Does the positioning of the text on a webpage matter for search engines?
-
Does the positioning of the text on a webpage matter for search engines?
Do you need to place the text at the upperside of a webpage or is at the bottom also a good option?
-
Dear all,
thanks for replying. Is it a good idea to use jquery sliders on the top of your page to still get all your text above the fold and score in search engines?
for example:
http://www.wolf-howl.com/wp-content/uploads/after-slider.jpg is much better
than
http://www.wolf-howl.com/wp-content/uploads/before-slider1-310x1024.jpg
??
Thanks again!
-
Make sure that you're doing all you can to categorize your content. H1/H2/H3, paragraph tags, etc. I can't say exactly how they do it, but from experience it appears that crawlers are pretty good about judging where your main messages are placed. And of course, as Matt Cutts has explicity said again and again, good content trumps SEO. Not sure I believe him 100% though.
-
Yeah, it's in situations like this that I find it a bit beguiling to be told to build for humans. If Google were as smart as humans, then I would agree but until then it seems to be a case of "build for both". Where do we draw the line between building for Google's computer like flaws and building to manipulate rankings........
-
I know what you mean.
I spend a lot of time doing stuff for google that I would not do otherwise.
-
This aspect has been exercising my brain recently. It bothers me slightly that Google seems to treat "content" as synonymous with "text". This create real problems for many e-commerce sites where people are not visiting to read......they want to "see" and then buy.
One of my websites sells printed greetings cards. The actual board, size etc of cards is pretty uniform across our range so the cards really only differ by how they look. Images are therefore hugely important and tell the user pretty much everything they need to know about the card. They are the number one important aspect for that product. Therefore to create the best user experience the images need to be number one priority. However if I want Google to love my page and return it for queries relating to that card then I need to provide a textual description. Ideally prominently on the page (since the Page Layout Algo etc). But I know humans don't need that explanation because everything they need to know is contained in the image information. So I am then forced to write a description not for my users but for Google. I know we are supposed to build sites for people not engines but I can't see any other way of having Google love my page except to write something pretty much exclusively for Google.
Sorry for the slightly "ranting" nature of this but it does bother me. Not only do I have to write descriptions for Google (unique for each card) but now I need to make them more prominent in the misguided belief that humans want them!
Gary
-
I think that the position can be highly significant.
What if the relevant text is in a paragraph in the body of an article. That should be more significant than text in the footer.
And, wouldn't you think that a link in the top navigation would be more significant than a link in the footer?
-
Hi,
The position of (main) text on the page doesn't affect the indexing or crawling of that page. From a user's standpoint, you probably want to position the text higher on the web page to make it easier to read. When it comes to choosing the position, I'd go with what makes the most sense for the overall design of your site.
If you meant the location of the text inside the HTML of the page, I don't think that really matters. Good coding practices would keep the HTML as simplistic as possible and put the content in a logical location. But that is more about coding practices, not SEO; I've seen sites with really sloppy HTML get crawled and indexed.
Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best way to optimize a website for local search today?
A real estate agent client has had a website for years, which he optimized to position himself as a national real estate expert (to get more TV and media exposure). Now he wants to be found for a more local real estate term, such as Westchester ny real estate. Should he add a page to his site that's focused on Westchester real estate, or would Google view that as spammy? Should he update older blog posts with relevant, useful content about Westchester? Any best practices and suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
On-Page Optimization | | JimMartinSF0 -
Branded keyword results meta description is different then long tail branded search term in SERP
Search "Venturize", the first result is Venturize with the
On-Page Optimization | | WWWade
description "Get help on finding the right loan for your small business
and learn what to look for when comparing your options." However, if you Google "Venturize opportunity finance network", the
first result is Venturize with the description "Playing:360p@30. Embed
size: CDN:fastly. Open link. Twitter · Facebook · About Venturize ·
Contact · About OFN · Mission-Driven Lenders: Locator Map." Why is Google not taking the meta description in the longer tail search? I have checked: All of google's indexed pages for the website- A 3rd party crawl of the website- Multiple other keyword combinations Nothing produced the same result or indicated a reason why "Venturize opportunity finance network" has the incorrect meta description in the SERP.any ideas?0 -
Do Search Engines Try To Follow Phone Number Links
Any SEO thoughts on using rel="nofollow" when inserting a link to a phone number? To make a phone number click to call we use (555) 555-1234 Wondering if search engines are trying to follow that link or if this is standard and not to worry. Any thoughts on if I should add rel="nofollow" to these or does it not matter? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | Lions-Pro0 -
Google search result dramatically dropped with drop in DA.
It looks like on 11/13 by site traffic dropped by like 75% and it just happens to coincide with the MOZ DA dropping to. Anyone else see this?
On-Page Optimization | | Motom70 -
Does Bolding Text Have Any Impact on SEO?
Someone told me it does but I thought that was old school way of thinking. Any thoughts?
On-Page Optimization | | tryfantasy1 -
Can I use the same text in my meta description as I put in my post excerpt?
Hi, I'm just trying to understand the right way to optimise my blog posts and this is likely a dumb question... but to what extent should the text in my meta description differ from the text in my post excerpts? cheers, Andrew
On-Page Optimization | | seowhiskey0 -
Removing text from Homepage - Bad idea?
Hi Mozzers, I've just read this great article: http://moz.com/ugc/how-to-build-a-great-online-fashion-brand-34-things-that-really-amazing-fashion-retailers-do I'm working with my wife on a small (hopefully, growing) fashion website www.vintageeheirloom.com One of the points was not to directly sell on the homepage, rather draw customers into different areas of the site. Seems good advice and it's followed by many big brands online. As a small company, doing fairly well for some targeted keywords, do you think it would be a good or bad idea for me to remove most, or all of the text on my homepage. The main emphasis of our site is vintage Chanel and using the tool nTopic I score 99% relevancy for 'Vintage Chanel'. Removing would certainly affect this. Obviously I could amend my Vintage Chanel shopping category to include all this. I'd be grateful if you have any thoughts / similar experience. Thanks ! Kevin
On-Page Optimization | | well-its-1-louder0 -
Lots of links on homepage to internal pages with keyword rich anchor text - problem?
Hi, All! We have a new potential client, that when looking at his site with a tool, we noticed that the previous SEO company they worked with filled the homepage copy with lots of keyword-rich anchor text links pointing to different pages on the site - many links going to the same page, just with different keywords. These links are not indistinguishable in format from the other text, which is why we only noticed it with a tool. I certainly wouldn't recommend doing that to start with, but once all these links are there, would you recommend taking them down? Is there any conceivable chance it could help the site? Is there a significant reason to think it will harm the site? Or will it just be pretty neutral? In all that's been written (much by SEOMoz) about only the first link's anchor text counting, do subsequent links work like a no-follow in the sense that they are a waste of the link-juice of the page, or is it as if they aren't there at all? (And is "only the first link counts" still the most widely held theory, or have there been new developments since?) Thanks, All!
On-Page Optimization | | debi_zyx0