Redirection in two phases
-
Hi,
One of my client want a website revamp in two phases.
The first phase would be to move the CMS from Sharepoint to Drupal keeping the same content and URLs but the page extension will change (it could become php or just the name of the page without any extension)
The second phase will be a content revamp with URL change.
The first phase will last 3 weeks and then we will push the second phase with the new content and the new URL.
Some shortcuts to make it a more readable:
- old url = OURL
- old url with new extension = OURLEX
- new URL = NURL
My problem is how can I manage the redirections. Should I:
- Phase 1: create one rule that will redirect all the OURL to the OURLEX
- Phase 2: keep the rule I created in phase 1 and add rules for OURLEX to NURL
Or
- Phase 1: create one rule that will redirect all the OURL to the OURLEX
- Phase 2: keep the rule I created in phase 1 and add redirect OURL to NURL
Or
- Phase 1: create one rule that will redirect all the OURL to the OURLEX
- Phase 2: remove the rule I created in phase 1 and add redirect OURL to NURL
Or
- Phase 1: create a rules for each OURL that will redirect all the pages to OURLEX
- Phase 2: remove the rules I created in phase 1 and redirect the OURL to NURL
Or
- Phase 1: create a rules for each OURL that will redirect all the pages to the OURLEX
- Phase 2: keep the rules I created in phase 1 and add rules to redirect the OURLEX to the NURL
Or
- something else you think is better
Difficult to explain, let me know if it's understandable.
Thanks for you help!
GaB
-
Hi Sha,
I'm changing all the file names and we do have a DB behind the site infrastructure (Drupal) but no unique ID so I guess we'll have to do many rules.
Thanks for your help Sha.
-
Hi GaB,
Sorry, I missed your reference to the URL changes in the original question.
It will depend on exactly what the changes are as to how many Rules will be needed to create the 301 redirects.
If you are retaining file names, but moving whole directories to a new location, then this can be achieved with a single Rule.For example, to 301 Redirect all filenames in Useless Folder 1 to the identical filenames in Relevant Folder 2 can be achieved with a single Rule.
For URLs where the actual filenames will change, or where only some files are relocated you would need to implement individual Rules for each URL.
However, if your site is large, there is another alternative, provided that your URL structure supports it. That would be the use of Database Rewrites to implement the 301 redirects as URL's are requested from the server.
There are some requirements for this to be a viable option:
- There must be a Database behind your site infrastructure
- There must be some identifier in the URLs that will remain constant with the change in site structure. Most commonly this would be a unique product ID number or product name
Basically what happens with Database Rewrites is that when the server receives a request for a URL, the identifier is matched against those in the Database and when the match is found the 301 Redirect is written and the new URL served.
For very large sites Database Rewrites would be the most suitable solution as very long lists of Rules in the .htaccess will eventually impact processing and load times.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Thanks Sha,
You are right, I will do a rewrite for phase 1 but for phase 2 I will need a lot of rewrite rules because the URL structure will change since I optimize it (removing useless folder, adding keywords, etc...) for pretty much every pages.
I don't think I have a choice here.
-
GaB, go with Sha's answer. It is a superior solution to my suggestion. I had a bit of tunnel vision and the rewrite idea did not come to mind.
-
Hi GaB,
I would suggest a completely different solution.
I would not use 301 Redirects for the Phase 1 change. Rather, I would use a Rewrite Rule to serve the file with the new extension. The Rewrite Rule is basically telling the server to serve OURLEX when a request is made for OURL. The nett result of this is that as far as the Search Engine is concerned, nothing changes.
Here is a Code example which will serve the .php when the .aspx is requested:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^(.*).aspx$ $1.php [L]Then, when Phase 2 is complete, I would implement the 301 redirects using a single Rule once again to permanently redirect all OURL's to NURL's. So, the solution I would recommend is the last one on your list.
Option 6 - Something else I think is better:
- Phase 1: Use Rewrite Rule to satisfy all requests for the OURL by serving the OURLEX
- Phase 2: create one rule that will 301 redirect all the OURL to the NURL
It is best to keep in mind that a 301 redirect should only be used when you intend the redirect to be permanent. Also while Google's stated position is that googlebot will follow multiple 301 redirects, it has also said that "daisy chaining" them is not generally a good practice. There are two reasons for this:
- Google's Matt Cutts has indicated that "at some point we will stop following them if there are a lot of them"
Should you happen to have other domains that are already 301'd to the site, the daisy chain effect is amplified. - As Ryan mentioned, the small amount of link juice that is lost with a 301 Redirect does accumulate over multiple redirects and can have a negative impact.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
You are absolutely correct. I failed to mentioned a 3rd step required for that solution:
one rule to redirect all OURLEX to NURL
-
Thanks for your answer.
I'm trying to push a one phase approach but since I'm not sure we will be allowed to do it I prefer to have a back-up plan.
With the methode you mention woudn't it be a problem if the robot index the temporary OURLEX during the 3 weeks (my redirections will all be 301)?
-
Generally speaking, I would not recommend this two phase approach but instead completing the work in a single phase. I'll set that idea aside and presume the two-phased approach is a requirement.
the same content and URLs but the page extension will change (it could become php or just the name of the page without any extension)
I would strongly recommend using the page name without any extension. It not only looks better but it will save you work and benefit your SEO the next time you change systems.
