How Can Low Quality Links Be Removed?
-
Let's say that in looking in OSE that you find an overall low quality link profile.
Let's say that some of those links were acquired by using article marketing systems like UAW or SEO Link Vine, which were hard hit in Penguin.
Let's also say that some keywords were targeted within blog networks that passed a lot of page rank to targeted pages.
Let's say that at one point in time an offshore link building team was used and they posted low quality blog comments on pages with hundreds of outbound links.
Let's say as a result of the drop in SERPS that you've finally been convinced that there must be a better way and in the process join SEO Moz - and now you want to clean up the low quality link profile.
How does one go about removing links on such a diverse number of sites? Are there best practices for how to remove links you longer want pointed to your site?
Or is it simply best to go on about the work of building a lot of quality links and let the past be in the past?
Thanks for your input Mozzers...
-
Carlos,
Just wanted to say "Thanks" for this post. I am in a similar situation as Scott, and I had my doubts that a reconsideration request would yield any results. Nice to hear that it does. My "prior" seo advised me to wait it out. When I insisted, they wanted me to remove all reference to them in my response as well as remove their IDs in Webmaster Tools. Been trying to unwind things on my own before i submit a reconsideration. Do you think Google will remove the penalty if i just tell them I fired the SEO?
Thanks again.
-
If you had a list of the URLs you could outsource the job of actually contacting the sites using a template link removal request. However you might find that a lot of the low value sites that accept articles from UAW and similar are highly automated, so the chance of getting a reply / link removed may be quite low.
-
yup... if it was page that is the problem and not your homepage... then what I would do is recreate that page - but when recreating it - take a close look at the on-page seo attributes.
See if there are any other close variations of the money keywords. Look at variations you could make the page name instead of what it used to be. I would stay away from an exact match between your page title tag, H1 and page url too on this new page. I would also try and change the content up if you can. Reword it to the best you can and check it on a duplicate content checker.
Again - previously when I gave some advice to you I (maybe wrongly) assumed it was home page you linked to.. If it was a page that was heavily optimized around the keyword and you linked to that - you maybe in luck.
This doesn't mean to forget what I said above - I would still try to get some delinking action done - IF ONLY just so you can post to G about your proactive measures taken. I know a lot will disagree with me here... but it is worth doing.
I have witnessed three websites having penalties revoked in the past 8 weeks. All three sent reconsideration requests with some evidence of proactive delinking measures.
So - although you can and should republish a new page - still try to do the other stuff I mentioned.
-
Are you suggesting that to 'recreate' a page that was dropped and by re-naming the page I might bring the content back in view?
The domain is still indexed - some of the pages have lost 10-40 spots, some only down 3-5 spots but for money keywords that were targeted in blog networks the serps are ugly. Pages that were in the top 10 are now out of the top 100.
-
I forgot to ask you... were the links to specific page or to your domain ?
One things seems sure - the penalties do seem to be PAGE and KEYWORD specific.
They do not affect the entire domain - or at least I have not seen evidence of that on these latest round of penalizations.
Unlike the example I gave above where his entire domain was toast. These latest warnings and penalties seem quite different.
So, if it is to a page... and not your domain - then you have a road to salvation
-
Carlos - you've provided an incredible amount of solid, actionable advice in your reply. I'm certainly willing to 'dig-in' and try to reverse some of the damage.
Oddly my traffic was low before Pengin and its a bit higher now. However my 'money' keywords are no longer in the top 100. Almost as if there was a penalty applied in addition to the loss of the link juice.
All of my pages are still indexed -they're just not ranking as they were a few weeks ago.
Look for my PM regarding the tool you used to quickly gather whois data and if you can provide guidance on the email you sent, that'd be a real gift.
Thank you again for your input. I believe that this will be useful to others who are also dealing with these issues.
Scott
-
Thanks Todd - definitely looking for quality, higher authority link opportunities. You've offered some really helpful suggestions...
SD
-
i think he may have been being sarcastic.
If you are not going to do any damage rectification at all - I would say either forget about traffic from Google and build your traffic from other channels - or move onto a new domain.
-
With over 900 of these 'links' - its a big job. Thanks for your input Adam.
-
Lets say that all this happened to you... I would give you the same advice that we have give two new clients this past week that have come to us with this problem after the Penguin update. They had also used LinkVine and other article systems.
We also have two clients it has happened to - where the links were not through Blog / Splog networks but genuine natural links that happened due to a book launch. many of them were low quality and may ahve looked spammy - but we know for certain she never did anything BH or even GH.
Anyway, our advice would be to attack from both sides.
I would say not to continue your link building though - at least not in the way you were doing it before.
If you are going to do ANY link building it needs to be done with a new perspective. They need to be real links that you acquire through means of networking or blogging or writing your own articles.
Yup - a lot of work... but it will pay off.
If you are going to any paid link building (which I wouldnt advise) I would ask for nofollows on them.
