If you are planning to put the content on the deep page very soon on the home page, you may use a 302. If this is not the case, you have to 301.
Posts made by baptisteplace
-
RE: Is a 302 redirect the correct redirect from a root URL to a detail page?
-
RE: Is a 302 redirect the correct redirect from a root URL to a detail page?
Disagree with that, the only case when this could be used is the following case :
Service in unavailable (503) for any reason, and you can't display a 503 on the homepage. In this case this could make sense to 302 to another page displaying a 503, because your home page will soon be back.
-
RE: Dynamic pages and code within content
I would not recommend doing so, google will index you pages but he won't be able to find them anywhere on the internet, event on your website. They won't rank.
You should make, at least, a way for users and google to access theses pages without the buttons.
For the code / content / style issue, you should really stop putting all together - it's been 10 years since people started to separate content and style
-
RE: Difference forum and QA
A good Q&A will have only one answer (editorial content) or have several ways to make the question and the answer have a good quality (content and SEO). This is done with moderation or social features (best answers, etc.). Content is targeted and under control.
A forum will be much more free, their is no best answer put in the first page just after the question, the topic may not be a question too, you can have very various contents. Also, forums have some very difficult SEO problems with duplicate content, empty pages and more.
-
RE: Bounce Rates - How would you deal with this scenario?
I don't think you would trick Google with these kind of hacks. Google Analytics bounce will not be used by Google if they use bounce rate for ranking. If this was the case you could just add an event on the page load and the bounce rate would go to 0%.
I would suggest to do nothing or to think about a different way to present the 2 sites.
-
RE: Can your site be penalised by backlinks?
Hi maximise,
The url you gave is wrong, beware there is your site's url. Anyway, the vietnamfuntravel website won't give any juice, it looks really suspicious and link exchange is in the menu !
I don't think these backlinks could impact negatively your site, but I would recommend to remove them anyway. They don't give you much, and this would sanitize your backlink profile.
-
RE: Slashes In Url's
Hi gregster,
Your trailing slash does matter although this is not a major problem. To keep things clean, you should choose one format and redirect the other one with a 301.
You will find more informations about it :
http://www.ragepank.com/articles/68/that-trailing-slash-does-matter/
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-url-canonicalization/
-
RE: E-Commerce Duplicate Content
The duplicate item pages will not be indexed but visited the google bot. He will consider this page to be the one linked in the canonical tag.
I hope you won't have to set the urls manually !
-
RE: 301 redirect on the root of the site
I would suggest keeping the 301, Google is well aware of these type of problem so you should keep it simple, just 301 home.aspx to / once your able to do it.
-
RE: E-Commerce Duplicate Content
Toddy,
For every product of your site, you should identify its main category (the one that will be indexed). When seeing a product with a different category url, use the rel=canonical tag to give google the good url. This works well with e-commerce site.
You may also apply this logic between categories, as some listing between two categories are sometimes very similar.
For more information about the rel=canonical tag, see these resources :
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=139394
-
RE: Rankings lower than expected
I've read several article about keyword posiiton in the url, my thoughts on this is simple : put it close to the left if you don't have a good reason to put it farther.
In your case, having /category/category/ is useless. At least remove one category, right now /category/ is a duplicate of the home. Even if you remove one category, you should put a breadcrumb on the site to make /category/ indexable, and usefull.
My final advice is to have the category slugs in the root, ie : /lathes/. But this means having a good developer which is not the case I guess.
-
RE: Avoiding "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" - Best Practices?
Hope you don't create link from visitor's researches, like find-a-recipe.php?course=salad**&q=tomatoes** as you would get penalised !
-
RE: Rankings lower than expected
Two quick things I noticed :
On ESP, your top menu, which are the first links of the page, are not about machines. The effect can be seen in the site: request : http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.esp-machinery.co.uk&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozillaofficial&client=firefox-a
You should put the most important menus here : machines ! BW does this.
Second thing : /category/category/sheet-metal-work-machines on ESP vs /sheetmetal-machines.asp on BW. ESP keywords are far from the root whereas BW has a page in the root with the good keywords.
There is several other improvements possible, especially for long tail ranking. For example, you don't have a single item page linked in a category : http://www.esp-machinery.co.uk/category/category/sheet-metal-work-machines. Optimised text on this page is missing too.
-
RE: Conducting Keyword Research in "Other than English"
Nemek is right, you should also browse the web with this langage to see the suggest results and the pages that rank well for your domain. Quick search gave me http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=ur as the google Urdu search page. You may aloso use Google pakistan (http://www.google.com.pk/) or google India.
