitystudios.com/Designs/western-wedding-invitations-p-1527.html
To fix this issue, the first suggestion is to understand each page of your site should ideally target one keyphrase. That phrase (or a very close variation) should be used in the page title, h1 tag and content. If that same phrase is used elsewhere on your site, it should ideally be an anchor text link to the correct page.
Based on your question the root cause of the issue is you have two products named "Western Wedding Invitations". Even though each product has a different id number, there is not enough differentiation to help any search engine understand your wishes.
To fix the problem, keep the name on the page you wish to be indexed and change the product name for the other page. Perhaps "Country Wedding Invitation" could work? For the purposes of this reply I'll use that as an example.
Change your product name to Country Wedding Invitation. You stated that change would cause the URL to change automatically. Next, change the page title, h1 tag, content, alt tags, etc. to support the new name. 301 redirect the old URL to the new one. Once Google crawls your site it will recognize the change and fix the problem. Your results may bounce around a bit for a month, but then they should settle down.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best URL when adding an SSL certificate . . .
Our (small) company is a little late to the party on this, and we've only just realised that we're better off with an SSL certificate for our website. (Yes I know, I know, but we dropped SEO some time ago after getting severely bitten by a certain Penguin, and are only just making tentative step back to it after those intervening years, so we're running to get back up to date with these things.) This has now been implemented, but our web guy has dropped the 'www' element during the process. Our http://domain.com address has always historically been redicrected to our main http://www.domain.com address. Now our web guy has implemented the SSL cert, our website URL is appearing as https://domain.com, and he has redirected the http://www.domain.com to that new URL. Obviously all our historic (and more recent) link building has been to the http://www.domain.com address. Is this an issue, should the new Https URL keep the 'www', or does it make no difference what so ever? Conversely could it actually be of benefit dropping the 'www.' because our keyword specific product URL's are now 4 characters closer to the http and 4 digits shorter? Finally, on the links we have control of (professional trade associations etc) do we need to ask them to change the links to the new Https address, or does the transition from Http to Https make no difference?
Web Design | | Wookii0 -
What you consider the best Jquery Sliders?
Hello there, i would like to ask you if there's some preference on certain jquery slider that not only don't interfere with SEO efforts but contribute so a good recommendation or preference from you the SEO community will be gladly received. It wont matter if its free or it has cost. Thank you in Advance
Web Design | | Amarok3d
Amarok0 -
What's the best way to sculpt links on a page?
I know PR isn't a top ranking factor anymore, so "PR sculpting" isn't something to focus on. But isn't it still true that having more links that you need on any given page is worse than having fewer, in terms of that page's authority? I'm managing a site that has a lot of navigational links in the footer, which are duplicative because they're almost all included in the top nav bar, and several are triplicated in the sidebar as well. I wanted to remove 85% of these duplicative links from the footer, thinking they diluted the page authority and that most users probably won't scroll there anyway when we launch the site. The site owner is pushing back, though, not wanting to remove so many links because he believes they might be useful to some users. We can test our respective user-behavior theories after launching, but right now I have two questions: Will having a sizable number of duplicative links in the footer dilute the page's authority? and 2) Are there any other ways to reduce this dilution, aside from simply removing the links? (I know nofollow is not the answer, but possibly using iframes or Java or something like that?)
Web Design | | KyleJB0 -
Which is the Best Web Hosting Company?
Which web hosting company is the best to use for SEO purposes? Also which company has the best cost and value?
Web Design | | bronxpad1 -
Best Website Builder - Help Me Choose
I need to built a multi language site (to built a Pilates, Yoga site) and I will use a site builder. After posting questions on wix.com I came to the fact I should continue my research because there are not SEO friendly. Do you have a suggestions? Limited to html knowledge, using a website builder is my only option. Here are some of the features I need: Multilanguage Web Site Mobile version SEO Friendly Nice Template Selections( this is important) HTML customization Twitter, Facebook, Blog... I'm not looking at free website builder, when you want good features, there is a price to paid. Thank you for your help and suggestions, BigBlaze
Web Design | | BigBlaze2050 -
Correct Canonical Reference
Aloha, This is probably a noob question, but here we go: I got a CMS e-commerce, which does not allow static "rel=canonical" declaration in the header and can only work with third-party modules (xml packages) that append "rel=canonical" to all pages dynamic pages within the URL. As a result, I have pages I'm declaring incomplete rel="canonical" as such: Instead of: rel="canonical" src="www.domainname.com/category.aspx" I get: rel="canonical" src="/category.aspx" Coincidentally (or not), after the implementation of the canonical tag, pages that were continuously increasing in rankings started dropping, and, within a week, disappeared from the index completely. Could the drop be a result of my canonical links pointing to incomplete URLs? If so, by fixing this issue, do I stand a chance of recovering my pages' SERPs?
Web Design | | dimanyc0 -
Best way of conserving link juice from non important pages
If I have a bunch of non important pages on my website which are of little use in the SE's index - IE contact us pages, pages which are near duplicate and conflict with KW's targetting other pages etc, what is the best way of retaining the link juice that would normally be passed to these pages? Most recent discussion I have read has said that with nofollow you effectively just loose link juice, as opposed to conserving it, so that doesn't seem a great option. If I do "noindex" on these pages, would that conserve the link juice in the site, or again would it be just lost? It seems quite a tricky situation as many pages are legitimate for customer usability, but are not worth having in the SE's index and you better off consolidating link juice - so it seems you are getting penilised for making something "for users". Thanks
Web Design | | James770 -
Correct use for Robots.txt
I'm in the process of building a website and am experimenting with some new pages. I don't want search engines to begin crawling the site yet. I would like to add the Robot.txt on my pages that I don't want them to crawl. If I do this, can I remove it later and get them to crawl those pages?
Web Design | | EricVallee340