Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
If you just added the tags then it may take time to drop them.
If you have not asked Google through Webmaster tools to remove these URLS I would make that my next step.
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1663416
The above link is to a few scenarios of Link removal in Webmaster Tools
Shane
Others may have varying opinions, but I am not sure i see much value in this strategy...
It could gain you some short term benefits (not even sure of that much) but as a longterm strategy it kind of seems like a throw away of resources to attempt an SEO trick.
In my opinion a better strategy would be
Of course others may have a completely different view.
Shane
I believe...
As an associate/employee/owner of a business/website you cannot create a page for your self within Wikipedia
Wikipedia is a resource for general consensus information, not just information. Not saying you "marketing-hyped" it up, but even if you did a great objective wiki... It is still not a consensus since you did it on yourself therefore technically not "UN-biased" information.
So technically you can't "get" a page on Wikipedia it needs to be created about you.... And only if you are important enough to deem a page, but not really sure what important enough threshold is.
If you are an SEO company and not SEOMOZ or another notable SEO company with worldwide recognition I am not sure i would waste my time.... But that is only my opinion.
I tried to find the other question cause i know this one has been asked before, but I think the "Good Answer" response was something like...
Google Never used these tags, some others did, but Googlebot has never, and having them these days just adds more code --- that means less code that really needs to be seen by the engines will be seen since they only crawl a certain amount of data on your site, per crawl.
And I know that a few lines of code is really negligible when it comes to site load speed and maybe even crawl amount, but removing superfluous code on your site is always a best practice in my opinion.
And this code would definitely qualify as superfluous code in my opinion
Shane
UPDATE**
Found it and the answer was staff endorsed
LOL probably the same firm (if you can call them that) I am competing with for exact same link building tactic.
But mine was something like...
Refinancing corporate credit cards? When you refinance with LINK (KEYWORD) LINK blah blah blah.... Irrelevant content blah blah blah...
and they HAD THOUSANDS!!! And were obviously fooling the algorithm cause they bumped me to #2
I just combated it with High Quality relevant content both on site and guest blogging and Real relevant Social Signals within 5 days.... I had retaken it and seems to be holding, (but they are still #2)
High Quality beats quantity any day with this type of thing as the links fall off quickly cause mostly these are content farms that post many blogs per day. Also it is a hodgepodge of content so there are no relevancy signals.
Just focus on a high quality campaign that gets good relevant info out about your niche and supplement that by integrating social brand building.
Shane
I know you may see it as a "cop out" and others might as well, but the recent stint was by a 3rd party, and was taken swift action upon the news..... So I am not sure How "Blackhat" gaining one follow link from a blog in the grand scheme of Google's over 400 million backlinks is......... But in this I understand we may not see eye to eye and it can be seen as hypocritical. And i agree in General that paying someone to review something and implying it should be a good review is unethical and un-helpful, but not really "Black-Hat" that is a word that gets thrown around alot.
The first reaction from any client/CEO to anything new usually is "Ugh"... come on man.
When do challenges in business ever stop...?
I think we will just have to agree to disagree on this 
But i will definitely research the other Blackhat claims as I had not heard of them.
And I was not trying to say you do not do well in SERPS, just that alot of people seem to have an axe to grind with Google cause they feel they should be doing better, even though there are millions of other sites out there. So that brings alot of anti Google sentiment that really is just all about competition.
Have A great Night!
Shane
We can talk about who uses what all day long, but your "mother" is not the only game in town, nor will she always be the user base (figuratively of course)... As time progresses more and more people will begin using technology more and more... As they always have...
Sounds like you have been jaded by not seeing the results you want to see in Google. Also I am not sure what Blackhat tactics you talk about that Google uses... We all have gripes, but just because you do not like something does not make it blackhat or non useful.
And G+ Does not automatically affect SERPS for everything, it has a very small subset that it influences, and I believe it only influences if you are Logged.
