301 redirect from root to /index.aspx
-
I have taken over the SEO for www.domain.net.
The way i've inherited the setup is that www.domain.net is 301 redirected to www.domain.net/index.aspx Looking at top pages and linking root domains in Opensiteexplorer I can see that
www.domain.net/index.aspx has 1,006 linking root domains www.domain.net has 806 linking root domains.
I assume that www.domain.net is passing the value of it's 806 domain links to www.domain.net/index.aspx via the 301 redirect and because of this would expect www.domain.net/index.aspx to be the strongest page on the site and be the url that ranks in the listings for many relevant searches.
It appears however that www.domain.net is what is shown in listings and not www.domain.net/index.aspx ??
Can anyone explain why this might be??
If I do a site: search in Google then www.domain.net is indexed and not www.domain.net/index.aspx ??
-
These could be mostly internal links - are you linking to "/index.aspx" from your navigation, logo, etc.? In OSE, select "from [only external]", and you won't see your internal links. That can really skew the count.
-
Thanks once again Brian.
I have double checked the header response and the redirect from "index.aspx" to the international pages is definitely a 302.
I'm hoping that Google is not assuming that the 302 is intended to be a 301 as I want the link juice to stay at the root domain and I assume this is why 302s were used by whoever setup the IP redirects to international pages.
-
Thanks Dr. Pete,
I am comforted slightly by what you say about Google having a strong preference for the root and that you've seen it before. With the volume of links coming in to "index.aspx" you can see why seeing the root in Google listings made me nervous that all of those links were being ignored.
This comment also comforts me..
301/302 chain could exacerbate the problem, although it would typically leave link-juice after the 301
as that is what I would expect too.
I am hesitant to make changes because of the risks it involves and might just have to accept that I'll never know for sure whether those links to "index.aspx" are definitely being counted.
-
Well, here are some more possible issues....
1. Are you sure the redirect to the English page is a 302 and not a 301? As Dr Peter suggested - check the headers.
2. Google has said that in cases where it believes the 302 is a mistake it will treat the 302 as a 301....if this is the case, there's really nothing you can do, besides getting rid of the 302 and using a meta refresh instead. The meta refresh is commonly used in situations like yours, and while not a perfect solution, it would seem to be better than using a 302, which is typically not a good solution at all anymore. I'd bet this is your issue.
-
Google seems to have a strong preference for the root domain, and I've seen this before. Unfortunately, ASP/.NET can be really stubborn about going for the "index.aspx" or "default.aspx" page. You're probably still getting credit for the back-links, but it can be tough to tell. A couple of things:
(1) Make sure you're linking internally to the canonical version (in this case "index.aspx"). Otherwise, you're sending a mixed signal and that can disrupt the 301.
(2) Add a canonical tag to the "index.aspx" page. It can't hurt to double up, in this case.
Oh, sorry - just saw your follow-up. That 301/302 chain could exacerbate the problem, although it would typically leave link-juice after the 301. It's a bit complex, though. You could consider moving your English home-page up a level and only redirecting other audiences. That is a tricky proposition, though, and carries risk.
I'd also grab a header checker and just make sure Google is seeing what you're seeing. It's always best to verify that your redirects are working as expected.
-
Thanks again for giving this some thought and trying to help!
OK, I left out some info that I thought would complicate my description of setup but I wonder whether it is pertinent to the problem....
The site has international content areas and is geo-targeted using the directory method i.e /en-gb, /en-au,, /en-us etc
I have mentioned that www.domain.net does a 301 redirect to www.domain.net/index.aspx but I did not mention that www.domain.net/index.aspx then 302 redirects to the relevant international landing page based on IP address.
I'm pretty sure that the Google spider crawls from a US IP address so I believe that what it will see is:
www.domain.net 301 redirects to www.domain.net/index.aspx
www.domain.net/index.aspx 302 redirects to www.domain.net/en-us/index.aspx
Could the 302 redirect from www.domain.net/index.aspx be responsible for Google keeping www.domain.net in their index despite the 301??
Also, and concerning me more, do you think the considerable link juice to www.domain.net/index.aspx is being lost in all of this??
-
Quba I've thought about this more, and...I have to say that I'm at a loss. All of the links to the domain.net should be lost to domain.net and gained by domain.net/index.aspx
Is it possible that the index.aspx url has a noindex instruction from the robots.txt?. Is index.aspx showing up at all?
-
Thanks for your response Brian,
it could be that most of the links are initially directed at www.domain.net.
According to Opensiteexplorer www.domain.net/index.aspx has more links than www.domain.net though?
Where is your non-www domain directed? Is it directed to www.domain.net or or www.domain.net/index.aspx ? If it's directed to the former then that could explain some or all of your issue.
domain.net redirects to www.domain.net/index.aspx
-
Quba it's hard to say, but....
1. We know that (according to Google) some PR is lost in redirection, and it could be that most of the links are initially directed at www.domain.net.
