Technically attribution (CC BY) requires the url to be linked, though I've seen it argued it just needs to be displayed.
Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Posts made by StalkerB
-
RE: Can you require link attribution under the creative commons license?
-
RE: How do I go about changing a 302 redirect to a 301.
How are you doing your 302 redirect?
If it's htaccess, either just change 302 to 301
So if it looks like this - redirect 302 /oldpage http://example.com/page - just change the number
If it's applied by a rule add R=301
RewriteRule ^oldpage(.*)$ /page [L,R=301]
If it's php
header("HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently");
header("Location: http://example.com/page");
exit();
?>if it's asp
<%
response.Status = "301 Moved Permanently"
response.addheader "location", "http://example.com/page"
response.end
%>Double check those though, end of the day here, getting tired
-
RE: Meta description tag in rss xml file?
Damnit, the one time I don't ctrl+c before hitting submit, grrr.
Anyway, I misunderstood, I though you were pulling descriptions from a .xml file not having your feed crawled.
Do you really want your feed to be indexed? Just duplicate content isn't it?
I'd think about blocking bots from crawling it (though please seek a second opinion first).
And to answer your actual questions the RSS description is not the same as the meta description (though I'm not sure if adding it will stop readers parsing the feed).
-
RE: Meta description tag in rss xml file?
What happens when you view source? Is there a tag?
If it's their I'd imagine you're all right, if not, then you'll need to add it.