Google Analytics shows most referrers as "Direct" -- What are some better tools?
-
Very often Google Analytics will show 50-90% of our referrers as (direct) which is not very helpful.
Are there other tools out there that will provide a clearer breakdown of what other websites are sending us our traffic?
Specifically, I want to be able to be able to tell who are the top traffic referrers to my top performing pages on my site for the last 30 days. (I want to be able to study this on a per-page basis.)
Thanks in advance!
-
Thank you for the amazing answer Robert. I followed your advice and checked for the GA code. Fortunately it is indeed placed in the header before the /head code, and it is only placed once.
I'm very grateful for this information, for at least now I don't have to worry that we've somehow implemented GA incorrectly on our site.
-
Killer
I saw this in the Moz Top 10 this morning and had to reach out to you. Very interesting stuff on organic traffic showing as direct. While not referral showing as direct, I think you will see the implications. Best
-
Killer,
Sorry I fell out of the loop on this one. I have to say that Takeshi has done beyond an above admirable job on laying out the issues of how referrers become direct. I think two things stand out to me: yes the installation of your GA code could be wrong and it should be before the closing head tag . Often people will put it in the footer and occasionally someone enters it more than once.
I think another thing you have to look at is you are comparing Chartbeat to GA and they provide two types of analytics. The numbers, of course, are different. Chartbeat was out before GA had realtime and, I think, it was intended for the real time needs. It claims to have better data for publishers and I have no way of comparing. Since it has been around for some time, I would think it has some real traction, but you have to be careful as you are comparing two different services.
Another thing that gives me a slight amount of concern about the issue is that they have a section on how they help you sell more ads (when you are a publisher). That type of data makes me a bit nervous. It may be the real deal, it just makes me nervous when something claims to help you prove your position.
The question re your site is a bit skewed in the way you present it. What is the other data re that site? How many total directs? How many organic visits? How many PPC visits? Etc. You cannot just conclude that there cannot be that many directs without all the data. How many total visits would be the first place to look.
As to the expert on analytics and your GA code, you can do it your self. Look at view page source (typically a right click function). When you have the page with the code on it, do a control lookup (command or Control plus F on). Then in the search box, type in UA- and see where it occurs. There should be only one occurrence of UA-XXXXXXXX-1 or -12, etc.
If you see it more than once it is likely a problem, but not always. If it is in the header and footer, typically you will see an artificially low 2% or less bounce rate. You can also do a lookup of the closing head tag and see if it is after the analytics code.)
I hope this helps you a bit.
Robert
-
You know what, that is a GREAT question. Maybe we should hire a professional to check up on our Analytics settings/scripts/installation to make sure it is all working properly.
Is there a special designation I should look for when hiring someone like that? Is there such a thing as a "certified analytics expert" or something?
-
Interesting. Do you know if Google Analytics is installed properly? Is the code in your header? Are there any javascript errors on your page? Do you have multiple analytics scripts installed?
May be some kind of tracking issue there.
-
Hi TakeshiYoung,
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question! When I was first presented this problem by my editor (who is trying to use GA), I thought the same thing as you -- that if GA couldn't find the info then it probably can't be found by any other tool.
However, my editor presented me with this example: one recent blog posts had 6,000 pageviews. Google showed referral data as:
- 5,000 (direct)
- 344 off.net.mk
- 113 facebook
- 21 feedly
Using another tool called Chartbeat on the same blog post, we got way clearer data:
- 3,410 from off.net.mk
- 1140 from fb
- 425 from feedly.
We think the 5,000 direct number from Google must be wildly inaccurate. How could 5,000 out of 6,000 pageviews be direct?
-
Hi Robert,
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question! Your rephrasing of my question is correct. Here's an actual example provided to me by our editor who is trying to figure this out.
For example, one recent blog posts had 6,000 pageviews. Google showed referral data as:
- 5,000 (direct)
- 344 off.net.mk
- 113 facebook
- 21 feedly
Using another tool called Chartbeat on the same blog post, we got way clearer data:
- 3,410 from off.net.mk
- 1140 from fb
- 425 from feedly.
We think the 5,000 direct number from Google must be wildly inaccurate. How could 5,000 out of 6,000 pageviews be direct?
I hope this helps!
-
Not really. Google only shows referrers as (direct) when there is no referral data present, and that's an issue with the referrer, not your tracking system. Referral data can be lost for many reasons:
- The user is getting to your site by typing the URL directly into their browser
- The user is getting to your site via a bookmark or browser favorite
- The user is using iOS6, which doesn't pass referrer data properly for search traffic
- The user is clicking on a link from an e-mail client which doesn't pass referrers (common if you have mailing list)
- The site that is linking to you is using HTTPS, and you are using HTTP
- Traffic is coming via a mobile app that doesn't pass referrers
- The user is using IE and they clicked on a Javascript or Flash link
- Etc.
