Is Google having trouble determining between two of my brand sites
-
I have a couple brand sites that our company uses and a couple of weeks ago one started to suddenly show up in the #1 position while searching for the other site via its brand.
If I search for "collegexpress" our other site careersandcolleges.com is in the #1 possition. If I search for "collegexpress.com" it shows carrersandcolleges.com's title and description but links to www.collegexpress.com
Could I have something messed up or is google confused with our two sites? In the past I am told that CollegeXpress referred to the careersandcolleges.com page but that has been there for many many years and this SERP change only started to show the first week in march of this year. I looked and there are a handfull of anchor text links from external sites using some form of the "CollegeXpress" brand linking to www.careersandcolleges.com but not that many, and they are not new.
If I do a search the other way for "careersandcolleges" I see it correctly return is own site #1 but www.collegexpress.com is shown to me as #3.
I checked and we dont have any redirects or mod rewrites between the two sites. They are on two different IPs
Any help that can point me in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
-
Oh, sorry - didn't realize those two pages were different. Can Google crawl the members page? I'm not completely clear where the ref= version is coming from.
Actually, I missed something. You have both the root ("/") version and the "/home" version being indexed, but the root version is cached as your other site. This could indicate that Google is connecting them. This is the cache of CollegeXpress, and it's the Careers and Colleges page:
I thought I had ruled this issue out, but apparently not. I'm not clear if Google thinks they're duplicated (which I'm not really seeing to be the case) or if there are some weird redirects or cross-linking causing the problem. I've seen this happen once or twice, but usually when sites were heavily duplicated.
-
Do I have to worry about putting a rel canonical between two pages that are not that similar? Our members home page has a lot more links to content and the "Home" page basically has the CTA for registration.
-
I see it now, collegexpress.com is 301ed to http://www.collegexpress.com/?ref=collegexpress.com. I will have to change that to get red of the ?ref=collegexpress.com.
Good call on the brand name as well. Since it is semi unique it shouldnt take much.
-
Can't tell why it's happening, but run CollegeXpress through this header checker:
http://tools.seobook.com/server-header-checker/
You should see a 301-redirect to an odd referrer code. It might be only happening to crawlers or it could be for new visitors (I think I saw it once, but then couldn't replicate it).
If you can update the old links, even though there are only a few of them, that should help. Since it's a unique brand name, even a handful of links with exact anchor text could be boosting the wrong site quite a bit.
-
Thanks for the input Peter, we have some very old links out there that we are in the process of reaching out to. We are trying to get everyone to change the links to point at the correct site.
Can you explain a little more about the 301 to ref=collegexpress.com? I dont see that or think that I have that setup anywhere. I am still pretty new to SEO as this was dumped on me in January.
The weakening of CollegeXpress and the existing strength of careersandcolleges really does look like what is happening here.
All of your answers really make sense and I appreciate the time you took to answer. Thank you very much.
George
-
I agree with Phil that I'd canonical that home-page - I don't think it's the whole problem, but parameter blocking in GWT is inconsistent, in my experience. For something that important, I'd want a stronger signal. I'm also not clear on why your doing a 301-redirect to ref=collegexpress.com when a crawler hits the site - it just seems like an unnecessary step that could weaken your home-page.
Although careersandcolleges.com isn't targeting "collegexpress" on-page, you do seem to be using it in inbound anchor text. For example:
http://home.epix.net/~captclint/schools.html
This sets up conflicting cues for Google, and since the Careers and Colleges domain is a bit stronger, it could be enough to cause you some problems. I'd make sure that brand anchor text is isolated, as much as possible.
In some rare cases we'll see Google canonicalize two domains, if they think the content is too similar. I'm not seeing any evidence of that here, though. Both domains are ranking, so that suggests that either the Collegexpress domain is being weakened somehow or Collegesandcareers is overpowering it.
-
"For #3 we recently added the URL parameter ref in Webmaster Tools to crawl the representative URL and ref= should have no effect."
It's still good practice to use rel canonical in case incoming links from other domains get counted for a single page rather than one for each of the following:
- http://www.example.com
- http://example.com
- http://www.example.com/index.html
- http://example.com/index.html
"For #2 /home is really a Member's landing page. It isnt what we want to display since there arent any CTA for registration."
If you want all search's to go to the true homepage, you could also put a rel canonical tag on the member's landing page telling search engines to send all link juice (PageRank) to the true homepage. The downside is that the member's landing page will not be included in search results.
Other websites just user scripts or redirects that change the when a user is logged in or not. For example, twitter, SEOmoz...
-
Thanks Phillip.
For #3 we recently added the URL parameter ref in Webmaster Tools to crawl the representative URL and ref= should have no effect. I also noticed that we didnt have www.collegexpress.com in our sitemap at the same time. I added it and resubmitted it to be crawled. It has not yet been indexed.
For #2 /home is really a Member's landing page. It isnt what we want to display since there arent any CTA for registration. How else can I tell Google that www.collegexpress.com is the place we want to use as our home page.
-
It looks like the link juice for your collegexpress site is being spread. Here is what i see in the SERP:
#2 - http://www.collegexpress.com/home
#3 - http://<cite>www.collegexpress.com/?ref=logo</cite>
Number 3 can be fixed to a root domain by using rel="canonical" tags
As for number 2, Google thinks that is a more relevant place to send users for "collegexpress", so maybe you should make that the homepage.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does a site with only one blog post a month rank alright?
