Frequently tempted by the dark side - need reassurance!
-
I'm a DIY seo with a video production company - our website has been given some solid foundations by an SEO friend and we are climbing nicely up the rankings..
Everyone and their dog constantly warns of not straying into black hat - and I totally understand and appreciate the reasonings.. my issue is - pretty much ALL of the competitors use what I would perceive to be pretty shady web directories.
These directories seem to account for 80% of each of my competitors inbound links (according to open site explorer)
If all the front page of google for "corporate video" are submitting to all these directories - should I?
Cheers
AC
-
that's a cracking article - many thanks
-
Don't forget: Just because they have a link, it doesn't necessarily follow that it is helping them.
I know a couple of SEOs who use directories mainly to obscure their more valuable links. Questionable tactic, but the same happens naturally: When you look at a competitors backlinks it is human nature to assume they are all working, even when the truth might be quite different.
Assume that the 80% is doing almost nothing and start looking closely at the other 20.
That said, I would call low quality directory submission black hat. It's not great (either in terms of effectiveness or feeling good about your work), but it doesn't harm in the same way as other methods can.
-
Mmm... even though it is totally correct to go for authoritative links, remember that they are not enough in order to obtain the desired rankings... and it is not just me saying this, but people like Wil Reynold, who surely a link building authority.
-
When I read the question I was imagining something like: I am ready to do some well craft cloaking and, why not, injecting links in my competitor sites...
To submit you site to directories, if they are relevant to your industry, doesn't have their PR cut (easily to check if you confront the mozRank with the PR... if the PR is - let's say - 3 and the mozRank says 6.4, then that directory has been penalized by Google), and the page your site will be listed is regularly crawled... then it is licit. Remember, a link profile should look "normal" to Google eyes... and it is normal that as site is listed in directories too.
On the other hand, being yours a video company, I can only imagine the infinite opportunities you could have in order to create a smashing inbound campaign... I suggest you to read this amazing post published just yesterday in the SEOgadget blog:
Why You Should Supercharge Your Video Strategy & How to Do It
which surely may give you great ideas.
-
It is a trade off, you do have to balance the return on investment when it comes to link-building. Try and think about the longer term rather than trying to get quick results.
Don't worry that things have to go viral to deliver any benefits. Don't think in terms of hits, or rankings - think about your conversion rate, how many visitors you need to make a 5k investment seem like a good idea...
-
but i'm nervous about marketing it coz spending 5k and the video only getting 300 hits and not going viral would suck!
You can't hit a homerun if you never step up to the plate.
I think that it would be totally honest to have several videos on your site with only a fraction of them going viral. If you tell everyone that you hit a homerun every time that is not a good way to control client expectations.
-
i totally agree...
and we do a reasonable (not enough) of stuff for our site.. of course need to do more..
it's a bit of trade off - im happy to invest time and money on making cool viral stuff for our site - but i'm nervous about marketing it coz spending 5k and the video only getting 300 hits and not going viral would suck!
-
I don't think I'd bother with the type of directory you've used as an example. You'd be much better off getting the kind of high quality links that your competitors aren't going to be able to get near just by getting directory entries.
If your customers would expect to find you there, it would be a different matter.
See EGOL's response for the kind of things that would really make a difference.
If you're still climbing up the ranks then it's not time to give up and succumb to the dark side!
-
I don't have any problem with a person submitting his website to a few directories... but if I want to beat my competitor, I will not mimic his methods. Instead I will do something clearly superior and kick his butt properly.
If I was the boss at a video production company a good portion of the production staff's time would be spent making videos for our own website.
Video production companies are where webmasters often go when they need some awesome linkbait for their own websites. Not only does it serve as great linkbait but it is also a great way to "strut your stuff" for anyone who visits your website.
Perhaps you don't make that type of video but maybe it would be beneficial to consider. It could open a whole new line of business for you.
-
There is a reason why your climbing the rankings nicely, because the link profile of your competitors by the sounds of it are poor.
Increase your MozTrust by getting links on Auth websites, Increase your MozRank by gaining more links and this should increase your PA - PA I think is more important then DA.
Those competitor DA stats are not that great.
-
What do you mean by "Shady" web directories?
Are these directories relevant to your niche (corporate video) or a broader but relevant market (corporate services?).
I would say that if there is a reasonable expectation for a normal human being, your prospects, to find you listed in the directory, (alongside your competitors) and the directories aren't involved in anything that clashes with Google's guidelines then I don't see that there is a problem.
