Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Those load speeds are absolutely fine and wont be hampering any SEO efforts at all. One of my sites takes around 7 seconds to load and ranks 1st to 4th for very highly competitive phrases 
It is more about the user experience, content and making sure you are attracting the right people.
If your site is built in Wordpress, look at a cache plugin to speed load times up if you want to get a little more from it.
Don't sweat about those times though
-Andy
I'm not a fan of trying to stuff with keywords, but I do try and make sure they are in the URL (not always possible), in the title, description and somewhere towards the top of the page - usually an H1 or title of some sort.
If you really must try and hit a percentage, don't ever try and go for more than about 4-5% (an an absolute max).
Google tell us that in the first part of the page they should get a feeling for what it is about...
So...
Andy
Hey Vince,
I remember reading that when it was posted.
Do you have an example if a page with an outbound link that has been nofollowed? I would like to take a look at this myself. Do you have a rel=nofollow tag on the outbound links at all?
-Andy
Hi Al,
There are so many possibilities for this, so I will run through a few for you to check / think about.
-Andy
I have never seen an instance where a span tag has had any negative effect on SEO as it is just a standard HTML element.
OK, perhaps some favour a style sheet, but raw code on the page is still more than acceptable.
Andy
This is going to be markup language, Schema / MicroData perhaps, but I haven't come across this myself yet.
I think perhaps it is time to do some digging
-Andy
Just read this:
"Update: A Google spokesperson let us know that restaurant menu data is coming from an unnamed data partner. It's similar to how Google uses data from The Weather Channel and other partners to pull in data for searches about the weather."
So there we go - I am sure we will all find out soon.
-Andy
Without mentioning the platforms you work with, you are never going to have brand influence until someone visits your website.
However, brand management is not a 2 minute subject as there are nuances that need to be looked at such as who your audience are, where they find you, opportunities to name-drop, how you advertise, how you are perceived - the list goes on.
So are you looking to piggy-back your service based on the platforms that you work with? or just build a brand of your own?
Andy
Very nice EGOL! It's been a long time since my copywriting days, so will certainly be interesting to look at
-Andy
Hi,
Have you done (or thought about doing) any testing and looking at stats to see which would work best for you?
Personally, I would be quite wary of just changing to a new form structure without doing a level of A-B testing first of all. You want to know for sure, which is going to work best for you.
I understand the points about drop-off but those that don't, you get a higher level of enquiry, but can you do better than this? Is 1 question per page too little? Could you get away with 2 and halve the process? How about 3? How about just 2 pages, one for personal and one for requirements?
There is a lot to think about here but please don't try to make the decision yourself as this isn't necessarily what other people want.
Head over to Hotjar (or something similar) that will allow you to watch how people actually interact with your forms. Setup goals in Analytics so that you can see where people are dropping out. Tie all of this in together and use real visitor numbers to help you with your decisions.
I hope this helps a little.
-Andy
Hi Steve,
So just to be clear, is the .ie site hosted in Ireland or the UK? And this is the primary site with just a .co.uk pointing at it as a domain forward?
I don't think that Google would re-index the .co.uk as they know it's a forward but to err on the side of caution, remove the forward that is currently in place and concentrate on putting right any issues with with the .ie - I suspect duplication features heavily?
Andy
Hope you get this sorted out guys, but you are probably going to get a faster answer if you create a support request and let someone take a look for you.
Andy
if you are using Chrome, Grammarly will monitor your email, moz posts, wordpress, etc for improvements and you can accept them with a click.
I am indeed! That will also be getting installed!
Right now, I am just stunned at how much better the opening paragraph on my 'About' page now sounds! hemingwayapp absolutely rocks!
That's me not sleeping tonight - I have a site to improve 
-Andy
Hi Oliver,
It does the same with my site, and although I have social icons throughout the site, I don't advertise an e-mail address because of spam.