I manage multiple websites and want to start new ones but want to know if one blog post a month is acceptable for SEO since I'm worried about rank.
Branding | | hssm20191 -
Do review sites like consumer affairs negatively affect SERPs?
Hey all, So when googling the name of our site we see consumer affairs pop up around 5th with a 1 star rating. These negative reviews are mostly spammy (competitors, etc.) since we have an awesome support team that deals with all unhappy members very effectively. We reached out to CA and they came back asking for $10k+ (highway robbery) to "help us improve our rating." My question is: do poor ratings on review sites like these negatively affect your SERPs? And if so, how can we work to combat their effect? Thanks in advance, Roman
Branding | | Dynata_panel_marketing1 -
Google Contacting Clients in an Adwords MCC?!
I am curious if this has happened to others and if so if you were able to resolve it. Today a client forwarded an email that went to a client account and we were in no way copied on it. This is a client that spends in the 6 figures with us and I was shocked to read (Any bold or italics I have added): Hi *****, My name is Jimmy Morrow and I am an Account Strategist at Google on our Agency Team. Your account was recently selected for free dedicated support this quarter and I will be your new point of contact at Google for all things AdWords. We can go over a few housekeeping things I noticed, broader strategy, and some betas that would be a good fit. Please let me know when you have time for a 20-30 minute phone call when we can go over the accounts and make a plan for working together this quarter. Thanks and just let me know a time that works best for you! Best, Jimmy To me, they have essentially gone around us and with the "housekeeping" and "beta" comments sought to make us look either incapable and/or uninformed. We are Google Partners, etc. and we have clients in our MCC for Adwords. I have never seen an occasion where Google blatantly tried to steal the client as it appears is happening here. This is a client who heretofore had NEVER used Adwords and they have been in business since before there was a Google or an Internet. We brought them to Adwords about 6 - 8 months ago!!! They are spending 6 figures on Adwords and I am ready to pull them out and spend the money elsewhere. We sent emails from our UK and our Houston office and no response from lil ole Jimmy. Our UK team has tried calling Google and nothing and then Chatting with them and we can get nothing. This is a client who has a lot of faith in our abilities based on many things we have done for them that worked and they are the kind of client that let's us know when issues arise. So, they are not going to switch and that is not the issue. The issue is Google acted as if they wanted to embrace agencies and if that is so, why then try to back door them? I hope to hear from others who are handling PPC with Google. Thanks a ton. Robert
Branding | | RobertFisher1 -
Looking to create a Press Release - Any decent sites out there?
Hey guys, I'm wondering whether you could point me in the right direction of a reputable PR site to use? I realise that many of these sites have been devalued over recent years but I wanted to produce something for a client after they struck-up a fairly notable connection with another company in their industry. Or should I just avoid PR sites altogether? Oh, and I'd prefer them to be free if possible 🙂
Branding | | Webrevolve0 -
How To Rebrand A Company In The Eyes of Google?
Greetings, Nearly 6 years ago, our company switched its entire business model from providing customized vitamins to a women's health publisher that offers medical advice, news and health tips. We have actively developed a decent link profile for our new brand around women's health and specific health conditions. Nonetheless the old vitamin-related keyword profile is still very prevalent. We have many hundreds of links with old vitamin-related anchor text scattered across the web linking to our main site and to many vitamin mini-sites that we own. What is the best way to rebrand ourselves and basically eliminate this old link profile? My first thought is to immediately park / take down all our vitamin-related domains, and eventually these links will no longer carry any weight in the eyes of Google. The other strategy is to attempt to contact all the sites with the old anchor text and ask them to take the links down. This is not an exciting option to me as I know that this is tedious and a slow process with many dead-ends. Thanks in advance for any advice. Kind regards, Eric Darby
Branding | | Eric_Lifescript0 -
Building Site Authority vs. Link Building
Hi,
Branding | | rayvensoft
I just watched the recent Whiteboard Friday, and I have one question. He talks a lot about "Building Site Authority". Is that just Link Building, or is it something else? If it is Link Building, does that mean that exchanging (3 way, or non-reciprocal) links with other "relevant" and good sites still works, as long as you use your brand name and/or url in the anchor text? Or did I misunderstand. Is "Building Site Authority" something entirely different from Link Building? Sorry if it is a basic question, I just want to make sure I understand the difference if there is one. Thanks in advance!0 -
How can I increase my brand signal for a common phrase?
We are having trouble with SEO branding. When I search for "designquotes" with the quotes, our site appears with sitelinks and it's great. However our brand name is Design Quotes. Which sometimes we aren't even first for. If I search for designquotes without the quotes, still no luck. Should we do lots of link building for Design Quotes or should we start calling ourselves DesignQuotes and build links with that as the anchor text? website is designquotes.com.au
Branding | | designquotes0 -
Brand & engagement study?
I believe I saw a study put out one time that showed that recognized brands have higher engagement metrics than non-branded sites, but I can't seem to find it. Can anyone point me in the direction of such a study?
Branding | | nicole.healthline0