Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Blueglass writes a lot about infographics and content promotion. Here's a post they have about finding the perfect network for your content promotion, which might help you. http://www.blueglass.com/blog/how-to-find-the-perfect-network-for-your-content-promotion-campaign/
A year ago, SEOmoz had a great post on building links with infographics at http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-build-links-with-infographics
Check out BlueGlass. They often write about infographics on their blog (this post http://www.blueglass.com/blog/avoid-ordinary-infographics-with-these-7-steps/ is from yesterday), and they also offer infographic services (I can't personally vouch for them, but did see information about it on their home page).
Actually, Google often changes title tags, especially based on the query. They've been doing this for a couple of years now.
Here's our post in the known issues forum about it. Keep an eye on this post, as we'll keep it updated.
https://seomoz.zendesk.com/entries/21120163-google-adwords-not-displaying-in-keyword-difficulty
We've got a known glitch with this right now, and will get updating the known issues page shortly. Sorry I don't have a better answer at the moment, but it just cropped up.
Hi James,
I'm not aware of any problems right now. As Broadbeach Media said, send an email to help@seomoz.org and they'll get back to you and be able to help you troubleshoot this. Thanks!
Keri
Hi Stubby,
First, take a look at the help page for sites with only one page crawled at https://seomoz.zendesk.com/entries/409821-why-isn-t-my-site-being-crawled-you-only-crawled-one-page. If that doesn't solve your problem, send an email to help@seomoz.org and they'll help you figure it out. Thanks!
Thanks for the reply here, we love having community members that help each other out like this. Thanks for the email to help Carey, and sorry for your troubles.
Google is just showing you a warning that hey, these are excluded, make sure that you want them excluded. They're not passing a judgement on whether or not they should be excluded. So, as long as they're excluded on purposes, no worries.
I had a big jump in page views and a big decrease in bounce rate a few months back. Happened right at the same time that I accidentally installed two copies of Google Analytics on my site. 
It's one thing to check for, just in case.
Rather than remove the old URLs, why not just go into Google Webmaster Tools and give them a change of address?
SEOmoz is having a known problem right now with Google Analytics connections, and we're so sorry. Can you please send an email to help@seomoz.org and let them know which campaign(s) you're having connection problems with? Thanks!
I'd see if there was a good way to get rid of the aspx so if you ever change technologies, you can keep those same URLs and minimize future redirects (and it makes your URLs a little bit shorter). I don't know if you can get rid of it or not, not that far into my own DNN site upgrade (upgrading a forum site and moving to friendly URLs, new version of DNN and active forums, and all kinds of fun stuff).
You can also spread your phrase over two sentences, such as "We service the Shenandoah Valley area in Virginia. Stained Concrete is blah blah blah" and you have "virginia stained concrete" as a phrase.
Do the pages have things like credit card or social security numbers where you need them out of the SERPs right away, or is it just stuff you want gone for some other reason? There is a URL removal tool you can use, but Google does prefer it to be used for things that have to be gone immediately, and to do what you're doing now for the rest of the items.
My personal experience (from a while back) is that when a robots.txt changed and unblocked items from being crawled, they were back in the SERPs right away. Google seems to still know about all of these URLs (and doesn't just wipe them from memory entirely) even if they don't show them in the search results. I don't have any resources to point you to on that right now though.
Can you clarify what you mean by "Also with the necessity to include text in the beginning of the website, is difficulty to found something really good."? Are you looking for code that has the content first then the navigation? If so, that's not nearly the big deal that it once was.
Would you be kind enough to add that to our Feature Request forum on Zendesk at https://seomoz.zendesk.com/forums/293194-seomoz-pro-feature-requests? That way other people can vote on it, and it'll let the developers know people would like this. Thanks!
Hi everyone,
We are having a known issue with the google analytics connection right now. If it is affecting you, please submit a ticket from our Help Desk and let them know the campaign name(s) you're having problems with. Sorry for the troubles, and thanks for your help!
Keri
Hi Michelle,
You need to verify the subdomain itself as its own site in Google webmaster Tools, then you can request removal of that entire site (subdomain).
The crawl test is separate from the campaigns (as you can run it on any subdomain as you wish). The crawls are two subdomains in 24 hours. Hope this helps!
Keri
You might try a custom crawl, which will crawl up to 3000 pages and should take a few hours, up to 24 hours. It's available at http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/crawl-test.
Hi Peter,
Did this answer your question, or are you still looking for some help?
