Get Lots of links quickly?
-
Hey everyone,
I have some questions about links. First off, I only do things that are very white hat, so I don't want to do any sort of spammy or paid links. I have been doing SEO for a year and a half and have been researching and following SEOmoz for that amount of time as well. I still am having a hard time getting links.
I have a low budget and am not sure what to do. I have two pro webinars in mind as some background for my questions. First of all, the webinar Rand did on link building during the summer was great and really motivated me - http://www.seomoz.org/webinars/future-of-link-building. I realized that there were things we could do to get links, but that they would just take time.
Secondly, in Dr.Pete's recent webinar on the future of SEO, (http://www.seomoz.org/webinars/future-proofing-your-seo-2012-edition) he threw out a number like 10 as far as referring to how many links someone could get per day. Maybe I misunderstood but this seems crazy to me. I've tried the tactic of emailing for links, no dice (they were personalized emails and done properly). I am now planning on moving towards producing great content to draw in links, but the kind that would work would take a lot more time and money than what I am allotted. I feel a little overwhelmed and concerned. I would appreciate any insights.
Thanks!
Holly
-
I really wanted to push the content marketing aspect in those slides, but I just want to add that it is a balancing act. Some manual link-building is fine - just make sure you mix in low-quality with high-quality AND make time to create solid content. In other words, just do everything simultaneously. As long as you don't need to eat or sleep, you'll be fine
Seriously, carve out the content time, even if it's 20 minutes/day and it's the first thing you do in the morning. That investment will pay off. Waiting until you need content to create it is like only networking after you lose your job. It'll work, eventually, but you'll lose months.
-
Dr. Pete,
Thanks for responding to me. I appreciate the explanation. I had always thought that it could take a long time to get those high quality links (the ones worth going after), so I was confused when I misunderstood what you said. Anyway, thanks for clarifying. I am a big proponent of content as well. Luckily for me, I have a degree in English. Now I guess I just have to come up with something brilliant that everyone will love. No problem right. haha. anyway. Thanks.
Holly
-
Thanks for responding. I appreciate your thoughts and insight, I hadn't thought of Guest blogging. I know content is a biggie and I will certainly be putting a lot of effort into creating content to get links, whether it be on my own blog, website or wherever. I appreciate your time and help.
Holly
-
Sorry, I think my statement may have been unclear. I was throwing out some numbers to try to illustrate what $1,000 could buy someone in low-quality link-building (number of hours, etc.). My broader point, though, was actually AGAINST that kind of approach. I'd rather see people invest in content than cheap links.
What's a "reasonable" number really depends a lot on quality vs. quantity. Someone could get you 100 links/day, but they'd be mostly junk. Some links could take months to build (if they involve building relationships with people and organization), but they might be well worth the investment. It's a balancing act. I think it's fine to get some blog comment links, guest-blog, do article marketing, etc., as long as the quality is reasonable AND you diversify that with hard-to-get links with higher authority.
I'll also make another pitch for content marketing, because it's the only way to put link-building on autopilot, so to speak. Once you invest in content and start to get the word out, that content can naturally attract links. You could get 10/day some days without lifting a finger, once the content is in motion. I think some manual link-building is fine, and probably necessary, but if you can put both in motion, you'll be in much better long-term shape.
-
Hi Holly,
I'll share my perspective on this and I hope it's helpful to you. I've been doing SEO part or full-time since 2008.
The most successful way that I've found to generate repeatable high-quality new links to our website has been to do a lot of aggressive linkbuilding via guest blogging with other blogs or websites in our field. It's been very successful but it is time consuming. My personal goal is to try and get one new targeted link with good anchor text every day. Some days are better than others - I've had days where I get five or more links in a day, and days where I don't get any.
Guest blogging can be time consuming (it's a lot of writing!) but you can get great, targeted links from it, and Google usually recognizes them quickly since they tend to crawl and index blogs very aggressively. I'm not always shooting for A-list blogs in our field either, but a variety. I generally looking for websites that have a mozRank of 4.0 or higher for this. People in the middle of our field are usually much more responsive and helpful (they're hungry for content, like that we offer to co-promote our blog posts, etc.) and work with me more often. If their mR is under 4, the link may not be worth the effort and I'll only consider it if I really think there's some other reason its worthwhile.
