Google Penalising Pages?
-
We run an e-commerce website that has been online since 2004. For some of our older brands we are getting good rankings for the brand category pages and also for their model numbers.
For newer brands, the category pages aren't getting rankings and neither are the products - even when we search for specific unique content on that page, Google does not return results containing our pages.
The real kicker is that the pages are clearly indexed, as searching for the page itself by URL or restricting the same search using the site: modifier the page appears straight away!
Sometimes the home page will appear on page 3 or 4 of the rankings for a keyword even though their is a much more relevant page in Google's index from our site - AND THEY KNOW IT, as once again restricting with the keywords with a site: modifier shows the obviously relevant page first and loads of other pages before say the home page or the page that shows.
This leads me to the conclusion that something on certain pages is flagging up Google's algorithms or worse, that there has been manual intervention by somebody. There are literally thousands of products that are affected.
We worry about duplicate content, but we have rich product reviews and videos all over these pages that aren't showing anywhere, they look very much singled out. Has anybody experienced a situation like this before and managed to turn it around?
Link - removed
Try a page in for instance the D&G section and you will find it easily on Google most of the time.
Try a page in the Diesel section and you probably won't, applying -removed and you will.
Thanks,
Scott
-
When I perform a search on Google.co.uk for "W11171G2" there are 36 results total returned. Understand first that because we are using such a specific and unique search query, few results are returned and we can see every one. If we change the query to "W11171G2" watch" then 1.2 billion results are returned.
Also, I don't see the page you shared in those 36 results. I see two pages from your site. #21 rank is http://www.firstclasswatches.co.uk/red-dial.html, #11 rank is http://www.firstclasswatches.co.uk/products_search.php?page=8. There are additional results but I need to click "repeat the search with omitted results included" to see them, which most people are unlikely to click.
There are two types of issues when dealing with duplicate content. Google will very often index duplicate and thin content pages, but they are algorithmically penalized in the rankings. The "main" version of the duplicate content will rank fine, and the rest will rank significantly lower.
You are correct that many of your competitors have thin content as well. You should be loving that fact, not upset by it. You can step up your site and take top rankings.
-
Wow that's definitely a long post to chew on!
I appreciate the content issues and know that it is really in best interest to get them fixed ASAP, that's why we are already pushing customer reviews (sometimes with images) and on the popular products have quite a few. But obviously the descriptions have got to go.
I think the best thing to do, as Steve suggested at the bottom is to run various tests with changes and more content to see what works and then build more of the same content on the rest of our pages.
The main thing that gets me is the other pages that rank in the top 50, sometimes thin affiliate sites with even less content or value than our pages! Seems a bit fishy.
One thing I still don't get though is why this 'Write a Review' page shows up instead of the newly added (indexed) product page?
If you look at this particular example:
Search on Google UK:
W11171G2This page shows up -removed which is probably the definition of duplicate content due to its form like nature (we don't normally let these get indexed at all but I let it slide so I could use this as an example).
Now repeating the search with -removed
W11171G2 -removedI see first result as the proper product page as the second result behind write a review.
How does that make any sense when write a review contains no content whatsoever?
Scott
-
Dupe content is pretty severe, enough to cause your problems easily... try that software, I found a tonne of dupes on a large site with it that we'd have never found without it as it looks for chunks of text and consecutive words and phrases with the body text as well as sidebars, etc...
-
Ah, well spotted!!
Yeah sorry Jamie lol.
-
I agree. I did pick up one advance warning indicator. If you highlight any text and try to use the insert/edit link button but the button wont show as active, your post will be lost when you press Post Reply. It is the only way I know to detect an issue before it actually occurs.
PS. Jamie, sorry for hijacking your Q&A here but I am hopeful we have addressed your question
-
Yeah I should do that really. It's strange when it happens, it's not timing out or anything it logs me out when it happens. So I'm logged in, I post a comment and then it returns me to the page but logged out with my comment disappeared into thin air.
It must be something to do with sessions and all that I guess.
-
even more annoying is when you spend a while typing up a response, click "post reply" and then it disappears lol
Please open a ticket with the help desk (help@seomoz.org) and let Nick know about the problem! Sha suckered me...err....convinced me to do such and I have been feeding them examples for some time. They are having difficulty reproducing the issue. The more details they gather, the sooner it can be fixed. Please include your browser version information too.