I don't know if this is too late for you, but a great resource is this Website Migration Guide promoted to the main blog late last month http://www.seomoz.org/blog/web-site-migration-guide-tips-for-seos.
If you're still having this issue, send a note to the help desk via email at help@seomoz.org. They'll help you figure out what is happening. So sorry for the delayed response!
Hi! Did this answer help, or are you still looking for some more advice? Our resources under the Learn SEO tab, including the Beginner's Guide to SEO, may also be of help to you.
Hi Rob,
How are things going on this site? Are your rankings back, or are you still looking for some help?
Hi Nicholas,
Have you been able to straighten this out, or would you like some more assistance regarding Google Webmaster Tools?
Google has been doing this for many sites. I haven't seen mention of site owners being able to change or disable them doing this.
Hi Tyler, did Alan's response answer your question, or are you still looking for some more help?
Both Casey and Ryan have good points here. A slight clarification that Google doesn't like buying links for the purpose of passing page rank (which is the main reason it's done).
It really depends on what your hosting company has done. Basically, you need to choose if you want a www in front of your URL or not, then make sure you set up your redirects properly. Your hosting company can help with this, or you can search for information on how to do this on apache, or there may be a Joomla plugin to help too.
Also check out Rand's post about what to do when the "wrong" page is ranking. This isn't the right use of a canonical tag in your situation.
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/wrong-page-ranking-in-the-results-6-common-causes-5-solutions
Hi Ryan,
I believe this was a bug we had in the crawler that's fixed now. If you're still seeing this, please send a note to help@seomoz.org and they'll get it straightened out for you.
I haven't heard too many people talk about switching back to the old website, and sorry I don't have any advice to give you there.
Since your original question was asked, this great post about migrating your website has been published on the SEOmoz blog that can really help make sure you have a lot of the correct things done for a site migration. Best of luck!
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/web-site-migration-guide-tips-for-seos
You can get a lot more points and a better link by writing a quality post for YouMoz.. Be aware there is a cap on the number of points in a month you can get from Q&A, so just a general notice for anybody that leaving a bunch of short answers to try to build MozPoints isn't worth it.
There is more to life than a followed profile link. 
Hi Chronicle,
You might also investigate other ways to speed up your site, such as making sure your images are optimized. Your home page images are all identical, and the file size could easily be cut in half with http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/.
Honestly, I would worry less about your server at this point, and more about other things that might send off some spammy signals to Google. The text of your website claims that it is just for research purposes, but the links coming to the site that show in Open Site Explorer have a lot of "buy viagra" anchor text coming from .edu pages that have been heavily spammed. The image that's often repeated on the home page has the filename of buy-sildenafil-citrate_00.jpg. The alt text for the free shipping image is "buy research chemicals", etc.
Here's a good FAQ from Google about Instant Preview http://sites.google.com/site/webmasterhelpforum/en/faq-instant-previews.
They're showing up for your site as well. I searched for [freight monster] in Google and when I hovered over the links I saw the instant preview.
You're seeing Google Instant Previews. If you click again on those two right arrows by the link, you'll be able to toggle it off. Likely, you've been browsing with it disabled and clicked at just the right place to turn it on. You should be able to see that for many sites. It's something Google is doing, not just something Northface is doing. Check out the links in my other answer for some more information.
Ahh, I bet you're talking about Google Instant Previews! Check out Google's information at http://www.google.com/landing/instantpreviews/#a and http://support.google.com/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1055571. This came out in October 2010, per http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2050540/Google-Testing-Full-Page-Preview-in-SERPs.
Hi Joseph,
The new list became available in late September of last year. See my previous post above that has a link to the blog post Cyrus made with some more information.
Hi Steven,
Can you attach a screenshot and highlight the part you are interested in? Are you speaking of the sitelinks perhaps?
Is this with visits from all engines, or just one search engine? If it's just one engine but not the others, that points more towards something with the way one particular engine is looking at your site. If it's all engines, then it might be something more happening with your site itself.
You might also see if you can find any more specific trends. is it one section of your site that's going up and down in visits, such as one folder, while the traffic to the other folders are OK? Or some keywords that are fluctuating while others are fine?
You need to wait for the next week's crawl or request a custom crawl to see a reduction in your duplicate content. For the canonical tags, it's a notice and not an error -- just a "hey, be aware that it's there, and make sure it's implemented correctly" note.
This post from Dr. Pete also explains the 100 link guideline, its origin, and how to think about it.