Dropping the www
-
We are planning on changing our domain next week. Everything has been covered including google change of domain procedure and redirects etc.
I plan on dropping the www during this move as it is redundant and dilutes the keyword density of the domain.
What do you guys think of this? Is it worth doing?
Thanks,
Gareth
-
We have made the change!
http://burfieldcreative.co.uk/
We have put the redirects in place and carried out the domain change procedure with google. If anybody can check everything is in order that would be most appreciated.
Thanks for all your advice.
-
Thanks for the response. Yes the reason is that the company has grown and already rebranded to burfieldcreative. We need to make this switch one day...
There will be a like for like relationship on the urls and we have hired a .htaccess expert to implement the redirects.
We are carrying out the full domain change procedure in Google webmaster tools.
Please see my previous thread here: http://www.seomoz.org/q/change-of-domain-procedure
We are carrying this out today but I am still unsure if I want to put my neck on the line!
-
As to question one, I believe it is force of habit. That is how they always did it.
As to question 2, Your issue with Burfieldcreative is that you have it 301'd to the JamesBurfield.co.uk. By virtue of that it has no links and will not have any links. Both the www and the non www of burfieldcreative.co.uk are 301'd to the old site. There is no value in either of the new domains at this moment. If they had a link, they would be passing the juice to the old site due to the 301's.
I think you are putting too much into BurfieldCreative vs JamesBurfield issue. If, your issue is you are already branded as Burfield Creative or you are going to put a lot of time, money, and other resources into BurfieldCreative being your brand, then you should stop and do this: Set the www.JamesBurfield.co.uk and the non www of same to 301to the new URL TO URL in the .htaccess file. If you do this any other way you are going to lose something that is hard to regain. You must be clear as to what you are doing. Do not proceed until you are. Once you switch, you are going to lose some of your links and some of your authority (up to ten percent). Be sure that is where you want to go. Remember you can put BurfieldCreative.co.uk all over and few will realize they landed on JamesBurfield. So, be sure it is a necessary change.
You are a web design firm and you are doing well with domain and page Authority. If you screw this up you are going to hate yourself and it will take a lot of ale/beer/wine/whiskey, etc. to make you not feel it. Trust me PLEASE.
Everything in my body is saying leave it as you have it and set the preferred as explained before. But, there are other mozzers who might interject here.
Best
-
Thanks for the response.
1. 60% use www. because:
a. There name server sets it up for them automatically
b. They think that is the only option
c. Don't realise that you maybe reducing diluting the keyword % of the domain name (A metric that is obviously considered by search engines)
2. Surely those numbers are mainly for www.jamesburfield.co.uk and not www.burfieldcreative.co.uk? It is hard to separate the back link numbers due to the new redirecting to the old. As we are doing a redirect anyway why not go to the non www?
The screen shots are great (thanks) but the tests we really need to do are:
As then we can compare the weightiness of the 2 options and see which is best.
What do you think?
-
As to question 1, doesn't matter. As I see it most (about 60%) still use www, but since it resolves to the one selected it doesn't matter.
I am attaching images using the jamesburfield.co.uk. As it is now, your new url is 301'd to that anyway. Using OSE you will see that your www had a LOT more links. By doing a 301 to the non you would be losing some significant juice even though it is somewhere between less than 1 percent and 10 percent. (I advocate for 301's due to the small loss all the time; with yours, there is too much to lose by going with non www IMHO).
You have 4 linking root domains in the non and 165 in the www. Since no matter what someone puts they will end up on the www if you set the 301 to it and make it preferred in GWMT, you should do all to resolve to www as preferred domain. See images below.
-
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the reply. The old domain is http://www.jamesburfield.co.uk and the new domain is http://www.burfieldcreative.co.uk.
This new domain has been 'played around with' previously but it's pretty much a fresh start I think (worth checking though!). Therefore I thought we might as well get off to the best possible start and that would involve (I think) dropping the www.
So now I have 2 questions if I may...
- Theoretically if this was a brand new domain with no history is it better to set the non www as the preferred? Of course we would redirect the alternative.
- How can I find out which version is juiciest as the new domain is on the google radar, I want to choose the most prominent version.
Thanks for your detailed reply.
Gareth
-
Gareth
Without knowing your domain it is a bit of a more difficult question. Assuming you have not already selected non www as preferred domain in GWMT and done a 301 redirect in .htaccess file already, you need to consider this: If you www has the preponderance of links coming to it, when you make they change you will be giving up a larger amount of juice than if you did it from the other. But, in any case you need a preferred domain and you need to choose one or the other. If you choose www. even if someone puts the non www in it will resolve to the www. So, I would do it based on which had the least link value and make that one link to the one with the most. Then in GWMT select the one with the most link value as preferred.
Best
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Use H2 or H3 for Six Ways to Hip Thrust https://www.fitness-china.com/hip-thrust
Our article about Hip Thrust https://www.fitness-china.com/hip-thrust We have sex tips about how to hip thrust. that use h2. but Final Words use h3 or h2?