-
Wow yeah that is something special!! Choose a Distilled conference in the UK, come visit us across the pond!!
Yeah I know what you mean with the spacings, etc... it can be annoying... even more annoying is when you spend a while typing up a response, click "post reply" and then it disappears lol. Doesn't happen often thankfully but each time it does I tell myself to remember to copy/paste into notepad next time but I always forget.
I wouldn't worry about the spacings, etc... too much though mate, with answers that to go above and beyond the call of duty like that I'm sure people aren't too worried about paragraphing.
-
Thanks Steve.
My reply bothers me because I can't get the spaces between the sentences to stick. I even tried on a different pc and the dang thing doesn't like spaces. Oh well.
I thought your reply was spot on and I thought to help out a bit with some specifics.
The "something special" was comprised of a few things, each of which I value highly:
-
a personal congratulations from Rand
-
a phone call with Rand where he certainly went out of his way to make me feel special
-
an as of yet unknown surprise package which should arrive any day. I am hoping for a dart board with Roger's image so I can use it whenever the Q&A gets glitchy or a piece of software doesn't function correctly.
-
and a complimentary pass to either MozCon2012 or one of the Distilled Conferences. Since I live in California and I love Seattle I chose the MozCon2012 option. I am very excited about taking this trip next year.
Cheers!
-
-
Jeez Ryan, no wonder you got Oracle with posts like that lol... congratulations on that by the way!! I don't suppose you can give a clue on what the "Something Really Special!" is?? haha
-
Hi Jamie.
I agree with Steve's assessment. The issue you are experiencing is common amongst ecommerce sites. You offer a lot of links, a ton of duplicate content and the unique content on the page is very thin.
I picked a random product page on your site: http://www.firstclasswatches.co.uk/police-sphere-12778msu61-p-8083.html. I performed a Google.co.uk search for "police sphere X" and your site shows as the 35th result.
When I view the page there are a relatively few number of unique words on the page. The unique sentences I do find seem like they either come from a product feed and are therefore duplicated on hundreds of other websites, or they seem canned as if they are used throughout the site with the current page's product name substituted in the phrase.
Example 1 - "Buy with confidence
This Police Sphere X 12778MSU/61 comes with the full official Police guarantee against manufacturing defects. As a reputable high street jewellers you can buy from First Class Watches with confidence. We are an official UK authorised dealer for every watch listed on this website."
Example 2 - "Authorised Dealer
This Police Sphere X 12778MSU/61 is an authentic, never worn item, supplied to us directly from Police. It is supplied with the official UK Police box, instructions and Police guarantee, exactly as if it were purchased from a high street jewellers. As a high street jewellers you can buy from First Class Watches with confidence. We are an official UK authorised dealer for every watch listed on this website."
The two examples above are the main pieces of "unique" content on the page. If you were to count every word on the page, what percent of the page is exactly the same on every other page of your site? Count your navigation, footer, sidebar and everything. The main content on your pages comes from a 4-tab block: Why Us, Buy with Confidence, Return Policy, Delivery. That content is identical on each page with the exception of substituting the current brand name.
I like many aspects of your site. Your products appear to be high quality and genuine. You offer a magnifying glass which provides detailed closeups of your products. You have established social engagement, a telephone number, your physical address, etc which helps with authenticity. But frankly, your site appears like you can add another 10k products tomorrow through a product feed and not blink an eye. There is absolutely no warmth, no customization, no sense of quality within the content. It is just another e-commerce site carrying products. This type of site was designed to be penalized by Panda.
Some suggestions:
- More images. You offer 1 main image which is fine. People love images. How about unique images of a model wearing the watch in various settings enjoying life.
- More reviews. While you can't force anyone to leave a review, there are many things you can do to encourage it. You can send e-mails to customers who purchased after 30 days requesting a review, as an example.
- More specifics about the exact watch you are showcasing. Was it used in a movie? Do any stars or famous people wear that watch? Does it look like a watch others wear in a fashion magazine?
- Redesign the pages to where the navigation, sidebar and footer present the links which are truly helpful to your users. Examine your Analytics to determine which links are not used. You may be surprised. The content on your page should stand out, not compete for attention against the rest of the page.
- Your "Similar Products" and "Recently Viewed Products" are both examples of potentially helpful blocks and should be retained.