You may be able to get around this to a certain extent by using URL parameters (utm_source, utm_campaign), but those would only be for links that you have some control over.
-
Killer
When you say referrers are showing as direct, what are you meaning by that?
If I type in your domain and enter, I will show as direct.If I go to site A (say YP.com) and click a link to your site it will show as a referral from YP.com.
The way you are saying this, if you are getting 1000 visits in a fixed period it shows as 500 organic, 450 direct and 50 referred. You believe the 450 direct are actually more like 50 direct and 400 referred, is that correct?
Best,
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Strange 404 Pages Appearing in Google Analytics
Hi, My client has some strange urls appearing in GA which lead to error pages. Please see the following image: https://imgur.com/a/6TPO8yL e.g URLs like /h/6445738.html I've used screaming frog to see if these pages exist on the website and I can't find them, anywhere. Therefore how are they coming up in GA? If anyone could please help I'd really appreciate it.
Reporting & Analytics | | SolveWebMedia0 -
How to do Google Multivariate Testing via Google Tag Manager with Universal Analytic?
Hello All, How to do Google Multivariate Testing via Google Tag Manager with Universal Analytic? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | dsouzac0 -
Help Blocking Crawlers. Huge Spike in "Direct Visits" with 96% Bounce Rate & Low Pages/Visit.
Hello, I'm hoping one of you search geniuses can help me. We have a successful client who started seeing a HUGE spike in direct visits as reported by Google Analytics. This traffic now represents approximately 70% of all website traffic. These "direct visits" have a bounce rate of 96%+ and only 1-2 pages/visit. This is skewing our analytics in a big way and rendering them pretty much useless. I suspect this is some sort of crawler activity but we have no access to the server log files to verify this or identify the culprit. The client's site is on a GoDaddy Managed WordPress hosting account. The way I see it, there are a couple of possibilities.
Reporting & Analytics | | EricFish
1.) Our client's competitors are scraping the site on a regular basis to stay on top of site modifications, keyword emphasis, etc. It seems like whenever we make meaningful changes to the site, one of their competitors does a knock-off a few days later. Hmmm. 2.) Our client's competitors have this crawler hitting the site thousands of times a day to raise bounce rates and decrease the average time on site, which could like have an negative impact on SEO. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't believe Google is going to reward sites with 90% bounce rates, 1-2 pages/visit and an 18 second average time on site. The bottom line is that we need to identify these bogus "direct visits" and find a way to block them. I've seen several WordPress plugins that claim to help with this but I certainly don't want to block valid crawlers, especially Google, from accessing the site. If someone out there could please weigh in on this and help us resolve the issue, I'd really appreciate it. Heck, I'll even name my third-born after you. Thanks for your help. Eric0 -
Google Analytics View Filters
Using the same GA property, I would like to set up three filtered views: 1. Tracking across one subdomain and one primary domain (example: shop.example.com & example.com) 2. Track only primary domain (example.com) 3. Track only subdomain (shop.example.com) Can this be achieved by using view filters? If so, how do they need to be set? Also, according to this article: https://moz.com/blog/cross-domain-subdomain-tracking-in-google-analytics, with cross domain tracking, I need to ignore self-referrals, which can only be done at the property level. If set up to ignore example.com referrals, will this cause problems with filter 2 and 3?
Reporting & Analytics | | Evan340 -
No Google Analytics code on page BUT reporting is active
How could Google Analytics be reporting data if my pages don't have the GA code on them? Mike
Reporting & Analytics | | Mike_c0 -
Why are plus signs (+) suddenly showing up in Google Analytics organic search keywords reports?
Since June 13, 2013, the number of organic search queries containing a plus sign (+) has gone up over 1,000% compared to the previous period on my site in Google Analytics. These plus signs appear to be taking the place of spaces in these search queries (i.e. "word1+word2+word3"). This appears to be almost (or completely) Google organic traffic, not other search engines. Since I highly doubt searcher behavior would change so suddenly, I'm trying to figure out why Google is replacing spaces with plus signs. Is anyone else seeing this? Any ideas?
Reporting & Analytics | | RCF0 -
Google Analytics "Undetermined" Keyword
Google analytics is suddenly showing a new keyword "undetermined". Traffic Sources > Sources > All Traffic with the primary dimension set to Keyword. It's currently our 13th keyword and it is displayed without parentheses around that you see with (not provided) or (not set). Anyone have any idea what this is? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | Morris770 -
Google analytics advanced segments
Ok, I need help with a simple (although, for some reason, I'm having trouble with it) advanced segment. Dilemma**:** All of our techs have a backend cookie that they use to log into our website. I want a way toexclude all visites where the landing page contained this in the url:/backend/cookie.php?username= Advanced Segment: We have a lot of techs and each one of them has a different "username=example". So how can I set up an advanced segment where it will exclude any visit where the visitor came in one a landing page containing /backend/cookie.php?username=
Reporting & Analytics | | NerdsOnCall0