I also try to produce about one good infographic a month, and post it to our blog and offer embed code and everything else good with it. These are the days that I can usually get five or six new links from spending about $400-500 and about two hours of my own time providing data, guidance, etc. with a designer to create the graphic. It depends on your budget, but to me that feels worth it. Overall, this has been really effective for us and I've been meeting my goals.
I haven't seen Dr Pete's webinar, but 10 links in a day does seem a little high - That's quite a lot. You might be able to do that if you gave up on trying to get specific anchor text and went for volume, or if you have a uniquely dedicated following who write about and cover many of your activities on their own blogs or websites (like I suspect SEOmoz does). I would encourage you to try to concretely network with more blogs and websites in our field/niche and expand your relationship with them, and keep the goal in mind:
"What can I do to get a link today?" or whatever your goal is that will deliver SEO success to you. From my experience so far, this hustle has been more valuable than any other piece of specific advice I've had. I think I have to thank Justin Briggs for that one - I think his quote that inspired me to that was "Link building is hard. Just f-ing do it." or something like that. I re-interpreted into the above.
I hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Relaunching a site that has had thousands of posts linking to the same 20 articles. How to properly setup internal linking?
I'm in the process of relaunching a music news site (www.prefixmag.com) that once did quite well in search (over a million monthly search visits in its prime). The site got crushed by Panda, etc. and we stopped updating it. I'm starting to do more research but one thing that I noticed was we have modules in the right rail (desktop) that are found on all of our article pages that point to the same posts. (Edit: Added attachment. The links in the right rail under Editor Picks, Features, News, Media, etc. are found on every page of the site). In other words, we have thousands of posts that all link to the same 20 or so articles. Should we not do this if we're not trying to emphasize these posts in Google? Assuming this is the case, what is the proper way to do internal linking? Do we simply setup a sitemap and link to it? I'm hoping to have the thousands of articles we've published over the years have a chance to rank in search again. Also, we have a number of posts that are thin in content should those pages not be submitted in the sitemap? Thanks in advance! 2KmX0
Link Building | | leggo0 -
When we use 'link:' for who get the link, how come google show us the same domain as a link.
the search result show the domain of its own. what is is? and is it meaningful as a link?
Link Building | | onedaykorea0 -
Is there value of consistently getting a link from a high DA site?
Is there value in consistently getting a link from a high DA sites? For example, consistently posting on a blog monthly rather then only doing it once and getting a link/being done with it. Could you list the pros of consistently getting links on high DA sites?
Link Building | | calf0 -
Does nofollow link has any effect on link building
I recently read some article on noflollow link and the author says that nofollow link does have some effect on page rank. Can anyone explain the effect of nofollow link on website ranking?
Link Building | | petwho0 -
Is providing a paid scholarship to schools and receiving a back link, classed as a paid link scheme?
I've always wondered if it is classed as paid links in Google's eyes?
Link Building | | ResumeGenius0 -
Wierd link
We have recently receive linek from one website. The site is quite very powerful for the word we try to rank, however the link is kind of wired. This is how it looks like: http://villasdiani.com/?db The webmaster of the site said that he ads (?db) on the end so as we would see on our analytics the traffic from his site.. Also the link is from footer...is this good or it does not have value
Link Building | | VillasDiani0 -
Link Building
I noticed another SEO builds backlinks (tons) on a social media profile that then has a link to his client's site. Another site he builds backlinks are a bitly account that 301's to the clients account. Why would you do this? Is it that you can build links indiscriminately to build a page up in PR to 3-4-5 PR, then pass that higher PR to your site (safe). Is that PR building method better than placing 100's of smaller PR links on your site? It seems logical that if you passed in a tremendous amount of juice to juice a site up to PR4, you won't make your main site PR4 by JUST that link. You would need to build a lot of PR4 sites to make your site PR4. Why not just put all the backlinks on the main page instead of building up secondary social profiles etc... Please reveal this secret. I know a lot of SEOs are using this method. Help 🙂
Link Building | | JML11790 -
Links in the Classifieds
We rent apartments. One way we use to find clients is to advertize these apartments in Classifieds. Generally, we use free ads. Sometimes, for very popular sites ( like Kijiji), we pay so our ads can be seen first. Could this be a problem with Google? Some sites send us clients, many of them never do. We keep putting ads there because of their PR. What is the worth of this kind of links? Thanks for your answers.
Link Building | | Caru0