Remember that OSE just takes a number of metrics and gives an estimation. This by no means is assuming that you are doing anything wrong, more that the crawler can't see where you address and details are - it might even be just 1 element of the address that is missing to it and it still reports it as a whole.
Don't worry about it at all.
Check your site in Google by doing cache:www.site.com and checking that Google sees your address. If it does, don't worry.
-Andy
First, tread carefully with Business.com as I know of companies that pulled out of there after Panda hit them and reports that they had seen a drop in terms of rank. Basically, if you are going for generic directories, try and find ones in your niche.
As for which service to use, I don't actually use PR services myself so can't offer any real input here, but do hear good things about PRWeb.
One thing to also remember, if you are looking to build backlinks, you need to diversify, but not to the point where the site has no meaning to your industry. For example, you could quite happily look for blogs and sites that sell fitness equipment, fitness food, bikes, climbing equipment and even diet websites - it is all related at some level and Google will know this.
You might be surprised just what you can turn up.
Andy
Hi,
If you have a look at this URL, there are plenty to choose from, and all appear to have reviews.
-Andy
Are you able to paste your Robots.txt file here so we can have a look? Failing all else, if you mail support, you will get an answer from the guys at SEOmoz with what is going on if you think there is still a problem.
Perhaps others who use the rank tracking can offer something additional.
Andy
I think that putting two hours of work into this opening single paragraph could help you rank better in the search engines because I do believe that Google demotes poor copy
^^ This!
Spend a bit of money and hire a professional copywriter to help out if you need to. It can work wonders!
Do you have the page with the link in it for me to take a look?
-Andy
Hi Thomas,
DA isn't just calculated off links, so it could be a wide range of factors making this happen. Moz explain it here:
Domain Authority is Moz's calculated metric for how well a given domain is likely to rank in Google's search results. It is based off data from the Mozscape web index and includes link counts, MozRank and MozTrust scores, and dozens of other factors. It uses a machine learning model to predictively find an algorithm that best correlates with rankings across thousands of search results that we predict against.
I hope this helps
-Andy
No, this won't be an issue. All you are talking about is a URL structure, but then you can get round this by changing your permalink structure if you wish.
However, I know others who have added the categories to their Robots.txt and others who have noindex'ed them. I also see many other sites that do absolutely nothing and with nothing detrimental in the SERPs.
It's not a biggie, but I am sure others will have some suggestions for you if you do want to do something about it.
Just focus on the great unique content on the pages and this will be Google's primary concern.
Andy
Hi,
When I do a search for Nickel Alloys, I get the homepage at position 17. Other than the Adwords, I don't see www.artificialgrass4u.co.uk in the first 5 pages.
What are you using to check pages and positions?
-Andy
You will need to use a package that allows you to track competitors. I'm not sure MOZ lets you do that, unless you had a pro account and just used you allocation on your own site and others.
There are lots of tracking apps out there though.
-Andy
If the content isn't indexed by Google, in theory there is no harm in reposting this, but just be careful to follow best practices with any external links from the article itself. Do you know if the site it was originally posted on was penalised? Was the article indexed originally?
One question... you mention Copyscape - has the article been spun at any point or a combination of information brought together from other sources? It might be worthwhile 'freshening' the article to ensure it is fully up to date.
-Andy
Some of the tools here at SEOmoz will be of great help to you.
Start out by using Google Keywords to research the phrases you want to rank for. This will serve as a guide to helping you chose and find new phrases and to see how many searches are performed each month.
Using Open Site Explorer here will help you identify your competitors sites to give you an idea of where they go to get their links.
Install the SEOmoz toolbar to help you are you browse sites as well.
Don't just stop at SEO either and remember to think about usability of your site. How easy is it to navigate, do any images give off the desired message, etc. After all,what is the point of getting traffic only to lose it when they get to the site.
It is also important to look at your sites analytics to help you understand what people are doing there - look at Bounce Rates and Exit Pages to understand where work needs to be done.