-
Thanks, we will try some experiments but I think there is something more severe occurring here.
-
I guess you don't have to do the same with all pages. Just pick three that aren't performing that well, ensure they don't have extra link building over other pages so you know it won't affect the outcome too much across all three, and then make the on-site pages to see what happens with just those pages
-
While you're probably right, some of the pages we are competing with (especially on things like very specific model numbers) are absolutely terrible and yet we appear nowhere for quite a lot of them. We don't even appear for unique text even when the page is indexed.
You're right about the URLs for brands, they need to have more in them but we have some which are quite old for instance -removed, which has a healthy ranking on page 1 for Seiko Watches and we don't want to because of the risks of moving lots of URLs (obviously with 301s).
-
Okay it looks to me like too many internal links off the homepage to spread your equity flow to the right internal pages.
You could also ensure the content of pages is higher in the source, make URL's more friendly by adding "watches" or something into the products as well as the brand name instead of "-c-24.htm", etc... and get another partial match keyphrase into the title tag instead of the same title tag ending for all products.
-
I've added a link now to the thread as I realise there's even less chance of sorting it out if I don't include one.
I think it has to be something else, I should say we have had problems with this since before panda, but maybe that has made it worse.
We used to have a page indexed for each product that was a simple form to add a new review to the product, it was essentially completely duplicate as the only thing that would change on the page was the product name.
Nevertheless, this write a review page which offered no benefit to anybody searching would show up in the SERPs ahead of this product page despite the duplicate content and there only being one link to it on our site (anchor text 'Write a review for this product').
Obviously when applying the site: modifier we still got our product page showing up as most relevant!
-
Hiya, yes Google has always penalized pages not just whole domains... but you're noticing it now due to Panda and its updates. As you said you're worried about duplicate content try this: http://www.dcfinder.com/ I only came across it the other day but it's pretty good for dupe detection
There could be something else causing it though, lots of people are seeing the same thing as yourself... difficult to pinpoint the issue sometimes though, especially without the website URL
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Without prerender.io, is google able to render & index geographical dynamic content?
One section of our website is built as a single page application and serves dynamic content based on geographical location. Before I got here, we had used prerender.io so google can see the page, but now that prerender.io is gone, is google able to render & index geographical dynamic content? I'm assuming no. If no is the answer, what are some solutions other than converting everything to html (would be a huge overhaul)?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | imjonny1231 -
How to stop google bot from crawling spammy injected pages by hacker?
Hello, Please help me. Our one of website is under attack by hacker once again. They have injected spammy URL and google is indexing, but we could not find these pages on our website. These all are 404 Pages. Our website is not secured. No HTTPS Our website is using wordpress CMS Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ShahzadAhmed0 -
Trying to escape from Google algorithm ranking drop
in 2010 our website was ranking number 1 for many keywords. we suddenly saw a crash in this a few years ago. we have since identified we have been hit by many shades of Panda and penguin updates. Mainly due to low quality back-links and poor content (some duplicates). since then we have done a major overhaul of our backlink profile. We have saved rankings that went from number 1 for many keywords to number 60 -70. We are now placed at around 11 to 18 rankings. We have also looked at our duplicate content issues, and removed all duplicate content, introduced a blog for fresh bi daily updates in an attempt to gain traffic. We also amalgamated many small low quality pages to larger higher quality content pages. we are now mobile friendly with a dynamic site, and our site speed is good (around 80). we have switched to https, and also upgraded our website for better conversions. we have looked at the technical issues of the site and don't have many major issues, although we do have 404's coming up in the google webmaster tools for old pages we removed due to duplicate content. we are link building at a pace of around 40 mentions a month. some are no follow, some do follow and some no links. We are diversifying links to include branding in addition to target keywords. We have pretty much exhausted every avenue we can think of now, but we cannot jump over to page 1 for any significant keywords we are targeting. Our competitor websites are not that powerful, and metrics are similar to ours if not lower. 1. please can you advise anything else you can think of that we should look at. 2. we are even considering going to a new domain and 301'ing all pages to this domain in an attempt to shake off the algorithm filter (penalties). has anyone done this? how long can we expect to get at least the same ranking for the new domain if 301 all urls to it? do you think its worth it? we know the risk of doing this, and so wanted to seek some advice. 3. we have on the other hand considered the fact that we have disavowed so many links (70%) that this could be a cause of the page two problem, however we are link building according to moz metric standards and majestic standards with no benefit.. do you think we should increase link building? Advice is appreciated!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Direct_Ram0 -
Best practice to preserve the link juice to internal pages from expired domain?
