How to prevent duplicate content within this complex website?
-
I have a complex SEO issue I've been wrestling with and I'd appreciate your views on this very much. I have a sports website and most visitors are looking for the games that are played in the current week (I've studied this - it's true). We're creating a new website from scratch and I want to do this is as best as possible. We want to use the most elegant and best way to do this. We do not want to use work-arounds such as iframes, hiding text using AJAX etc. We need a solid solution for both users and search engines.
Therefor I have written down three options:
- Using a canonical URL;
- Using 301-redirects;
- Using 302-redirects.
Introduction
The page 'website.com/competition/season/week-8' shows the soccer games that are played in game week 8 of the season. The next week users are interested in the games that are played in that week (game week 9). So the content a visitor is interested in, is constantly shifting because of the way competitions and tournaments are organized. After a season the same goes for the season of course.
The website we're building has the following structure:
- Competition (e.g. 'premier league')
- Season (e.g. '2011-2012')
- Playweek (e.g. 'week 8')
- Game (e.g. 'Manchester United - Arsenal')
- Playweek (e.g. 'week 8')
- Season (e.g. '2011-2012')
This is the most logical structure one can think of. This is what users expect.
Now we're facing the following challenge: when a user goes to http://website.com/premier-league he expects to see a) the games that are played in the current week and b) the current standings. When someone goes to http://website.com/premier-league/2011-2012/ he expects to see the same: the games that are played in the current week and the current standings. When someone goes to http://website.com/premier-league/2011-2012/week-8/ he expects to the same: the games that are played in the current week and the current standings.
So essentially there's three places, within every active season within a competition, within the website where logically the same information has to be shown.
To deal with this from a UX and SEO perspective, we have the following options:
Option A - Use a canonical URL
Using a canonical URL could solve this problem. You could use a canonical URL from the current week page and the Season page to the competition page:
So:
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season/playweek-8' would have a canonical tag that points to 'website.com/$competition/'
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season/' would have a canonical tag that points to 'website.com/$competition/'
The next week however, you want to have the canonical tag on 'website.com/$competition/$season/playweek-9' and the canonical tag from 'website.com/$competition/$season/playweek-8' should be removed.
So then you have:
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season/playweek-9' would have a canonical tag that points to 'website.com/$competition/'
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season/' would still have a canonical tag that points to 'website.com/$competition/'
In essence the canonical tag is constantly traveling through the pages.
Advantages:
- UX: for a user this is a very neat solution. Wherever a user goes, he sees the information he expects. So that's all good.
- SEO: the search engines get very clear guidelines as to how the website functions and we prevent duplicate content.
Disavantages:
- I have some concerns regarding the weekly changing canonical tag from a SEO perspective. Every week, within every competition the canonical tags are updated. How often do Search Engines update their index for canonical tags? I mean, say it takes a Search Engine a week to visit a page, crawl a page and process a canonical tag correctly, then the Search Engines will be a week behind on figuring out the actual structure of the hierarchy. On top of that: what do the changing canonical URLs to the 'quality' of the website? In theory this should be working all but I have some reservations on this.
- If there is a canonical tag from 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-8', what does this do to the indexation and ranking of it's subpages (the actual match pages)
Option B - Using 301-redirects
Using 301-redirects essentially the user and the Search Engine are treated the same. When the Season page or competition page are requested both are redirected to game week page.
The same applies here as applies for the canonical URL: every week there are changes in the redirects.
So in game week 8:
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/' would have a 301-redirect that points to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-8'
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season' would have a 301-redirect that points to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-8'
A week goes by, so then you have:
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/' would have a 301-redirect that points to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-9'
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season' would have a 301-redirect that points to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-9'
Advantages
- There is no loss of link authority.
Disadvantages
- Before a playweek starts the playweek in question can be indexed. However, in the current playweek the playweek page 301-redirects to the competition page. After that week the page's 301-redirect is removed again and it's indexable.
- What do all the (changing) 301-redirects do to the overall quality of the website for Search Engines (and users)?
Option C - Using 302-redirects
Most SEO's will refrain from using 302-redirects. However, 302-redirect can be put to good use: for serving a temporary redirect.
Within my website there's the content that's most important to the users (and therefor search engines) is constantly moving. In most cases after a week a different piece of the website is most interesting for a user. So let's take our example above. We're in playweek 8.
