Have I been mauled by the Panda?
-
I mentioned my problem a few nights ago, but since then I think I may have found my problem. I have a site that was never really promoted to any great level, but for the main keywords I could find it in serps with out clicking though too many pages. I came up first for the company name in both Bing or Google.
Recently I finally decided to promote it and did a bit of a ranking check. First I still come up first for my company name in Bing, but in Google I come up 900+ out of 1000, virtually last. For my main keyword, the title of my site and optimized well for, I come up last, absolutely last. For long tail terms from my home page where I am the only site in the world to have the exact term, I come first in Bing, and absolutely last in Google. I don’t do black hat, but I thought I must be flagged by Google and I asked for reconsideration, they replied that no manual actions had been taken again the site, and referred me to the usual Google guidelines.
It was very frustrating, I then had a thought, I had a long forgotten sub domain that had a load of duplicate content, it was a load of Microsoft documentation and other dev stuff from other sources, rss feeds and the like. Nothing sinister, but duplicate all the same. I am now thinking that this maybe my problem. I have 410’ed the whole sub domain as the site has not been maintained for some time anyhow.
Does anybody know of simular, sub domain causing loss of ranking for root domain
-
I simply put a 301 for the domain name, and kept the site the same in place on the same server.
I did not use change of address.
-
Alan, thanks for posting an update for everyone on this topic.
I have a few follow-up questions for you about your rankings recovery:
-
When you moved domains, did you do all the typically suggested best practices (e.g. 301 redirect each page to its equivalent on the new domain)?
-
Did you use the "Change of address" form in Google Webmaster Tools to tell them you moved your domain?
-
Did you do anything else that you think may have contributed to your rankings recovery or that you think helped in transitioning from your old domain to your new domain?
-
-
This is a very old htead, i changed the domain from .net.au to .com.au and all rankings came back, i never did find out what was wrong, but something was wrong alright
-
Hello Alan.
No, I don't think so.
It is the wrong pattern for panda, from what I have seen.
At least you are showing up in the results.
I believe if it was panda, that you would have to go to the end of the displayed results and click on the link that displays all of the results, including the results that were previously hidden.
Then you would show up, in a relatively high position.
The change you describe doesn't fit that pattern.
What I described is the only pattern I think is panda.
-
Edited this post as itwas a false alarm, i thought my rankings had returend, they had not.
Althought they are not quite as bad as they were yesterday. -
My expirences are that when you rank low in the hundreds, even one or two links from my own c-block will give a big boost, or cause when you enter the top 50 thinks get much harder. I have added a lot of links, a lot of them are just profile links from microsoft news groups, and it has not budged.
i have pointed my profile links at many pages before and made them move.I have seen sites drop out before , but only temp, its been the best part of a month now.
The sub domain I metioned has been removed from google, I checked and it is constantly showing no pages in the index.
I did see a temp small jump in rankings, so i am still hopeing although i have read much the same as you suggested, that moving duplicate content to a subdomain is a fix and suggest its not the problem.
As for the links, I have anouther 2 site, that have much teh same links, one has the same subject matter, and they rank much better. i would think that they would suffer the same fate.
-
To not rank for your own business name is a sign a automatic penalization. The fact links have not changed (as you say) suggests that the penalization is because of the links (as far as I have not seen any apparent misuse onpage). Panda in not working in this case.
-
At the time of first posting I had 500+ links I now have 700+, for the last few years up
until the problem I had 100+, see imageBut your whole argument that all of a sudden I would drop from first for my business
name to almost last when my links have not changed is not realistic.What facts? You haven’t presented any, you came in with a flawed argument, now trying to alter the facts to fit it.
I have heard you theory, and your thinly disguised abuse and dismissed them both
-
Your new site is irrelevant to the problems you are having. If your main site has dropped due to poor quality signals (garbage links, etc) then of course just about any other site with a similar domain will do better. This is especially true if Google's algorithm has flagged your site as crap. Note that I am talking about the machine algorithm NOT any manual penalty.
Here's what you are missing: You don't have 700 or even 500 GOOD links. You have about 82 inbound links according to the most reliable sources and the links are mostly crap. Why do you keep insisting that Yahoo, OSE and Majestic are all wrong? If you want to check one more, try backlinkwatch.com. Even it says only 46 links to your site.
Getting more bad links will not make you rank any better than fewer bad links, whether it is 700, 500, or 3. You do understand the quality issue, right?