I personally think this is a step in the right direction for social, but we all have our own opinions
And also from a business perspective not using something that is a marketing tool on principle that you dont't like it, is not necessarily in my opinion the best decision for your clients as you are not giving them all available "ammo" to succeed.
But of course that is PURELY my opinion
Have a great day!
Yes, In my opinion this is the exact game of G+...
Google's way of using "social proof" to drive valuable content up
If you are really an expert in "insert trade/industry here" then you would obviously have many people with relevant friends, posts ect about "example trade/industry"
And when you post something within your "industry realm" and it has you as the rel=author, then Google can begin to give you preference as an expert in your field for further content if you have large amount of industry relevant followers
I think this is their answer to spam and manipulation, as an SEO/SMM agency will have issues without actually having meaningful content and strategy of gaining industry relevant followers. Of course there are always ways around these sorts and I am sure someone will begin gaming it (if not already)
But overall i think the author is being a little over dramatic (probably on purpose for exposure reasons)
But nevertheless, I think this is a step in the right direction for a more genuine user experience in the Social World.
I am not sure there is an easy answer.
I would calculate your losses on the de-indexation
I would OSE the URL's in question (and verify through webmaster tools) See how many external sites point to them.
If you do not have many incoming links, then I am not sure de-indexation is so bad, comparatively to the man hours or work needed to keep this up now and in the future.
I think it would just become almost like a Profit and Loss (P&L) scenario.
Also if you are already seeing duplicate content penalty's, in the grand scheme it may help to get rid of those pages as post PANDA it MIGHT be dragging you down.
But really this is all speculation, as I am not fully "up to speed" with the exact situation, and the answer in my opinion would be based on alot of factors not just SEO.
Hope this helps!
Shane
I THINK a PO Box would not be good as it would not be as universally accepted, but possibly an SEOMOZ associate could chime in on that?
SHane
NM I found it, and the guy that answered works for Google so the answer in NO a PO box is not accepted at Google Places
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Places/thread?tid=0cd635a1627dcb81&hl=en
In my personal opinion I would not de-index them, use canonical
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html
Here is a good take on it from a past Q & A Post
http://www.seomoz.org/q/best-way-to-handle-different-views-of-the-same-page
If you are not aware what a canonical is =
It is a tag you place in the head of your page that tells search engines to look to another page, due to this page is a duplicate. You point to the page you want Search Engines to Index as the "master" page
Hope this helps
w00t!
Yeah,
I see this alot as well
Mozbar gets confused alot
Many times I have to refresh the page multiple times to get PA, even though DA is showing up.
Also most of the times this has happened to me it appears the DA is incorrect of what it actually is.
I think it may just be a quirk in the API call or something from the MOZBAR
Shane
I did not really understand that part of the question?
What is occurring?
Shane
Hi,
Google's crawler (GoogleBot) has a separate larger database, crawl rate ect... than Open Site Explorer (RogerBot)
I also think in general the OSE index is updated once a month ( i think they are working on making it more often and expanding the crawl database)
Google's index is updated more often than that.
In short, OSE is just a different "snapshot" of the net then Google's much larger database of the web
Hope this helps
Hi,
I know for certain that in Google Places you can actually specify that the "Service Provider" comes to customers locations and you can set it for a radius of up to 635 miles (could be wrong on the #)
You can also hide the address, so in this instance the home address would be the place of business and would not be unethical due to probably with Tax records (and such) the Home address IS the business address, but it is hidden so will not "confuse" the end user.
I am ALMOST certain that you can do this in most local directories as well, such as Yelp and Local.com, but don't quote me on that but if you cannot ( I do not think they accept PO Boxes) so for local citations to gain Google Places exposure you may want to use the home address IF NECESSARY.
Hope this helps
w00t!
I know this one is good, but very hard to get into as not many sites qualify.
Other than that I am not sure how many more out there would classify as Free AND Quality.
Although there are good sites out there that you have to pay for, paying is not a sign of being bad, just like free is not a sign of good.
