Anyone else noticing that their expired domains have lost PR?
-
A while back I experimented with buying some expired domains that had some PR. I built a small website on each and created content with anchor text that linked back to my main site.
For one of my sites I noticed a significant drop in rankings this week. At first I thought it was because of the latest Panda update. But, the drop was slow, not sudden like most Panda hits have been.
Then, I noticed that some of my previously purchased domains that had held their PR for quite a while are now PR N/A. I'm guessing that the latest algorithm change caught on to what I was doing.
Probably what I was doing was grey hat. I honestly think that every SEO goes through a period where they try out some grey or even black tactics. This makes me even more desiring to be completely White hat now....and build links that are going to last.
I was just wondering if any of you guys have experienced anything like this this week? Would love to hear your thoughts.
EDIT: A second question - What would you guys do with these domains? They're still in the Google index so they're not penalized, likely just stripped of PR. Would you scrap them completely? Remove the links back to my sites? Do nothing?
-
There's also a problem that's happened in the last couple of days for third-party reporting of toolbar pagerank that might be affecting what you're seeing. Check out the post at http://mz.cm/rjPAwc.
-
Marie, feel free to send me an email if you want to bounce any ideas off of me about YouMoz, I'm currently the primary person reviewing submissions and can give you some pointers about what tends to do well on the blog. keri at seomoz dot org.
-
I've noticed that my two domains that have lost PR had links in a blogroll in the sidebar. I have some expired domains that are still working for me. These simply had links in context.
Perhaps the newest Panda Update looks for sites with PR that have recently changed hands that have blogroll links?
-
Thanks Ryan. Your video reminded me of this animated gif that Rand tweeted the other day. (See image below):
-
Thank you for a thoughtful reply. I'm thinking of creating a YouMoz post about my struggles of learning to rank with only White Hat Tactics. You're right, it's crummy to look at your competitors and see that they rank with ridiculous directory links.
-
** This makes me even more desiring to be completely White hat now....and build links that are going to last.**
Thumbs up for both the question and the sentiment.
Google is far from perfect, but given the size of their work and the determination of webmasters, programmers, SEOs and everyone with an iPad to usurp their process, I applaud them for continuing to take steps to improve results.
To address your question and Robert's concern:** Anyone else noticing that their expired domains have lost PR?**
I would put my logic hat on and think the right thing for Google to impact (i.e. reset PR) would be expired domains which changed owners AND content. That's what I would do if I worked for Google. It explains the results you and Robert shared.
Otherwise I wholeheartedly echo Robert's sentiments. Panda 2.5 hit last week. The only thing I feel bad about is those poor people at Panda's international who depend on people's donation to save this species which is almost extinct (around 1000 left in the world). You are trying to save a species on the bring of extinction and the world's largest marketing company names their spam and manipulation killing algorithm change after the species you are trying to save....big ouch!
-
I found your post interesting, but I have had a different experience this week in that several sites that we have been nurturing moved up a significant amount page 4 to page 2, several moved up over a dozen positions. Hope that means we have been doing a good job and not that Google knocked some others around.
I was pondering your very issue re older domains and expiring domains over the last couple of days. I have not seen an expiring domain lose ranking before. (Hopefully, we never will as that is the last thing I need. A registrar with one more reason to send me another expiration notice - you ignored our last 300 emails that started two years before your domain expired.....do you really want to lose DA???? Contact us NOW!)
But, the question regarding what to do with a domain that is "unused" is interesting. We typically buy most extensions for any TLD and those are built around several keyword groups as we begin to develop a campaign. So, assuming we are building a group of sites around a new dental paint that never has to be whitened...... Dental-paint.com, .net, .org, .info, etc. along with Never-whiten-with-dental-paint.org, .com, .net, .info, etc.
From these, our clients will typically use 3 or 4 so there are a group that are left. Maybe, never used before. I will sometimes let an intern build a site as a project for their degree, etc. Rarely do they end up with any real DA.
As to the white/grey/black hat issues, for me it always seems to be around expediency. Personally, I have always wanted what I want, when I want it and I always want it now or yesterday!!! So, I can either opt for the expedient and hope my client doesn't pay the price or endeavor to take the high road. My personal opinion is that one person saying something is wrong does not make it so. So, I try to measure my actions against how I feel when I see others doing something similar.