You even acknowledge that "not having good links can explain bad ranking". You don't have good links! It is as simple as that. Maybe you did have them at one time and they are gone, or maybe Google didn't notice how lame your links were until recently. Either way, you will need some legitimate, good quality links if you want to improve your rankings. You offer SEO services on your site so this should not be news to you. If it is news to you, then it is probably a good thing nobody can find your site.
I am beginning to think you are joking or something. You refuse to accept facts, advice and reality. Good luck with that.
-
look at image on last thread, i have 500+, i have 700+ now as i have been redirecting some. when i ranked better, i had less links.
but i thing your missing the point,
My site did rank much better, not having good links can explain bad rankings, but not a drop in rankings.
if you look at this search, you will see thatsitsolutions.net.au on first page or top of second, i made that site about a week ago, it has no links, and almost no content, yet my real site is almost last in the whole index.
I used to come up first. you cant explain that with bad links, i mean they are better now then they were then.
Content is all orginal on root domain
-
Here's a thought - you thought you had 500+ links, everyone else sees a much lower number when checking reliable sources. Maybe you lost some of those links are no longer there. MajesticSEO says 82 http://bit.ly/phYeGp which is almost the same as Yahoo Site Explorer, and OSE said even fewer. You can insist that you have 500 all you want, but if YSE and Majestic aren't seeing your links, you can safely bet that Google isn't seeing them either. If Bing thinks you have more, that would explain why you are doing well in Bing searches. Once Bing gets an accurate count, that may change.
Also, you pointed out that many of your links are from the same IP. Those probably don't count for much. The links that ARE showing are not very good quality or relevant - school uniforms?
Google told you no MANUAL action was taken. That doesn't mean your site has escaped the normal automatic quality and authority checks. Since your links are mostly worthless, that would explain why you dont rank for anything. No manual penalty - but the algorithm has no reason to believe your site is better than the hundreds of other sites you are competing with. Again, compare your link profile to your competition.
I know you want to believe that there is some external issue or a magic bullet, but your answers are all right in front of you, some are even in your own posts here (your links are from same IP, forum spam, etc).
The short answer is still the same: you need links. Good ones.
Another thing you might try is to make 100% certain that your content is unique.
-
Gianluca
I have done a bit more reading and have found that moving to a subdomain has been promoted as a fix rather then a problem, but as many have claimed subdomains can be treated as seperate domains or true subdomains depending on linking and the such. so i am still wondering.
anyhow the old subdomain was outdated and removing it was not a problem.
The only other thing i can think of is many of my links are same ip, as they are from sites i built or done seo work for and also host. If panda has tighted up on same ip this could be a factor, but then, they have always know this and i dont think the numbers are that great.
I am watching the page count of subdomain in index, as page count decreases I hope to see a rise in rankings, I am also going to try and lift the ratio of same ip to true external links
-
how does not having many links send you from top to bottom for my bussiness name?
Nick if you find my last post I show that i created a second site, with no content just a link to the first site, with no links, and it ranks on the first page for the business name.
Sure the linking sucks, it has over 500, but a lot are signitures from microsoft forums.
I apoligize if my answeres sound a bit abrupt, but the last post sunk into the same debate.
but remeber it ranked number one for my business name for the past few years, now almost last.
Long tail terms where i am the only one to have exact match, i am the very last result. I dont care if othes have better linking profile than i do, having the same words spread thoughtout your page, but about a different subject should not rank you above the exact match.
I never did rank well for the compeditive keywords, but i was still in the top 10% of results, now i come absolute last, not near the bottom, the very last result.
Even if i was always last, you would wonder why the test site i made ranks on first page, with no links.
i asked google and they say there is no MANUAL action taken agaiinst my site.
Lets asume you rank #1 for your business name, tomorrow you are last, and I suggested that you need more links, would you accept that as an answer?
-
Thanks, Gianluca - I looked for the original question but did not find it.
Alan, I have to agree with what you were already told. You don't really have much going for you as far as inbound links. I looked at yahoo site explorer which says about 86 links. I looked at a few of them and they appear to be footer credit links, which supposedly don't count for much. I didn't get a recent count of the total number of linking domains as OSE is due for an update, but I seriously doubt that there are 500 of them.
I took a quick look at the site too, and it doesn't have any painfully obvious problems.
