I'm not talking about conjectures or guesses -- but SEO studies that is actually backed up by hardcore data.
Which SEO firm produces excellent data-driven studies you always trust?
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
I'm not talking about conjectures or guesses -- but SEO studies that is actually backed up by hardcore data.
Which SEO firm produces excellent data-driven studies you always trust?
Some facts:
Some articles say Google considers this "buying a link" and will therefore penalize you. Or at best, this will have no effect. And here's a Search Engine Land article saying the exact opposite.
$1,500 is a lot of money. So I just want to make sure I'm not wasting it -- or worse -- getting penalized.
Just out of curiosity James, where would you go for most updated, trustworthy SEO information?
Hi guys,
I told my extended network that we're hiring an SEO firm to do some white hat SEO auditing, link building, and ongoing seo consultation.
Rae Hoffman's firm Pushfire came highly recommended via several sources. They seem to have a good blend of high profile (they speak at all sorts of conferences and write at various prestigious publications) and reasonable pricing.
I was wondering what fellow moz members think about this firm. Any reviews or thoughts are welcome!
Hi guys, I'm completely new to PPC. I want to hire a firm to help drive PPC traffic to credit card landing pages. Our starting budget is limited ($2,000/month for everything) but can grow to about $5,000 if we see results.
My questions are:
Thanks in advance!
Hi Robert! Nice seeing you again.
Yeah, it looks like Neil is pushing his Quicksprout Traffic University very aggressively. Have you heard either good or bad things about that course? It has a money back guarantee so there's no risk to money. But if the advice is bad, then the damage might be severe.
The article claims that the traffic bump is coming from increased indexing of TechCrunch due to Neil adding a widget that links out to 25-50 random internal pages on the 404 error pages.
But your explanation makes more sense, and that means this article is kinda misleading. Most small-mid sized sites don't have problems with systematically deleted pages. So for this tip to be added to an article directed at webmasters of small-mid sized sites seems a bit out of place.
Neil Patel claimed in this article that by creating a custom 404 page that links out to 25 to 50 random internal pages on the website, he was able to increase the traffic of Techcrunch by 9%.
I'm a bit skeptical about this claim. A couple of questions:
Thanks!
Thank you for the amazing answer Robert. I followed your advice and checked for the GA code. Fortunately it is indeed placed in the header before the /head code, and it is only placed once.
I'm very grateful for this information, for at least now I don't have to worry that we've somehow implemented GA incorrectly on our site.
You know what, that is a GREAT question. Maybe we should hire a professional to check up on our Analytics settings/scripts/installation to make sure it is all working properly.
Is there a special designation I should look for when hiring someone like that? Is there such a thing as a "certified analytics expert" or something?
The article claims that the traffic bump is coming from increased indexing of TechCrunch due to Neil adding a widget that links out to 25-50 random internal pages on the 404 error pages.
But your explanation makes more sense, and that means this article is kinda misleading. Most small-mid sized sites don't have problems with systematically deleted pages. So for this tip to be added to an article directed at webmasters of small-mid sized sites seems a bit out of place.
Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.