What else: struggling with google position
-
Hi.
I understand everyone is offering their time for free here so any advice or support is much appreciated.
http://www.cytronex.com
PA 44 || mR 4.6 || mT 5.73 || 986 links from 43 Root Domains
DA 33 || 3,942 links from 71 DomainsWe've dropped from position 25ish to position 70ish in keyword searches for 'electric bikes'. I've tried everything and I just don't understand! It's genuine content, the actual product is increasingly popular, we have several links from sites which are (well, to my mind) reasonable quality.
I've only just been brought in to look at this and my lack of any SEO or web experience is not putting my boss off expecting an instant solution As I'm only just getting to grips with it, Analytics was only installed about a month ago so I can't pin point a moment when it dropped.
We're consistently out-positioned by sites with lower PA/DA scores.
Any insight anyone might have would be amazing!
Thanks
Adam -
Can I ask what things have you tried?
How many visitors were you getting when you were ranked 25 and how many are you getting now?
You want to be aiming to be on the first page (spots 1 - 3 ideally) going from 25 - 70 will make hardly any difference in actual visitors imo.
Do you know when this drop occured?
If the product is becoming increasingly popular it could be a fact that other sites are moving up due to relevance and you down and you need to adjust your approach a little.
Another thing is alot of your competitors have the words "bike" or "electric" in their domain name and this helps too, you don't.
Anchor Text for you is REALLY important so every link you get from now on make sure it says Electric Bikes or Buy Electric Bikes (as that what you want people to do buy your bikes) You will rank for your brand name with any issue so try to avoid any further links with your brand name.
I would even go as far as changing the tab that says "bike" to "Electric Bikes" also.
++++++++++
As a side note:
When you get visitors to your site I feel you will have a issue with converting as many as you "could" because your site isn't very friendly it shouldn't be on black it makes it very hard to read but you may not deal with that nor want to talk about that yet....
-
No problem. I know how hard it is to start in the deep end. Best of luck.
-
Thank you, that's a very thorough response. I will take some time to digest and implement your suggestions.
Thank you again. Adam
-
Hi Adam,
Your right, you had have a very solid DA and PA and there are certainly competitors in the top 10 results with similar kinds of authority. Also the design of your site looks very nice.
One problem I can see by using http://www.opensiteexplorer.org is that all your anchor text is brand related. Anchor text is one of the key ranking signals which indicates what your website is about and none of your refer to 'electric bikes'.
Of course your 'raw' number of links (by total and root domains) is lower than those in the top 10 results too, which is also another ranking factor which you could improve.
Hope this helps,
Rikki
-
Hi there
A few thoughts on 'electric bike':
You've got a huge amount of keyword cannibalization going on. Have a look at your title tags - you've got 'Cytronex Electric Bikes' at the front of most of them. That's some of the most important space on your site's page, it needs to be used wisely. Put whatever keyword(s) each page is targetting there. You'd be better off having something like:
Electric Bikes | Cytronex
Electric Bike Reviews | Cytronex
Light Electric Bikes | Cytronex
etc.
Also, you're in a very competitive niche - a search reveals lots of highly SEO-ed pages. I can't imagine you were getting much traffic when you were at 25-ish anyway. Your boss needs to understand dropping from page 3 to page 7 is nowhere near as bad as dropping from 1st position to 3rd - at least in real revenue.
You do have some links from some relevant sites. But your inbound links could use a bit more keyword rich anchor text on inbound links. I've had a look, and your inbound anchor text is mostly your brand name. In an aggressively SEO-ed niche, that's going to hurt.
Google Adwords estimates a million global searches a month for that term. That's high and that's why the competition is so high. Nobody can reasonably expect you to compete with agency-managed sites, especially if you're new to this.
How long have you been looking at this drop? Big changes, especially in the lower rankings, aren't that unusual. All the more so in competitive (ie highly spam-ridden) niches. You're at the sharp end of algorithm changes. You'll need to measure this for a longer time before really freaking out about it.
So my main advice would be to get some better anchor text links. You're getting some good media coverage - see if you or a PR person can get a few anchor text-rich links in from good sources. That'll make a difference.
You should also definitely try targetting some less competitive terms as well as getting rankings for 'electric bikes'. Targetting the entire site at that one term isn't likely to help.
Have you considered adding a blog, a resources section (etc) which can contain some easier keywords? 'Best electric bike', 'fast electric bike' etc. You already rank well for 'lightest electric bike', you could try picking up some variants of that. Much fewer searches, but a lot better chance of ranking.
Being fast seems to be a Unique Selling Point for your bikes, so I'd target anything related to that - 'fast electric bike, power electric bike' hard.