If money is the issue then this a completely different story,
But if it is just that you do not like paid directories, then in my opinion look at the directories on more factors other than that..
Last Cache data?
Do they rank for their own brand name?
Are they a PR 0? (Bad sign)
Are they laden with Adsense and Affiliate links? (Bad Sign)
Do they serve a purpose other than another directory in the thousands of directories?
Are the sites all properly categorized?
Do they allow bidding? (Bad sign)
Do they allow all sites? or do they have strict rules on Pharmaceutical, Gambling, Drugs ect....
This is just a few things to look at
hope this helps
Does PR Web treat some differently than others?
Yes, I believe so on a few different levels -
You can purchase multiple levels of distribution options that get you more exposure and links from PRweb itself separate from the external distribution channels. I have also noticed depending on the editor score of the release you are sent to different levels of distribution channels.
I do agree as well that actually PRWeb itself gets more SEO/SEM benefits from press releases than the person doing the release.
I have also seen diminished results from PRWeb over the last 3 -5 months**.**
I personally came to the realization (and many may disagree) that Press releases as a SEO/SEM strategy might be loosing quite a bit of steam, but as a general marketing tactic i think they are actually effective.
As long as you actually have news to announce, and not just writing fluff to get some links. I think it will turn more into a Social Media Marketing tool other than and SEO tool over the next years to come.
But this is all just opinion...
What i have always wondered is how does Google Treat press releases? It seems to me it is just like distributing a bunch of duplicate content, so what links count and which ones don't in the actual distribution network?
Hi,
I just did this and had similar issues
It looks like the .htaccess is correct at the old domain.
but you need to put in re-directors at the new domain that will take in these extra items due to these directories do not exist at the new domain.
There could be an easier way, without putting a redirect after a redirect (which possibly losses a little extra juice) but I am not aware of a way without redirecting all 404 queries.
after you have put back the 301 that was working at the OLD domain In the .htaccess at the NEW domain you would put
Redirect /category/models/next/2 http://www.example.com/
This will tell any queries for http://www.example.com/category/models/next/2
to redirect to http://www.example.com or whatever you put in....
hope this helps!
I found alot of conflicting info on the topic...
It appears in September of 2010 they did change it, but I think it is only enforced and it is almost even worded as if you just cannot elicit the content of the review...
But It seems to be sort of a grey area as alot still do it and flourish (much like everything else in Google)
I have never personally tried this incentive strategy myself but Have done the citation route many times and seen EXTREMELY good results.
And in my look around incetivizing increased reviews by over 100% (of course) so this may have been why they stopped it, as those with the most money could have the most reviews causing an unfair advantage (but isn't that sort of true in everything?)
Just in my personal opinion since I am not a lawyer nor do i work for Google
Incentive's for reviews are good for all as long as you are not incentivizing the content
1. Customer -
Get the chance to either come back and enjoy another meal/service or If they had a bad time the owner gets to try to make it right...
2. Perspective Customer -
They get to learn about the experience and see the transpareny of the owner either rectifying or not. (of course i understand some clients/customers are unreasonable, but hey it is a part of being in business
3. Business
They get the Benefits in both Word of Mouth and Search Engine Marketing plsu the chance of repeat business OR the chance to right a wrong therefore helping brand image.
It also entices the business owner to strive to be better to make sure they do not incentive themselves into a bad review
But hey this could get you in trouble, but their are lots of risks taken every day in business, must weigh the ROI potential.
w00t!
Hi,
This is a good place to start..
http://www.seomoz.org/dp/seo-directory#local
Go through every site on this list (most are free) and if your business applies (which you would apply to most)
eitther submit your business or claim your business and make sure your business:
Name
Address
Phone
and Website
are Identical to your Google Places listing.
This will greatly help your rankings.
I also notice they have some reviews. It may be a good idea to start some kind of campaign on your tickets or receipts to give a 10% discount the next time they come in if they leave a review or something like that.
Moral of the story you need more reviews and local citations and you will see good results!