2. Where is your non-www domain directed? Is it directed to www.domain.net or or www.domain.net/index.aspx ? If it's directed to the former then that could explain some or all of your issue.
-
Why has the main domain been redirected to index.aspx? it makes no sense
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Forced Redirects/HTTP<>HTTPS 301 Question
Hi All, Sorry for what's about to be a long-ish question, but tl;dr: Has anyone else had experience with a 301 redirect at the server level between HTTP and HTTPS versions of a site in order to maintain accurate social media share counts? This is new to me and I'm wondering how common it is. I'm having issues with this forced redirect between HTTP/HTTPS as outlined below and am struggling to find any information that will help me to troubleshoot this or better understand the situation. If anyone has any recommendations for things to try or sources to read up on, I'd appreciate it. I'm especially concerned about any issues that this may be causing at the SEO level and the known-unknowns. A magazine I work for recently relaunched after switching platforms from Atavist to Newspack (which is run via WordPress). Since then, we've been having some issues with 301s, but they relate to new stories that are native to our new platform/CMS and have had zero URL changes. We've always used HTTPS. Basically, the preview for any post we make linking to the new site, including these new (non-migrated pages) on Facebook previews as a 301 in the title and with no image. This also overrides the social media metadata we set through Yoast Premium. I ran some of the links through the Facebook debugger and it appears that Facebook is reading these links to our site (using https) as redirects to http that then redirect to https. I was told by our tech support person on Newspack's team that this is intentional, so that Facebook will maintain accurate share counts versus separate share counts for http/https, however this forced redirect seems to be failing if we can't post our links with any metadata. (The only way to reliably fix is by adding a query parameter to each URL which, obviously, still gives us inaccurate share counts.) This is the first time I've encountered this intentional redirect thing and I've asked a few times for more information about how it's set up just for my own edification, but all I can get is that it’s something managed at the server level and is designed to prevent separate share counts for HTTP and HTTPS. Has anyone encountered this method before, and can anyone either explain it to me or point me in the direction of a resource where I can learn more about how it's configured as well as the pros and cons? I'm especially concerned about our SEO with this and how this may impact the way search engines read our site. So far, nothing's come up on scans, but I'd like to stay one step ahead of this. Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | ogiovetti0 -
How long does Google/Bing take to index
Hello we have 2-3 new pages being submitted every night to google/bing via our sitemap. Two issues I am noticing. Wondering if anyone else has same issues. a) 22 URL submitted via sitemap but only 1 indexed in two weeks. there are no errors showing b) If i submit manually using "Fetch As Google" and request indexing - the page gets indexed right way but after a day it seems to be unindexed - it will show up when i search (site:domain.com) but then disappear from the results doing the same search a few days later. Is this normal or do i have a problem that needs addressing? thank you
Technical SEO | | sancarlos0 -
Selective 301 redirections of pages within folders
Redirection Puzzle - it's got me puzzled anyhow! The finished website has just been converted from an old aspx affair to a wordpress site. Some directory structures have changed significantly; there appears to be a load of older medical articles that have not been added back in and it sounds unlikely that they will be. Therefore unmatched old news articles need to be pointed to the top news page to keep hold of any link value they may have accrued. The htaccess file starts with ithemes security's code, Followed by the main wordpress block and I have added the user redirects to the final section of the htaccess file . I have been through the redirects and rewrites line by line to verify them and the following sections are giving me problems. This is probably just my aging brain failing to grasp basic logic. If I can tap into anybody's wisdom for a bit of help I would appreciate it. My eyes and brain are gone to jelly. I have used htaccesscheck.com to check out the underlying syntax and ironed out the basic errors that I had previously missed. The bulk of the redirects are working correctly. #Here there are some very long media URLs which are absent on the new site and I am simply redirecting visiting spiders to the page that will hold media in future. Media items refuse to redirect
Technical SEO | | TomVolpe
