My client has lost his URL - is there anything he can do to salvage SEO?
-
My new client has had his URL for 8 years and built up good SEO, visitors and links. He has now lost it and the cost of getting it back is prohibitive.
Apart from contacting all the places he is currently getting links from, is there anything he can do to salvage SEO and site visitors? Is there anyway he can get 301s done if he no longer owns the URL?
If he starts again with a new URL, and loads all the new content on it, will submitting a site map help Google understand its not duplicate and all the content is just at a new URL?
He is hoping that contacting Google and explaining will help them "look kindly", but I have never heard anything like this happening!
Any ideas?
Many thanks
-
Thanks everyone - apart from following up on backlinks, will try the GWMT route and hope for the best!
-
Hi Chammy,
With no other information on how he came to "lose" it, I would say his only hope is if he still has access to the Google Web Master Tools account, but he would have to act NOW, in the hope that the new domain owner is slow in getting things organized.
The process:
- Purchase a new domain
- Upload all content and ensure that site is ready to go as soon as new domain resolves
- In Google Webmaster Tools, create a Site account for the new domain & verify it
- In your old Webmaster Tools Site account, notify Google that the site has moved to new domain
- Add a few pages of completely new content to the site on the new domain
- In the Webmaster Tools Site account for the new domain, use "Fetch as Googlebot" to fetch each of the new pages and up to the maximum 50 most important pages in the site. (If a page is successfully fetched with this feature, you can manually add it to the index.)
- Find all existing backlinks possible (using Open Site Explorer, Majestic SEO, link: search operator in Google, Bing & Yahoo) and contact as many of those webmasters as possible, advise of the domain change and ask them to correct their links.
As Alan pointed out, the only way that this will work for him is if the new domain owner is slow in setting up a GWMT account and he still has access to his existing account, so basically, he needs to act immediately and pray a lot
Incidentally, if he has already missed out on the opportunity to tell Google about the change of domain he should still follow the steps above for the new domain and try to get the links corrected if he can to get some quick traction where possible.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
So he let the domain expire?
You can not contact Google if the domain has expired, all trust will be lost, you can also not 301 re direct a domain you do not physically hold.
What you can try and do is acquire the domain when it comes back onto the market, yet with high competition it may cost a fair amount, especially if the domain is a good generic term & has 8 years age.
-
You mean he has lost his domain name?
He can not 301 a domain he dose not own, he need not worry about duplicate content as the old content will drop out of the index eventualy.
If he still has access to the account in GWMT, he can remove the site, but i would hurry before WMT tries rto validate the site again and finds out it no longer exists
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What IS SEO FRIENDLY BEST PRACTICE FOR URLS FILTERED 'TAGGED'
EX: https://www.STORENAME.com/collections/all-deals/alcatel– Tagged "Alcatel", when I run audits, I come across these URLS that give me duplicate content and missing H1. This is Canonical: https://www.STORENAMEcom/collections/all-deals/alcatel Any advice on how to tackle these I have about4k in my store! Thank you
Technical SEO | | Sscha0030 -
Google Appending Blog URL inbetween my homepage and product page is it issue with base url?
Hi All, Google Appending Blog URL inbetween my homepage and product page. Is it issue or base url or relative url? Can you pls guide me? Looking to both tiny url you will get my point what i am saying. Please help Thanks!
Technical SEO | | amu1230 -
Can redirect URL website also shown on the google ranking? and higher than the original website?
can redirect URL website also shown on the google ranking? Â and higher than the original website? For example, I create URL B which redirect to website A, and do good SEO on URL B, can URL B rank higher than my original website A?
Technical SEO | | HealthmateForever0 -
How can I provide titles and descriptive text for our list of USPs on the same page optimized both for usability and SEO
I am rebuilding our website together with an agency and I am stuck with the following problem: We have a page which will provide the visitor with a quick and convincing impression why he should chose our enterprise. On this page we want to show our USPs (Unique Selling Points) each with a title and a short description. Now my preferred way of presenting those USPs would be of a list of the titles (which permits to see all USPs without having to read a lot of text) where each title can be clicked to expand the description (in case you want to know more about this specific USP) and if you click on another title the previously clicked title description will collapse and the new description expand and so on (similar to this page: http://www.berlin-city-immobilien.de/38.html - I'm talking about the list in the middle of the page starting with the headline "Dabei profitieren Sie von folgenden Vorteilen"). Since I also want to use these descriptions as on page SEO-texts I checked whether Google might not index or at least value "click to expand content" less than plain text in the body of the page and I stumbled over this article: https://www.seroundtable.com/google-hidden-tab-content-seo-19489.html. According to this article Google will definitely discount the descriptions on my page. Does anyone have an idea how to solve this problem? Either by suggesting a different way to show titles and descriptions on the page or maybe by suggesting a workaround so Google will not treat the descriptions as "click to expand text". Thank you already in advance for your input.
Technical SEO | | Benni
Ben0 -
High DA url rewrite to your url...would it increase the Ranking of a website?
Hi, my client use a recruiting management tool called njoyn.com. The url of his site look like: www.example.njoyn.com. Would it increase his ranking if I use this Url above that point to njoyn domain wich has a high DA, and rewrite it to his site www.example.com? If yes how? Thanks
Technical SEO | | bigrat950 -
Can hreflang replace canonicalisation ?
Hi Im working with a site that has ALOT of duplicate content and have recommended developer fix via correct use of Canonicalisation i.e the canonical tag. However a US version (of this UK site) is about to be developed on a subfolder (domain.com/uk/ & domain.com/US/ etc so also looking into adopting the hreflang attribute on these. Upon reading up about the hreflang attribute i see that it performs a degree of canonicalisation too. Does that mean that developing the international versions with hreflang means there's no need to apply canonicalistion tags to deal with the dupe content, since will deal with the original dupe content problems as well as the new country related dupe content, via the hreflang ? I also understand that hreflang and canonicalisation can conflict/clash on different language versions of international subfolders etc as per: Â http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igbrm1z_7Hk In this instance we are only looking at US/UK versions but very likely will want to expand into non english countries too in the future like France for example. So given both the above points if you are using hreflang is it advisable (or even best) to totally avoid the canonical tag ? I would be surprised if the answers yes, since whilst makes logical sense given the above (if the above statements are correct), that seems strange given how important and standard best practice canonical usage seems to be these days. What best ? Use the Hreflang alone, or the Canonical tag alone or both ? What does everyone else do in similar situation ? All Best Dan
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
4XX (Client Error)
How much will 5 of these errors hurt my search engine ranking for the site itself (ie: the domain) if these 5 pages have this error.
Technical SEO | | bobbabuoy0