Yes,
A well thought out structured campaign to not only inform, but also entice them to "Like" would be best.
The one benefit you have is... You have a direct connection to all those 800 people as a "person" so getting the message out will be a little easier.
Once you create the correct set up Page (Make sure the original "person" account is an admin) and you can send out "Like" request using "Invite Friends"
But yes enticing them would be smart as well (I would setup an Advanced Targeted PPC campaign)
Set up a Sweepstakes app that only allows for entry upon "Like" (If you do not have app experience a good workaround is North Social)
Set up Facebook PPC campaign to app -
Set up the advanced Connection Targeting option for that app (Only show my ad to friends of "Your Page here")
Verify that the "Person" account who is friends with the 800 people has "Liked" this page
Now only the people who are friends with "person" account will see, and for every like you gain you will gain more targeted exposure as the ad will now be shown to every persons firends who likes the page.
I would say your bid would be around 0.93 per click or so...
hope this helps!
w00t!
Your Proposal seems just like a standard 3-4 way reciprocal strategy. If you are within related niches and do not do Homepage links, then in theory it may help you, but it all really depends.
Of course this strategy could pay of, and for some I am sure it has, but this should not be the only method in which you obtain links in my opinion.
You will need to be meticulous in your tracking of links to verify you do not leave a footprint. All in all in my opinion I am not sure the work involved will translate to a large SEO gain, so the return and risk would outweigh the benefits.
w00t!
So I am not totally sold that "Too Many on Page links" is a universal blanket metric.
What I mean specifically is....
If the links are useful, and benefit the user experience (navigability) I think that "Too Many on Page Links" does not necessarily apply.
I really in my opinion think this is mostly for Link farms, content farms ect...
If the links are necessary, relevant and help the user find what they need....
Then i am not sure it is a problem.
It would be good to get others opinions on putting rel=nofollow for the sub nav links, but personally I do not think this is a good idea, but others may have a different opinion as traditionally this would help you conserve "juice" so i think it could help, but have never tested.
If you forward it then the "Keyword Match" benefit is negated.
Creating a landing page that promotes the specific product with links to your main domain is a current tactic used by many. You must make sure it is not a "thin content" site or duplicate to your main domain or this will negate the benefits as well.
Personally I do not necessarily suggest this tactic as it is becoming less and less effective and will continue to do so.
But as i said it is definitely is a tactic employed by many and if done correctly can generat sales, but I would not look at this as a longterm silver bullet...
w00t!
Hi,
If i understand PR correctly it is only a measure of the links on the web - the below numbers are in NO WAY statistically correct, but just a VERY rough explanation of how i understand PR and please keep in mind there are many mathematical equations that go into determining this, but has very little to do with the quality of links only the quantity, Unless you have a penalty and are a 0 then this could be a "red flag" to start "worrying"
Example:
if the most linked to site on the web has 1,000,000 links pointing to it, then it jumps to 2,000,000 in the next refresh and your site did not gain links in equation to this largest site then the PR shifts.
There was a time (i believe) long ago when PR (Number of Links) was the determining factor of SERPS. This is why people tell you to not be obsessed with page rank as in theory it is actually a useless metric except to see if the site in question is a 0 which means (in some situations) there could be a problem in Google's eyes.
In short, if you are gaining quality links and presenting engaging useful relevant content you should not sweat a PR change unless it goes to 0 (typically)
w00t!
You are correct if there is no dup content currently then it will not be seen as duplicate.
Yes, you and mhelp3 are correct some of the "juice" may be passed, and since any penalty items on the site have been leveraged pre 301, the penalty content will probably not transfer as they have already "dropped off" the index.
The longterm issue with this strategy is it does not help user experience. It is merely an "SEO Trick" that more and more every day are being devalued by Algorithm updates.
Where i agree that this tactic probably a years ago and before was VERY VERY effective, now and going forward it will become LESS AND LESS effective.