If you want 'website.com/$competition/' to be redirecting to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-8/' you can use a 302-redirect. Because the redirect is temporary
The next week the 302-redirect on 'website.com/$competition/' will be adjusted. It'll be pointing to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-9'.
Advantages
- We're putting the 302-redirect to its actual use.
- The pages that 302-redirect (for instance 'website.com/$competition' and 'website.com/$competition/$season') will remain indexed.
Disadvantages
- Not quite sure how Google will handle this, they're not very clear on how they exactly handle a 302-redirect and in which cases a 302-redirect might be useful. In most cases they advise webmasters not to use it.
I'd very much like your opinion on this. Thanks in advance guys and galls!
-
Hi Andy and Peter, thanks for your response.
@Andy: the rel=next and rel=prev markup won't really help in solving the problem we had. We will use it though because it's very helpful.
@Peter: yeah it's been something we've been struggling with for a while but we've finally made a decision on it.
The /current solution wasn't really a good solution because at the start of a season all the gameweeks are planned and created so it would become quite complex. We've done some calculations on how much duplicate content we would have if we would not use any of the redirects of canonical tags and the percentage of DC is very small (below 1%) so we're going to put our faith in Google's hands and let them figure it out. It's a good quality website with loads of links we're talking about so I don't expect to much issues. We'll monitor it closely though and stand by to interfere when needed.
Anyways, thanks for your suggestions. Although it didn't solve my problem 1:1 it did make me think and make a decision.
Bye, Steven
-
Yeah, time-sensitive information is always tough. I think you're dead on about the disadvantages - the timing of Google's application of these rotating tags would always be off, and you could end up with some really weird search results that are not only bad for SEO but could create bad UX (people landing on old pages thinking they're new).
What about another option - could you take more of a news/blog approach and have a "/current" page that is always the current week? As the current week changes, roll that content into an archive page ("/week8", etc.). That way, the content lives on, but the current URL never changes.
In terms of duplication, is this really full duplication? It sounds like some pages (like the season) just have snippets of the current week. That's not necessarily a problem. If they are very similar, could you "widgetize" it somehow? Could be straight HTML, but use a condensed format for the season page that links to the full version on the current week page. This would be much like a snippet of a blog post - instead of repeating everything on all 3 pages, have one main chunk of content and two summaries.
-
Hi,
Does the rel=next, rel=prev markup help you out with this problem? See http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-and-relprev.html
Ive used it a couple of times to help stop pages been seen as dupe content where those pages are duplicate (meta, main content, images etc) except for example reviews, or comments e.g. /product_x /product_x_review_page1 /product_x_review_page2 /product_x_review_page_3
Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate Content For E-commerce
On our E-commerce site, we have multiple stores. Products are shown on our multiple stores which has created a duplicate content problem. Basically if we list a product say a shoe,that listing will show up on our multiple stores I assumed the solution would be to redirect the pages, use non follow tags or to use the rel=canonical tag. Are there any other options for me to use. I think my best bet is to use a mixture of 301 redirects and canonical tags. What do you recommend. I have 5000+ pages of duplicate content so the problem is big. Thanks in advance for your help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pinksgreens0 -
Wordpress and duplicate content
Hi, I have recently installed wordpress and started a blog but now loads of duplicate pages are cropping up for tags and authors and dates etc. How do I do the canonical thing in wordpress? Thanks Ian
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jwdl0 -
Duplicate content
I run about 10 sites and most of them seemed to fall foul of the penguin update and even though I have never sought inorganic links I have been frantically searching for a link based answer since April. However since asking a question here I have been pointed in another direction by one of your contributors. It seems At least 6 of my sites have duplicate content issues. If you search Google for "We have selected nearly 200 pictures of short haircuts and hair styles in 16 galleries" which is the first bit of text from the site short-hairstyles.com about 30000 results appear. I don't know where they're from nor why anyone would want to do this. I presume its automated since there is so much of it. I have decided to redo the content. So I guess (hope) at some point in the future the duplicate nature will be flushed from Google's index? But how do I prevent it happening again? It's impractical to redo the content every month or so. For example if you search for "This facility is written in Flash® to use it you need to have Flash® installed." from another of my sites that I coincidently uploaded a new page to a couple of days ago, only the duplicate content shows up not my original site. So whoever is doing this is finding new stuff on my site and getting it indexed on google before even google sees it on my site! Thanks, Ian
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jwdl0 -
Is this duplicate content?