That said, I would wonder how much the link from the directory is actually work and whether it would be better to spend the time to get better quality links elsewhere that would beat your competitors anyway?
How does your site stack up against the competitors in Open Site Explorer? Is your domain authority way off?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I need how many link for a keyword
i seo keyword "sim số đẹp", my competitor have 4k ref domain for this keyword. So Do I need more than 4k ref domain with anchortext "sim số đẹp"? Please help me. Thanks.
Link Building | | simthanglongdotvn0 -
How many external links do I need?
I write short blog post between 80-100 words and I link out to other websites. However, How many external links should I have in each blog post to rank better in search?
Link Building | | WilCross0 -
Need clarification on Linking strategy and whether I am doing more harm than good?
I wanted to get an opinion of whether a new strategy is wise or profoundly idiotic. Here is the scenario. We have a branded site that offers villa rentals around the world but we also have separately branded geo specific websites that focus on villas rentals at a specific destination meaning the villas are mutually inclusive on the sites but we try to differentiate them with different descriptions and markups. This is what we did. We have a magazine associated with the global company that posts articles 1 to 2 times a day and it is set up as a subfolder on the global website. The articles have revelant links to the global company landing pages as well as relevant villa pages. Additionally, we embed links to the geospecific websites as well if an article features a destination, topic or villa that is relevant to both the geospecific and global website. Moreover, In we have aggressively cross linked relevant keywords from specific villa pages (ie villa xyz on Barbados) to the magazine as well as to the root domain of the global website and other relevant pages. But we do not link the geospecific site back to the magazine or global site. Since we implemented this strategy, the rankings on our global site have dropped and the specific villa page on the global site (villa xyz on Barbados) has dropped precipitously for that villa xyz keyword. The complicating feature in all of this is that we have been launching new sites and fixes in the past month so I am not exactly sure what is the cause of the drop but I have a suspicion that the aformentioned issue may be a contributing factor. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Link Building | | Isle_Blue1 -
Back Link site DA must higher than our side DA?
Lower DA Back link will hurt your side? Or is meaningless for those back link with lower DA?
Link Building | | skyten0 -
Need to know best practices of Google Local Optimization 2013
I want to know best practices of Google Local Optimization 2013and need sources. Thanks
Link Building | | GM0070 -
Timing of Adding Links -- Guidance Needed
We have entered into a partnership with one of our sister companies that owns many different small newspapers and their associated websites -- they have agreed to show some of our content on their site along with providing links back to our website. There are 50+ of these websites that we will be getting links from. Does it matter to Google how quickly we add these links to these sites? They are all very legitimate links with unique content provided. We just didn’t know if Google would view it negatively if we added a bunch at one time. Any guidance on the timing of how links are added would be most valuable. Thank-you.
Link Building | | MWM37720 -
Links - In need of ideas
Hi there! I have tried my best to get quality back links to my http://www.petmedicalcenter.com site but I feel like I have hit a wall. I have searched my competition to see what links they are getting and have been successful with some. Some websites just don't respond. Are there any valuable resources I am missing? Or ideas? My biggest concern is ranking well for the search term "vet las vegas" and "las vegas veterinarians". So far I have managed to get to the second page on Google. Thanks in advance for your help!
Link Building | | PMC-3120870 -
Need help interpreting Ranking Factors.
Trying to see DA vs. mozrank and why things don't match the definitions given by seomoz. I'm comparing my site www.taxproblem.org w/ www.unclefed.com I have more root sites linking to me and more links. I can see that the mozrank for me is 4.96 which is higher. But their mozrank is higher. How are they more popular based on how the domains, rather than the pages link to each other. That is real confusing? Please help me understand what this means, and yes i know that right now they have better quality links, but that's not what the definition says. I'm I not understanding the definition? mozRank of the page www.unclefed.com/ mozRank shows how popular a page is on the web. The more links to a page, the more popular it becomes. Links from important pages increase your popularity, and your mozRank, even more. 4.64 out of 10 4.64 Links to the page www.unclefed.com/ The total number of links to this page, counting links from www.unclefed.com and links that don’t increase the mozRank. 606 links 2 Root domains linking to the page www.unclefed.com/ The number of different websites with links to this page. When compared to the number of links to this page, it can reveal how the links might be distributed across the web. 279 domains 5 mozRank of the subdomain www.unclefed.com Domain mozRank is a link popularity score based on how the domains, rather than just pages, link to each other. It is an indicator of a how popular www.unclefed.com is among domains 5.12 out of 10 5.12
Link Building | | joemas990