Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Dear all,

On jun 20 I have uploaded a disavow file including some domains by error (good links), my question is could I remove from the Disavow file these domains and update it again, so Google will take the removed domains again as good links?

Thank you

Thank you for your response

Dear Dan,

I agree with you 100%, so which tool are you using to detect duplication with other sites for example pages on our site duplicated with tucows.

There are any massive or batch way to detect it.

We feel this is the major issue with our site.

Waiting for your response

Thank you

Claudio

YES absolutelly, (Always at domain level) it prevents future new pages from the spammy domain linking your pages, only you can use subdomain level where the links comes from authority domains, for example blogs on blogspot ie: linking.blogspot.com in this case you should include on your disavow file only the subdomain linking.blogspot.com and at the TLD level ".com" which includes all the regional like .com.tw , .com.ar etc

Use to detect bad links as many tools as you can starting with Google WMT, bING WMT, yandex WMT, SeoMOZ, ahref, linkdetrox etc.

Hope it helps

My friend Evan,

Google get thousand of innocent reconsideration request, saying "I'm innocent" for example if you tag any page with the robots meta tag "OINDEX,FOLLOW"  it always will consider it as NOINDEX,FOLLOW they assume the pesimistic option, so if you has spammy links, you has two options, the first is remove all of them which will save your site or leave it and be penalized or rank low .....

Again my experience is assume that Google will think you're the responsible (the pesimistic option) and try to remove all the possible links and the rest should be disavowed and never try to joke the links to your site, think Google has the 90% of the market on the internet, so your site and mime are not the most important.

Recently Google has penalized to ebay and many others ....

Hope it helps

Dear Kevin,

I feel you are an expert SEO (I was looking for this), I agree 100% with you, about the schema, I was adding it and for my surprise it is not W3C compliant, also I add this to other pages (other sites) and no improvements at all, at this time

I'll increase the font size, this was a concern for me, anyway I'm using the same font size of my competitors.

Finally, do you think this page can be catched by Google as Keyword sttuffing ?

Claudio

Dear kevin,

I know that and usually use them, I need a human eyes different to mime to detect any possible keyword joke on this page, Im working hard to revamp this site

Thank you

Claudio

I was dealing with DISAVOW for a long time and my conclusions are:

1. Remove as many links as you can.

2. The remaining links (bad or suspicious) should be included into a DISAVOW file and upload it to Google Disavow tool.

This allow your site to keep safe for future and coming penalties or rank issues.

PS.: Google can detect all the un-natural link schemes better than you and me ....

Hope it helps

Dear Mates,

This sample page is http://goo.gl/kGljFX

Title tag: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Coupon Code 30% - Buy Page

Meta Desc: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Coupon Code 30%: Convert both Standard-Definition and High-Definition formats, super fast speed.

H1: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Coupon Code

H2: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Key Functions:

H2: Wondershare Video Converter Ultimate Detailed Features:

Could you take a look and let us an idea?

Thank you

Claudio

Dear Evan,

You could get a Google manual-penalty, or simply be affected by an algorithm penalty (Penguin), so the best practice is:

1. Contact the webmaster of these sites and ask for link removal.

2. The remaining links should be included on the DISAVOW file at domain level.

You should be use to construct your link profile several sources, such as Google WMT, Bing WMT, Yandex WMT and of cours several tools such as ahref, SeoMoz, LinkMajestic and LinkDetrox, and other tools, each bad link you detect and get remove from there is a goal and prevent future penalties or gradual downgrades of your rank.

Good luck

Your canonical is correct, (this is your root domain), also is a good practice, all the links from deeper pages pointing to your home page should be pointed to http://www.example.com/.

Additionally is a good practice to use the 301 redirect (avoid duplicates on the home page):
http://example.com/ redirect to http://www.example.com/
http://example.com/index.php redirect to http://www.example.com/
http://www.example.com/index.php redirect to http://www.example.com/

Hope it helps

Hello,

I'm working on the same niche (software), the best practice from my point of view is ALWAYS use the same page, and update it according the new release of the product, never remove (you're losing inbound links, Authority and even other important trust factors.

Only is recommended "remove" the discontinued products as by including a 301 to the most similar product page on your site and also take care about never redirect all your discontinued pages to the home page (a very common error).

I hope it helps

Claudio

You're looking as a link schema from google point of view, you should remove all links between A and B, google nows both sites (domains) are owned by the same person.

Hope it help

Hello Ryan,

You can try Alexa, it gives you an estimate of the site traffic and it is free-cost

Dear Morris,

After the Google Panda and Penguin updates, the value of the links has varied, Google has deprecated 100% the links comming from PR sites, (They are no natural links) at this time from Google point of view you're buying these links, even some reputable paid directories don't add any value (you pay and you get listed).

Google now is looking for other signals such as Google+, Facebook likes etc. the link building has changed.

I recommends to put you effort on social channels especially Google+ and second on Facebook.

I hope it helps

Claudio

The site to be improved after Google Penguin is freesharewaredepot.com actually it has SEOMOz domain authority only 56 and I know it is very low compared with other similar directories.

We need to get quality links from reputable directories, so I was thinking paid for inclusion in yahoo and other reputable directories and for us $300 by/Yr is not expensive at this time.

So I should paid for inclusion and it can help to extend our link profile and SERP ?

Thank you

Yes, 100% agree Irving comment about the IP's (same network), also google looks the domain registration owner to determine if both sites comming from the same person or company.

Hope it help

It is my point of view, on 2011 I bought an expensive  PR package on a reputable PR site and the traffic comming from the PR's was very low and also the value of these links was low too, so I recommend again put this money and effort in a social channels campain it will be more valuable in terms of traffic (targeted traffic) and also link value, authority etc.

PR sites has been absolutelly deprecated by Google and also the traffic comming from them is always less than espected.

This is my personal point of view

PS.: In the 90's we were buying PR packages and our rank was increased in a few weeks, today the rank is not affected by PR sites.

Hope it helps

Hello Patrick,

NEVER reuse content from one site on other site and in your particular case take care about a few things.

1. NO content sharing between your sites.

2. REMOVE any link between them.

3. MOVE the penalized site to another IP very different to the your prosun.com.

4. Finally abandon the welproma.com if you can.

Hope it helps

Claudio

Hello Armin,

You should use only one H1 tag on your page, the recommendation is include on it the page title (title tag).

Also you can use other H2 and H3 etc, no limitations but you should care about keyword dilusion and care about not sound as keyword spammer.

Actually I'm using one H1 identical to my title tag, and two or three H2's

Hope it help

Claudio