So the short answer is:
You need links. Good ones.Take a look at the link profiles of the sites who are ranking on page one for your keywords. Have they got more, and better links?
-
Nick i have been though all the check your links and your on off page stuff, i dont want to get stuck in that debate again. I am no novice, its not a case of my wanting to rank higher and being disapointed, its case of a dramatic change of rankings. when you come almost last for your business name from first a few moths ago when i last checked. to come last for a term you are the only one in the world to have the exact macth, its more then a few broken links or so.
Yes the no-index stuff is a good point, but i checked all that, I have no no-index or no-follow tags at all, i have the basic robots.
I must also add, that I have destroyed the evidence and made a new site in my panic, i have also 410ed the whole sub domain
Gianluca, i had doubts myself as i have anouther sub domain that does not seem to be affected (hard to tell). but i just read on the google forum about someone who did have a simular problem or should i say thinks he has.
-
Alan previously presented this case in this Q&A http://www.seomoz.org/q/rankings-last-google-says-no-flags
-
Hi Alan,
honestly I have no knowledge of anything similar.
Anyway it seems quite strange to me that a sub-domain may affect the root domain or another sub-domain if Pandasized.
I say this because to move from the main site to sub-domains the duplicates or thin contents that caused the Panda ban is the solution used by many big sites, which were hitten by Panda and claimed they have recovered.
I don't say that is "bible", but it seems suggesting that the sub-domain maybe it is not the real cause of your site poor rankings.
-
I don't think having a bunch of junk on a subdomain would cause that kind of problem. Double check that there aren't any major technical issues on the site, and the usual on page stuff - each page should have a unique title, not blocked in robots.txt or noindexed, good quality original content, not keyword-stuffed, etc.
How have you been promoting the site? It could be that what you think is not black hat may still be something Google will not tolerate.
What is the site's address? I am sure that someone here will be able to spot anything serious almost right away.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Payday Loan or Panda? Any thoughts?
So this is a very old problem, but I'm finally getting around to trying to figure it out. My site experienced a dramatic organic traffic drop from Google (-40%) on May 17th 2014. It then drops another 30% on May 19th 2014. See graphs. According to Moz these two dates correlate with Payday Loan 2.0 and Panda 4.0. Panda makes complete sense, as this site (www.ausedcar.com) has a large amount of content that is syndicated across other sites (used car inventory is essentially the same everywhere on the Internet). Payday Loan on the other hand, which seems to be the primary traffic drop doesn't make any sense at all. Is it possible I started getting hit by Panda on the 17th and then it completed on the 19th? I know the dates for algorithm changes are not perfect. Next, assuming it is Panda, what are some things you guys have done to help with this? As I mentioned this content is duplicated all over the Internet, so it seems like Google arbitrarily picks winners and losers (my site is twenty years old!). I know I need unique content, but not sure how exactly to do that besides rewriting words so it doesn't appear duplicate.
Technical SEO | | Catbelly0 -
Panda Cleanup - Removing Old Blog Posts, Let Them 404 or 301 to Main Blog Page?
tl;dr... Removing old blog posts that may be affected by Panda, should we let them 404 or 301 to the Blog? We have been managing a corporate blog since 2011. The content is OK but we've recently hired a new blogger who is doing an outstanding job, creating content that is very useful to site visitors and is just on a higher level than what we've had previously. The old posts mostly have no comments and don't get much user engagement. I know Google recommends creating great new content rather than removing old content due to Panda concerns but I'm confident we're doing the former and I still want to purge the old stuff that's not doing anyone any good. So let's just pretend we're being dinged by Panda for having a large amount of content that doesn't get much user engagement (not sure if that's actually the case, rankings remain good though we have been passed on a couple key rankings recently). I've gone through Analytics and noted any blog posts that have generated at least 1 lead or had at least 20 unique visits all time. I think that's a pretty low barrier and everything else really can be safely removed. So for the remaining posts (I'm guessing there are hundreds of them but haven't compiled the specific list yet), should we just let them 404 or do we 301 redirect them to the main blog page? The underlying question is, if our primary purpose is cleaning things up for Panda specifically, does placing a 301 make sense or would Google see those "low quality" pages being redirected to a new place and pass on some of that "low quality" signal to the new page? Is it better for that content just to go away completely (404)?
Technical SEO | | eBoost-Consulting0 -
Any penguin or panda is updating today?
