As kerry said this is the seond case of no title today, it maybe a problem at google.

I also notived you have a meta title tag also, what with that?

I find you will rank for both anyhow, if you look at keywords in google, you will see a keyword like company (2 versions), meaning you have company and comanies on your site.

I would try to put both in like rob said, it looksa more natural, search engines analyze the page for words that should support your keywords to see if your content is natural

First I would say that I dont like the www on domains names and i belueve uit will fade away sometime as it is not nessasary and will make urls look old fashioned. Its a good point that some may type in the www, but i believe that is a small amount fo people.

Matt Cutts has mentioend cheap domain TLDS are associalited with spam in a few videos, while this does not mean they rank them lower, i would not risk it.

The best reason not to use them is conversion, they look cheap and spammy, i would always prefere a .com, .net or .org

I had a quick scan thought the article and it looks likethey are talking from a usability aspect. I am talking from a link juice aspect. Page rank passes only 85% thought a link, so if the home page passes PR of 1 thought each of its likes, the a page one click away only gets 0.85, 2 clicks 0.72, 3 clicks 0.61, 4 clicks 0.52.

It gets a bit more complicated when the pages link back to the home page, theough dopnt pass back as much either.

i have a simple explaination here.

http://thatsit.com.au/seo/tutorials/a-simple-explanation-of-pagerank

And her is a caculator that you can ry to see how it workes out.

http://www.webworkshop.net/pagerank_calculator.php

Its not how many folders deep your pages is, but how many clicks from the home page it is.

if page domain.com/deep/deep/deep/deeppage.htm is linked from the home page then thats ok.

if page domain.com/rootpage.htm takes 4 clicks to get to it from the home page then you have a problem.