There are so many pointers I could pop in here that it would take forever, but do have a read of the blogs and guides here at SEOmoz
Regards,
Andy
I honestly don't see any problem with what you are wanting to do. That certainly wouldn't cause me concern.
Just remember that you don't want pages to fight against each other in terms of which one is going to serve the content for a given phrase. However, don't try too hard otherwise you might find Penguin coming along and giving you a hit before you even get anywhere. OOP (over optimisation penalties) are quite common when you try to do everything you possibly can.
Just keep it clean and you should be fine without having to worry about trying too hard.
And just remember that Wordpress has lots of little nuances that could be classed as problematic by other SEO's, but in reality, it is invariably pretty good at what it does, and does without penalty out of the box.
Andy
Hi Conor,
If visitors are correctly redirected to the mobile page already, you don't really need to do anything else. If there is a rule that takes someone to the mobile site (when on a mobile platform), that is pretty much all you need to do. Sticking a canonical tag in there will confuse issues.
-Andy
Hi,
First of all, disavowing will have nothing to do with the number of duplication warnings you get. This can only affect inbound links and even then, you won't see any drop in these through Webmaster Tools.
What are you using to see the duplicate pages?
-Andy
I would be tempted to add an 'updated' date and leave the original posted date in place. This way you satisfy both readers and Google.
The only time I would update the actual posted date, is if the article was very significantly different - to the point it wasn't that recognisable as what it used to be.
Get busy sharing the post socially again and make sure you advise people that it has been updated to reflect new data.
-Andy
Personally, I don't like long pages of endless text, tend to be over-faced and move on. I much prefer something broken into bite-size chunks.
However, you can't argue with the masses - I can't imagine reading a camera review on DP Review that is 14 pages long, but then all on one page!
There should be no SEO downside whichever way you go, as long as the article is good.
Your 1st point - don't worry about this. As long as there is enough good unique content on each page, then a snippet isn't a problem.
Regarding your 2nd point, were you given a reason not to noindex? Were you given an alternative solution?
In many cases, noindex sorts out all of the problems that Panda can throw at a website. However, just be aware that there are occasions this wont work and you need to look to robots them out.
Andy
Hi,
"My question is, does mens v.s men's make a different for on-page SEO?"
Google are always going to look for the grammatically correct wording, so it is important to always ensure this is what you give them. As Andrew said, MOZ & Google are going to have pretty major differences in what they look for and how they grade it.
You also have to think about visitors that land on your page and find the lack of punctuation, and yes, people will do this. I'm not saying that it would lose you business, but I would never give anyone the chance to question any aspect of credibility.
Would wording this incorrectly leave you with a penalty? Nope! Would getting this right form part of a score on one of the Google algorithms? More than likely - but to what degree is anyone's guess.
-Andy
You can get problems with duplicate content from all over the web, but a disavow would have absolutely no impact on this. That is to distance you from external links that you don't wish to be associated with.
As this is a something related to the MOZ products, I can't give you an answer on that I'm afraid.
Have you made no actual changes to the site that could account for this? If you can, re-categorise this post to include Product Support.
-Andy
Hi Niall,
we were wondering if there is any widget or plugging to make this in a smooth way and that works fine
What is it powering the site then? Drupal? Joomla? Or is it just good old HTML?
If you are looking for a way that works, then there is no reason not to use Google - after all, they are the search masters. This would be a fairly quick and easy way to get a search function working with no cost other than a bit of time, if you go for the free version that is. However, if you are looking for something more custom, then you would really need to talk to a developer who can do this for you.
How big is the site?
More reading here...
-Andy
Hey Dylan,
You now have 512 pixels to play with for your page title. This equates to around 60 characters, depending on the characters used and how wide they are.
