Website Is In Tables
-
Our website www.accupos.com is mainly created with TABLES, which I've heard is a practice from Neanderthal times.
Nevertheless, it is my job as the new Dir. of Marketing to SEO the hell out of it. Would you recommend converting the ENTIRE website into Divs or changing the current Tables situation? Or is this not a big deal for SEO?
The site APPEARS fine, but I want to get our keywords ranked as well as possible, putting my time in the most efficient places (like link building!). How much of a high priority might this Tables fix be?
We are also running an AdWords campaign spending LOTS every month.
Please Moz me!
Derek
-
Yes, I've been blessed with this task. I have been able to achieve #1 rankings for many less competitive keywords and Page 2 ranks for the biggest keywords we're after.
I don't suspect the Tables in our site are holding us back from a Page 1 ranking, since the competition gets so much more severe in those spots, but MAYBE!?
We do have a Wordpress blog on our subdomain, blog.accupos.com and there is already the stock CMS system there, I don't think we really need to move the rest of the site into a CMS, but just wanted to see if switching to a CSS site would make the difference we need to boost in the ranks.
The content is well optimized, the design is good, site is 9 yrs old, there's about 150 pages. Not too bad..and we do have an on-site programmer, who's never built a site in Divs before (don't ask me how). So I guess my 2nd question would be; Do I outsource this job? or trust that our in house guy can figure it out with no errs?! I didn't even think about this before. He's a bright guy but hey, your first time is your first time. I'm sure there are tricks to writing perfectly clean code for Divs and CSS, any suggestions??
DM
-
So you inherited a dinosaur of a website and are expected to get organic traffic. Oh, the humanity...
First off: yes, tableless CSS sites are definitely considered best practice. They tend to be lighter overall (i.e. pages generally contain less code), meaning they load faster and Google can crawl them faster, both of which are search signals. BITD Amazon's pages were crammed with nested tables. Today, not so much - it's taken them some time and effort to get there, but a lot of their content is now table-free.
However, please understand that when you say "converting the ENTIRE website into Divs," you are ultimately talking redesign, with the potential hassle and expense that entails. Is it worth it? At the risk of sounding really indecisive: maybe, maybe not. It depends on a range of quantifiable and subjective factors: how much content really needs to be rewritten, how long would it take, how competitive is the site at present, how old is the current design of the site, etc.
The wider issue here is on-site vs. off-site SEO. On-site is still very important. On-site by itself is not enough, which you seem to understand (hence, your question on link building). However: without a good foundation through a properly optimized web presence, link building won't be as effective.
Here's what I'd recommend. I did a static build of a site for a client - quick job, small site (i.e. less than 10 pages). Around 6-12 months later, we moved the site into WordPress. It was quick, painless, quite affordable to the client, and the client now has a blog and can update/add pages with no involvement from a web designer, which suits me just fine. However, I had already optimized the site quite effectively beforehand, so it wasn't a big deal, and as I say, it was a small site.
In your case, if:
- the site is already well optimized (good title tags/meta descriptions, well written content)
- it has a good, attractive design
- it's a mature site (URLs have been indexed for a while)
- it isn't a crapload of pages that you would have to migrate
...then it might be worth the time and expense to move the site into a content management system. I'm a huge fan of WordPress, but there are other open source systems out there that are perfectly acceptable.
Bottom line: for any major SEO campaign, I strongly believe you need the right foundation in place first in the form of a strong website. Depending on your situation, it may or may not make sense to move it into a CMS.
Hope that helps.
-
Yes absolutely change it over from tables. A lot of the work the search engines are doing lately is to understand and interpret semantic markup. A table based layout is pretty much the antithesis of semantic markup.
It doesn't seem like a presentation issue like tables could effect your SEO, but you're missing out on all the goodness of rich, semantic html.