Line 408 redirect 301 /Professionals/Biomedicalforum/Recordedfora/Rich%20Media%20http:/kplayer.kcl.ac.uk/ess/echo/presentation/15885525-ff02-4ab2-b0b9-9ba9d97ca266 http://www.SITENAME.ac.uk/biomedical-forum/recorded-fora/ Line 409 redirect 301 /Professionals/Biomedicalforum/Recordedfora/Quicktime%20http:/kplayer.kcl.ac.uk/ess/echo/presentation/15885525-ff02-4ab2-b0b9-9ba9d97ca266/media.m4v http://www.SITENAME.ac.uk/biomedical-forum/recorded-fora/ Line 410 redirect 301 /Professionals/Biomedicalforum/Recordedfora/Mp3%20http:/kplayer.kcl.ac.uk/ess/echo/presentation/15885525-ff02-4ab2-b0b9-9ba9d97ca266/media.mp3 http://www.SITENAME.ac.uk/biomedical-forum/recorded-fora/ #Old site pagination URLs redirected to new "news" top level page - Here I am simply pointing all the pagination URLs for the news section, that were indexed, to the main news page. These work but append the pagination code on to the new visible URL. Have I got the syntax correct in this version of the lines to suppress the appended garbage? RewriteRule ^/LatestNews.aspx(?:.*) http://www.SITENAME.ac.uk/news-events/latest-news/? [R=301,L] #On the old site many news directories (blog effectively) contained articles that are unmatched on the new site, have been redirected to new top level news (blog) page: In this section I became confused about whether to use Redirect Match or RewriteRule to point the articles in each year directory back to the top level news page. When I have added a redirectmatch command - it has been disabling the whole site! Despite my syntax check telling me it is syntactically correct. Currently I'm getting a 404 for any of the old URLs in these year by year directories, instead of a successful redirect. I suspect Regex lingo is not clicking for me 😉 My logic here was rewrite any aspx file in the directory to the latest news page at the top. This is my latest attempt to rectify the fault. Am I nearer with my syntax or my logic? The actual URLs and paths have been substituted, but the structure is the same). So what I believe I have set up is: in an earlier section; News posts that have been recreated in the new site are redirected 1 - 1 and they are working successfully. If a matching URL is not found, when the parsing of the file reaches the line for the 1934 directory it should read any remaining .aspx URL request and rewrite it to the latest news page as a 301 and stop processing this block of commands. The subsequent commands in this block repeat the process for the other year groups of posts. Clearly I am failing to comprehend something and illumination would be gratefully received. RewriteRule ^/Blab/Blabbitall/1934/(.*).aspx http://www.SITENAME.ac.uk/news-events/latest-news/ [R=301,L] #------Old site 1933 unmatched articles redirected to new news top level page RewriteRule ^/Blab/Blabbitall/1933/(.*).aspx http://www.SITENAME.ac.uk/news-events/latest-news/ [R=301,L] #------Old site 1932 unmatched articles redirected to new news top level page RewriteRule ^/Blab/Blabbitall/1932/(.*)/.aspx http://www.SITENAME.ac.uk/news-events/latest-news/ [R=301,L] #------Old site 1931 unmatched articles redirected to new news top level page RewriteRule ^/Blab/Blabbitall/1931/(.*)/.aspx http://www.SITENAME.ac.uk/news-events/latest-news/ [R=301,L] #------Old site 1930 unmatched articles redirected to new news top level page RewriteRule ^/Blab/Blabbitall/1930/(.*)/.aspx http://www.SITENAME.ac.uk/news-events/latest-news/ [R=301,L] Many thanks if anyone can help me understand the logic at work here.0 -
Best & easiest way to 301 redirect on IIS
Hi all, What is the best and easiest way to 301 redirect URLs on IIS server? I got access to the FTP and WordPress back office, but no access to the server admin. Is there an easy way to create 301 redirect without having to always annoy the tech in charge of the server? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | 2MSens0 -
.EDU via a 301 Redirect?
I recently received a link to my website from an .edu. However, the way they configured it was they pointed the link to one of their internal pages and then made that page 301 to my website. Is there anyway to gain any link juice from that sort of link?
Technical SEO | | gundogs0 -
My home page 301 redirects - is this an SEO problem
When ever a browser calls my site canineconcepts.co.uk, it is automatically 301 redirected to canineconcepts.co.uk/en I am not sure if I should be concerned about this from an SEO perspective or not. Any thoughts?
Technical SEO | | CanineConcepts0 -
301 Redirection of entire section to the homepage
Hi Guys, So here's the deal. Let's say I have a site at mysite.com/ which talks about tomatoes, and I also have a subsection that talks about potatoes at mysite.com/potatoes I want to stop providing information about potatoes altogether so i'm thinking about doing a 301 redirection from all of the pages at mysite.com/potatoes(.*) to the home page. The thing is, mysite.com/potatoes actually has a great page authority (3475 links from 145 domains) so I really don't wan to lose all that juice... Here are my questions: Will the links be added to the ones i have for the homepage already? Since my home page and my /potatoes section ranked for 2 different subjects, how is this transfer going to affect my rankings for the homepage? will it now also rank for both tomatoes AND potatoes? How much time does it usually take for google to recognize the 301 and pass the link juice? Any other tips on optimizing this process? Thank you for your time! -francois
Technical SEO | | nyakim0 -
Redirecting /default to domain ??
Google analytics shows me that this: http://www.quicklearn.com/default.aspx is my "top content page" This page doesn't redirect to my root domain: http://www.quicklearn.com IT tells me that "/default.aspx" can not redirect to my domain. I am told: "You can only redirect deeper into the site." We have had an ongoing issue with duplicate content (that we are in the process of correcting). Anyone with experience in redirecting that can help? Any advice welcome
Technical SEO | | QuickLearnTraining0