Local business with multiple sites
-
I'm auditing a local business' sites (a spa) and I wanted to run my recommendations by everyone.
There are 3 sites:
www.sitename1.com -- main store location, used for Google Places listing #1 www.sitename2.com -- 2nd store location, used for Google Places listing #2 www.sitename3.com -- used for product sales for both locations
Sitename1.com has the most ranking power. I'm going to recommend that they move sitename2.com and sitename3.com to sitename1.com as subfolders, 301 redirecting each page to the corresponding page on sitename1.com/subfolder.
Google Places listing #2 would be changed from www.sitename2.com to www.sitename.com/location2.
Any risks or problems with this strategy anyone can see?
-
Hi Keith,
If these businesses are in the same metropolitan area, then I definitely give thumbs up to consolidation. Yes, put 301 redirects in place.
Regarding optimizing the footer, there is not a problem with listing several addresses. As long as you have 10 or less locations, consider this a fine practice. I do recommend using hCard for the the formatting of the addresses...and do make your Contact Page a good strong page featuring both addresses in hCard. Also a good idea to make a Google MyMap for each location and embed and link to it on the contact page.
Make the copy clear that you've got the 2 locations from the homepage forward.
I feel you are making a smart choice for this business. Good luck!
-
Related question: if location #2 is brought under site 1 as a location page, what's best practice as far as putting the address in the footer sitewide? Put location 1 address in the footer everywhere but the location 2 page(s)? Avoid altogether?
Thanks --
-
Hi -- thanks for your help. Here is more info. in response to your answer:
-I have picked up duplicate content problems and will be working with the client to fix this
-The locations are in the same metro area (good to know that separate states can be a good reason to keep separate sites)
-The lost rankings/Places shake-up is a bit concerning. Site 1 is well-established and has domain authority of 38 and home page authority of 48 (this is the site I'd likely move everything to). Location 2's site is 2.5 years old but has 23 domain authority and 36 page authority. Site 3 is an online store for spa products and very new (not yet launched).
For queries that trigger a Places result, location #1 outranks location #2 in every instance I can find. Having location #2 disappear for a while wouldn't be great, but from what I see the location #1 site ranks really well Organically (and there is a prominent link to location #2 on the home page) so we may be OK.
Also, there are a few queries where local results are not triggered, and the location #2's site ranks high. I'm not worried about the Organic ranking scenario in this case because a 301 redirect should largely preserve the position, correct?
In any case, I think the benefits outweigh the costs and consolidated ranking power potential. I'll keep my fingers crossed that the Places shake-up will be short-lived and advise the client accordingly.
Thanks -- let me know if I missed anything.
-
Hi Keith!
Thanks for coming to Q&A with your question. I'm the Local SEO Associate here in the forum. I will do my best to answer your question.
It's a very common practice for companies to have a single website for their multiple locations. For example, an auto dealership with locations in San Jose, San Francisco and San Rafael does not need to have 3 websites. They can simply have one and do landing pages for each of the three cities.
The main benefit I can discern of consolidating your client's 3 sites will be greater ease of management.
One thing I can imagine that you are going to need to be careful about is this: do sites 1, 2 or 3 duplicate one another's content in any way? If so, you need to avoid this. Don't have the landing page copy for the 2 different locales be the same.
Another thing I'm curious about is the locales of the 2 physical offices. How far apart are they? If they were in different states, I'd be inclined to keep the businesses on separate sites, but if they are in the same state, I think having the one site will be fine.
My only other concern would be potential lost rankings for the other sites. Are they old and established, or relatively new and low ranking? If the former, it would be a tough decision to get rid of them. If the latter, this re-organization could be a smart idea.
Finally, do realize that when you make changes in Google Places, it can cause a temporary shakeup. Even small changes like altering the domain the Place Page is pointing to can result in a time delay until Google's updates its index. Prepare the client for that possibility.
I hope my thoughts have been helpful, Keith. Good luck!
-
Hi sorry I have read your initial question more in detail and did some further pondering and research and as I understand it, according to Google's places quality guidelines if you are moving all the store locations to best ranking domain as sub folders you should still only have one listing for the central store and add service areas.
You can go that way but then you will loose two possbile places listings. But then again on the other hand some one can report the listings as is to Google and they can remove the listing and see it as duplicate listing.
http://support.google.com/places/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=107528
I would do what you suggested above accept only keep one listing as is to best ranking domain and then edit the listing with service areas if not already listed.
Even though they do not say this in detail in their help I am sure Google might flag your edit if you point to an existing domain places listing.
Hope this helps,
-
Hi -- there are no subdomains in the equation here. I would be moving to subfolder pages (not subdomains), and the current domains are separate domain names altogether.
Thanks --
-
After panda there has been a few people that would create sub domains saying that this worked as lets say all content that is related to yellow went to yellow.domain.com and red to red.domain.com.
Why I am bringing this up I think you should maybe look at this and be sure if moving to main domain as sub domain that Google Panda will not penalise the over all site, this can be prevented by making sure you not moving over any of the old content that was low performing, if there is some of the old content that was low performing I would improved it and the move it over to sub domain and 301 redirect as you said to the new sub domain and content that is better when it comes to post panda on site seo factors (if this makes sense).
Here is a interesting forum thread you could read that might influence your decission.
http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4394776.htm
Hope this helps,
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved URL dynamic structure issue for new global site where I will redirect multiple well-working sites.