Here's a good intro: http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/html-css/semantic-html/
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Staging website got indexed by google
Our staging website got indexed by google and now MOZ is showing all inbound links from staging site, how should i remove those links and make it no index. Note- we already added Meta NOINDEX in head tag
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Asmi-Ta0 -
Spammy page with canonical reference to my website
A potentially spammy website http://www.rofof.com/ has included a rel canonical tag pointing to my website. They've included the tag on thousands of pages on their website. Furthermore http://www.rofof.com/ appears to have backlinks from thousands of other low-value domains For example www.kazamiza.com/vb/kazamiza242122/, along with thousands of other pages on thousands of other domains all link to pages on rofof.com, and the pages they link to on rofof.com are all canonicalized to a page on my site. If Google does respect the canonical tag on rofof.com and treats it as part of my website then the thousands of spammy links that point to rofof.com could be considered as pointing to my website. I'm trying to contact the owner of www.rofof.com hoping to have the canonical tag removed from their website. In the meantime, I've disavowed the www.rofof.com, the site that has canonical tag. Will that have any effect though? Will disavow eliminate the effect of a rel canonical tag on the disavowed domain or does it only affect links on the disavowed website? If it only affects links then should I attempt to disavow all the pages that link to rofof.com? Thanks for reading. I really appreciate any insight you folks can offer.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | brucepomeroy1 -
Blog on Custom Website - WordPress Alternatives
Howdy folks. I'm trying to find any good alternative for adding CMS blog to custom website. Most people, us included, are using WP, but, as we know, it's really painful to work with, easily hackable etc etc. So, I wonder if anyone knows of a blog platform, which can be installed on our own websites for blogging, but without drawbacks of WordPress. Any nudge in correct direction will be appreciated. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DmitriiK1 -
What are the Best SEO Website which you read daily
Hai Moz memebers, Can you pls suggest me some best seo websites that you people read articles everyday a part from MOZ
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEO_GB1 -
Having issues crawling a website
We looked to use the Screaming Frog Tool to crawl this website and get a list of all meta-titles from the site, however, it only resulted with the one result - the homepage. We then sought to obtain a list of the URLs of the site by creating a sitemap using https://www.xml-sitemaps.com/. Once again however, we just go the one result - the homepage. There is something that seems to be restricting these tools from crawling all pages. If you anyone can shed some light as to what this could be, we'd be most appreciative.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gavo0 -
How to create AMP Pages for product website?
How to create AMP Pages for product website? I mean we can create it easily when we have wordpress through plugin, what about when we have millions of pages, It would be too tedious to create amp version of every page. So, is there any alternative way to create amp version?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sachin.kaushik0 -
How to check a website's architecture?
Hello everyone, I am an SEO analyst - a good one - but I am weak in technical aspects. I do not know any programming and only a little HTML. I know this is a major weakness for an SEO so my first request to you all is to guide me how to learn HTML and some basic PHP programming. Secondly... about the topic of this particular question - I know that a website should have a flat architecture... but I do not know how to find out if a website's architecture is flat or not, good or bad. Please help me out on this... I would be obliged. Eagerly awaiting your responses, BEst Regards, Talha
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MTalhaImtiaz0 -
SeoMoz Crawler Shuts Down The Website Completely
Recently I have switched servers and was very happy about the outcome. However, every friday my site shuts down (not very cool if you are getting 700 unique visitors per day). Naturally I was very worried and digged deep to see what is causing it. Unfortunately, the direct answer was that is was coming from "rogerbot". (see sample below) Today (aug 5) Same thing happened but this time it was off for about 7 hours which did a lot of damage in terms of seo. I am inclined to shut down the seomoz service if I can't resolve this immediately. I guess my question is would there be a possibility to make sure this doesn't happen or time out like that because of roger bot. Please let me know if anyone has answer for this. I use your service a lot and I really need it. Here is what caused it from these error lines: 216.244.72.12 - - [29/Jul/2011:09:10:39 -0700] "GET /pregnancy/14-weeks-pregnant/ HTTP/1.1" 200 354 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; rogerBot/1.0; UrlCrawler; http://www.seomoz.org/dp/rogerbot)" 216.244.72.11 - - [29/Jul/2011:09:10:37 -0700] "GET /pregnancy/17-weeks-pregnant/ HTTP/1.1" 200 51582 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; rogerBot/1.0; UrlCrawler; http://www.seomoz.org/dp/rogerbot)"
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jury0