Also you don't seem to have any of the synonyms for bike - pedal bike, push bike etc. - anywhere on your site. Your customers may use that language so so should you.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Blocking Google from telemetry requests
At Magnet.me we track the items people are viewing in order to optimize our recommendations. As such we fire POST requests back to our backends every few seconds when enough user initiated actions have happened (think about scrolling for example). In order to eliminate bots from distorting statistics we ignore their values serverside. Based on some internal logging, we see that Googlebot is also performing these POST requests in its javascript crawling. In a 7 day period, that amounts to around 800k POST requests. As we are ignoring that data anyhow, and it is quite a number, we considered reducing this for bots. Though, we had several questions about this:
Technical SEO | | rogier_slag
1. Do these requests count towards crawl budgets?
2. If they do, and we'd want to prevent this from happening: what would be the preferred option? Either preventing the request in the frontend code, or blocking the request using a robots.txt line? The latter question is given by the fact that a in-app block for the request could lead to different behaviour for users and bots, and may be Google could penalize that as cloaking. The latter is slightly less convenient from a development perspective, as all logic is spread throughout the application. I'm aware one should not cloak, or makes pages appear differently to search engine crawlers. However these requests do not change anything in the pages behaviour, and purely send some anonymous data so we can improve future recommendations.0 -
Why Google crawl parameter URLs?
Hi SEO Masters, Google is indexing this parameter URLs - 1- xyz.com/f1/f2/page?jewelry_styles=6165-4188-4184-4192-4180-6109-4191-6110&mode=li_23&p=2&filterable_stone_shapes=4114 2- xyz.com/f1/f2/page?jewelry_styles=6165-4188-4184-4192-4180-4169-4195&mode=li_23&p=2&filterable_stone_shapes=4115&filterable_metal_types=4163 I have handled by Google parameter like this - jewelry_styles= Narrows Let Googlebot decide mode= None Representative URL p= Paginates Let Googlebot decide filterable_stone_shapes= Narrows Let Googlebot decide filterable_metal_types= Narrows Let Googlebot decide and Canonical for both pages - xyz.com/f1/f2/page?p=2 So can you suggest me why Google indexed all related pages with this - xyz.com/f1/f2/page?p=2 But I have no issue with first page - xyz.com/f1/f2/page (with any parameter). Cononical of first page is working perfectly. Thanks
Technical SEO | | Rajesh.Prajapati
Rajesh0 -
Homepage is deindexed in Google
We recently noticed that our primary page was de-indexed in Google. When looking in google search console there are no manual actions taken. We did add a few new banners to the site but I have no idea why this would have negatively affected that site. I did add a new page called https://enleaf.com/company/testimonials/ that had some duplicate testimonials that were also on the home page but have since removed that. Not sure where to go from here.
Technical SEO | | AChronister0 -
Google Update Frequency
Hi, I recently found a large number of duplicate pages on our site that we didn't know existed (our third-party review provider was creating a separate page for each product whether it was reviewed or not - the ones not reviewed are almost identical so they have been no indexed. Question - how long do you have to typically wait for Google to pick this up On our site? Is it a normal crawl or do we need to wait for the next Panda review (if there is such a thing)? Thanks much.
Technical SEO | | trophycentraltrophiesandawards0 -
My sitemap in Google is coming back with an error
I submitted my xml sitemap to Google Webmaster tools. It is giving an error, not found. 404 Error. But I can't figure out why my site map is signaling a 404. Why? 😞
Technical SEO | | cschwartzel0 -
Google Webmasters News Errors ressolution
Hello to the community, i had a sudden increase from just a couple to 50 someting Google Webmaster News Errors. The two areas affected are Content of article and date of article.I found a very good article in SEOMoz about Google Webmasters, but it was published before the changes early last year were done in Google Webmasters. http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-fix-crawl-errors-in-google-webmaster-tools The people that have been asking the same question in the internet have not yet received replies from Google and the Google support replies dont make it really clear. http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=93994 Any views experiences with this. My site is in Google News, but we do not have a Google News Sitemap. Thanks, Polar
Technical SEO | | Polarstar0 -
Google Sitelinks
We have an e-commerce site that has about 50k pageviews of our main shop page every week. However in our Google sitelinks we have one for 'Shop'. However, for the Shop sitelink Google is linking to a random URL that we have never & would never use as a URL and not to our Shop page. I can't work out why Google would pick up this random url as we have so many links etc to the main shop page. Why are they not linking to the right page? I have blocked that url in webmaster tools and done a redirect but I want to understand why it happened in the first place. It included 'swedish+fish' so it seems weirdly spammy?! Any thoughts would be really helpful (and I am only mildly techy). Many thanks
Technical SEO | | ahamill0 -
How can I tell Google, that a page has not changed?
Hello, we have a website with many thousands of pages. Some of them change frequently, some never. Our problem is, that googlebot is generating way too much traffic. Half of our page views are generated by googlebot. We would like to tell googlebot, to stop crawling pages that never change. This one for instance: http://www.prinz.de/party/partybilder/bilder-party-pics,412598,9545978-1,VnPartypics.html As you can see, there is almost no content on the page and the picture will never change.So I am wondering, if it makes sense to tell google that there is no need to come back. The following header fields might be relevant. Currently our webserver answers with the following headers: Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0, public
Technical SEO | | bimp
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT Does Google honor these fields? Should we remove no-cache, must-revalidate, pragma: no-cache and set expires e.g. to 30 days in the future? I also read, that a webpage that has not changed, should answer with 304 instead of 200. Does it make sense to implement that? Unfortunatly that would be quite hard for us. Maybe Google would also spend more time then on pages that actually changed, instead of wasting it on unchanged pages. Do you have any other suggestions, how we can reduce the traffic of google bot on unrelevant pages? Thanks for your help Cord0