Even though some high trafficked websites in the SEO community still SELL links (such as SER) - it is not enough to rely on webmasters to tell you you have to have a nofollow on the paid links. You should ask for them.
If you were to engage in paid link building without nofollows you need to change your entire strayegy and make sure they have a diverse range of anchor texts. Put your URL in some, put your company name in some. DO NOT just go after a money keyword. I want to be clear though - I am in no way advising this.
My advice though would be to not do paid link building unless doing nofollows.
Certainly stay away from those Blog networks such as those you mentioned.Some on other forums are also advising clients that it is a waste of time trying to attack the bad links.
I disagree - and although it may take a lot of time and resources.... you have to ask yourself what your domain is worth to you. If you have spent a lot of time on the website and had it for some years - but just made some mistakes in your eagerness to get ahead... then hold your hands up (which it sounds like you are doing), turn a corner and attack vigorously to try to get it all corrected.
Get a list of all the domains linking to you, and all their pages for each individual domain.
Input the domain list into some software (PM ME) that will quickly get you as many of the contact details (from whois records). Within a few minutes you could have a database of emails for a 1000 domains that you will need to contact. Come up with a standard email format.... or with a little programming you could make your own script to do all this. That is what we have done for the clients above. We got through this task for hundreds of domains within a few days.
Now, I must admit - even though our email is nicely worded and effective (as it reads) - I would say, just based on the following two points - the success rate of this will be very low...
-
The webmasters of these offending websites that have links to you have NOTHING to gain by spending time to delink you...
-
The WHOIS information isnt always the best contact information
BUT - at least you are doing something.
Your success rate may be 2-5% with this - but even if you manage to get 20 or 30 of these sites to delink your website...it is still something you can document and send to Google as aproactive steps you have taken to rectify the situation.
Depending on the amount of links to your website - it may only change the percentage of good links to bad links slightly.... That's why you need to do what you can on acquiring natural links.
It might not be a quick process. It will $%##$ you off doing it. There is no guarantee they will lift a penalty - EVER - but one thing is for sure - if you dont do anything and show some proactive action to remedy the problems - they are 100% sure to never lift it.
I know one website that had a penalty 18 months ago... the owner did not want to do any reconsideration request - since they thought it would result in a manual review.
The only thing his actions (or lack of ) did was ensure his website never allowed back into the index. A 10,000 page website that was top in their industry. He did stuff wrong - but didn't want to admit it. Doing a SITE:domain.com search to this day (18 months on) doesn't find any of his pages.
So, it all depends on what the domain means to you and if you are prepared to do SOME action on the bad stuff - because you will have to in my opinion.
Hope this helps - and if you need the name of that software that I recommend for the WHOIS records - just PM me. I don't like putting links in posts since it looks like advertising / promoting. It isn't our software but one we use.
Any other questions - just let us know.
Carlos
-
-
I wouldn't put my priority on removing the low quality links. With that amount of spam it's going to be nearly impossible to get them all removed anyway. I'd spend my time lowering bounce rate and working on social. Go through each page and ask yourself, "Can this be improved?"
As always, look for authoritative link opportunities. Try getting some media mentions using helpareporterout.com. Guest posts are always good too. Look for ways to get traffic through your links. Try running some contests.
Here's an interesting poll about the Panda update last year.
http://www.seroundtable.com/panda-poll-14693.html
Only about 10% recovered fully from Panda, but I'm betting most people just gave up after they were hit.
Good luck!
-
Contact each site directly and ask nicely to have the links removed.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
6 .htaccess Rewrites: Remove index.html, Remove .html, Force non-www, Force Trailing Slash
i've to give some information about my website Environment 1. i have static webpage in the root. 2. Wordpress installed in sub-dictionary www.domain.com/blog/ 3. I have two .htaccess , one in the root and one in the wordpress
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NeatIT
folder. i want to www to non on all URLs Remove index.html from url Remove all .html extension / Re-direct 301 to url
without .html extension Add trailing slash to the static webpages / Re-direct 301 from non-trailing slash Force trailing slash to the Wordpress Webpages / Re-direct 301 from non-trailing slash Some examples domain.tld/index.html >> domain.tld/ domain.tld/file.html >> domain.tld/file/ domain.tld/file.html/ >> domain.tld/file/ domain.tld/wordpress/post-name >> domain.tld/wordpress/post-name/ My code in ROOT htaccess is <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">Options +FollowSymLinks -MultiViews RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase / #removing trailing slash
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ $1 [R=301,L] #www to non
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.(([a-z0-9_]+.)?domain.com)$ [NC]
RewriteRule .? http://%1%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L] #html
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule ^([^.]+)$ $1.html [NC,L] #index redirect
RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /index.html\ HTTP/
RewriteRule ^index.html$ http://domain.com/ [R=301,L]
RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} .html
RewriteRule ^(.*).html$ /$1 [R=301,L]</ifmodule> The above code do 1. redirect www to non-www
2. Remove trailing slash at the end (if exists)
3. Remove index.html
4. Remove all .html
5. Redirect 301 to filename but doesn't add trailing slash at the end0 -
Consensus on disavowing low-quality auto-generated links (e.g. webstatsdomain.org etc) ?
