Does anyone have a copy of the 2011 Google Quality Raters Handbook that was recently leaked?
-
http://searchengineland.com/download-the-latest-google-search-quality-rating-guidelines-97391
Google has been on a conquest taking them down online but I would really like to take a look at it if you have a copy!
[moderator note - please use the PM system and exchange email addresses there. We've removed emails from this thread before it gets indexed and exposed to the world]
-
Hi
I would appreciate a copy as well please.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Regards
-
I would appreciate a copy too please if not too much trouble.
-
Make that... 25 ... please!
-
Hi I'd also like a copy - who do I need to PM?
-
I would like a copy.
-
Would it be possible to receive this as well ?
-
Hi Martijn
I appreciate a copy of the "Quality Raters Handbook" as well. [email removed - please use PM if needed]
Regards
Ed
-
Thanks Martijn!
-
Can i have a copy too?
thanks guys!
-
Could I have a copy please? Wow... curious to see what sort of measures goggle can take to keep these from the public.
-
Hi Jorge,
If you could sent me you're emailaddress by PM then I'll make sure you'll receive the handbook. Because I received more questions about this, this would be the best option.
-
I need a copy as well thank you
-
is it too late to request a copy? thanks in advance!
-
Oh boy. Just found out about this.
Is there any way someone would be able to send me a copy of this as well?
-
Would love a copy too if possible...thx!
-
Imsybiatb and ribbo check your private messages...
-
Could someone send me a copy, thanks for sharing!
-
I would really appreciate a copy if possible.
Thanks
-
Guys please if anyone has it can you please send it to me as well??? [email removed - please use PM if needed] Thank you !!!
-
.
-
Would love it as well if possible, thanks!
-
Got mine - thanks a lot Martijn!
-
If you could send a copy to [email removed - please use PM if needed] I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks
-
Ill add myself to the list of beggars
If any of you guys would be so kind [email removed - please use PM if needed]
thanks
-
Could you please send a copy to [email removed - please use PM if needed]? Thanks!
-
Thanks, I'd appreciate a copy if anyone has one: [email removed - please use PM if needed]
-
Me too please!
[email removed - please use PM if needed]
-
If it is possible, I would love a copy myself. Thank you.
[email removed - please use PM if needed]
-
hi guys
would it be possible for you to send me a copy too [email removed - please use PM if needed]
thank you
-
Just got a copy thanks guys!
-
Hi Brian,
Just sent you a copy from the guidelines I downloaded yesterday from Searchengineland.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Anyone have experience or feedback on SharpSpring?
I love HubSpot and have been a partner for years. I get great marketing material from SharpSpring, and I have an inkling that their software is really good, but their sales team seems unbelievably awful. Can anyone speak to this and say the software is worth the money, works well and has decent support?
Industry News | | aj6130 -
Manual action penalty by Google
Hello, We have a big well-known brand - www.titanbet.com. This brand is well established and the site has been live for almost 4 years now ranking very well on some very strong KWs. we received a message from Google on Aug 29<sup>th</sup> saying “Google has detected a pattern of artificial or unnatural links pointing to your site” and that “Google has applied a manual spam action to titanbet.com/” The past 2 weeks since the penalty was received we saw some of our major KWs drop in rankings. BUT all brand related KWs were still ranked 1<sup>st</sup> Over the last weekend the penalty has worsen and we no longer rank on any of the brands KWs (we find the site in 5<sup>th</sup> page at best). Moreover, when searching for a sentence from the any of the page on the site in Google, we see other sites ahead of us in the SERPs. Based on the message we originally received from Google we have started cleaning some of the bad links to the site. We found a lot of links from bad sites, some of them are not indexed and probably penalized as well, some are from affiliate websites and some are from some automatic indexation websites based in China and Russia
Industry News | | Tit
we have started reaching out to some of these sites to try and have them remove our links. We are also worried about the duplication of our site. We have found many other sites (mostly affiliate websites) have copied and in some cases completely duplicated our content. Google for some reason has chosen to penalize us for this. Although we do not have control over these other sites. We have run copyscape to try and figure out which pages are the most problematic and we will try to re-write the content on these pages. But what if the other sites copy us again? Any suggestions on the above would be appreciated as we try to understand why Google has penalized us. thank you Titan Bet Team0 -
Anyone tried MathSite
I've just found this and I am not quite sure if I understand what it does. I was wondering if anyone know more about it? http://finance.yahoo.com/news/alchemy-viral-unveils-mathsight-pioneering-101200184.html Thanks
Industry News | | Rubix0 -
Did Google Search Just Get Crazy Local?
Hey All, I think it's a known fact at this point that when signed into a personal Google account while doing a search, the results are very oriented around keywords and phrases you have already searched for, as well as your account's perceived location; for instance when I wanted to check one of my own web properties in SE listings I would sign out or it would likely appear first as a false reading. Today I noticed something very interesting: even when not signed in, Google's listings were giving precedence to locality. It was to a very extreme degree, as in when searching for "web design," a firm a mile away ranked higher than one 1.5 miles away and such. It would seem that the algos having this high a level of location sensitivity and preference would actually be a boon for the little guys, which is, I assume why it was implemented. However, it brings up a couple of interesting questions for me. 1. How is this going to affect Moz (or any SE ranking platform, for that matter) reports? I assume that Google pulls locations from IP Addresses, therefore would it not simply pull the local results most relevant for the Moz server(s) IP? 2. What can one do to rise above this aggressive level of location based search? I mean, my site (which has a DA of 37 and a PA of 48) appears above sites like webdesign.org (DA of 82, PA of 85). Not that I'm complaining at the moment, but I could see this being a fairly big deal for larger firms looking to rank on a national level. What gives? I'd love to get some opinions from the community here if anyone else has noticed this...
Industry News | | G2W1 -
Are Wordpress sites being dinged by Google? Read a few articles regarding.
I read a couple "SEO" related articles that sites built in Wordpress are going to be dinged by Google because Google sees Wordpress sites as simple to make and a higher potential to be "spammy". Is there any truth to this? Your thoughts? I do give "thumbs up" and "best answer" marks and appreciate receiving thumbs up myself... Thanks
Industry News | | JChronicle1 -
Google Pushed Out Panda Update 3.9 Last Night
Google said it was rolling out a Panda algorithm last night.
Industry News | | Chenzo
New data refresh of Panda starts rolling out tonight. ~1% of search results change enough to notice. More context: goo.gl/huekfHas anyone been affected yet ....I seem to see a jump in some newer sites less than 3 months old already for some rankings - I don't like seeing rankings that quick!Do you see anything?
1 -
Is a canonical to itself a link juice leak
Duane Forrester from Bing said that you should not have a canonical pointing back to the same page as it confuses Bingbot,
Industry News | | AlanMosley
“A lot of websites have rel=canonicals in place as placeholders within their page code. Its best to leave them blank rather than point them at themselves. Pointing a rel=canonical at the page it is installed in essentially tells us “this page is a copy of itself. Please pass any value from itself to itself.” No need for that.” He also stated that a canonical is much like a 301 except that it does not physically move the user to the canonical page. This leads me to think that having such a tag may leak link juice. “Please pass any value from itself to itself”
Google has stated that GoogleBot can handle such a tag, but this still does not mean that it is not leaking link juice.0 -
Google guidlines 2011
Guys I have asked for the leaked SEO guidlines just to fine tune my SEO campaigns and it seems no one wanted to send it to me. Anyone can do it here, please?
Industry News | | SearchOfficeSpace230