The approach I would recommend is your 3rd option:
- Phase 1: create one rule that will redirect all the OURL to the OURLEX
- Phase 2: remove the rule I created in phase 1 and add redirect OURL to NURL
You want to redirect your site with as few rules as possible to minimize the effort, reduce errors, and minimize server overhead. Additionally, you want to redirect pages with a single redirect. It is a bad practice to allow pages to endure multiple redirects as you will lose a lot of link juice.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Changing a domain name, pages redirection
when changing a domain name, should we redirect all the pages to their new pages or only the indexed pages? Thanks
Technical SEO | | bigrat950 -
Google not using redirect
We have a GEO-IP redirect in place for our domain, so that users are pointed to the subfolder relevant for their region, e.g: Visit example.com from the UK and you will be redirected to example.com/uk This works fine when you manually type the domain into your browser, however if you search for the site and come to example.com, you end up at example.com I didn't think this was too much of an issue but our subfolders /uk and /au are not getting ranked at all in Google, even for branded keywords. I'm wondering if the fact that Google isn't picking up the redirect means that the pages aren't being indexed properly? Conversely our US region (example.com/us) is being ranked well. Has anyone encountered a similar issue?
Technical SEO | | ahyde0 -
301 Redirect Best Practices
Hi SEOs, Question about ranking/redirects. If I have a particular page that is already ranking for a couple KWs in top SERPs, but know there are higher volume KWs I can optimize for should I just leave it as is or change the URL key and redirect for the time being until Google re-indexes. Example:
Technical SEO | | IceIcebaby
current URL: www.example.com/action/best-movies
new URL: www.example.com/action/best-action-movies
(the current would be ranking for "best action moves" whereas the new would include the actual "best action movies" KW) Let me know if I can clarify, thank you!0 -
CNAME vs 301 redirect
Hi all, Recently I created a website for a new client and my next job is trying to get them higher in Google. I added them in OSE and noticed some strange backlinks. To my surprise the client has about 20 domain names. All automatically poiting to (showing) the same new mainsite now. www.maindomain.nl www.maindomain.be
Technical SEO | | Houdoe
www.maindomain.eu
www.maindomain.com
www.otherdomain.nl
www.otherdomain.com
... Some of these domains have backlinks too (but not so much). I suggested to 301 redirect them all to the main site. Just to avoid duplicate content. But now the webhoster comes into play: "It's a problem, client has only 1 hosting account, blablabla...". They told me they could CNAME the 20 domains to the main domain. Or A-record them to an IP address. This is too technical stuff for me. So my concrete questions are: Is it smart to do anything at all or am I just harming my client? The main site is ranking pretty well now. And some backlinks are from their copy sites (probably because everywhere the logo links to the full mainsite url). Does the CNAME or A-record solution has the same effect as a 301 redirect, from SEO perspective? Many thanks,
Hans0 -
Redirecting the .com of our site
Hey guys, A company I consult for has a different site for its users depending on the geography. Example: When a visitor goes to www.company.com if the user is from the EU, it gets redirected to http://eu.company.com If the user is from the US, it goes to http://us.company.com And so on. I have two questions: Does having a redirect on the .com will influence rankings on each specific sub-site? I suspect it will affect the .com since it will simply not get indexed but not sure if affects the sub domains. The content on this sub-sites are not different (I´m still trying to figure out why they are using the sub-domains). Will they get penalized for duplicate content? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | FDSConsulting0 -
Can I remove 301 redirects after some time?
Hello, We have an very large number of 301 redirects on our site and would like to find a way to remove some of them. Is there a time frame after which Google does not need a 301 any more? For example if A is 301 redirected to B, does Google know after a while not to serve A any more, and replaces any requests for A with B? How about any links that go to A? Or: Is the only option to have all links that pointed to A point to B and then the 301 can be removed after some time? Thank you for you you help!
Technical SEO | | Veva0 -
To 301 redirect or not to 301 redirect? duplicate content problem www.domain.com and www.domain.com/en/
Hello, If your website is getting flagged for duplicate content from your main domain www.domain.com and your multilingual english domain www.domain.com/en/ is it wise to 301 redirect the english multilingual website to the main site? Please advise. We've recently installed the joomish component to one of our joomla websites in an effort to streamline a spanish translation of the website. The translation was a success and the new spanish webpages were indexed but unfortunately one of the web developers enabled the english part of the component and some english webpages were also indexed under the multilingual english domain www.domain.com/en/ and that flagged us for duplicate content. I added a 301 redirect to redirect all visitors from the www.domain/en/ webpages to the main www.domain.com/ webpages. But is that the proper way of handling this problem? Please advise.
Technical SEO | | Chris-CA0 -
Redirects
I have a question about 404ed domains and old domains. #1 A domain has many links to it, but has been 404ed for 4 months. Should I redirect to a page I own and is almost exactly the same content. Will the fact that it was once 404ed be an issue? #2 I have an old domain that has many links but has been stagnant for a long time. Are these links still valuable and I should I redirect them to an important page on a different site? Does penguin influence your advice?
Technical SEO | | tylerfraser0