Why did our ranking go up, then drop down again?
-
Hello SEOMoz community.
I work for a website that runs a collectibles news service and sells collectibles online.
I recently renamed one of the pages from "Stock for Sale" to "Collectibles for Sale" anticipating this would help our ranking for the term "collectibles for sale". This changes the Title, URL and h1 to Collectible for Sale.
A few days later we were up to 5th on Google UK for that keyword.
But now after the weekend we've dropped off the face of the earth... Or at least somewhere low down in the rankings.
I imagine there could be multiple reasons for this, but what are the most likely causes?
There is not much text on the page, it contains an iFrame with image boxes that link to relevant collectibles categories.
Website: www.paulfrasercollectibles.com
-
We used to use a different style URL which just included the docid and catid. At this point we manually entered friendly URL redirects in the CMS.
At the beginning of this month we converted to an automatic friendly url system. The url is generated from the article title. Old urls now use the rel="canonical" to direct to the correct page which is always of the format:
www.paulfrasercollectibles.com/category/article-title/0000.page
I'm not entirely sure if we have the ability to make 301 redirects.
-
Hey everyone.
Can I just add something else. I changed the text on another page, adding more information about the service the company provides. The page is titled "Investment Newsletter" it was page 3 Google UK for that term and had been for a while.
It went up to page 2. And now its dropped away somewhere. This change was implemented over a week ago.
Why is this happening? Surely it shouldn't be a result of me changing the content on the page?
I've never seen anything on SEOMoz to suggest that improving a pages content will lose my rank in Google.
Any suggestions?
Can I also add, that we changed the Meta description on the home page from being the same as the title:
"Latest news from the world of high-end collectibles and investments"
to
"Free daily news for collectors plus antiques, memorabilia and investment-grade collectibles for sale."
This has seen us drop from 5th place on the 1st page in the UK. to the 3rd page on Google.
But the Meta description only has limited SEO effect and surely this is a change for the better?
-
Adrian,
We always see an initial high ranking that last about a week then goes back down sometimes a few pages..Over a 2 month period we see the ranking usually restore.
-
Hi Adrian
In regards to the other tags, I take it back, it was Chrome's view source code coloring, made tags look broken at quick glance. Sorry!
As far as the canonical, I was just curious why there are two URLs for that page to begin with? Is it that you need the '1850' in the URL to provide the GET call to the database?
It appears as if all your category level pages operate this way? You should be able to get a singular, clean URL and make your category call without the need for duplicate pages at all.
If this is not the case, you may want to 301 Redirect the '1850' page to the other page. There doesn't seem to be a need for both pages to be accessible by users.
Hope that helps!
-Dan
-
Hi Dan, thanks for the response.
I see what you mean about the two versions. It seems to be worse than that as well. The page was originally called "Stock for Sale" which is also indexed twice.
We were under the impression that using rel="canonical" would mean Google only indexed one url for the page. Even if older URL's are still used on the website. Should this other urls drop out of the index on their own?
As for the unclosed title and style tags. I don't see what you mean. To me they seem to be perfectly fine, and he haven't encountered any problems with these before.
Cheers
-
It appears as if you have two versions of the page indexed;
http://www.paulfrasercollectibles.com/Collectibles-for-Sale/1850.page
and
http://www.paulfrasercollectibles.com/Collectibles-for-Sale/
The rel="canonical" cites http://www.paulfrasercollectibles.com/Collectibles-for-Sale/1850.page as the page that should count in the index, however on your site its the other page which is linked to from the menu.
It would require a deeper look at things to tell what is going on for sure, but having duplicate versions of the same page in the index is certainly something of concern.
At quick glance I see a few other things that should be addressed when I view source; including a style tag and title tag not closing correctly.
-Dan
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Need help on declining page rank
Hi Guys,
On-Page Optimization | | Slideuplift123
We had a consistent page ranking for a specific keyword between 5 and 8 positions on google. This week all of a sudden the page which was ranking for that keyword no longer ranks for it and another page has started ranking for that keyword that too at 20th position. I am so confused why has this happened? I didn't do any changes to that page or to the now ranking page. Can anyone help why could this be happening?0 -
My organic search dropped over 25% since March Update....Any insights?
My website is purecbdvapors.com. Any insight would be greatly appreciated! Anthony
On-Page Optimization | | Purecbdvapors0 -
Optimise root level page for secondary keyword or try to make second level rank?
My Main keyword ranks no where in the top 100 for any pages in my site. for / I am ranked at number 10 for a great secondary keyword. Really want to get this secondary keywordranking on /secondary-keyword.html , should I focus my main page only on my primary keyord and remove any references to "Secondary Keyword"? What I feel here is that I would be sacrificing my rank for "Secondary Keyword"
On-Page Optimization | | Adamzoz0 -
Keywords dropping
My website http://www.refrigeratedtransportuk.com/ is dropping like a stone for the keyword 'refrigerated transport'. Even though the page gets a grade A, can anyone help?
On-Page Optimization | | CreativeCow0 -
Variations and Rankings
How do search engines view wording variances? I am trying to target Scottish Wedding Photographer but will google/bing etc be intelligent enough to see plurals, see the word Scotland instead of Scottish, photography instead of photographer? Also with rankings, I had a secondary phrase there to which I'm ranking sort of page 2-3 at the moment (the site is circa 3 months old) but finding that I'm nowhere with the Scottish phrase, I checked 30 pages of results and show nowhere, is this due to the competition for my phrase? My site is www.martinwardphotography.com
On-Page Optimization | | MartinWardPhoto0 -
Will unstyled bold tags help ranking
I intend using Bold tags to add emphasis but I don't want to
On-Page Optimization | | YGF
actually show bold words
so have amended by css. are the B tags enough to help with SEO or will my amended
CSS damage the effect? Many thanks,Sinead0 -
Will deleting excess self serving links from old posts damage established ranking
My SEOmoz report showed many posts with "too many links." I can easily go back into wordpress and delete self serving links. But is there a downside to this if these posts are already ranked well on google search for the desired key words? Or will deleting the excess self serving links improve ranking
On-Page Optimization | | wianno1680 -
Images being ranked
I have a client who is concerned about the performance of his images ranking on Google Images. I have taken a look at the obvious things like - alt tags, title tags , file names. I am not sure why he is struggling quite so much to get his images ranked well as the sites he is competing against and who are already ranking are a very poor quality. This is his site - http://www.ukweddingfavours.co.uk Would really appreciate your feedback and I can dish out some good answers.
On-Page Optimization | | onlinemediadirect0