Dear all, We are working on a new platform called [https://www.piktalent.com](link url), were basically we aim to redirect many smaller sites we have with quite a lot of SEO traffic related to internships. Our previous sites are some like www.spain-internship.com, www.europe-internship.com and other similars we have (around 9). Our idea is to smoothly redirect a bit by a bit many of the sites to this new platform which is a custom made site in python and node, much more scalable and willing to develop app, etc etc etc...to become a bigger platform. For the new site, we decided to create 3 areas for the main content: piktalent.com/opportunities (all the vacancies) , piktalent.com/internships and piktalent.com/jobs so we can categorize the different types of pages and things we have and under opportunities we have all the vacancies. The problem comes with the site when we generate the diferent static landings and dynamic searches. We have static landing pages generated like www.piktalent.com/internships/madrid but dynamically it also generates www.piktalent.com/opportunities?search=madrid. Also, most of the searches will generate that type of urls, not following the structure of Domain name / type of vacancy/ city / name of the vacancy following the dynamic search structure. I have been thinking 2 potential solutions for this, either applying canonicals, or adding the suffix in webmasters as non index.... but... What do you think is the right approach for this? I am worried about potential duplicate content and conflicts between static content dynamic one. My CTO insists that the dynamic has to be like that but.... I am not 100% sure. Someone can provide input on this? Is there a way to block the dynamic urls generated? Someone with a similar experience? Regards,
Technical SEO | | Jose_jimenez0 -
Why is Google not indexing my site?
I'm a bit confused as to why my site just isn't indexing on Google. Even if I type in my brand name, my social channels rank and there's no evidence of my website. I've followed all of the advice I've read and gone into webmaster tools and got the Wordpress yoast plug-in but nothing seems to be making a difference!One thing I've noticed, in Google Webmaster Tools it says "Couldn’t communicate with the DNS server." in site errors. I've called GoDaddy and they said that everything is fine. A bit frustrating. Trying to work out what my next steps should be but feeling a bit lost to be honest! Any help GREATLY appreciated!
Technical SEO | | j1066s0 -
Mobile site content and main site content
Help, pls! I have one main site and a mobile version of that site (m.domain.com). The main site has more pages, more content, different named urls. The main site has consistently done well in Google. The mobile site has not: the mobile site is buried. I am working on adding more content to the mobile site, but am concerned about duplicate content. Could someone pls tell me the best way to deal with these two versions of our site? I can't use rel=canonical because the urls do not correspond to the same names on the main site, or can I? Does this mean I need to change the url names, offer different content (abridged), etc? I really am at a loss as to how to interpret Google's rules for this. Could someone please tell me what I am doing wrong? Any help or tips would GREATLY appreciated!!!!! Thanks!
Technical SEO | | lfrazer0 -
Redirects in site map
I have a site with the ace/sef ( creates friendly URLS) in a large data base site. It creates a site map dynamically. Yet I realize one issue which I am trying to think through. I recently changed my urls to include an ID number example: homepage/houses/1134-big-blue-house The prior url was: homepage/houses/big-blue-house the original url above redirects to the new one with the ID like I want. However the site map has both URLS in it which go to same page I am not sure but it seems rather stupid to have the new URL and OLD redirected URL in the site map. Yet beside stupid I am wondering if this is duplicate content and will cause a penalty from the google bot. What is your opinion ?
Technical SEO | | aimiyo0 -
Redesigning the site with same Domain (IMP.)
technical SEO question - If we take down a site and use the same domain but just redesign the whole site. I guess sometimes in this case Google still keeps indexing old pages though they do not exist now! What the solution for this? Google suggests redirect them to a 404 page but in this case as its same domain- Is it possible that we throw 404 errors and redirect them to 404 page and this 404 page exists in the new site itself (but of course we don't have link our menu to this 404 page) (if that makes sense)? Would appreciate if you can suggest or add anything to above topic.
Technical SEO | | Personnel_Concept0 -
Any recommendations for small businesses
I'm currently helping a bunch of small business owners with using internet marketing SEO etc. A couple of them are just starting out and cant afford to pay for someone to build the site for them etc. If someone wants to use one of these Free / cheap websites (live vistaprint, 123 reg, Moonfruit, etc), which one would you recommend? Are any any better and giving the foundations to build some decent rankings on?I Do the ones where you drag and drop to build the site normally create a flash site? Has anyone done a study on which ones work best? Any recommendations would be appreciated. Ant
Technical SEO | | Ant710 -
Local listings squeeze out my SERP :-(
Buonjourno from 9 degrees C partly cloudy wetherby UK 🙂 Ive noticed website www.davidclick.com optimised for "York wedding photographer" has been squeezed off page 1 by local listings as illustrated here:http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/squeezed-out-by-local-listings_zpsd506cd71.jpg But i do have a local listing and as good as any of the others that have squeezed the site out. So my question is please: "Why has davidclick.com been pushed out of page 1 by a raft of local listings despite this site having a reasonably well optimised local site"? Any insights welcome:)
Technical SEO | | Nightwing
Grazie Tanto, David0 -
How should I structure a site with multiple addresses to optimize for local search??
Here's the setup: We have a website, www.laptopmd.com, and we're ranking quite well in our geographic target area. The site is chock-full of local keywords, has the address properly marked up, html5 and schema.org compliant, near the top of the page, etc. It's all working quite well, but we're looking to expand to two more locations, and we're terrified that adding more addresses and playing with our current set-up will wreak havoc with our local search results, which we quite frankly currently rock. My question is 1)when it comes time to doing sub-pages for the new locations, should we strip the location information from the main site and put up local pages for each location in subfolders? 1a) should we use subdomains instead of subfolders to keep Google from becoming confused? Should we consider simply starting identically branded pages for the individual locations and hope that exact-match location-based urls will make up for the hit for duplicate content and will overcome the difficulty of building a brand from multiple pages? I've tried to look for examples of businesses that have tried to do what we're doing, but all the advice has been about organic search, which i already have the answer to. I haven't been able to really find a good example of a small business with multiple locations AND good rankings for each location. Should this serve as a warning to me?
Technical SEO | | LMDNYC0