Also private registration already looses some of its "Trust" with Google and usually sets off a red flag, which probably will devalue the entire endeavor.
Will this ultimately harm your main domain... Probably Not So if you are up for a risk of it maybe working and maybe not, but i would not base a strategy around this concept going forward as these types of old school white hat tactics are dying....
w00t!
Probably not, although if he is acting unethically is this someone you want your customers/perspective customers seeing you involved with?
w00t!
In My opinion this could work, but will ultimately be devalued as Duplicate content. Also (not to pigeon hole all affiliate marketers) but most use tactics that get quick boosts, not longterm sustained traffic.
So not only are you possibly gonna cause yourself a duplicate content penalty, you assume the risk of all the links that Affiliate marketer acquired good and bad.
All in all this strategy could yield positive results, and is not necessarily a "Black Hat" tactic so its not gonna get you banned, but probably is not the best risk free strategy.
You would be better off creating a page with lots of content keyword optimized for "Christmas Gifts" and do a link building campaign around this page ex: www.example.com/Christmas-Gifts use quality articles and content from linked from this page around the topic of Christmas and Christmas Gifts plus LOTS of other items cause i did not look into it, but I am assuming they Keyword "Christmas Gifts" around this time is a VERY high competition keyword, and you will be fighting against established brands so "SEO tricks" probably will not help.
w00t!
I think this would be situational....
Much like Facebook "Likes" you can put a "Like" box that directly makes them a fan, or just a "Like" for the webpage in question.
It really depends on what you use you Facebook/Google+ page as.... Is it purely for SEO purposes or is it a relationship tool?
If it is a relationship tool and you are an established brand i would suggest getting them into your circle/fanbase as this is a more longterm strategy for relationship building as well as Brand Building.
If you use your social media for purely SEO reasons, then the direct webpage would seem to make more sense.
Should a business have more followers or +1's?
Of course you would want both but if a decision needs to be made of which one you need to decide which one will benefit you the most.... It is situational and no blanket answer can really answer this question in my opinion.
w00t!
I believe homepages are only accepted.
Also I am pretty sure a 301 would make your submission in valid and rejected and YOU DO NOT GET A REFUND!!!!
I would suggest just submitting the homepage, but not sure this will really help you in your specific link building efforts even though the Yahoo directory is powerful and respected.
w00t!
WOW an SEO firm that thought Quantity over Quality is important, NO!!!!!!
I am unaware of any solution for this, as I had a similar issue due to the company i work for has changed names a few times for Branding, so before i got here there were 3 -4 Place pages for each one of our 15 locations. It sucked to say the least especially since Google does not allow the use of extensions for authentication.
I would like to hear if anyone has any ideas, although I do not think it is possible. Especially since in most cases the comments are from 3rd party sources.
Hope you find an answer though!
w00t!
Also you can look at this as it is on this subject:
http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/getting-back-from-a-penalty-second-time-around
It took a very methodical approach to a reconsideration which i am sure Google appreciated, as cheesy as this might sound..... We all make mistakes, but it is if we learn from those mistakes that Google seems to care about..
Recently i remember Rand Talking in a white board Friday that the OSE Algo does not account for any spam metrics that Google does, it does gives a Trust ranking metric based on best practices and . The trust metric may be a good metric to look at.
I look up to page 180.... Any ideas if a link from page authority of "1" is "bad" link?
Not necessarily.... a 1 just means it has not been indexed by OSE i believe.
Also I am not sure that "Unnatural Links" automatically equates to a penalized domain link, it may just simply mean you got to many links from too many sources in too short of a time that could only be achieved by automation....
So looking for "penalized" domains could be a wild goose chase. I think you are in a pretty tough spot. The best course of action could be just wait longer and see if the penalty passes as links fall off that are "suspect"
It depends alot on your needs and budget:
Rackspace and Amazon are good when it comes to reliability, but dedicated is VERY expensive. If you are okay with the cloud they both offer this and can be quite reasonable.
