I am purely White, but...
-
I spend a lot of time building great content for my webzines/blogs and I received quality links from other blog of my niches. So the game is done, I receive targeted and quality traffic from Google and my rankings in SERP are often good... but... there is always a "but"...
Sometimes I see some sites in #1 with competitive keyword in my niches who has built link from hundreds of trash-site. So I understand that Google has not reached his objective to fight spam definitely.
Now I decided to understand from scratch "Black Hat" strategies... brrrrrrr...
In example i build my links manually, commenting on blog, talking on forums, submitting into directory and obviously spending a lot of time and energy for good guest-posting... as I say but... Anyone have experienced with automated software like Senuke and others? Not to become a spammer, but really to understand what is the best for us... I see also people buy links from Philippines company who has hundreds of employees who manually build links... Hope you may understand my point of view (and my poor english)...All the best, Alessio
-
Do realize one thing Alessio. Asking a question like that here in a website/SEO authority site where nobody wants to ruin their reputation, you'll probably never get someone to say:
_F*ck yah! Go and do as much Black Hat as you can! It' works! _
You know, over the years, I've seen a lot of people jumping into the arena of SEO and asking questions similar to yours. I did. When I first got into the business, a guy who I considered someone who's VERY ethical and incredibly White Hat taught me a strategy that probably might be considered Gray or at least spammy in terms of today's standards.
Frankly, we found a bit of a jump due to blog commenting in our initial days and we rank quite high because of it, but some would argue that's spammy as well. At the same time, writing comments on blogs that add to the conversation are supposedly a "contribution" vs. spam. At the same time, I don't know if I would be or would have been commenting as much to blogs as I did in the past.
I had a conversation with a very highly respected SEO who speaks at some of the largest conferences in the world and also is one of the top people in a company SEOMoz absolutely loves, but we agreed that some of the "old strategies" work and are still applied. Do we do them 100% of the time? No. But will we say we don't do them? I'll let you figure that one out.
I recommend to clients all the time to do link building in the most white hat, natural ways possible, but guess what? They rarely follow up on those strategies even if we give them everything it takes to apply them. However, I would avoid doing things like cloaking and anything that is extremely black hat. However, do note that you'll usually get answers from people saying stick with doing things as "white hat" as possible. Who wants to take a beating here proclaiming the opposite?
-
Don't do it! I can understand the frustration of seeing a competitor beat you by using black hat techniques, but joining him is not going to help and could end up really hurting you.
You mentioned that a lot of your backlinks come from blog comments and forums. If you're spending a LOT of time going after these links it may not be the best spend of your time.
I've recently gotten into guest posting and I'm amazed at my results already.
-
Hi Alessio
One common Black hat tool that can be used in a White Hat way is Scrapebox
Scrapebox can be used to harvest valuable backlinks that you can manually work with e.g. search for Guest posts you can also do competitor research, bulk check your backlinks to make sure they are still live, perform bulk WhoIs lookups and lots more things too.
As you can imagine a tool that can automatically scrape blogs for guest blogging opportunities or who might publish your new infographic is going to save you lots of time.
Hope this helps
-
I'm with Istvan, dont do it
as with seeing sites do well with lots of spammy links, it is often the case that they also have a few really good links, and it is that few good links that is getting them their rankings. if they are being sucessfull with only spammy links, they have teh chance of getting found out at anty moment. Most sites like this dont last.
Stick with it, success is not garenteed, but usually good content with time will win.
-
Hi Alessio,
Regarding gaining a lot of links (from agencies or from softwares) I am always getting back to the same idea:
Do you think the software or the link builder (which is payed 4$ for 100 links.... and no kidding I have heard even rougher payments in that industry) does respond on the following questions?
- Does that link provide information, +value for the reader?
- Is that link complementary to the content where it is placed?
- Does the visitor, who reaches our site find what he was looking for through that link?
- Is that link valuable for robots?
I believe that we, as online marketers we should focus for the idea of gaining more trust from both visitors(HUMANS) and Search engines(ROBOTS).
Now gaining a lot of low quality links will not harm Humans (at least not directly) but may harm robots reputation. I think you should ask yourself: Do I really want that?
I hope that helped,
Istvan
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Victim of negative SEO, but will this be believed if the client has not always been whiter than white?