My client has several articles and pages that have 2 different URLs For example: /bc-blazes-construction-trail is the same article as: /article.cfm?intDocID=22572 I was not sure if this was duplicate content or not ... Or if I should be putting "/article.cfm" into the robots.txt file or not.. if anyone could help me out, that would be awesome! Thanks 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ATMOSMarketing560 -
Concerns about duplicate content issues with australian and us version of website
My company has an ecommerce website that's been online for about 5 years. The url is www.betterbraces.com. We're getting ready to launch an australian version of the website and the url will be www.betterbraces.com.au. The australian website will have the same look as the US website and will contain about 200 of the same products that are featured on the US website. The only major difference between the two websites is the price that is charged for the products. The australian website will be hosted on the same server as the US website. To ensure Australians don't purchase from the US site we are going to have a geo redirect in place that sends anyone with a AU ip address to the australian website. I am concerned that the australian website is going to have duplicate content issues. However, I'm not sure if the fact that the domains are so similar coupled with the redirect will help the search engines understand that these sites are related. I would appreciate any recommendations on how to handle this situation to ensure oue rankings in the search engines aren't penalized. Thanks in advance for your help. Alison French
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | djo-2836690 -
Two Brands One Site (Duplicate Content Issues)
Say your client has a national product, that's known by different brand names in different parts of the country. Unilever owns a mayonnaise sold East of the Rockies as "Hellmanns" and West of the Rockies as "Best Foods". It's marketed the same way, same slogan, graphics, etc... only the logo/brand is different. The websites are near identical with different logos, especially the interior pages. The Hellmanns version of the site has earned slightly more domain authority. Here is an example recipe page for some "WALDORF SALAD WRAPS by Bobby Flay Recipe" http://www.bestfoods.com/recipe_detail.aspx?RecipeID=12497&version=1 http://www.hellmanns.us/recipe_detail.aspx?RecipeID=12497&version=1 Both recipie pages are identical except for one logo. Neither pages ranks very well, neither has earned any backlinks, etc... Oddly the bestfood version does rank better (even though everything is the same, same backlinks, and hellmanns.us having more authority). If you were advising the client, what would you do. You would ideally like the Hellmann version to rank well for East Coast searches, and the Best Foods version for West Coast searches. So do you: Keep both versions with duplicate content, and focus on earning location relevant links. I.E. Earn Yelp reviews from east coast users for Hellmanns and West Coast users for Best foods? Cross Domain Canonical to give more of the link juice to only one brand so that only one of the pages ranks well for non-branded keywords? (but both sites would still rank for their branded keyworkds). No Index one of the brands so that only one version gets in the index and ranks at all. The other brand wouldn't even rank for it's branded keywords. Assume it's not practical to create unique content for each brand (the obvious answer). Note: I don't work for Unilver, but I have a client in a similar position. I lean towards #2, but the social media firm on the account wants to do #1. (obviously some functionally based bias in both our opinions, but we both just want to do what will work best for client). Any thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | crvw0 -
Accepting RSS feeds. Does it = duplicate content?
Hi everyone, for a few years now I've allowed school clients to pipe their news RSS feed to their public accounts on my site. The result is a daily display of the most recent news happening on their campuses that my site visitors can browse. We don't republish the entire news item; just the headline, and the first 150 characters of their article along with a Read more link for folks to click if they want the full story over on the school's site. Each item has it's own permanent URL on my site. I'm wondering if this is a wise practice. Does this fall into the territory of duplicate content even though we're essentially providing a teaser for the school? What do you think?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | peterdbaron0 -
Duplicate Content from Article Directories
I have a small client with a website PR2, 268 links from 21 root domains with mozTrusts 5.5, MozRank 4.5 However whenever I check in google for the amount of link: Google always give the response none. My client has a blog and many articles on the blog. However they have submitted their blog article every time to article directories as well, plain and simle creating duplicate and content. Is this the reason why their link: is coming up as none? Is there something to correct the situation?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danielkamen0