I hate it when I see so many sites with links, for example for urologists that com from caps-or us, honkytonkyjonky, expotexto, monkeymania, etc. I read about Google penalizing people but then see that the vast majority of links used on professional practice sites are so bogus that ....well they are.
What's an SEO marketer to do. For me, I just don't have time to deal with the junk directories and I have learned that some of them will get to me anyway. I watch as big directories of national companies take money from their clients then put nofollow links to the sites. (Can't wait until there is some sort of exclusion for a site that is simply a lawyer, doctor, dentist, carpenter, etc. directory - when I want a dentist for an implant I do not want to be served up Yahoo.local.dentist from some other place or specialty. )
So, I am submitting to the better directories then pushing clients to go to vendors, etc. for links and we do all that we can to blog, PR Web, etc.
Personally, there is satisfaction at the end of the day in knowing we "Out-optimized the other guy and we did it on the up and up with quality site metrics, quality links, thought out keyword and link strategies, and a commitment to look at it every day in order to keep the client on top or moving toward the top."
And one last thing. We stayed on top of our game because we are connected to such a great group of marketing pros through SEOmoz. Sorry for the sentimentality, but I never cease to be amazed at the willingness to help one another get better and better and better.
Thanks for a thought provoking question,
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do links from subdomains pass the authority and link juice of main domain ?
Hi, There is a subdomain with a root domain's DA 90. I can earn a backlink from that subdomain. This subdomain is fresh with no traffic yet. Do I get the ranking boost and authority from the subdomain? Example: I can earn a do-follow link from **https://what-is-crm.netlify.app/ **but not from https://netlify.app
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | teamtc0 -
Buy exact match domain and 301 worth it?
So there is this exact match domain that gets about 500 visitors a day. it has trust flow 17 and citation flow of 23 which is just a little lower than our own website. The website talks about one of our keywords and rank on second page in SERPs. I am not interested in buying and running that website, but rather just to liquidate all the pages with 301s into our existing domain and onto relevant pages. So the 301s would be to relevant pages. The question is, would this strategy be worth it in todays SEO world and Google updates?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | TVape0 -
Does Duplicate Content Actually "Penalize" a Domain?
Hi all, Some co-workers and myself were in a conversation this afternoon regarding if duplicate content actually causes a penalty on your domain. Reference: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66359?hl=en http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-duplicate-content-wont-hurt-you-unless-it-is-spammy-167459 Both sources from Google do not say "duplicate content causes a penalty." However, they do allude to spammy content negatively affecting a website. Why it came up: We originally were talking about syndicated content (same content across multiple domains; ex: "5 explanations of bad breath") for the purpose of social media sharing. Imagine if dentists across the nation had access to this piece of content (5 explanations of bad breath) simply for engagement with their audience. They would use this to post on social media & to talk about in the office. But they would not want to rank for that piece of duplicated content. This type of duplicated content would be valuable to dentists in different cities that need engagement with their audience or simply need the content. This is all hypothetical but serious at the same time. I would love some feedback & sourced information / case studies. Is duplicated content actually penalized or will that piece of content just not rank? (feel free to reference that example article as a real world example). **When I say penalized, I mean "the domain is given a negative penalty for showing up in SERPS" - therefore, the website would not rank for "dentists in san francisco, ca". That is my definition of penalty (feel free to correct if you disagree). Thanks all & look forward to a fun, resourceful conversation on duplicate content for the other purposes outside of SEO. Cole
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ColeLusby0 -
Change domains and start over?
We have a fairly new client who has taken part in many questionable SEO technique over the past few years (mainly buying links and directory web pages). In an effort to fix this they hired three separate SEO’s – we are the fourth. Over the past 3 months we have spent lots of time following best practice techniques to clean up and improve their rankings (including link removal requests but not yet disavow), and after some initially positive results, things are looking down again. Given Google’s apparent rolling algorithm updates and the mess we have found, we are wondering if the best option is to change domains and start over (downside is that they are in a highly competitive industry)? My other question pertains to a domain change and if we were to change from a plural to a singular, would that be enough for Google? (e.g from www.domains.com to www.domain.com). The idea is that we start the link building process again – but keep their brand intact. Really appreciate any feedback.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | E2E0 -
Why does expired domains still work for SEO?