I like Rackspace as you have a little more wiggle room and it is a little cheaper than Amazon.
What are you needs/requirements in a web server?
w00t!
Within 36 hours it is definitely a timing issue at this point, but cannot say for sure that in the long term it will sort itself out.
There are many other things to take into consideration other than just META and onpage optimized content.
You would also want to do a high quality informational link building campaign that uses (gracefully) the anchor text "yoga bolster" to this newly optimized page. There is also internal linking you can do that would help re-inforce this directive to Google.
w00t!
There are a few different thought processes here...
If I understand it correctly social signals are not really at the domain level, they are at the page level. Social signals are to signify trending or popular items. So by doing this you are trending a page on your site with little to no content (or purpose) other than a photo to gain likes. This MAY give the overall domain credence, in the Social World, but not sure it actually will affect the process of SEO to much.
Also the photos are smaller and worse quality when they are attached as a web link instead of uploaded to your wall directly so you may get less likes, not to forget that the CTR of links on FB is VERY LOW!
Of course you want positive social signals to your website, but is this really the way to achieve it organically and with overall user experience in mind?
Keep in mind as well that SEO/SEM are more and more everyday becoming online about brand building and Sharing the item that gets alot of likes on your Branded Facebook page can increase your brand power online.
In my opinion this strategy has merit, but employing under the idea of just gaining rankings is not really a strategy it is just another "SEO trick" that will get picked up and devalued as a webpage with little to no content so the Social Gain you made will proabably be devalued in the end, so you might as well retain the power in your Social branding.
w00t!
I think Alan's theory is correct, but of course in theory
I would think as well that the bad links would not pass anything as he says they have already been discounted by G.
It appears you really do not have a choice.... And have little to loose with attempting the 301 as described, as you are already penalized.
At least if you do.... POSSIBLY the Good will follow, and the bad stay behind, but I am not sure if this is how it works though, but seems plausible. Also I believe penalties "drop off" after a while (1 - 2 years) as the "unnatural links" themselves will eventually drop off of G's index altogether.... Which will possibly drop the penalty.
Personally i would have a "Post 301 Strategy" in place to begin a link building campaign to this new URL that is high quality and informational in nature utilizing social signals heavily (BUT ETHICALLY ) and even stay away from White hat for a while as well until you establish a new "reputation" for yourself.
w00t!
You need to ask for a reconsideration if you cannot get those links removed.
You need to explain what happened (Did you hire an SEO firm who got these "unnatural" links.) Explain exactly what happened and if you were inexperienced when you did this, there are lots of SEO firms out there that claim they use "100% White Hat Tactics" Which in most cases is complete BS as a white hat tactic is not thousands of links in a day..... No matter how you want to spin it. (Before anyone screams at me yes there are perfectly rational explanations for a thousand links in a day sometimes.... Sometimes....)
There is a CHANCE (small chance) Google will take this info into consideration and give you a "reprise" or second chance...
I am not sure I would 301 a penalized domain to a new domain, but of course understand this may be un-avoidable.
Sorry for your troubles
w00t!
I agree with Stores Direct...
Blog Commenting has actual marketing value past just SEO/SEM. Now is commenting on a blog "Keyword-Keyword-Keyword-Keyword.com a good idea... Probably not or is getting thousands or even hundreds of these in a day or maybe even month depending on your current link portfolio a good idea probably not as well.
But commenting on a post, on a reputable blog No Follow or not with a comment that is relevant and informational to the post in question is good for many things as stores direct points out, but should not be a focus to your overall strategy.
w00t!
Hmmm,
I would personally think that a few years ago this might have done just this, but these days I assume it would have less of an impact.
I am definitely interested to hear others opinions, but just from current Google "Buzz" (no pun intended) I think this might be an effort that could hurt you more than help you.
I would focus more with on page SEO to help users and Search Engines understand which pages you want to rank for what keywords. Personally I don't like "SEO Tricks" that we think fools Google into doing what we want. It usually seems to backfire sooner or later.