Screaming Frog Spider offer a free download that will allow you see how many pixels your titles are.
to answer your other question, yes, that is overly spammy. I always like to follow the simple rule of
<important keywords=""><expansion words="" phrase="">|<brand></brand></expansion></important>
-Andy
Rich snippets are what come from HTML markup from the likes of Schema. And yes, there are a number of Wordpress plugins that will allow you to create markup very easily. This will then (hopefully) be used by Google to create rich snippets.
It is confusing at first
-Andy
Very unethical. And your H1 doesn't need to just be the same as what is already there - it can be a sentence explaining the page. I wouldn't advise making the page use the same words / phrases all over. Try going for some synonyms for extra punch.
-Andy
Ahh you said Homepage above. "...which keywords to target for your home page"
The about us page isn't really one that you want to be SEOing for any of your key phrases. It's just a page that gives you some opportunity to tell your story and background. It isn't something that people would necessarily visit to purchase a product or service.
Is there a reason you are trying to get more people to it?
-Andy
Hi Robin,
For internal linking, you want to explain the page that the link is taking you to. This is still the current way to handle internal links.
Try not to think of the link as an opportunity to rank that page for the desired keywords / phrase. The link should be a short and snappy description of the linked page, but do move away from just using "money keywords".
-Andy
Hi Steve,
First, I would suggest looking at Yoast's SEO plugin. This offers much more in terms of customisation and function.
Do you mind listing the URL so I can take a look at the homepage? It might be Google (probably is) but just need to be sure.
-Andy
A quick way would be to disallow crawling of all pages starting with /?PIPELINE. That will prevent Google from seeing them. You can do this by adding the following into your robots.txt file...
Disallow: /*?PIPELINE
However, you want to get to the root cause, which will be something to do with the system generating these. Ideally, this needs to be fixed.
-Andy
Would Google see them as duplicate? Probably, but I can't see it as something that is much of a problem. Will crawlers identify it as an 'issue'? Most certainly - and I suspect MOZ isn't the only one that would.
More often than not, these are only 'issues' that you should be aware of. It is much better to be aware of something than it being missed, so they all tend to err on the side of caution and pick up lower levels of dupe content.
That said, there is nothing wrong with adding some content to those pages. It can only do good things for you.
Have you seen any drop in the SERPs to suggest problems with those pages?
-Andy
If the keyword contains the location term like "SEO company London" is it better to use the wider results over local?
Can you expand on this please Darren? I don't really understand what the question is. Is it better to use the wider results for what?
-Andy
Hi Adam,
I would remove those footer tabs. I have never been a fan of these as there is always speculation over what Google can and can't see, depending on how they are implemented.
Try to resist the urge to get your key phrases into the page too many times. Google are pretty smart at figuring these things out and as you said, your competitors are ranking well without the need to do this.
I would also be focussing on link-building for the site as that will be one of the biggest contributors next to content. Have you done much of this for the site?
-Andy
That must be really frustrating for you Mike.
I am not surprised you can't access them at the back-end as these are almost always a by-product of the e-commerce system. So many don't care about what extra churn the sites produce.
You could always robots out those bad pages? Just something like:
Disallow: /store/pc/www.ocelco.com/*
This should still readily allow everything else to be indexed after http://www.ocelco.com/store/pc/...
Give it a try and then run the site through Screaming Frog and see if these bad pages are then picked up.
-Andy
...it wont harm us for sure.
Well, being aware of it, you can make it better - that then will do things both for the user experience and Google.
Just be aware that there is a Panda refresh imminent. That will look at thin content (amongst other factors). Anything you can do to make your pages better will be good.
-Andy
If your tracking app allows, track as much as you can. Local and non-local will always be given different positions, so always track both.
-Andy
Hi Megan,
You shouldn't really have two live versions of your site. Apart from anything else, this causes duplication issues. What I would do is correct this by having someone create a redirect in the .htaccess file so that when anyone does hit the non-www version, they will automatically be forwarded to the www version.
That being said, you could always look at page caching to speed the load times up. Perhaps even look to have large images fed from an alternative source such as Flickr?
Andy