Hey Friends, Please help i have a question .. could you please tell me with the answer about google updates . is there any google algo is changed. because my website has loss the position. Please help me. i checked today removalinmelbourne.com.au it was on first page and suddenly today i lost this. Please guys help me and give me some good ideas to make me back .............. 😞
Technical SEO | | Tufail0 -
Panda: Are our ads duplicate content or just structural and not even considered?
We have hundreds and hundreds of pages with similar ads on. We are getting content written for these pages right now and we're removing some pages, but we're wondering how Panda might see the ads which we have across the site? The ads consist of the name of a company and a description and a few other bits. The description is the same on all pages that a company's ad is listed on - and that can be hundreds of pages. You can see some examples here: http://www.agencycentral.co.uk/agencysearch/accounting/skills/indandcomm/financialanalyst.htm http://www.agencycentral.co.uk/agencysearch/accounting/skills/indandcomm/financialaccountant.htm http://www.agencycentral.co.uk/agencysearch/accounting/skills/indandcomm/assistantaccountant.htm What we're wondering is whether Google Panda might be seeing the description of the company as internal duplicate content or just structural and not even considered as part of the Panda algorithm? Or something else? Or wouldn't it be clear in this case? Clearly Panda wouldn't hit duplicate content in nav bards, sidebars etc... but this is in the content area of the page so it did make us wonder. This could make a difference to how we proceed so we appreciate your thoughts. Regards, Phil
Technical SEO | | agencycentral0 -
Panda and affiliate networks
Last year we were hit with a Panda penalty and have been unable to recover from this. We removed all duplicate content from our site and SEOMoz confirms this. I have spoken to a new SEO company and they have identified that the cause maybe our content being duplicated off site by affiliates who are using our product feed such as Shopwiki and Thefind. Is this a possibibilty and if so I presume the easiest thing to do is stop these affiliates using our descriptions. Neil
Technical SEO | | NeilPark0 -
Panda recovery timeframe question
Site was hit by Panda Aug. 22nd. Lost 90% of Google traffic. I know 🙂 We think we found a reason and made few changes to landing pages structure. Updated sitemaps submitted. When can we expect effect (if any) - few days or after next Panda data refresh? Thank you!P.S. What is also interesting, similar traffic loss from Bing/Yahoo happened at exactly the same date. Does that mean Bing is "stealing" search results from Google when can't provide their own relevant results? 🙂
Technical SEO | | LocalLocal0 -
Panda and unnatural links caused ranking drop
Hi I have been approached to do some SEO work for a site that has been hit badly by the latest panda update 3.3, they have also had a warning in their Google webmaster tools account saying they had unnatural looking links to their site, they received this in 26 Feb and that prompted them to stop working with their excising seo company and look for a new one. Apparently their rankings for the keywords they were targeting have dropped dramatically, but it looks like just those they were actively building back links for, other phrases do not look affected. Before I take them on I want to be clear that it is possible to help them reclaim their rankings? I have checked the site and the on-page seo is good, the site build is good, just a few errors to fix but the links that have been built by the seo company are low quality with a lot of spun articles and the same anchor text so I see what the Google webmaster tools message is refuring to. I do not think these links can be removed as there is no contact details on the sites I checked I have not checked all of them but a random sample does not show promise, they are from low authority domains. So if I am to take them on as a client and help them to regain their previous rankings what is the best strategy? Obviously they want results yesterday and from our phone call they would rather someone else did the work than them, so my initial response of add some better quality content that others in your industry would link to as a reference did not go down well, to be fair I think it is a time issue there are only 3 people in the company and they are not technical at all. Thanks for your help Sean
Technical SEO | | ske110 -
How to publish duplicate content legitimately without Panda problems
Let's imagine that you own a successful website that publishes a lot of syndicated news articles and syndicated columnists. Your visitors love these articles and columns but the search engines see them as duplicate content. You worry about being viewed as a "content farm" because of this duplicate content and getting the Panda penalty. So, you decide to continue publishing the content and use... <meta name="robots" content="noindex, follow"> This allows you do display the content for your visitors but it should stop the search engines from indexing any pages with this code. It should also allow robots to spider the pages and pass link value through them. I have two questions..... If you use "noindex" will that be enough to prevent your site from being considered as a content farm? Is there a better way to continue publication of syndicated content but protect the site from duplicate content problems?
Technical SEO | | EGOL0