But i could be completely wrong as i have never run tests on this scenario
w00t!
With these tactics you will probably get to page one (position 6-10) for some low competition keywords. But i highly doubt you will even see the return on even this low amount of money.
With long-term employment of this strategy you do run the risk of getting a penalty, but at these volumes (depending on niche and keyword comp) you should not get one, but that does not mean i am advocating it.
I would highly suggest against tactics like this and companies like these as they probably have a huge footprint, that can be seen as "spammy" techniques easily.
19 spun versions of 1 article - This would be the worst of all. They have actually taken an idea, and made it less effective then if they just did the one LOL
I say no go.. do this work yourself and concentrate on what you think the users of your site would want, not what some SEO company thinks they want in a box...
w00t!
Yeah i knew i had read that recently. In my opinion Brand is more powerful of a tool than an "SEO Trick" but of course if you don't have a brand and are only trying to sell someone elses stuff it is hard i guess.
So i guess the answer to his question would be situational, meaning is the using of keywords in the domain relevant to the user experience?
w00t!
Per the "leaked" rating guidelines, I believe raters are told to be on the lookout for Hyphenated Keyword domains. Also Google's patent for a new technology to actually devalue exact match domains was approved last month i believe.
In my opinion exact match will be dead soon, so using it as a strategy is probably not the best idea.
With that being said, i would say the hypenated version would be the worse long term bet, but no one can predict the Google future!
w00t!
At one point this was taken as a "suggestion", but I believe almost all search engines automatically ignore this nowadays.
I think even when it was a valid command, it was still more often than not ignored by Googlebot
Shane
Hi,
Our form system needs a major overhaul, but very short on time and resources...
Can anyone suggest or know of a contact system prebuilt that can be integrated into HTML that has send, tracking and reporting abilities?
One of the main reasons for this is we are moving away from Tomcat, and the form system we currently have utilizes servlets....
I have not been able to find much on this subject, so not even sure if there is such a thing?
Thanks
You May have already done all this, but just in case others may be experiencing...
Just as a first step i would remove the MOZBAR (Not disable actually remove fully)
Second clear all cache and cookies (clearing all your PC's temp and prefetch can sometimes assist as well, but not necessarily relevant. And yes i know there are many articles out there that say do not clear prefetch, but they are incorrect...
Next reinstall the Addon
Just from years of support, this is the first steps I would take on any addon no matter the author. Add ons source code is rarely the issue, and most often system specific. But of course there are always exceptions to the rule!!
W00t
Realized after making blanket statement "Add ons source code is rarely the issue, and most often system specific" ..... That could be misinterpreted. Speaking specifically to hung processes, this is caused by a DLL interacting incorrectly, and if your temp and cache is full, this adds to the issue especially in this instance because the browser itself begins reacting slower, because it is having to shift around data every time a query is made. In the instance of Mozbar, I would assume it makes a "call" on almost every interaction with browser. This is the reason for both the Temp and cache clear as well as reinstall. (Just to verify it gets a "fresh start" at interacting with system resources)
But of course this could be the simple fact that the addon is making so many calls.... Hope i cleared something up (probably not LOL)
Safe may be the wrong outlook
This strategy is definitely employed by many, but i think they are slowly seeing the returns on these types of strats slipping. Not to say they do not work, but not sure it is a good idea in such a small niche (probably a pretty big SEO footprint will be left)
If you have articles that call for linking to your site that has a logical and informational purpose, then this is a good strat, but just throwing out content with anchor text to your site is sometimes a waste and possibly hurtful.
IMHO - Forget so many word presses and concentrate on having a blog on your site that generates quality informational content that is related to your niche both directly and abstractly. This is a site link building strategy that can payoff in incoming links and traffic.
Now this is not to say that other avenues should not be taken, but if you have lots of content that can be created then i would keep alot of it on your site mostly in one place so you are not spreading all that potential traffic to alternate sites not on your domain (wordpresses)
Just an idea