-
RE: Homepage display for seo
I usually put on the home page a lot of links when I don't want to rank the homepage for specific keyword (or when it's too hard to rank). My homepage has to give it's juice the best way, so :
-
First the top pages of my site (selected manually, or the most popular ones), so you may put the articles you want to rank the most
-
Then the pages recently created to index them faster in Google and give content freshness to the domain
-
Finally the pages with recent activity (update, comments, etc.), this usually allow old pages to get some fresh internal link
-
-
RE: Avoiding "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" - Best Practices?
I would suggest making indexable pages for courses, the rest of the parameters are rather user orientated and - I think - not usefull for SEO. This means separating the search script with browse pages.
This means making find-a-recipe.php, which looks like the search engine, forbidden to robots. Instead, you should have a category browser, using only the course (I suppose no recipe have multiple courses ?). You would have url like :
/recipes/ => all recipes, paginated
/recipes/start/ => all starter recipes, paginated
/recipes/starter/fry/ => fried starter recipes, but you should check the search volume of those expression, like "fried starter recipes". If you have a very small volume of recipes, wait until every subpages of /recipes/starter/ have at least 5 recipes.
The goal here is to make your recipe pages easy to index, with a strong focus on the course type. Although the course may not be the best root category for recipe, this should be a good way to may your site seo friendly.
-
RE: Is publishing content on multiple platforms like Tumblr, Blogger, Posterous, etc. a legit way to build backlinks?
If this is manual, this would be another channel as you say. So you could create 1 account in each in these sites and manage them very well - following other fishing sites on a given platform, connect to twitter and much more as Barry said.
Then this is totally legit to put an excerpt of the original article, made from scratch or reworded, and then put a link to the full article.
-
RE: Is publishing content on multiple platforms like Tumblr, Blogger, Posterous, etc. a legit way to build backlinks?
I think you are asking if Google / Bing would consider this out of the guidelines. If you publish the exact same content on blogging platform, you will get not much from these. If you create a LOT of those fake blogs, you may even be penalised.
This may work if performed in a smart manner - different content, no systematic backlink and much more to create a credible blog. This is hard though, if your client is not publishing his content on blog aggregators, I would recommend doing so - just be aware of the risk of being ranked after the aggregator if the client's site has weak mRank.
-
RE: What To Do For A Website That is Mainly Images
Barry is right, I would suggest to wait before puttin tag pages online (or making them indexable), this can lead to huge amount of very similar pages.
Apart from asking user to put a description (or any other UGC like comments, tags, etc.), you compute some data from the images if you have the technical capacity : compute the colors of the wallpapers to have 2 or 3 main colors, size of the wallpaper, file format, etc. This will allow you to display "raw" data or even generate text patterns to fill the blanks.
-
RE: Does Frequency of content updates affect likelyhood outbound links will be indexed?
From my experience, adding fresh content on a regular basis, even when the pages are rather empty, will make Google crawl more and more your website. As crawl budget gets bigger, deeper pages will be crawled.
Although I never worked on a similar case to yours, I would suggest adding fresh content on a regular basis and link those new pages on the homepage to get them crawled ASAP. Put internal links to the pages you want to be crawled in those new pages if they are revelant.
-
RE: What is the effect of too many internal links on a page?
Hi Candida,
The link juice of the homepage is splitted between the 200 links of the page, SEOMoz recommends about 100 links per page. This may not be the cause of the ranking difference, but you should consider removing the links to the less important pages.
If you wish to make a more important change to your linking architecture, you should follow a pyramidal architecture as described in several seomoz articles :
http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/internal-link
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/diagrams-for-solving-crawl-priority-indexation-issues
-
RE: What do you do about links to constantly moving pages?
That's a good practice for small ads sites. As every of your jobs should be in a category, you should redirect the user to the category browsing page. Best page for the user and for googlebot too.
-
RE: New domain name for existing site
If you goal is to 301 all the pages of the new site to the old one, I would suggest to make the new site with the right pages for the different search terms you target, let it be indexed and ranked, get a few backlinks to keep the domain somehow "visible" to google. This process should take a couple of months.
Once this is done, create a redirect script on the new site.
If you want to rank deep pages of the old site, the script should redirect user to the page of the old site which correspond the best with the new site page.
If you want to rank the homepage of the old site, just redirect all requests to this homepage.
-
RE: Would you suggest submitting a website to a travel platform which gets backlinks from link farms?
Considering you can't get penalised by a backlink form a spammy site ("negative" SEO), I would submit the site to the travel platform if it does no cost much time/money.
Reading your response to Gianluca, it looks like the backlinks are not so spammy so you should do it without fears.