A new client has come to me because they have found themselves in hot water with Google having received a manual spam action for unnatural inbound links. The sad case in this story is that I completely believe that the client has been a victim of an attack by a competitor. They finally made it onto page 1 in their competitive niche, and within a few days random links started appearing on spammy sites (often foreign language sites.) By the time the message came from Google about 2 weeks later several thousand of these links had been built. The first stage was to get the client to be very honest with me about anything he personally had done that might be considered manipulative. Unfortunately following some bad advice several months ago the client purchased one site-wide link (already in the process of removing it.) The same company that gave him this advice also built just under 100 links to his website (over the course of a couple of days) in early December. So - we know the client hasn't been whiter than white, and we are going to undo anything that he had responsibility for asap. We are also working to ensure that he is earning really high quality links in the right way (already have some great press coverage in the pipeline and are working on unique content.) My question is - given some past mistakes made by the client - is there any way that we credibly get across the fact that this recent huge volume of spam is absolutely nothing to do with him in a reconsideration request? Of course we can start work on removing these links and can disavow anything we can't remove - but my expectation is that should this be successful the same competitor is going to continue throwing spam links at my client. I appreciate that previous actions by the client would in themselves have been worthy of a manual spam action - but it seems far too much of a coincidence given the timing if this penalty was unrelated to the recent attack. I'd really appreciate any insights from the Moz community and will look forward to sharing our eventual success story as a YouMoz post! Tom
Link Building | | TomVolpe0 -
Best Way to Market a White Paper
Hello everyone, I had to write a white paper for an entirely different purpose than to drive links, but it did come out very well and I think it would be a fantastic tool in my SEO efforts. What do you guys think is the best way to market a white paper? Obviously I will let our email subscribers know about it and place a link to it in a prominent place on the website, but if anyone has any extra ideas, I would love to hear them. Also, what is the best way to host it? Taking the Moz beginners guide for example, I would love to just put it on my server like http://static.seomoz.org/files/SEOmoz-The-Beginners-Guide-To-SEO-2012.pdf but is it necessary that I make it web-friendly like http://moz.com/beginners-guide-to-seo? Can the former do anything for SEO? What if there are links to and from the site? Any advice would be great. Thanks
Link Building | | CleanEdisonInc0 -
Hunting the White Whales?
I'm not a SEO, just a small business owner with the will to succeed. When it comes to the Big Links from real sites, (Technorati, Tech Crunch, Slash Dot, ect.) where do you start? How do you begin the process of getting a good article on a great site?
Link Building | | KristopherWho0 -
Example of a local "boring-niche" site in a relatively high competition area using strictly white hat tactics
I'm looking for an example of a site in a very boring service niche locally "let's say elevator doors in chicago" or something like that, that successfully using blogging, content generation, etc to achieve top rankings above its spammy competitors. Anyone care to give out a case study? I'm not talking about companies that submit to 100's of local directories like yelp, or google maps rankings. I'm talking about organic or blended serps.
Link Building | | ilyaelbert0 -
What is white hat seo for google penguin and google panda?
Hi, This is my 1st question to some experts. I need advice on link building. Are following good and white hat seo? 1: Bookmarkings on top sites 2: Top directory submission, or directories that seomoz recommended? 3: Top article directories, yahoo voices, ezine etc.. 4: Top web 2.0, wordpress, blogger, tumblr 5: Guest posts on quality blogs. I was use to with black hat methods (by mistake) , that i was not aware, Some are pure blackhat, that i never did. some time it hard to judge which are black hat. In past google like some links, now most are devalue or got penalty. Now i want to do quality seo work and slow process. any advice will be great regarding quality seo. Thanks.
Link Building | | chsajid110 -
What white hat article marketing tactics do you use?
It seems there's a lot of negative connotations with the phrase "Article Marketing" as it's associated with spam, spinning, etc. I couldn't find anything other than that, which begs to ask, what are the white hat tactics that you use after you publish your article? What tools do you use to streamline the process? Social Bookmarking? RSS? Any methods you use to score quick backlinks? How do you get your content in front of bloggers?
Link Building | | 10JQKAs0 -
Great idea to get back links in short order; however the links would be unrelated. . Is it worth the effort . BTW, it's a white hat method. Should I proceed?
I have come up with a very creative way to get some great back links using white hat methods. The problem is that the back links to the site would be to an interior page or external promotional website which then have links back to the main website. What kind of value for the main domain would this potentially achieve. What are peopLes thoughts on this idea?
Link Building | | FidelityOne0 -
Obtaining followed links - white or black?
I have just watched the overtake of the number one UK position for garden accessories. The old 1st place holder held it for the last 2.5 years (min) ....taking a look at the back links of the number one holder it seems they are paid links ...as they are little follow image adverts with anchor text posted on the home page of niche blogs, forums and design related website.. ....so is this white hat or black hat?
Link Building | | GardenBeet1