Hi everyone I’ve been doing an experiment during more than 1 year to try to see if its possible to buy expired domains. I know its considered black hat, but like I said, I wanted to experiment, that is what SEO is about. What I did was to buy domains that just expired, immediately added content on a WP setup, filled it with relevant content to the expired domain and then started building links to other relevant sites from these domains.( Here is a pretty good post on how to do, and I did it in a similar way. http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2297718/How-to-Build-Links-Using-Expired-Domains ) This is nothing new and SEO:s has been doing it for along time. There is a lot of rumors around the SEO world that the domains becomes worthless after they expire. But after trying it out during more than 1 year and with about 50 different expired domains I can conclude that it DOES work, 100% of the time. Some of the domains are of course better than others, but I cannot see any signs of the expired domains or the sites i link to has been punished by Google. The sites im liking to ranks great ONLY with those links 🙂 So to the question: WHY does Google allow this? They should be able to see that a domain has been expired right? And if its expired, why dont they just “delete” all the links to that domain after the expiry date? Google is well aware of this problem so what is stopping them? Is there any one here that know how this works technically?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Sir0 -
Schema.org tricking and duplicate content across domains
I've found the following abuse, and Im curious what could I do about it. Basically the scheme is: own some content only once (pictures, description, reviews etc) use different domain names (no problem if you use the same IP or IP-C address) have a different layout (this is basically the key) use schema.org tricking, meaning show (the very same) reviews on different scale, show a little bit less reviews on one site than on an another Quick example: http://bit.ly/18rKd2Q
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Sved
#2: budapesthotelstart.com/budapest-hotels/hotel-erkel/szalloda-attekintes.hu.html (217.113.62.21), 328 reviews, 8.6 / 10
#6: szallasvadasz.hu/hotel-erkel/ (217.113.62.201), 323 reviews, 4.29 / 5
#7: xn--szlls-gyula-l7ac.hu/szallodak/erkel-hotel/ (217.113.62.201), no reviews shown It turns out that this tactic even without the 4th step can be quite beneficial to rank with several domains. Here is a little investigation I've done (not really extensive, took around 1 and a half hour, but quite shocking nonetheless):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aqbt1cVFlhXbdENGenFsME5vSldldTl3WWh4cVVHQXc#gid=0 Kaspar Szymanski from Google Webspam team said that they have looked into it, and will do something, but honestly I don't know whether I could believe it or not. What do you suggest? should I leave it, and try to copy this tactic to rank with the very same content multiple times? should I deliberately cheat with markups? should I play nice and hope that these guys sooner or later will be dealt with? (honestly can't see this one working out) should I write a case study for this, so maybe if the tactics get bigger attention, then google will deal with it? Does anybody could push this towards Matt Cutts, or anybody else who is responsible for these things?0 -
Why doesn't Google find different domains - same content?
I have been slowly working to remove near duplicate content from my own website for different locals. Google seems to be doing noting to combat the duplicate content of one of my competitors showing up all over southern California. For Example: Your Local #1 Rancho Bernardo Pest Control Experts | 858-352 ... <cite>www.pestcontrolranchobernardo.com/</cite>CachedYou +1'd this publicly. UndoPest Control Rancho Bernardo Pros specializes in the eradication of all household pests including ants, roaches, etc. Call Today @ 858-352-7728. Your Local #1 Oceanside Pest Control Experts | 760-486-2807 ... <cite>www.pestcontrol-oceanside.info/</cite>CachedYou +1'd this publicly. UndoPest Control Oceanside Pros specializes in the eradication of all household pests including ants, roaches, etc. Call Today @ 760-486-2807. The competitor is getting high page 1 listing for massively duplicated content across web domains. Will Google find this black hat workmanship? Meanwhile, he's sucking up my business. Do the results of the competitor's success also speak to the possibility that Google does in fact rank based on the name of the url - something that gets debated all the time? Thanks for your insights. Gerry
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | GerryWeitz0 -
Best way to handle expired ad in a classified
I don't think there is a definitive answer to this, but worth the discussion: How to handle an expired ad in a classified / auction site? Michael Gray mentioned you should 301 it to it's category page, and I'm inclined to agree with him. But some analysts say you should return a "product/ad expired" page with a 404. For the user I think the 404 aproach is best, but from a SEO perspective that means I'm throwing link juice out. What if I 301 him from the ad, and show a message saying why they're seeing the listing page instead of the product page? Thoughts?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mirum_agency0