Is there a consensus in the SEO world around the best practice on how to treat the multiple auto-generated links for a domain? With a lot of the link profiles we have been analyzing nearly 70% volume of the backlinks relate to these auto generated links (e.g. similarweb.com, informer.com, webstatsdomain.org etc) I can see arguments for disavowing them (low-quality links) as well as keeping them (skew anchor text distribution towards URL mentions, natural link profile) but would be interested if people have run experiments or prefer strongly one way or the other.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | petersocapro1 -
Using rel="nofollow" when link has an exact match anchor but the link does add value for the user
Hi all, I am wondering what peoples thoughts are on using rel="nofollow" for a link on a page like this http://askgramps.org/9203/a-bushel-of-wheat-great-value-than-bushel-of-goldThe anchor text is "Brigham Young" and the page it's pointing to's title is Brigham Young and it goes into more detail on who he is. So it is exact match. And as we know if this page has too much exact match anchor text it is likely to be considered "over-optimized". I guess one of my questions is how much is too much exact match or partial match anchor text? I have heard ratios tossed around like for every 10 links; 7 of them should not be targeted at all while 3 out of the 10 would be okay. I know it's all about being natural and creating value but using exact match or partial match anchors can definitely create value as they are almost always highly relevant. One reason that prompted my question is I have heard that this is something Penguin 3.0 is really going look at.On the example URL I gave I want to keep that particular link as is because I think it does add value to the user experience but then I used rel="nofollow" so it doesn't pass PageRank. Anyone see a problem with doing this and/or have a different idea? An important detail is that both sites are owned by the same organization. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ThridHour0 -
Relevancy of link profile
Hi! I'm doing an audit of http://www.stevesims.com/ at the moment, who has had rankings for 'website designers' plummet recently. Looking at the site, there a few things to do with on-page and on-site optimisation, but nothing major. Instead, I think the link profile is the issue. There's a lot of site wide links from non-relevant sites, but I'm struggling to see anything else. Any thoughts would be much appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Blink-SEO0 -
What if a 301 redirect is removed?
Suppose the following scenarios after a 301 redirects from source URL to targent URL is removed. 1. If source URL raises a 404 error, will target URL retained the link juice previously passed from source URL? 2. If source URL starts to show different content than what is showing on target URL, will the previously passed link juice be credited back to the source URL?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bull1350 -
Removed Site-wide links
Hi there, I have recently removed quite a lot of site-wide links leaving the only link on homepage's of some websites, since doing this I have seen a dramatic drop on my keywords, going from position 2-3 to nowhere. Has anyone else experienced anything like this, should I expect to see a return on these keywords? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Paul780 -
Removing Canonical Links
We implemented rel=canonical as we decided to paginate our pages. We then ran some testing and on the whole pagination did not work out so we removed all on-page pagination. Now, internally when I click for example a link for Widgets I get the /widgets.php but searching through Google I get to /widgets.php?page=all . There are not redirects in place at the moment. The '?page=all' page has been rated 'A' by the SEOmoz tool under On Page Optimization reports and performs much better than the exact same page without the '?page=all' (the score dips to a 'D' grade) so need to tread carefully so we don't lose the link value. Can anyone advise us on the best way forward? Thanks in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jannkuzel0 -
Bad neighborhood linking - anyone can share experience how significant it can impact rankings?
SEOMoz community, If you have followed our latest Q&A posts you know by now that we have been suffering since the last 8 months from a severe Google penalty we are still trying to resolve. Our international portfolio of sports properties has suffered significant ranking losses across the board. While we have been tediously trying to troubleshoot the problem for a while now we might be up to a hot lead now. We realized that one of the properties outside of our key properties, but are site that our key properties are heavily linking to (+100 outgoing links per property) seems to have received a significant Google penalty in a sense that it has been completely delisted from the Google index and lost all its PageRank (Pr4) While we are buffed to see such sort of delisting, we are hopeful that this might be the core of our experienced issues in the past i.e. that our key properties have been devalued due to heavy linking to a bad neighborhood site. My question two the community are two-fold: Can anyone share any experience if it is indeed considered possible that a high number of external links to one bad neighboorhood domain can cause significant ranking drops in the rank from being top 3 ranked to be ranked at around a 140 for a competetive key word? The busted site has a large set of high quality external links. If we swap domains is there any way to port over any link juice or will the penalty be passed along? If that is the case I assume the best approach would be to reach out to all the link authorities and have tem link to the new domain instead of the busted site? Thanks /Thomas
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tomypro0