On-Page Optimization | | ahislop5740 -
Should I remove 'local' landing pages? Could these be the cause of traffic drop (duplicate content)?
I have a site that has most of it's traffic from reasonably competitive keywords each with their own landing page. In order to gain more traffic I also created landing pages for counties in the UK and then towns within each county. Each county has around 12 towns landing pages within the county. This has meant I've added around 200 extra pages to my site in order to try and generate more traffic from long tail keywords. I think this may have caused an issue in that it's impossible for me to create unique content for each town/country and therefore I took a 'shortcut' buy creating unique content for each county and used the same content for the towns within it meaning I have lots of pages with the same content just slightly different page titles with a variation on town name. I've duplicated this over about 15 counties meaning I have around 200 pages with only about 15 actual unique pages within them. I think this may actually be harming my site. These pages have been indexed for about a year an I noticed about 6 months ago a drop in traffic by about 50%. Having looked at my analytics this town and county pages actually only account for about 10% of traffic. My question is should I remove these pages and by doing so should I expect an increase in traffic again?
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK0 -
Will google regards www.example.com and www.example.com?331457 as the duplicate content?
Our site has some affiliates, and the affiliate id is the suffix following with the url "?xxxxxx". I can see Google Analytics regards www.example.com and www.example.com?331457 as the different page, but in fact they are exactly the same, the version www.example.com?331457 is the visit from our affiliate site. And yesterday I start up my Moz Pro membership, and in the crawl issues I see SEOMoz thinks www.example.com and www.example.com?331457 are duplicate content. Is this really an issue? Will the search engine thinks these two pages are duplicate content?? Thanks you guys My first question here, not too dumb I hope. -----------------Update---------------------- I should explain how our affiliates work. We are an eBook related software company, and anyone can apply an affiliate account on the transaction platform "RegNow" even without our permission because we have opened the affiliate door. When a visitor come to our order page from an affiliate site, the url will add the affiliate ID suffix "?xxxxxx", and it's combined in cookies. After the deal is done, the affiliate gets his commission. So no matter how I customize the url with URL Builder, there must be the suffix "?xxxxxx". It's the ID of our affiliate, or they will get nothing. So the key point is, will the suffix "?331457" makes Google think www.example.com and www.example.com?331457 are different pages and duplicate content?
On-Page Optimization | | JonnyGreenwood0 -
Authorship and 50% Drop in Search Traffic
Hi. I had some problems with my content being copied by other sites, and was suggested to claim my pages. Immediately after Google started listing the posts with my photo next to them my traffic picked up slightly but since, over the past few weeks, it has dropped by about 50%! It seems that the average position has declined (as has the CTR) At the same time as claiming authorship I added the post date to my articles which I have now removed. Does anyone have any ideas for me? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | ben10000 -
Is it ok to point internal links to index.html home page rather than full www
I thought I saw this somewhere on SEOmoz before but I was so busy by the time I got around to work on my SEO on my site, I realized I have this happening and can't recall if it is a problem which takes away from my ranking. If my www.website.com is ranking well but I have internal menu links pointing to www.website.com/index.html instead of www.website.com will that take away from my www.website.com rankings? Should I change all my menu links that point to /index.html to the full website url path www.website.com ?
On-Page Optimization | | Twinbytes0 -
With or without the "www." ?
Is there any benefit whatsoever to having the www. in the URL? My domain is quite long therefore I've not been using the www. however a few people have mentioned it's good practice to include it. The www. forwards to the main URL (non www.) and I've set my preferred domain name in webmaster tools to the non www. so I'm thinking that should all be ok. Just hoping I could get some of the experts views to make sure this is all ok. The site is a year old and I'm just starting to really get going on the link building so it's not too late to change if I'm wrong. If others link to my site and include the www. will the link juice be passed, as I suspect many will include it without any thought?
On-Page Optimization | | Optimise0 -
Dropped rankings due to too many links, help needed
We have just re-designed our site and added a big drop-down navigation menu to help users get straight to the category/sub-category they are looking for, take a look at http://www.discountfiresupplies.co.uk to see what I mean. Since doing so our rankings have dropped which we've been told may be because there are now so many links on (particularly) the home page diluting the rankings of that page. We've been advised that if we hide the drop-down menus using "style='display: none'" until they are required that the search engines will ignore them which we have now done but is this correct or will they still be indexed? And if so do you have any other suggestions? Thanks, Tariq
On-Page Optimization | | tjhossy0 -
Are Forum Links To Website Causing Rankings To Drop ?
For many years our top keywords hve ranked in top 5. Usually top 3 for a few in particular. The last few months those particular keywords have dropped to 25 +. Our other rankings are doing pretty decent and are remaiing the same. We are members of about 6 forums since they relate to our website and sometime we have contests on them. I do know that the forums are based on those particular keywords and are linking to our website, as well as other forum members linking to us. Each forum has roughly 300 links to our website. It does not seem as if our competitors are affected by this, as they are members of the forums as well. What could be causing this for these certain keywords? If those forums were affected by Google's new algorythm would this have an affect on our website?
On-Page Optimization | | hfranz0