This question relates to setting up an expired domain, that already has quality links, including deep links to internal pages. Since the new site structure will be different, what's the best practice to preserve the link juice to these internal pages? Export all the internal pages linked to using majestic Seo/ ahrefs etc, and set these pages previously linked to? Or 301 redirect these pages to home page? I heard there's a Wordpress plugin that 301 redirects all the 404 errors successfully preserving all the potential link juice.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | adorninvitations0 -
Are links on a press page considered "reciprocal linking"?
Hi, We have a press page with a list of links to the articles that have mentioned us (most of which also have a link to our website). Is there any SEO impact with this approach? Does Google consider these reciprocal links? And if so, would making the links on the press page 'nofollow' solve the issue?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mikekeeper0 -
Can a hidden menu damage a website page?
Website (A) - has a landing page offering courses Website (B) - ( A different organisation) has a link to Website A. The goal landing page when you click on he link takes you to Website A's Courses page which is already a popular page with visitors who search for or come directly into Website A. Owners of Website A want to ADD an Extra Menu Item to the MENU BAR on their Courses page to offer some specific courses to visitors who come from Website (B) to Website (A) - BUT the additional MENU ITEM is ONLY TO BE DISPLAYED if you come from having clicked on the link at Website (B). This link both parties are intending to track However, if you come to the Courses landing page on Website (A) directly from a search engine or directly typing in the URL address of the landing page - you will not see this EXTRA Menu Item with its link to courses, it only appears should you visit Website (A) having come from Website (B). The above approach is making me twitch as to what the programmer wants to do as to me this looks like a form of 'cloaking'. What I am not understanding that Website (A) URL ADDRESS landing page is demonstrating outwardly to Google a Menu Bar that appears normal, but I come to the same URL ADDRESS from Website (B) and I end up seeing an ADDITIONAL MENU ITEM How will Google look at this LANDING PAGE? Surely it must see the CODING INSTRUCTIONS sitting there behind this page to assist it in serving up in effect TWO VERSIONS of the page when actually the URL itself does not change. What should I advise the developer as I don't want the landing page of Website (A) which is doing fine right now, end up with some sort of penalty from the search engines through this exercise. Many thanks in advance of answers from the community.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ICTADVIS0 -
Google Disavow and Penalty lifted please help?
We disavowed 80% of our backlink profile due to our last SEO building cheap nasty links and filed a reconsideration requested (we had the Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links to http://www.xxx.co.uk penalty for a year from the 24<sup>th</sup> march 2012 but thought it best to clean up before round 2 – even though we had no real penalty and we dd some decent link building that moved us up). We then received a successful penalty lifted note (on the 22<sup>nd</sup> of May 2013) but our rankings dropped (due to the crap links propping us up) since then we have built a fair few high quality links but our rankings do not seem to be moving much if at all (7 weeks clear now). has anyone had any experience with the above (are we in a sandbox type situation). Thank you for your time Thanks Bob
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobAnderson0 -
Why did Google reject us from Google News?
I submitted our site, http://www.styleblueprint.com to Google to pontentially be a local news source in Nashville. I received the following note back: We reviewed your site and are unable to include it in Google News at this
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | styleblueprint
time. We have certain guidelines in place regarding the quality of sites
which are included in the Google News index. Please feel free to review
these guidelines at the following link: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35769#3 Clicking the link, it anchors to the section that says: These quality guidelines cover the most common forms of deceptive or manipulative behavior, but Google may respond negatively to other misleading practices not listed here (e.g. tricking users by registering misspellings of well-known websites). It's not safe to assume that just because a specific deceptive technique isn't included on this page, Google approves of it. Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles will provide a much better user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who spend their time looking for loopholes they can exploit. etc... Now we have never intentionally tried to do anything deceptive for our rankings. I am new to SEOmoz and new to SEO optimization in general. I am working through the errors report on our campaign site but I cannot tell what they are dinging us for. Whatever it is we will be happy to fix it. All thoughts greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jay0